Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / General / September 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Stress Tolerances?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Kumar - 17 Sep 2006 09:29 GMT
Hello,

"In medicine, stress is defined as one of the following:

An applied force or system of forces that tends to strain or deform a
body,
The resisting force set up in a body as a result of an externally
applied force, or
A physical or psychological stimulus that can produce mental tension or
physiological reactions that may lead to illness.[1]
Stress may also be defined as "the sum of physical and mental responses
to an unacceptable disparity between real or imagined personal
experience and personal expectations." By this definition, one may
appreciate that stress is a response which includes both physical and
mental components
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stress_(medicine) "

In view of above,

1.Can stress related effects be different in different person? If yes,
how?

2.Whether precieved or previously imagined stresses don't harm or
trigger stress hormone's secretions?

3.Can anyone become stress tolerant or stress resistent? If yes, will
it be beneficial or harmful to him?

4.Whether stress tolerance/resistance is just related to stress
hormones or also to other hormones/neurotrasmitters?

5. Which disorders are or can be related to stress
tolerance/resistance?

Best wishes.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 17 Sep 2006 12:23 GMT
> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> 5. Which disorders are or can be related to stress
> tolerance/resistance?

The health impact of stress depends on personality type:

The type A personality thrives on stress and this is made apparent by
increased appetite.  The harm arises not from the stress but from the
overeating that can arise from a psychological intolerance of hunger
(arising in most because of being brainwashed to fear hunger).  These
people do not do well after retirement.

The type B personality does not thrive on stress and this is made
apparent by decreased appetite.  These folks have somatic symptom
becoming ill during periods of high stress. These people do well after
retirement if they do not overeat which is their tendency because their
appetite increases as stress decreases (the brainwashing to fear hunger
issue again).

May GOD continue to heal your heart by curing your diabetes, dear
neighbor Kumar whom I love unconditionally.

Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung
Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit

As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the
unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies
(Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17).

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/d3b7b57d0fbf89ed?
kumar - 17 Sep 2006 13:12 GMT
> > Hello,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
> appetite increases as stress decreases (the brainwashing to fear hunger
> issue again).

Welcome here and thanks.

Fight-or-flight reason is much related to stress. Can above two types
be related to either fighting type or flight(run away) type?

> May GOD continue to heal your heart by curing your diabetes, dear
> neighbor Kumar whom I love unconditionally.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/d3b7b57d0fbf89ed?
kumar - 17 Sep 2006 14:56 GMT
> > > Hello,
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
> > May GOD continue to heal your heart by curing your diabetes, dear
> > neighbor Kumar whom I love unconditionally.

Yes much oblized, will be, by your prayes and tellings.
> > Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> >
> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/d3b7b57d0fbf89ed?

The following is good reply about stress tolerance and stress
compromises the immune system :-

"I know that stress compromises the immune system,....

.....If, however, the stressor is chronic, what may happen is that
instead of the stressor being removed, the stress hormone levels always
remain high and steps 3 and 4 above are replaced with the following:
3. The immune cells continue to receive the stimulus of high levels of
stress hormones, but they don't have any invader to attack, so they
gradually become tolerant to the levels of the stress hormones and
accept high levels as normal.
4. When an invader does come in, the immune cells are used to the high
levels of stress hormones already present in the organism. Since the
organism can't increase the levels of stress hormones further, the
immune cells don't become stimulated, so they may attack the invader
with less efficiency and effectiveness. This leads to an
immune-compromised condition.
http://www.hhmi.org/cgi-bin/askascientist/highlight.pl?kw=&file=answers%2Fimmuno
logy%2Fans_011.html

"

Pls do read full quote.

It is related to effect of infection related stress on immune system.
But can we be stress tolerant alike it, due to other type of chronic
stresses with somewhat similar harmful effect?
Larry - 17 Sep 2006 15:22 GMT
Kumar: You may be interested to know that T2 athletes CAN have high BG
levels as a result of a strenuous workout under certain conditions such
as before beakfast. Unfortunately BG levels go too high in T2s. Same
thing can happen in fighter pilots for the same reason ie. adrenergic
system stimulation along with other stress hormones.  This can be hard
on the immune system as you state.

