Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / General / October 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Blood in urine and abnormal complement

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Paul - 06 Oct 2006 22:24 GMT
Hi all,

For two years now, I've had trace amounts of blood in my urine, with
abdominal discomfort (flank pain, upper-abdominal pain and sore ribs,
and a burning sensation down my right side when urinating). I was
diagnosed and treated for prostatitis in January 2005. The only tests
that have come back abnormal are my urine tests (trace blood, but
protein and ketones negative, normal glucose and pH 7), and an abnormal
complement (two different complement tests that were low).

I'm emigrating to the US in December and won't have any health
insurance for 6 months, so I'm anxious to rule out anything serious
while I still have free healthcare.

What could blood in my urine and low complement indicate? Is there
anything you would recommend testing for?

Thanks,

Paul
Jason Johnson - 06 Oct 2006 22:42 GMT
Hi all,

For two years now, I've had trace amounts of blood in my urine, with
abdominal discomfort (flank pain, upper-abdominal pain and sore ribs,
and a burning sensation down my right side when urinating). I was
diagnosed and treated for prostatitis in January 2005. The only tests
that have come back abnormal are my urine tests (trace blood, but
protein and ketones negative, normal glucose and pH 7), and an abnormal
complement (two different complement tests that were low).

I'm emigrating to the US in December and won't have any health
insurance for 6 months, so I'm anxious to rule out anything serious
while I still have free healthcare.

What could blood in my urine and low complement indicate? Is there
anything you would recommend testing for?

Thanks,

Paul

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Paul,
I am not a doctor and am not an expert related to kidney disease. I suggest
that you read the following book. The info. in the book will help you rule
in or rule out kidney problems as a cause for your symptoms:

"Coping With Kidney Disease" by Mackenzie Walser, M.D.
Doctor Walser is a kidney specialist and a professor
at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

Jason
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
XYZ - 06 Oct 2006 23:01 GMT
> Hi all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> What could blood in my urine and low complement indicate? Is there
> anything you would recommend testing for?

What's your serum creatinine level?
Input it into a GFR calculator
http://nephron.com/cgi-bin/MDRD_GFR.cgi

Serum creatinine can fall in normal levels even if you
have CKD.
Jason Johnson - 06 Oct 2006 23:11 GMT
Paul wrote:
> Hi all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> What could blood in my urine and low complement indicate? Is there
> anything you would recommend testing for?

What's your serum creatinine level?
Input it into a GFR calculator
http://nephron.com/cgi-bin/MDRD_GFR.cgi

Serum creatinine can fall in normal levels even if you
have CKD.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

XYZ,
Excellent post. You are correct. Based upon my research, many of the
people that have Renal Tubular Acidosis have normal creatinine levels.
Do you know of any other kidney diseases or disorders that are not
effected by creatinine levels?
Jason
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
XYZ - 07 Oct 2006 04:53 GMT
> Paul wrote:
>> Hi all,
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> Jason
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I wasn't referring to Renal Tubular Acidosis. I was talking about
Chronic Kidney Disease. In CKD, creatinine is raised
but still falls within normal lab levels - because the lab
normal levels are stupid (or too broad) - creatinine is
related to age, muscles, sex & race - hence GFR
is the way to go.
Jason Johnson - 07 Oct 2006 07:13 GMT
Jason Johnson wrote:
> In article <4oo225Ffh5r9U1@individual.net>, "XYZ" <xyz@6url.com>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> Jason
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I wasn't referring to Renal Tubular Acidosis. I was talking about
Chronic Kidney Disease. In CKD, creatinine is raised
but still falls within normal lab levels - because the lab
normal levels are stupid (or too broad) - creatinine is
related to age, muscles, sex & race - hence GFR
is the way to go.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

XYZ,
Thanks. I'll do some research on CKD tomorrow.
Jason

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Robert1 - 07 Oct 2006 19:23 GMT
> Hi all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Paul

You might want to google hematuria and complement. If both C3 and C4
are reduced then probably and immune complex has to be ruled out with
things such as ANA lupus, virus, even urates etc.
This would indicate the classic activation of complement rather than
the alternate activation.
Paul - 10 Oct 2006 07:00 GMT
Well, my ANA came back negative, so I guess that rules out lupus, and
the kidney doctors didn't think the hematuria was of renal origin, so I
guess that rules out kidney problems.

