Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / General / June 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

We won't allow MMR cover-up say parents of tragic toddlers

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
john - 19 Jun 2006 21:06 GMT
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=
391163&in_page_id=1770
18/6/06

We won't allow MMR cover-up say parents of tragic toddlers

By SUE CORRIGAN, Mail on Sunday 01:01am 18th June 2006

Comments Reader comments (0)

The parents of two healthy toddlers who died ten days after being given the
controversial MMR jabs have warned the Government that they will not allow
the cause of their deaths to be 'covered up'.

Doctors say they cannot explain why George Fisher and Anna Duncan, both
aged 17 months, died in their sleep.

But the children's parents believe that the controversial triple jab -
against measles, mumps and rubella - is to blame.

Sarah and Chris Fisher, from Cheltenham, and John and Veronica Duncan, from
Cardrona, Scotland, say that if British health authorities do not give them
answers they will send brain tissue samples from their children's bodies to
a specialist laboratory in America for analysis to determine whether the
live viruses in MMR did cause the deaths.

George and Anna had been healthy toddlers when they died. Cot death has
been ruled out because both children were more than a year old and blood
found on Anna's lips suggested she had an epileptic-type seizure just
before death which does not occur in sudden infant death syndrome

The only indications of ill-health before the children died were that both
showed signs of apparently minor reactions to their MMR jabs.

George's mother, Sarah, said last week that despite repeated Government
assurances the vaccine is safe,she and her husband were '100 per cent sure
George was killed by MMR'.

And Anna's father, John, said he and his wife would 'never forgive
themselves' for not paying privately for single jabs and for believing
Government assurances that MMR was safe. They now believe that the doctors
should have spotted and warned of the dangers.

Mr Duncan said that, having conducted extensive research since Anna's
death, he and his wife, who is a nurse, considered it possible that their
daughter had died 'as a result of a catastrophic reaction to the vaccine'.

He said: 'Six days after her jab, Anna developed purple spots on her body
and bouts of high temperature.

'We read only later that these were side-effects of MMR to watch out for.

'If we had been properly warned we would have taken her for medical help
sooner. But the risks of vaccines are just never mentioned.

'Anna had been exposed to an outbreak of chickenpox in our village just
before her jab, which we mentioned, and had a runny nose, which means she
really shouldn't have been injected with MMR at that point.

'Parents should be better informed about the risks and the choice of single
jabs should be available to all parents through the NHS.'

Mrs Fisher also believed her son should not have been given the jab. George
was due to have his first MMR jab in September last year but it was delayed
when he developed a high temperature and, when taken to the doctor, had a
convulsion in the surgery.

She said: 'It was extremely frightening, but the doctor assured me it was
not uncommon, nothing to worry about, and gave him antibiotics. George soon
got better, and I thought nothing further of it.

'But since his death I have learnt that if a child has any history of
convulsions or fits then doctors are supposed to take that into account
when administering any vaccine and watch the childmore carefullyfor adverse
reactions.

'No one mentioned this to me when I took him along to the same surgery four
months later for his MMR, and I had no idea he was at any increased risk.

'I feel very let down. I'm not against MMR, even now, but parents should be
made aware of the risk factors.

'I am speaking out to warn other parents to take more care if their child
shows any signs of adverse reactions.'

Since 2002 the Government has spent millions of pounds attempting to shore
up public confidence in the vaccine, first undermined in 1998 when clinical
researcher Dr Andrew Wakefield suggested it could cause autism and gut
disease.

The failure of the Government's campaign was demonstrated last week when
figures showed that because so many parents are spurning MMR, Britain is
now in the grip of the biggest measles outbreak since the vaccine's
introduction in 1988.

Doctors have reported hundreds of cases of measles since January in just
three areas of the country, including the death of a 13-year-old boy.

Conservative health spokesman Andrew Lansley said: 'The Government's
failure to maintain confidence in the MMR jab has led directly to these
outbreaks.'

Opposition leader David Cameron has pledged to restore single jabs on the
NHS.

Comment Add your comment Reader comments (0)

No comments have so far been submitted. Why not be the first to send us
your thoughts?
PeterB - 20 Jun 2006 14:13 GMT
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=
> 391163&in_page_id=1770
> 18/6/06

Thanks, John.  A beautiful little girl which my mother adored was
killed years ago just minutes after injection with pertussis vaccine.
And I suspect the rise in measles could well be manufactured by
pharma-friendly health agencies accomodating their mutual interests.
We have no reason to trust the data coming out out of this.
High-powered lobbys for the drug makers have thus worked worked hard to
get waivers on liability.

> We won't allow MMR cover-up say parents of tragic toddlers
>
[quoted text clipped - 101 lines]
> No comments have so far been submitted. Why not be the first to send us
> your thoughts?
Jan Drew - 20 Jun 2006 23:31 GMT
Thanks for reposting this.

Somehow I missed john's post.

I suspected it was only a matter of time.

>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=
>> 391163&in_page_id=1770
[quoted text clipped - 131 lines]
>> No comments have so far been submitted. Why not be the first to send us
>> your thoughts?
David Wright - 21 Jun 2006 05:32 GMT
>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=
>> 391163&in_page_id=1770
>> 18/6/06
>
>Thanks, John.  A beautiful little girl which my mother adored was
>killed years ago just minutes after injection with pertussis vaccine.

That would be very unusual.  All I can think of is some sort of
anaphylactic reaction to an ingredient of the vaccine, assuming
the vaccine did it.

>And I suspect the rise in measles could well be manufactured by
>pharma-friendly health agencies accomodating their mutual interests.

Gee, PeterB, I'm glad I know that you're not at all paranoid.

 -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "If you can't say something nice, then sit next to me."
                                -- Alice Roosevelt Longworth
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.