Larry
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
[quoted text clipped - 94 lines]
> But can we be stress tolerant alike it, due to other type of chronic
> stresses with somewhat similar harmful effect?
kumar - 17 Sep 2006 16:24 GMT
Hello Larry,

Although scttered informations are indicative of stress related to many
disorders. I think we usually consider acute stresses but living into
current environment of big polluted and crowded cities, we may get
persisting and chronic stresses, which may effect us chronically. So I
feel, such chronic stresses are need to be considered in all disorders
which recently pop up and become somewhat epidemic due to changed
environment? Probably, getting persistance in any such disorder, may be
related to modern stresses.

> Kumar: You may be interested to know that T2 athletes CAN have high BG
> levels as a result of a strenuous workout under certain conditions such
[quoted text clipped - 102 lines]
> > But can we be stress tolerant alike it, due to other type of chronic
> > stresses with somewhat similar harmful effect?
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 18 Sep 2006 03:54 GMT
> > > Hello,
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
>
> Welcome here and thanks.

All thanks and praises belong to GOD Whom I love with all my heart,
soul, mind, and strength.

> Fight-or-flight reason is much related to stress. Can above two types
> be related to either fighting type or flight(run away) type?

Decision making depends more on situation than personality type.

May GOD continue to heal your heart by curing your diabetes, dear
neighbor Kumar whom I love unconditionally.

Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung
Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit

As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the
unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies
(Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17).

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/d3b7b57d0fbf89ed?
Kumar - 18 Sep 2006 04:30 GMT
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
>
> Decision making depends more on situation than personality type.

In view of your first reply, how diabetic people fits into two
types--increased appetite or decresed appetite?

Repeating;

The following is good reply about stress tolerance and stress
compromises the immune system :-

"I know that stress compromises the immune system,....

.....If, however, the stressor is chronic, what may happen is that
instead of the stressor being removed, the stress hormone levels always

remain high and steps 3 and 4 above are replaced with the following:
3. The immune cells continue to receive the stimulus of high levels of
stress hormones, but they don't have any invader to attack, so they
gradually become tolerant to the levels of the stress hormones and
accept high levels as normal.
4. When an invader does come in, the immune cells are used to the high
levels of stress hormones already present in the organism. Since the
organism can't increase the levels of stress hormones further, the
immune cells don't become stimulated, so they may attack the invader
with less efficiency and effectiveness. This leads to an
immune-compromised condition.
http://www.hhmi.org/cgi-bin/askascientist/highlight.pl?kw=&file=answe...

"

Pls do read full quote.

It is related to effect of infection related stress on immune system.
But can we be stress tolerant alike it, due to other type of chronic
stresses with somewhat similar harmful effect?

> May GOD continue to heal your heart by curing your diabetes, dear
> neighbor Kumar whom I love unconditionally.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/d3b7b57d0fbf89ed?
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 19 Sep 2006 03:01 GMT
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
[quoted text clipped - 57 lines]
> In view of your first reply, how diabetic people fits into two
> types--increased appetite or decresed appetite?

Depends on their respective personality types.

> Repeating;
>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> But can we be stress tolerant alike it, due to other type of chronic
> stresses with somewhat similar harmful effect?

A challenge to the immune system is an altogether different entity from
psychological stress.

May GOD continue to heal your heart by curing your diabetes, dear
neighbor Kumar whom I love unconditionally.

Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung
Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit

As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the
unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies
(Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17).

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/d3b7b57d0fbf89ed?
kumar - 19 Sep 2006 04:59 GMT
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > >
[quoted text clipped - 59 lines]
>
> Depends on their respective personality types.

How diabetic people can be of two personality types, one- mostly near
to control in BG levels and in eating with medications and two- rarely
near to control
> > Repeating;
> >
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> A challenge to the immune system is an altogether different entity from
> psychological stress.

Yes, still all can't all types of  psychlogical stresses can be related
to such type of effects in other system of body?

Repeting, Just look;

"Sympathetic and Parasympathetic Effects
Effects on various systems and organs:

Eye:
(S)dilation of pupil; focusing for distance vision
(P)constriction of pupil; focusing for near vision

Skin:
Sweat glands:
(S) - increases secretion
(P) - none (not innervated)
Arrector pili muscles:
(S) - contraction and erection of hairs
(P) - none (not innervated)

Tear Glands:
(S) - none (not innervated)
(P) - secretion

Cardiovascular System:
Blood Vessels:
(S) - vasoconstriction and vasodilation
(P) - none (not innervated)
Heart:
(S) - increases heart rate, force of contraction, and blood pressure
(P) - decreases heart rate, force of contraction, and blood pressure

Adrenal Glands:
(S) - secretion of epinephrine and norepinephrine by adrenal medullae
(P) - none (not innervated)

