> Hi!
>
> I am concerned about the high use of the CAT scan. Is it relevant in
> conditons where an X-ray might suffice?
It's very likely, IMHO, that CT scanning is over-used, and applied in
cirumstances where other/cheaper diagnostic techniques would suffice.
HMc
KC health info - 05 Nov 2006 00:52 GMT
The cause for my concern is that a CT scan has so high a radiation dose
and most physicians are not aware of this high dose that it delivers as
shown by numerous studies.
[1] This study from Yale University shows that physicians and patients
are not fully aware of the radiation dose and the risk associated with
CT scanning.
[2] "a typical CT scan of the chest gives a radiation dose equivalent
to 400 chest radiographs (chest CT » 8 mSv, chest radiography = 0.02
mSv) and a high resolution CT scan of chest by conventional scanner
(thin slices, high mA) gives a dose of more than 600 chest radiographs"
[1]Source: Lee CI, Haims AH, Monico EP, et al. Diagnostic CT scans:
assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of
radiation dose and possible risks. Radiology. 2004;231:393-398.
[2]Source: The Royal College of Radiologists. Making the best use of
department of clinical radiology- guidelines for doctors, Fourth
edition. London: The Royal College of Radiologists, 1998
> > Hi!
> >
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> HMc