Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / General / May 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

I Need A Measure

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
John Schutkeker - 26 May 2006 12:45 GMT
For a grant application I'm writing, I need to make a table of different
addictive substances, and their "degree" of addictiveness.  Does anybody
have any ideas what numerical quantity would be used to measure the
addictive "strength" of a drug?  Is modern medicine een capable of
measuring such a quantity, yet?
Dr. Zarkov - 26 May 2006 20:31 GMT
> For a grant application I'm writing, I need to make a table of different
> addictive substances, and their "degree" of addictiveness.  Does anybody
> have any ideas what numerical quantity would be used to measure the
> addictive "strength" of a drug?  Is modern medicine een capable of
> measuring such a quantity, yet?

People have at least done rough estimates of some aspects of addictive
potential; I'm not sure how quantitative it is.  Dr. Peter Proctor
posted this ranking of "reinforcement" in talk.politics.drugs a while back:

" A rough ranking on "reinforcement"  is smoked nicotine is number one,
followed by smoked cocaine, then injectable opiates.   Oral alcohol,
stimulants such as meth,   other sedative hypnotics, and oral opiates
are all about equally reinforcing,    Followed by intranasal cocaine
and caffeine.   then marijuana and the hallucinogens ( the latter are
hardly reinforcing at all).

        Note that the dosage form is important-- smoking or injection
give higher instantaneous levels and are thus more reinforcing.   But
not enough to really justify much higher penalties."

Don't have a link, but it's been discussed in the drugs groups a few
times.  Of course you could do a Medline and other searches for it.
audaxrex@hotmail.com - 27 May 2006 14:12 GMT
..as a 20-yr heroin addict who has also quit smoking and alcohol, i am
annoyed by this bald statement that nicotine is harder to withdraw from
than heroin. Severe heroin withdrawal is weeks of intense physical pain
in every part - bones, teeth, etc - with violent vomiting, clonic spasm
etc etc, insomnia coupled with exhaustion and PROFOUND depression...
this is followed by up to a year of anhedonia, which is the simple
inability to feel pleasure. ANY pleasure. It's rough, believe me, and
tobacco is not remotely as difficult.
   There are essentially two types of dependence, physical and
emotional. Physical addictive substances in order of intensity would
run heroin, barbiturates (which can be fatal on withdrawal), alcohol
and benzodiazipines like valium or xanax, and finally tobacco.

Psychological dependence is entirely different. The order there would
be crack cocaine, methamphetamine, heroin, alcohol, rock cocaine,
cannabis, nicotine, benzodiazapines and barbiturates.

Cocaine and cannabis have relatively minor (if any) physical effects on
withdrawal.

That's subjective, but it's subjective TRUTH. - Ъ×
Dr. Zarkov - 27 May 2006 16:57 GMT
It's not just that it's subjective, but it's anecdotal--You can't
generalize from one experience; it's impossible to know the possible
confounding factors; etc., etc.--the usual problems with anecdotal
evidence.  Addicts have generally described the physical effects of
heroin withdrawal as similar to a bad case of the flu.   But some people
can have severe psychological problems withdrawing from
anything--including overeating.

> ..as a 20-yr heroin addict who has also quit smoking and alcohol, i am
> annoyed by this bald statement that nicotine is harder to withdraw from
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> That's subjective, but it's subjective TRUTH. - Ъ×
John Schutkeker - 27 May 2006 22:00 GMT
audaxrex@hotmail.com wrote in news:1148735562.790375.223120@
38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:

> ..as a 20-yr heroin addict who has also quit smoking and alcohol, i am
> annoyed by this bald statement that nicotine is harder to withdraw from
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Cocaine and cannabis have relatively minor (if any) physical effects on
> withdrawal.

Without hard numbers for volumetric concentrations of some kind of rebound
chemical, apparently the only thing we all agree on is that withdrawal from
marijuana is pretty benign.

My dad was an alcoholism psychiatrist, and his stories such detox were
horriffic.  Hardcore booze-heads experience something called the DT's, aka.
delirium tremens, a scary combination of hallucinations and the shakes.  
IIRC, it can also be fatal.  

I don't buy your claims regarding meth and crack.  The boundary between
physical and psychological withdrawal has always been very blurry, because
so much is still not understood about the chemical mechanics of brain
function.  Any addiction that is "merely" psychological must inevitably
repond well to hypnosis.  If what you say about meth and crack were true,
there would be a great boon to hypnotists in such treatment, and the
problems would quickly become trivial.  I won't accept your claims about
those drugs without hard evidence.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.