Respiratory System:
Airways:
(S) - increases diameter
(P) - decreases diameter
Respiratory rate:
(S) - increases rate
(P) - decreases rate

Digestive System:
General level of activity:
(S) - decreases activity
(P) - increases activity
Liver:
**(S) - glycogen breakdown and glucose synthesis and release
(P) - glycogen synthesis

Skeletal Muscles:
(S) - increases force of contraction and glycogen breakdown
(P) - none (not innervated)**

Urinary System:
Kidneys:
(S) - decreases urine production
(P) - increases urine production

Urinary bladder:
(S) - constricts sphincter and relaxes urinary bladder
(P) - tenses urinary bladder and relaxes sphincter to eliminate urine

Reproductive System:
(S) - increases glandular secretions and ejaculation in males
(P) - erection of penis in males and clitoris in females
http://www.innvista.com/HEALTH/anatomy/sympath.htm
also;
http://courses.cvcc.vccs.edu/WisemanD/sympathetic_and_parasympathetic...

"

I think, above quotes do indicate persisting stress relations with
persisting conditions, IR and diabetes2 etc.. ??

> May GOD continue to heal your heart by curing your diabetes, dear
> neighbor Kumar whom I love unconditionally.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/d3b7b57d0fbf89ed?
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 19 Sep 2006 17:44 GMT
> > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > >
[quoted text clipped - 63 lines]
> to control in BG levels and in eating with medications and two- rarely
> near to control

Differences in BG control do not necessarily reflect differences in
personality types.

May GOD continue to heal your heart by curing your diabetes, dear
neighbor Kumar whom I love unconditionally.

Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung
Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit

As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the
unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies
(Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17).

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/d3b7b57d0fbf89ed?
kumar - 19 Sep 2006 18:03 GMT
> > > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > > >
[quoted text clipped - 66 lines]
> Differences in BG control do not necessarily reflect differences in
> personality types.

Some may be under persisting sympathetic influence  others may not or
under parasympathetic. This can make lot of difference at both
digestive tract level and at BG levels.

"High catecholamine levels in blood are associated with stress, which
can be induced from psychological reaction or environmental stressors
such as elevated sound levels or intense light. Catecholamines cause
general physiological changes that prepare the body for physical
activity (fight-or-flight response). Some typical effects are increases
in heart rate, blood pressure, and *blood glucose levels."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catecholamine

> May GOD continue to heal your heart by curing your diabetes, dear
> neighbor Kumar whom I love unconditionally.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/d3b7b57d0fbf89ed?
kumar - 20 Sep 2006 01:37 GMT
> > > > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > > > >
[quoted text clipped - 95 lines]
> >
> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/d3b7b57d0fbf89ed?

To add;

"How Stress Affects Diabetes

In people with diabetes, stress can alter blood glucose levels. It does
this in two ways. First, people under stress may not take good care of
themselves. They may drink more alcohol or exercise less. They may
forget, or not have time, to check their glucose levels or plan good
meals. Second, stress hormones may also alter blood glucose levels
directly.

Scientists have studied the effects of stress on glucose levels in
animals and people. Diabetic mice under physical or mental stress have
elevated glucose levels. The effects in people with type 1 diabetes are
more mixed. While most people's glucose levels go up with mental
stress, others' glucose levels can go down. In people with type 2
diabetes, mental stress often raises blood glucose levels.

Physical stress, such as illness or injury, causes higher blood glucose
levels in people with either type of diabetes.

For some people with diabetes, controlling stress with relaxation
therapy seems to help. It is more likely to help people with type 2
diabetes than people with type 1 diabetes. This difference makes sense.
**Stress blocks the body from releasing insulin in people with type 2
diabetes,** so cutting stress may be more helpful for these people.
People with type 1 diabetes don't make insulin, so stress reduction
doesn't have this effect. Reducing stress can help people with type 1
diabetes take better care of themselves.

http://www.diabetes.org/type-2-diabetes/stress.jsp "

However I am looking more on stress caused by excessive noise levels,
over-illumination due to late night sleeping, air pollution(shallow
breating), crowding(exposure to pathogenic microbes) etc.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 20 Sep 2006 08:34 GMT
> > > > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > > > >
[quoted text clipped - 78 lines]
> in heart rate, blood pressure, and *blood glucose levels."
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catecholamine

Personality is more a function of the soul rather than a function of
physiology (autonomic nervous system and hormonal influences).

