Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / General / September 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

rh neg.....B neg

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
red1355 - 27 Sep 2006 15:41 GMT
i am trying to understand if its possible for my wife and i to have a baby.
she says no, but i think we can....i am Apos and she is B neg, rh neg.......
is it possible?
are there any treatments available?
glenn P - 27 Sep 2006 20:56 GMT
Possible, they just help out with the monkey bit during the pregnancy.

>i am trying to understand if its possible for my wife and i to have a baby.
> she says no, but i think we can....i am Apos and she is B neg, rh
> neg.......
> is it possible?
> are there any treatments available?
Robert1 - 27 Sep 2006 21:14 GMT
> i am trying to understand if its possible for my wife and i to have a baby.
> she says no, but i think we can....i am Apos and she is B neg, rh neg.......
> is it possible?
> are there any treatments available?

Having babies is not dependent on ABO blood types so I really don't
know or understand your question.

Your wife is B- would mean that when or if she does get pregnant then
she would require RHo immune globulin in order to prevent her from
developing Rh antibodies that might cause problems in an Rh+ baby.

It is possible for her to have an Rh negative baby depending on your
genetic breakdown. You are phenotypically RH positive but you may be
heterozygous genetically carrying the RH negative gene. You may also be
heterozygous as to your type A status also meaning you might carry the
type O gene. Your baby might come out as type O.

Apart from the RH factor the type B mother with a type A baby is not a
problem.
Routinely the mothers who have the most problems are type O mothers who
have a higher concentration of anti-A and anti-B that can cause
hemolytic disease of the newborn although not very severe in comparison
to RH hemolytic disease.

Blood types of baby cord bloods and checks for antibody coating the
baby cells are always performed in type O mothers and all Rh negative
mothers after delivery.

There is no problems in conception with ABO although there might be
problems in fetal development with Rh incompatiblity in a mother who
has already developed an antibody to the RH antigen. Monitoring of such
mothers is usually successful in delivering healthy babies.
red1355 - 27 Sep 2006 21:27 GMT
well my wife already has 2 children now, from before. her first is fine but
her second, she has down synd. currently my wife is in the Philippines and my
wife told me that they didnt giver any kind of shots at all knowing that she
was rh neg B neg.  but after her last was born, now she has a problem with
her tubes. the doctors say she cant get preg and if she does then the big
problem will be with her blood type...... sometimes i just really dont think
they know what they are doing down thr in the Philippines......

>> i am trying to understand if its possible for my wife and i to have a baby.
>> she says no, but i think we can....i am Apos and she is B neg, rh neg.......
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>has already developed an antibody to the RH antigen. Monitoring of such
>mothers is usually successful in delivering healthy babies.
Robert1 - 27 Sep 2006 22:35 GMT
> well my wife already has 2 children now, from before. her first is fine but
> her second, she has down synd. currently my wife is in the Philippines and my
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> problem will be with her blood type...... sometimes i just really dont think
> they know what they are doing down thr in the Philippines......

All prenatal workups include ABO Rh typing including antibody screen in
checking for Rh antibodies.
Downs syndrome is a chromosomal abnormality unrelated to ABO RH
incompatibility.
As many as 20% of miscarriages are related to numerical chromosomal
abnormalitites unrelated to the above.
Once a mother has developed anti-D in her system then subsequent babies
who are RH positve will be affected in varying degrees. Not all babies
are RH positive and the only way to know is actual testing of baby
cells in-utero or testing of fetal tissue or following the
concentration of antibody titer which is routinely done in all
pregnancies involving this situation. Amniocentesis is then performed
and parameters checked to see if the baby is in danger and subsequent
preterm delivery undertaken or rarely in-utero transfusions etc.
Granted these are high risk pregnancies but they are kept an eye on
through out the pregnancy. These things are not routinely available in
poor countries. It is obvious that Rhogam is not routinely used in such
countries to prevent immunization in the first place. It is also a good
thing that Rh negative blood types are rare in asia with the vast
majority of the population being positive. Here in the states it is
about 15% Rh negative. In asia it might only be 2% and thus they don't
really care about such a low rate and don't worry about them,
unfortunately.
Problems with tubes etc are a different thing altogether.
red1355 - 28 Sep 2006 13:39 GMT
Thank you very much for your isight! it is very helpful! this makes my wife
and i very hopeful!
>> well my wife already has 2 children now, from before. her first is fine but
>> her second, she has down synd. currently my wife is in the Philippines and my
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>unfortunately.
>Problems with tubes etc are a different thing altogether.
Robert1 - 28 Sep 2006 20:33 GMT
> Thank you very much for your isight! it is very helpful! this makes my wife
> and i very hopeful!

