Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / General / November 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Testing new drugs against old drugs

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
BernardZ - 11 Nov 2006 15:18 GMT
This question sort of follows after my previous question.

Say after I invent a new drug. Now why is testing the results of
existing treatments against the new drug much dearer then testing
against a placebo? I would have thought that the existing drug in use
would be supplying a score.

Also if the old drug was tested against a placebo do you need to run a
series of testing using a placebo again or can you just quote the
previous round of placebo testings.

Signature

Making a website is not so easy but filling it up with suitable material
is extremely difficult.

Observations of Bernard - No 107

Kurt Ullman - 11 Nov 2006 15:34 GMT
> This question sort of follows after my previous question.
>
> Say after I invent a new drug. Now why is testing the results of
> existing treatments against the new drug much dearer then testing
> against a placebo? I would have thought that the existing drug in use
> would be supplying a score.
 I don't understand what you are asking. Can you try again?

> Also if the old drug was tested against a placebo do you need to run a
> series of testing using a placebo again or can you just quote the
> previous round of placebo testings.

 If the older drug is already approved, you generally don't have to
mess with placebo if you are doing a comparison trial (for instance is
medicine New, better than medicine Old).
Jim Chinnis - 12 Nov 2006 00:20 GMT
BernardZ <bernardZ@Nospam.com> wrote in part:

>This question sort of follows after my previous question.
>
>Say after I invent a new drug. Now why is testing the results of
>existing treatments against the new drug much dearer then testing
>against a placebo? I would have thought that the existing drug in use
>would be supplying a score.

I don't understand what you are asking.

>Also if the old drug was tested against a placebo do you need to run a
>series of testing using a placebo again or can you just quote the
>previous round of placebo testings.

You cannot use the placebo results of a different experiment to compare
against the results from a new drug. The placebo (and treatment) results
come from many uncontrolled or irreproducible factors in the subject
selection and experimental design and implementation. One canoot assign new
subjects to the old placebo group, so randomization is impossible in the new
experiment unless a new control group is used.
--
Jim Chinnis   Warrenton, Virginia, USA
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.