May GOD continue to heal your heart by curing your diabetes, dear
neighbor Kumar whom I love unconditionally.

Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung
Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit

As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the
unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies
(Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17).

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/d3b7b57d0fbf89ed?
kumar - 20 Sep 2006 10:04 GMT
> > > > > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > > > > >
[quoted text clipped - 81 lines]
> Personality is more a function of the soul rather than a function of
> physiology (autonomic nervous system and hormonal influences).

Scientifically, what is soul?

A person with more of either predisposed sympathetic or
para-sympathetic influence can't be considered as a function of
soul/personality. Although, all our liveliness or activies can be
considered as a function of current energy or soul or sprit, whatever
you say still it may yet be a pseudoscientic concept. I just consider
it as a spectrum of forces/wavelengths emitted from our body alike
colours from any substances.

Furthur,

"Definition: Chronic stress is a state of ongoing physiological
arousal. This occurs when the body experiences so many stressors that
the rarely has a chance to activate the . (We were built to handle ,
not chronic stress.) This type of chronic stress response occurs all
too frequently from our modern lifestyle, when everything from
high-pressured jobs to loneliness to busy traffic can keep the body in
a state of perceived threat and chronic stress. In this case, our
fight-or-flight response, which was designed to help us fight a few
life-threatening situations spaced out over a long period (like being
attacked by a bear every so often), can wear down our bodies and cause
us to become ill, either physically or emotionally.
http://stress.about.com/od/stressmanagementglossary/g/Chronicstress.htm
"

The above quote matches with my thoughts.

> May GOD continue to heal your heart by curing your diabetes, dear
> neighbor Kumar whom I love unconditionally.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/d3b7b57d0fbf89ed?
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 20 Sep 2006 10:34 GMT
<snip>

> > Personality is more a function of the soul rather than a function of
> > physiology (autonomic nervous system and hormonal influences).
>
> Scientifically, what is soul?

The core essence of being.

May GOD continue to heal your heart by curing your diabetes, dear
neighbor Kumar whom I love unconditionally.

Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung
Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit

As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the
unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies
(Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17).

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/d3b7b57d0fbf89ed?
kumar - 20 Sep 2006 12:09 GMT
> <snip>
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> The core essence of being.
Since mass people agree to it but science not yet, such thing can yet
be said "pseudoscientific" till they can understand "prime force of all
forces".

"Science and the soul
Science and medicine seeks naturalistic accounts of the observable
natural world. This stance is known as methodological naturalism[4],
which is silent on the question of whether non-material or supernatural
entities, such as the soul, can or do exist as distinct from natural
entities. Scientists, therefore, investigate the soul as a human belief
or as concept that shapes cognition and understanding of the world (see
Memetics), rather than as an entity in and of itself
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soul "

Probably, speed of such "prime force" if there, may be speed of our
thinking and visulizing a distant place--a straight travel not in
wave/zig-zag.

> May GOD continue to heal your heart by curing your diabetes, dear
> neighbor Kumar whom I love unconditionally.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/d3b7b57d0fbf89ed?
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 23 Sep 2006 05:32 GMT
> > <snip>
> >
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> be said "pseudoscientific" till they can understand "prime force of all
> forces".

It is an accepted definition of soul:

http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/soul

May GOD continue to heal your heart by curing your diabetes, dear
neighbor Kumar whom I love unconditionally.

Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung
Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit

As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the
unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies
(Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17).

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/a77da2d26da0ab97?
kumar - 23 Sep 2006 07:16 GMT
> > > <snip>
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> It is an accepted definition of soul:
By whom? Is it scientific to scientists?
> http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/soul
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/a77da2d26da0ab97?
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 24 Sep 2006 00:06 GMT
> > > > <snip>
> > > >
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> >
> > It is an accepted definition of soul:

> > http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/soul

>  By whom? Is it scientific to scientists?

The soul is as real as love is real.

Would you dispute the existence of love ?

May GOD continue to heal your heart by curing your diabetes, dear
neighbor Kumar whom I love unconditionally.

Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung
Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit

As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the
unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies
(Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17).

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/a77da2d26da0ab97?
kumar - 24 Sep 2006 03:49 GMT
> > > > > <snip>
> > > > >
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Would you dispute the existence of love ?
Personally, I feel "something is there", it is not at all delusion, but
yet pseudoscientific. May it be "emitted or reflected spectrum" from
our body.
> May GOD continue to heal your heart by curing your diabetes, dear
> neighbor Kumar whom I love unconditionally.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/a77da2d26da0ab97?
kumar - 20 Sep 2006 12:10 GMT
> <snip>
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> The core essence of being.
Since mass people agree to it but science not yet, such thing can yet
be said "pseudoscientific" till they can understand "prime force of all
forces".

