 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / General / General / June 2006my reference
CLinics in Laboratory Medicine Clinical Toxicology March 2006 vol 26 number 1 Original publication by authors of the "Medical Toxicology", issue of the Medical Clinics of North America in November 2005, same authors. > CLinics in Laboratory Medicine Clinical Toxicology March 2006 vol 26 > number 1 > > Original publication by authors of the "Medical Toxicology", issue of > the Medical Clinics of North America in November 2005, same authors. Robert, *what* are you talking about? > CLinics in Laboratory Medicine Clinical Toxicology March 2006 vol 26 > number 1 > > Original publication by authors of the "Medical Toxicology", issue of > the Medical Clinics of North America in November 2005, same authors. Is this about the AC studies? You started a new thread, so it's not clear what you're trying to communicate. >> CLinics in Laboratory Medicine Clinical Toxicology March 2006 vol 26 >> number 1 [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Is this about the AC studies? You started a new thread, so it's not > clear what you're trying to communicate. I believe so Marcia, based on the word "toxicology" :-):-) > >> CLinics in Laboratory Medicine Clinical Toxicology March 2006 vol 26 > >> number 1 [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > I believe so Marcia, based on the word "toxicology" :-):-) I suppose. I thought he might have further comment, though; it seemed like an aborted message. Robert, I don't think your credentials or knowledge are in doubt. I think the entire medical profession was on trial. > > >> CLinics in Laboratory Medicine Clinical Toxicology March 2006 vol 26 > > >> number 1 [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > Robert, I don't think your credentials or knowledge are in doubt. I > think the entire medical profession was on trial. Actually I have some computer problems ;-) Until they are resolved my posts will be few and far between as well as measured. > > > >> CLinics in Laboratory Medicine Clinical Toxicology March 2006 vol 26 > > > >> number 1 [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > Until they are resolved my posts will be few and far between as well as > measured. Well, then I hope they're resolved soon. You're a valuable asset to sci.med, and your posts are always well-considered (measured) and knowledgeable. Your participation would be seriously missed around here. Don't let the NG get too unbalanced in favor of the trolls and nut cases, 'kay? The responsibility for maintaining order is all on *your* shoulders, you know. ;) marcia Robert1 wrote: > marcia wrote: > > Pete wrote: [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > Until they are resolved my posts will be few and far between as well as > measured. Well, then I hope they're resolved soon. You're a valuable asset to sci.med, and your posts are always well-considered (measured) and knowledgeable. Your participation would be seriously missed around here. Don't let the NG get too unbalanced in favor of the trolls and nut cases, 'kay? The responsibility for maintaining order is all on *your* shoulders, you know. ;) marcia ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Marcia, As usual, you done a great job related to this thread. Please note that I stayed out of it since I have never done any research related to AC or the medications mentioned in the first two posts. Keep up the great work. The local ER doctors only stabilizes patients and calls a specialist to treat major medical problems. It sometimes takes about an hour for the specialists to arrive so I doubt that he would have given the patient any medications during that hour. I doubt that most specialists would give the patient medications until he or she done a medical exam and some blood and urine tests. I don't know how long such an exam would take or how long it would take to get back from the lab the blood and urine tests. Perhaps someone else knows how much time it takes to perform a medical exam and to get back the lab test results. As a result of legal issues, ER doctors don't just give patients medications unless they are very sure the medications will do no harm to patients. I realize that they do such things on TV medical shows but real doctors do worry about legal issues which is one of the main reasons ER doctors don't give patients medications unless they are sure that those medications will not cause the patient to die----million dollar lawsuit. I don't believe that anyone mentioned legal issues in the thread. Jason ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.