Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / General / September 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Transfusion-free surgical program reduced use of blood products for all liver transplant patients

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
FireCobraBlue - 24 Sep 2006 17:43 GMT
Development of a transfusion-free surgical program for Jehovah's
Witness patients undergoing liver transplantation also has helped
reduce the overall use of blood products for non-Jehovah's Witnesses
undergoing the procedure, according to a study in the September issue
of Archives of Surgery, one of the JAMA/Archives journals.

"Orthotopic liver transplantation [in which a patient's diseased liver
is removed and a donor liver transplanted into the same place] is
typically associated with a large volume of blood loss, resulting in
multiple transfusions and related complications," the authors describe
in background information in the article. "Transfusion-free surgery is
rapidly gaining much-needed attention primarily because of the concerns
surrounding transmission of diseases such as human immunodeficiency
virus, hepatitis C and other viral infections. Additionally, long-term
shortage of blood products and a paucity of alternatives put the system
under duress, resulting in cancellation or postponement of elective
cases."

Nicolas Jabbour, M.D., from the INTEGRIS Baptist Medical Center,
Oklahoma City, and colleagues analyzed the medical records of 365 adult
and pediatric orthotopic liver transplants performed from January 1997
through December 2004 at the University of Southern
California-University Hospital in Los Angeles. The investigators
evaluated the impact of the initiation of a transfusion-free program
for Jehovah's Witnesses undergoing liver transplantation on the overall
use of blood products in non-Jehovah's Witnesses undergoing the
procedure. The pediatric and Jehovah's Witness transplant recipients
were eliminated from the study, leaving only adult non-Jehovah's
Witness patients who either received a liver transplant from a deceased
donor or a living donor (n=272). These patients were categorized into
two groups based on the initiation of the Transfusion-Free Medicine and
Surgery Program at USC (for Jehovah's Witnesses) in January 2000. Group
1 consisted of recipients who received the liver transplant before
January 2000 and group 2 included all patients who underwent
transplantation after January 2000.

"Recipients in group 1 underwent orthotopic liver transplants without
intraoperative blood-saving or salvaging techniques, whereas all
transplant recipients in group 2 underwent intraoperative cell salvage
(ICS) and acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH) whenever feasible," the
authors report. "ANH indicates a therapeutic initiative that involves
simultaneously removing the patient's blood and replacing it with
nonblood products..."

"In comparing group 2 with group 1, the mean (average) MELD [model of
end-stage liver disease] score was statistically significantly higher,
whereas the mean number of intraoperative PRBC (packed red blood cells)
and FFP (fresh frozen plasma) transfusions were significantly lower,"
the authors report. The MELD score describes the survival probability
of a patient with end-stage liver disease, with higher scores
indicating sicker patients. "The number of preoperative and
postoperative PRBC, FFP and platelet transfusions between the two
groups was not statistically different."

"The development of a transfusion-free surgical program for Jehovah's
Witness patients has had a positive impact on reducing the overall
blood use in non-Jehovah's Witness patients," the authors note.
According to the authors, autotransfusion decreases some of the
complications of transfusions, such as transmission of unknown
pathogens, and also helps to preserve blood bank resources, which
consequently reduces the overall procedure cost. "Surgeons are the
leading consumers of blood products, and it is important that we are
leaders in promoting transfusion-free techniques. In conclusion, we
propose that the recognized need to minimize the use of blood products
be elevated to the same level as antibiotic and deep venous thrombosis
prophylaxis (prevention)."
Precision - 24 Sep 2006 23:07 GMT
> Development of a transfusion-free surgical program for Jehovah's
> Witness patients undergoing liver transplantation also has helped
[quoted text clipped - 62 lines]
> be elevated to the same level as antibiotic and deep venous thrombosis
> prophylaxis (prevention)."

This is very encouraging information. The contribution Jehovah's Witnesses
belief in abstaining from blood has given to humanity -- in the saving of
lives by decreasing "some of the complications of transfusions, such as
transmission of unknown pathogens" -- is becoming increasing apparent. The
benefits, well, are simply immeasurable.
Skeptic - 24 Sep 2006 23:59 GMT
To clarify, it is not possible to guarantee that a transfusion will not be
necessary during a liver transplant.

>> Development of a transfusion-free surgical program for Jehovah's
>> Witness patients undergoing liver transplantation also has helped
[quoted text clipped - 68 lines]
> transmission of unknown pathogens" -- is becoming increasing apparent. The
> benefits, well, are simply immeasurable.
Wëndãlen - 25 Sep 2006 15:56 GMT
> To clarify, it is not possible to guarantee that a transfusion will not be
> necessary during a liver transplant.

Keep in mind that the JWs don't even want you to set aside your *OWN* blood
in case you  need it during selective surgery.   The GB claims you are going
against Jah's law, that Jah would rather see you die than take your *OWN*
blood, even if it means you leave behind motherless/fatherless children.
The GB are responsible for the deaths of many gullible and beguiled members
of their cult/sect/publishing-house.  The blood of many innocents is on
their hands.  I truly hope they pay for these deaths in some way, in time.
Signature

Ironweed.....
'There is a principle which is a bar against all information,
which is proof against all arguments and
which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance-that
principle is contempt prior to investigation.'
-- Herbert W. Spencer --
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`~~~~~

Terry - 25 Sep 2006 19:46 GMT
> > Development of a transfusion-free surgical program for Jehovah's
> > Witness patients undergoing liver transplantation also has helped
[quoted text clipped - 68 lines]
> transmission of unknown pathogens" -- is becoming increasing apparent. The
> benefits, well, are simply immeasurable.

How can a religion reject receiving blood, but receiving an organ is OK?
Ironweed - 25 Sep 2006 21:41 GMT
> How can a religion reject receiving blood, but receiving an organ is OK?

The GB is avoiding unlawful-death lawsuits by allowing organs but not blood.
Look how many they killed already with their misinterpretation of that
eating blood scripture.  As if a god had nothing better to do with it's time
but lurk around ERs and surgery rooms in hospitals to see who took blood to
live.
Signature

Ironweed.....
'There is a principle which is a bar against all information,
which is proof against all arguments and
which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance-that
principle is contempt prior to investigation.'
-- Herbert W. Spencer --
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`~~~~~


Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.