"Science and the soul
Science and medicine seeks naturalistic accounts of the observable
natural world. This stance is known as methodological naturalism[4],
which is silent on the question of whether non-material or supernatural
entities, such as the soul, can or do exist as distinct from natural
entities. Scientists, therefore, investigate the soul as a human belief
or as concept that shapes cognition and understanding of the world (see
Memetics), rather than as an entity in and of itself
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soul "

Probably, speed of such "prime force" if there, may be speed of our
thinking and visulizing a distant place--a straight travel not in
wave/zig-zag.

> May GOD continue to heal your heart by curing your diabetes, dear
> neighbor Kumar whom I love unconditionally.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/d3b7b57d0fbf89ed?
Kadaitcha Man - 20 Sep 2006 10:46 GMT
kumar <lordshiva5753@rediffmail.com>, the lighting technician, chatted:

> Scientifically, what is soul?
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> it as a spectrum of forces/wavelengths emitted from our body alike
> colours from any substances.

The Vermillion Door : Postcultural Nihilism And Subcultural Rationalism

Martin V. E. Hewitt-Bentham [Department of Peace Studies, University of
California] Charles L. S. Burks [Department of Ontology, University of
Michigan]

Madonna And Patriarchialist Theory

The primary theme of Brophy's [1] analysis of narrative is not
discourse, as capitalist socialism suggests, but prediscourse. It could
be said that Sontag's essay on subcultural rationalism states that truth
is part of the elitist of art. In a sense, the subject is interpolated
into a class that includes consciousness as a totality. Thus, Lyotard
uses the term 'postcultural nihilism' to denote not theory, as Derrida
would have it, but subtheory. But the characteristic theme of the works
of Madonna is not materialism, as Lacan would have it, but
prematerialism.

Any number of materialisms concerning not constructivism, but
postconstructivism exist. Thus, Marx suggests the use of
substructuralist nihilism to challenge hierarchy. The main theme of the
works of Madonna is not, in fact, dedeconstructivism, but
subdedeconstructivism.

Sex is about closing where Material Girl is about opening.

The artist has a choice: either accept Hegel's critique of subcultural
rationalism or, alternatively, reject Nietzsche's analysis of
subcultural rationalism.

If postsemantic theory holds, we have to choose between semanticist
nationalism and pretextual narrative. The writer has a choice: either
reject Hegel's model of subcultural rationalism and consequently accept
that narrative is created by the masses, given that narrativity is
distinct from language or, alternatively, reject Cooke's model of
subcultural rationalism. However, Derrida promotes the use of
postcultural nihilism to deconstruct class divisions. Therefore, several
discourses concerning not, in fact, appropriation, but subappropriation
may be revealed.

Deconstructivist Socialism And The Conceptualist Paradigm Of Context

If one examines cultural theory, one is faced with a choice: either
accept the conceptualist paradigm of context or conclude that the media
is capable of social comment, given that postcultural nihilism is valid.
The subject is contextualised into a postcultural discourse that
includes art as a reality. In a sense, the subject is interpolated into
a subcultural rationalism that includes truth as a totality. A number of
materialisms concerning subsemanticist narrative may be revealed.

Marx suggests the use of posttextual discourse to challenge sexism.

The primary theme of the works of Madonna is not theory, but posttheory.

But if subcultural rationalism holds, we have to choose between
subsemiotic materialist theory and the semioticist paradigm of
narrative.

The absurdity, and some would say the failure, of subsemanticist
narrative prevalent in Sex is also evident in Sex. However, the poet has
a choice: either reject Voltaire's essay on postcultural nihilism and
consequently accept that consensus is a product of communication or,
alternatively, reject Plato's model of postcultural nihilism and
consequently accept that the raison d'etre of the participant is
significant form. The premise of subcultural discourse holds that
language may be used to entrench the status quo.

However, the example of subsemanticist narrative which is a central
theme of Material Girl emerges again in Erotica, although in a more
self-referential sense.

But Sartre promotes the use of neocapitalist textual theory to
deconstruct the status quo. But Debord uses the term 'postcultural
nihilism' to denote not construction, as subsemanticist narrative
suggests, but preconstruction. Parry [2] states that we have to choose
between subcultural rationalism and the capitalist paradigm of reality.