I've had an ultrasound of my upper and lower abdomen where nothing
showed up. The only thing the GP noticed was that my bowel might a
little blocked on one side, causing the abdominal pain.

Is it possible for someone to have blood in the urine and low
complement without anything being wrong?

Thanks,

Paul

> > Hi all,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> This would indicate the classic activation of complement rather than
> the alternate activation.
Jason Johnson - 10 Oct 2006 08:48 GMT
Well, my ANA came back negative, so I guess that rules out lupus, and
the kidney doctors didn't think the hematuria was of renal origin, so I
guess that rules out kidney problems.

I've had an ultrasound of my upper and lower abdomen where nothing
showed up. The only thing the GP noticed was that my bowel might a
little blocked on one side, causing the abdominal pain.

Is it possible for someone to have blood in the urine and low
complement without anything being wrong?

Thanks,

Paul

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Paul,
The best thing to do is to have your urine tested about once a month to
determine if you continue to have blood in your urine. You can purchase
test strips that allow you to test your own urine for blood and various
other items such as protein and glucose. The toll free number is
1-800-443-9942. You can buy the test strips at some drug stores. You may
want to google "urine test strips" to compare prices. I copied the above
toll free number from a book related to kidney disease.
You should visit this web site:
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/000466.htm
The ultrasound was a great idea.
I am not a doctor.
Jason
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
David Rind - 11 Oct 2006 02:28 GMT
>  Well, my ANA came back negative, so I guess that rules out lupus, and
>  the kidney doctors didn't think the hematuria was of renal origin, so I
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> Jason
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Why are you advising someone with hematuria that "the best thing to do"
is to have their urine tested once a month for blood. How exactly do you
know that is the best thing to do?

Signature

David Rind
drind@caregroup.harvard.edu

David Wright - 11 Oct 2006 02:57 GMT
> Well, my ANA came back negative, so I guess that rules out lupus, and
> the kidney doctors didn't think the hematuria was of renal origin, so I
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>I am not a doctor.
>Jason

Paul,

One of the best moves you can make for your health is to ignore
anything Jason says.  He is not a doctor, has no medical training, and
is an idiot.  He keeps promising to stop giving medical advice, but
since he is an idiot, and compulsive to boot, he is unable to keep that
promise.  

 -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
      "George Bush is a gruesome boob."  -- Bill Maher
REP - 11 Oct 2006 05:42 GMT
> One of the best moves you can make for your health is to ignore
> anything Jason says.  He is not a doctor, has no medical training, and
> is an idiot.  He keeps promising to stop giving medical advice, but
> since he is an idiot, and compulsive to boot, he is unable to keep that
> promise.  

Jason *desperately* wants to have kidney disease despite having
absolutely no signs or symptoms, no matter how many tests he has his
doctor run on him. He fancies himself to be an expert as he's read
exactly one book, written by a pharmacologist, on kidney disease. David
Wright is correct; ignoring Jason is a sound move unless you read him
for entertainment.

Signature

"Did Father shoot him? I will eat Grandfather for dinner."
- Helen Keller, on learning of the death of her grandfather

email: aripee at inanna . com

Robert1 - 10 Oct 2006 09:23 GMT
> Well, my ANA came back negative, so I guess that rules out lupus, and
> the kidney doctors didn't think the hematuria was of renal origin, so I
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Paul