You need to take her to an OB/GYN anyways for pap smears etc and they
can answer your questions more directly. It is obviously helpful to
have a verification of ABO antibody screen status.  Without getting
into specifics, it is possible for someone to have been typed as Rh
negative in the past and with the newer monoclonal reagents in this
country turn out to be Rh positive. We have seen several of those.
There is also some Rh antibodies related to Rh negative mothers that
are not as harmful as the single Anti-D and such pregnancies are
treated like any other preganancy. This subgroup of mothers have anti-G
antibodies which are a composite anti-D plus anti-C. Although both
cases are rare above one needs to have the facts in front of them and
testing is the only way to do that. Hopefully she hasn't developed any
antibodies at all and you would be free of all of that.

Good luck
Robert1 - 28 Sep 2006 21:45 GMT
> Thank you very much for your isight! it is very helpful! this makes my wife
> and i very hopeful!

You need to take her to an OB/GYN anyways for pap smears etc and they
can answer your questions more directly. It is obviously helpful to
have a verification of ABO antibody screen status.  Without getting
into too much specifics it is possible for someone to have been typed
as Rh negative in the past and with the newer monoclonal reagents in
this country turn out to be Rh positive. We have seen several of those.
There is also some Rh antibodies related to Rh negative mothers that
are not as harmful as the single Anti-D. This subgroup of mothers have
anti-G antibodies which are a composite anti-D plus anti-C. Although
both cases are rare above one needs to have the facts in front of them
and testing is the only way to do that. Hopefully she hasn't developed
any antibodies at all and you would be free of all of that.

Good luck
red1355 - 29 Sep 2006 04:29 GMT
she also had a miscarriage after her last born, which was a very complicated
miscarriage, it happned at 5 or 6 months. blood was everywhere. she lost soo
much blood that she was in the hosp for almost a week. they had a very hard
time getting her blood. i am in the army, and i know that they use plasma for
people that need blood. but they said it is very hard to find........any
alternatives for getting blood when its needed?

>Thank you very much for your isight! it is very helpful! this makes my wife
>and i very hopeful!
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>unfortunately.
>>Problems with tubes etc are a different thing altogether.
Robert1 - 29 Sep 2006 22:02 GMT
> she also had a miscarriage after her last born, which was a very complicated
> miscarriage, it happned at 5 or 6 months. blood was everywhere. she lost soo
> much blood that she was in the hosp for almost a week. they had a very hard
> time getting her blood. i am in the army, and i know that they use plasma for
> people that need blood. but they said it is very hard to find........any
> alternatives for getting blood when its needed?

Well chromsome analysis can be undertaken of such miscarriages in the
hopes of finding the reason for such miscarriages as they may be
relevent to subsequent pregnancies. Miscarriage in general is common as
I mentioned a rate of around 20% for each and every pregnancy with the
cause being numerical chromosomal abnormalities. Genetic counseling is
available when such information is available.

Unfortunately Rh negative blood is rare and even in this country a
shortage exists with such blood. Hard choices must be made when the
blood supply is short. In general women of child bearing age are given
priority for Rh negative blood. Older women and men who are Rh negative
and require urgent blood then they are given Rh positive blood with a
shortage of Onegs. Blood is given to save someones life and any
subsequent problems associated with the immune production of Rh
antibodies are hypotheticals dealt with later. The obvious danger is
giving RH positive blood involves and RH negative person who already
has an anti-D. This can lead to a hemolytic transfusion reaction and
add problems to a person who already has medical urgent needs. The
decision becomes don't transfuse anything and the person dies because
of blood loss or give Rh positive blood and accept the possiblity of a
transfusion reaction.

Oneg is the universal donor so as a donor we love them but as a
recepient then we can have problems. They may be started on Onegs and
then switched to O pos later on depending on supply.
These are difficult decisions that I have to make because I am in
control of the supply and have to give the doctor options. It's either
this or nothing. Summer months are bad and elective surgeries are
cancelled.

Plasma is a short term solution for a decrease circulating blood
volume. In the long run one needs oxygen carrying red blood cells to
prevent hypoxia and oxygen deprivation. There is no substitute for red
cells and Rh positive blood cells would be transfused under such
circumstances. There were clinical studies involving hemoglobin blood
substitutes, such as Polyheme which is a pure hemoglobin solution, that
were recently completed. These products have a long shelf life without
refrigeration requirements. There is no blood typing requirements. They
were being used in trauma patients out in the field. I hope to see the
findings shortly.

Apart from that studies were undertaken with Factor VII Novaseven
infusions and the positive effect in decreasing blood products. This
coagulation factor is very expensive as one little vial is about $4000
but is vital in decreasing the amounts of blood transfused. It serves
as a fibrin plug and plugs the holes where blood is being lost. I have
seen it do wonders with blood cell requirements as less blood is used
after that.

Good luck again

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.