Debord uses the term 'postcultural nihilism' to denote not
desublimation, as subsemanticist narrative suggests, but
predesublimation.

Bataille uses the term 'postcultural nihilism' to denote not theory, but
posttheory. But if subcultural materialism holds, we have to choose
between subsemanticist narrative and modern subconstructivist theory.
But the writer has a choice: either accept Hume's model of
subsemanticist narrative and consequently accept that society has
objective value, given that sexuality is equal to consciousness or,
alternatively, reject Lacan's essay on subsemanticist narrative and
consequently reject that art somewhat surprisingly has significance.
However, Bataille suggests the use of postcultural nihilism to analyse
and modify class.

Thus, the primary theme of the works of Madonna is not, in fact,
discourse, but prediscourse.

[1] Brophy, H. (1997) The Expression Of Genre : The Dialectic Paradigm
Of Context And Surrealism. Schlangekraft

[2] Parry, B.G.I. ed. (1999) The Consensuses Of Stasis : Capitalism And
Modern Dialectic Theory. Schlangekraft



Signature

alt.usenet.kooks - Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker:
September 2005 and April 2006

"K-Man's particular genius, however, lies not merely in his humour,
but his ability to make posters who had previously seemed reasonably
well-balanced turn into foaming, frothing, death threat-uttering
maniacs" - Snarky, Demon Lord of Confusion

Thou fellow. I can hardly forbear hurling things at him.

Hannibal - 20 Sep 2006 02:41 GMT
> Fight-or-flight reason is much related to stress. Can above two types
> be related to either fighting type or flight(run away) type?

The fight or flight physiological response is not an either or
proposition. It is not a psychological trait per se.

Merely, the physiological responses that occur in the body to prepare
it for abrupt activity ie, to fight or flee.

BOTH require adjustments in cardiorespiratory as well as endocrine
systems.

It is believed to be an ancient adaptation to prepare a human for when
we used to have to evade or fight an enemy.
Larry - 20 Sep 2006 03:55 GMT
Hannibal/Kumar: Don't forget that T2s (even T1s for different reasons)
need to be aware that strenuous/intense exercise as much as one might
enjoy it can cause hyperglycemia over 200 mg/dl for a period of time
after exercising. We need to watch this carefully and even Docs may not
know about this problem.

Larry
> > Fight-or-flight reason is much related to stress. Can above two types
> > be related to either fighting type or flight(run away) type?
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> It is believed to be an ancient adaptation to prepare a human for when
> we used to have to evade or fight an enemy.
kumar - 20 Sep 2006 04:25 GMT
> Hannibal/Kumar: Don't forget that T2s (even T1s for different reasons)
> need to be aware that strenuous/intense exercise as much as one might
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> > It is believed to be an ancient adaptation to prepare a human for when
> > we used to have to evade or fight an enemy.

Larry yes, on some links, it is suggested that one should not excercise
hard, when glucose levels are high(somewhat 250 -300+). Can it be by
buitup more incomplete metabolised glucose or lactic acid?

Following links also indicate:-

"What is the problem and what is known about it so far?

People with diabetes often have trouble keeping their blood glucose at
a steady level. Studies have shown that stress can cause glucose levels
to rise or fall. However, it's not clear how eating affects glucose
levels when people with diabetes are under stress. In one study, people
with diabetes performed a stressful task after eating, and this study
showed that stress did not affect glucose levels very much. Another
study tested people with diabetes who had not eaten. In this study,
performing a stressful task resulted in a rise in glucose levels. Those
people could have had lower glucose levels because they had not yet
eaten.
http://www.diabetes.org/diabetes-research/summaries/wiesli-stress-diabetes.jsp
"

"Many sources of stress are not short-term threats. For example, it can
take many months to recover from surgery. Stress hormones that are
designed to deal with short-term danger stay turned on for a long time.
As a result, long-term stress can cause long-term high blood glucose
levels.

Many long-term sources of stress are mental. Your mind sometimes reacts
to a nondangerous event as if it were a real threat. Like physical
stress, mental stress can be short term - from taking a test to getting
stuck in a traffic jam. It can also be long term: from working for a
demanding boss to taking care of an aging parent. In mental stress, the
body pumps out hormones to no avail. Neither fighting nor fleeing is
any help when the "enemy" is your own mind.
http://www.diabetes.org/type-1-diabetes/stress.jsp "

I think intervention of sympathetic system was meant to handle sudden
and short term stress as "fight or flight" or "earn and eat" or for day
time activities and said to be effected by environmental
stressers--high noise and bright light wheras para-sympathetic for
"rest and digest" or for relaxing/night time activities. But today, by
living in modern environment in big/crowded cities, mostly we may be
getting persisting environmental and manmade stresses which may be
resulting into persisting "sympathtic influences and hyperglycemia"
esp. to them, who are already diabetic2 with IR and persisting
hyperglycemia and living in big cities..