Well it depends on the value and the test in question. The more
prolonged and profound depression then the more significant. The
complement is functional and serves to protect against bacterial
infection. Congenital and aquired conditions may result in increase
infections. The activation of the classic components of complement
indicate immune complexes are present and they can be inflammatory ie
vasculitis, nephritis, depending on the location of these immune
complexes.
One would definitely screen for hepatitis B and C as these are common
causes. A person can be asymptomatic and still have urinary
abnormalities. In your case they are minimal abnormalities without a
nephrotic syndrome. If anything it would resemble IgA nephropathy in
presentation with the exception of an upper respiratory infection.  It
does not impact or activate complement and so that would not be
consistent with low complement levels..
Glomerular hematuria is generally associated with proteinuria with a 2+
protein having a high confidence level of it being glomerular. Although
not always possible is a phase examination of a fresh urine sample
within an hour of voiding for abnormal deformed red cells consistent
with glomerular lesions. It is more likely that the origins would be
lower urinary tract via bladder or prostate. Renal calculi would also
show microscopic hematuria.
As far as chronic prostatitis aka CPPS one may see blood with
prostatitis and some have studied the condition as an autoimmune
disorder including C3 levels in prostatic fluid.

Sorry about the rambling so lets just say that one looks for the most
common things and looks at the clinical picture in order to make
decisions. As far as the doctors response to the complement levels they
did do additional testing and felt it not beneficial in going any
further without a clear cut clinical picture. You might have just had a
bad day with borderline values.

http://www.emedicine.com/med/topic1119.htm
Jason Johnson - 10 Oct 2006 18:32 GMT
Paul wrote:
> Well, my ANA came back negative, so I guess that rules out lupus, and
> the kidney doctors didn't think the hematuria was of renal origin, so I
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Paul


Well it depends on the value and the test in question. The more
prolonged and profound depression then the more significant. The
complement is functional and serves to protect against bacterial
infection. Congenital and aquired conditions may result in increase
infections. The activation of the classic components of complement
indicate immune complexes are present and they can be inflammatory ie
vasculitis, nephritis, depending on the location of these immune
complexes.
One would definitely screen for hepatitis B and C as these are common
causes. A person can be asymptomatic and still have urinary
abnormalities. In your case they are minimal abnormalities without a
nephrotic syndrome. If anything it would resemble IgA nephropathy in
presentation with the exception of an upper respiratory infection.  It
does not impact or activate complement and so that would not be
consistent with low complement levels..
Glomerular hematuria is generally associated with proteinuria with a 2+
protein having a high confidence level of it being glomerular. Although
not always possible is a phase examination of a fresh urine sample
within an hour of voiding for abnormal deformed red cells consistent
with glomerular lesions. It is more likely that the origins would be
lower urinary tract via bladder or prostate. Renal calculi would also
show microscopic hematuria.
As far as chronic prostatitis aka CPPS one may see blood with
prostatitis and some have studied the condition as an autoimmune
disorder including C3 levels in prostatic fluid.

Sorry about the rambling so lets just say that one looks for the most
common things and looks at the clinical picture in order to make
decisions. As far as the doctors response to the complement levels they
did do additional testing and felt it not beneficial in going any
further without a clear cut clinical picture. You might have just had a
bad day with borderline values.

http://www.emedicine.com/med/topic1119.htm

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Robert,
Excellent post. Could a really small stone (perhaps a kidney stone or
uninary stone) cause blood in the urine? In most cases, people know they
passed a stone due to pain. However, if they passed a stone that was
really small--perhaps people such as Paul may not even know that they
passed a stone. In such a case, could the stone have caused blood in the
urine? I agree that an infection may have been the source of the blood in
the urine. If so, the blood in the urine will stop after the infection
goes away. I seem to recall learning that prostate problems can cause
blood in the urine--is this true?
Jason
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thanks again for your post
Robert1 - 10 Oct 2006 21:29 GMT
> Robert,
> Excellent post. Could a really small stone (perhaps a kidney stone or
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Thanks again for your post

There was an old study 1956 of microhematuria which is somewhat
different than gross hematuria as far as breakdown in diagnosis. Don't
know if the break down would be similar now but the breakdown goes like
this.

1. BPH 24%
2.Urethritis 21%
3. Renal Calculus 3%
4.Cystitis 3%
5.Other 3%
6. No lesion found 44%

I don't know what the negative or positive predictive values of RBCs,
microhematuria, in urine involving stones are. It is not uncommon to
see blood in urine and or sperm  with prostatitis patients.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.