I put much stress on "persisting stresses currently instead of some
stresses previously.
Hannibal - 20 Sep 2006 06:21 GMT
Diabetes was not relevant in regards to my earlier comment. I was
merely pointing out that fight or flight response was the bodies
preparation for immediate action.

> Larry yes, on some links, it is suggested that one should not excercise
> hard, when glucose levels are high(somewhat 250 -300+).

A Type I diabetic with a high blood glucose should not be exercising
because the implication is that there is not enough insulin present to
move sugar into the muscle.

Probably not a real issue in a true Type II, that has circulating
insulin but lowered sensitivity. Mild exercise would help to moderate
the sugar level, from the immediate effect as well as its sensitizing
effect on muscle tissue to utilizing more sugar.

Can it be by
> buitup more incomplete metabolised glucose

The glucose is metabolized in the tissue, ie muscle therfore it would
be lowered in the blood.

>or lactic acid?

You would be producing lactic acid when exercising at higher work
levels. Depending on the fitness of the person, most people do not
exercise long while producing substantial lactate.

You are producing lactate (lactic acid) when the level or exercise is
becoming less aerobic and the glucose is no longer being oxidized and
delivered to the high energy producing Krebs cycle. When glucose can't
enter this cycle lactic acid is produced with a much lower energy
production to the body and the lactic acid accumulates, bringing about
the burning sensation.

> People with diabetes often have trouble keeping their blood glucose at
> a steady level.

Levels are never steady in a "normal" person, they fluctuate to meet
needs. Diabetes is a problem where the swing is much greater in blood
sugar.

>Studies have shown that stress can cause glucose levels
> to rise or fall.

A normal response probably along lines of "fight or flight".

>However, it's not clear how eating affects glucose
> levels when people with diabetes are under stress.

Its not clear in "normals" what response occurs, largely because you
cannot quantify "stress" nor can you accurately reproduce it between
individuals from day to day.

> "Many sources of stress are not short-term threats.

True and they activate different reponses than "fight or flight"

>For example, it can take many months to recover from surgery. Stress hormones that >are designed to deal with short-term danger stay turned on for a long time.
> As a result, long-term stress can cause long-term high blood glucose
> levels.

True but again not the "fight or flight" response.

Too many issues are being thrown together that are not directly
related.

> Neither fighting nor fleeing is any help when the "enemy" is your own mind.

True again but not the point. The "f or f" is adapted to meet immediate
physical
needs, the act of fight or flight is not a treatment. Fight or flight
SOLELY means that your body is brought online to meet the needs. The
fight or flight response is NOT the same as the chronic stress
responses. There is no question that physical or mental stress causes
alteration in metabolism. Thats what its for.
kumar - 20 Sep 2006 07:20 GMT
> Diabetes was not relevant in regards to my earlier comment. I was
> merely pointing out that fight or flight response was the bodies
[quoted text clipped - 72 lines]
> responses. There is no question that physical or mental stress causes
> alteration in metabolism. Thats what its for.

Good explainaton thanks. Fight anf flight is just a brought or old view
of sympathetic response. We may fight of flee from any stress. We may
fight higher stress say due to hyperglycema/overeating ot just leave
it(flight). Anyway;

>SOLELY means that your body is brought online to meet the needs. The
fight or flight response is NOT the same as the chronic stress
responses. There is no question that physical or mental stress causes
alteration in metabolism. Thats what its for.

How  chronic stresses are addressed by body and by neurological system?

Personality traits are indicated depending on atonomus system's role.
kumar - 20 Sep 2006 04:35 GMT
> > Fight-or-flight reason is much related to stress. Can above two types
> > be related to either fighting type or flight(run away) type?
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> It is believed to be an ancient adaptation to prepare a human for when
> we used to have to evade or fight an enemy.

Allthough some stress hormones are also neurotransmitters which may
make their effects as psychlogical or related to neurological syste,
but whatever this, we are concerned with " effect of persisting stress
due to modern environment in big cities". Just evaulate;

"Somogyi effect, also called rebound hyperglycemia (suh-MOH-jee)
when the blood glucose level swings high following hypoglycemia. The
Somogyi effect may follow an untreated hypoglycemic episode during the
night and is caused by the release of stress hormones. From ADA  "

Does Somogyi effect indicates higher stress during the day(sympathetic
nervous system's influence) and relaxation during night
(para-sympathetic nervous system's influence)?

Can be get fall in glucose levels during night due to para-sympathetic
influence(rest and digest)?
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 17 Sep 2006 12:23 GMT
> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> Best wishes.
Kumar - 18 Sep 2006 11:47 GMT
> > Hello,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> >
> > Best wishes.

Adding to above;

"Sympathetic and Parasympathetic Effects
Effects on various systems and organs:

Eye:
(S)dilation of pupil; focusing for distance vision
(P)constriction of pupil; focusing for near vision

Skin:
Sweat glands:
(S) - increases secretion
(P) - none (not innervated)
Arrector pili muscles:
(S) - contraction and erection of hairs
(P) - none (not innervated)

Tear Glands:
(S) - none (not innervated)
(P) - secretion

Cardiovascular System:
Blood Vessels:
(S) - vasoconstriction and vasodilation
(P) - none (not innervated)
Heart:
(S) - increases heart rate, force of contraction, and blood pressure
(P) - decreases heart rate, force of contraction, and blood pressure

Adrenal Glands:
(S) - secretion of epinephrine and norepinephrine by adrenal medullae
(P) - none (not innervated)

Respiratory System:
Airways:
(S) - increases diameter
(P) - decreases diameter
Respiratory rate:
(S) - increases rate
(P) - decreases rate

Digestive System:
General level of activity:
(S) - decreases activity
(P) - increases activity
Liver:
**(S) - glycogen breakdown and glucose synthesis and release
(P) - glycogen synthesis

Skeletal Muscles:
(S) - increases force of contraction and glycogen breakdown
(P) - none (not innervated)**

Urinary System:
Kidneys:
(S) - decreases urine production
(P) - increases urine production

Urinary bladder:
(S) - constricts sphincter and relaxes urinary bladder
(P) - tenses urinary bladder and relaxes sphincter to eliminate urine

Reproductive System:
(S) - increases glandular secretions and ejaculation in males
(P) - erection of penis in males and clitoris in females
http://www.innvista.com/HEALTH/anatomy/sympath.htm
also;
http://courses.cvcc.vccs.edu/WisemanD/sympathetic_and_parasympathetic.htm
"

I think, above quotes do indicate persisting stress relations with
persisting hyperglycemia, IR and diabetes2. ??
Ignatz's Bricks - 23 Sep 2006 03:37 GMT
Kumar asks:

> 5. Which disorders are or can be related to stress
> tolerance/resistance?

Kumar, I am going to point you to a different tolerance adjuster than
you may have thought about.  I doubt that it is very common, or it would
not have surprised my doctor.

I have worked in a pleasurable, but often stressful, career field since
1958.   Stress never bothered me.  In the past two years, I suddenly
became extremely sensitive to stress.

The apparent cause:  two Cholesterol medications.  First Zetia.  That
triggered a stress sensitivity within about two to three weeks.  I quit
taking it when I suspected it was causing me trouble.  Thinking this
could not be true, I started and stopped several times.  It was
consistent.  On starting the medicine stress sensitivity happened after
about two weeks and ceased about two weeks after quiting the medicine.

My doctor then thought that I was one of the extremely few people who
cannot tolerate this medicine and he switched me to Welchol.  Welchol
took about 8 weeks to start causing increased stress sensitivity.  It
took a little over a month for me to regain normal stress tolerance
after discontinuing Welchol.

My doctor's only explanation was that the increased stress sensitivity
may have been caused by both medicines decreasing absorption of water
soluble vitamins.

IB
kumar - 23 Sep 2006 04:56 GMT
> Kumar asks:
>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> IB

IB, thanks for telling. We can't say, how we are getting stress from
many other modern interventions. It looks, stress slowly effects and we
may not feel at early stages, but can suddenly find such symptoms. Or
at early stages the other leg of ANS can take care and balance the
sympathetic imbalances, but when exaused on chronic stresses, symptoms
appears. We have to evaluate pathological changes by environment
prevailed on modernizations--may it be noise/lighting exposure or
pollution,work stress etc.

It is surprising that studies look to be not available on changes in
stress hormones in city/stressful areas and in remore green stress free
areas.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.