Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / General / June 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Anti-HBc

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
cookie - 25 May 2006 23:45 GMT
How is it possible for only this part of the hepatitis related tests to
be positive when the person, in this case my daughter, was vaccinated
against hep b as a child?  This came up in the blood tests they do when
donating blood.  Could this be a false positive twice?  Any info would
be appreciated.
Robert CLS, MT(ASCP) - 26 May 2006 03:01 GMT
<How is it possible for only this part of the hepatitis related tests
to
<be positive when the person, in this case my daughter, was vaccinated
<against hep b as a child?  This came up in the blood tests they do
when
<donating blood.  Could this be a false positive twice?  Any info would

<be appreciated.

"Anti-HBc appears at the onset of symptoms or liver test abnormalities
in acute HBV infection and persists for life. Acute or recently
acquired infection can be distinguished by the presence of the IgM
class of anti-HBc, which is detected at the onset of acute hepatitis B
and persists for up to 6 months if the disease resolves. In patients
who develop chronic hepatitis B, IgM anti-HBc can persist at low levels
during viral replication and can result in positive tests for IgM
anti-HBc (40). In addition, false-positive IgM anti-HBc test results
can occur. Because the positive predictive value is low in asymptomatic
persons, for diagnosis of acute hepatitis B, testing for IgM anti-HBc
should be limited to persons with clinical evidence of acute hepatitis
or an epidemiologic link to a case.

In persons who recover from HBV infection, HBsAg is eliminated from the
blood, usually within 3--4 months, and anti-HBs develops during
convalescence. The presence of anti-HBs typically indicates immunity
from HBV infection. Infection or immunization with one genotype of HBV
confers immunity to all genotypes. In addition, anti-HBs can be
detected for several months after hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG)
administration. The majority of persons who recover from natural
infection will be positive for both anti-HBs and anti-HBc, whereas
persons who respond to hepatitis B vaccine have only anti-HBs. In
persons who become chronically infected, HBsAg and anti-HBc persist,
typically for life. HBsAg will become undetectable in approximately
0.5%--2% of chronically infected persons yearly, and anti-HBs will
occur in the majority of these persons (41--44).

In certain persons, the only HBV serologic marker detected in serum is
anti-HBc. Isolated anti-HBc can occur after HBV infection among persons
who have recovered but whose anti-HBs levels have waned or among
persons in whom anti-HBs failed to occur. Persons in the latter
category include those with circulating HBsAg levels not detectable by
commercial assays. These persons are unlikely to be infectious except
under circumstances in which they are the source for direct
percutaneous exposure of susceptible recipients to substantial
quantities of virus (e.g., through blood transfusion or following liver
transplantation) (45). HBV DNA has been detected in the blood of <5% of
persons with isolated anti-HBc (46). Typically, the frequency of
isolated anti-HBc relates directly to the prevalence of HBV infection
in the population. In populations with a high prevalence of HBV
infection, isolated anti-HBc likely indicates previous infection, with
loss of anti-HBs. For persons in populations with a low prevalence of
HBV infection, an isolated anti-HBc result often represents a
false-positive reaction. The majority of these persons have a primary
anti-HBs response after a 3-dose series of hepatitis B vaccine (47,48).
Infants who are born to HBsAg-positive mothers and who do not become
infected might have detectable anti-HBc for <24 months after birth from
passively transferred maternal antibody. "

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5416a1.htm

As you can see from the above recommendations that post vaccine testing
to check for the seroprotective response to the vaccine is not
mandatory. The rate is usually greater than 95% but not 100%. The
vaccine does not work in some people.

You can have a false positive Anti-HBc depending on tests used. A
rechallenge with vaccine would yield the presence of anti-HBs that
declined with time. This would indicate past infection with resolution
of hepatitis with the generation of anti-HBs. Vaccination does not
induce anti-HBc antibodies.

"Isolated anti-HBc positive HCWs should be tested for anti-HBc IgM and
HBV-DNA: if negative, anti-HBs response to vaccination can distinguish
between infection (anti-HBs &gt;50 mUI/ml 30 days after 1st
vaccination: anamnestic response) and false positive results(anti-HBs
&gt;10 mUI/ml 30 days after 3rd vaccination: primary response); true
positive subjects have resistance to re-infection. and do not need
vaccination."

Euro Surveill. 2005 Oct 1;10(10) [Epub ahead of print]

European recommendations for the management of healthcare workers
occupationally exposed to hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus.

PMID: 16282641 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher

As far as the false positive twice statement, it is test methodology
dependent. If it is the same manufacturer being used then it is the
same test no matter how many times it is done. Having it done with an
alternate method manufacturer is better than simply repeating it. These
are immunoassays and cross-reactivity is from the manufacturer's system
can be country wide.
With borderline results, I respin the blood sample to clear it of some
interference and repeat the test and if still positive then it is
reported as positive.
cookie - 26 May 2006 13:31 GMT
Thank you for your prompt reply and my apologies if this posts twice, I
haven't quite gotten the hang of this board.  I am taking my daughter
to an independent lab on the suggestions of my doctor for a hepatitis
panel, acute reflex I believe it is called.  I guess I'll find out
whats going on when I receive the results.  Again, thank you for your
help.
Robert CLS, MT(ASCP) - 26 May 2006 19:01 GMT
<Thank you for your prompt reply and my apologies if this posts twice,
I
<haven't quite gotten the hang of this board.  I am taking my daughter
<to an independent lab on the suggestions of my doctor for a hepatitis
<panel, acute reflex I believe it is called.  I guess I'll find out
<whats going on when I receive the results.  Again, thank you for your
<help.

It is always a good idea to be tested for the anti-HBs antibody after
somebody has completed the vaccine series. With infants and children
this isn't commonly done.

Prenatal testing or even perinatal testing during labor, a HBag must be
on record for the women. We have 12 hours to obtain results
post-partum. This issue will be brought up again with your daughter in
the future so it needs to be fully worked up and she should fully
understand what is going on for future reference.

As far as the acute hepatitis panel goes, most questions I see here
pertain to isolated anti-Hc antibody results. I included two sources on
how to deal with that issue depending on where you live.

Good luck.
bae@cs.toronto.no-uce.edu - 26 May 2006 21:22 GMT
>Thank you for your prompt reply and my apologies if this posts twice, I
>haven't quite gotten the hang of this board.  I am taking my daughter
>to an independent lab on the suggestions of my doctor for a hepatitis
>panel, acute reflex I believe it is called.  I guess I'll find out
>whats going on when I receive the results.  Again, thank you for your
>help.

While this is a good idea for your daughter's health, note that
the blood donation system is extremely cautious about accepting
blood from people who have had even one positive test for relevant
pathogens, even if it's established that it was a false positive.
So even if it turns out that she never had hepatitis, she probably
still won't be acceptable as a blood donor.

Congratulations on raising a daughter with the altruistic intention
to help other people by donating blood!  I hope she can find another
satisfying way of expressing her concern for the well being of others.
cookie - 27 May 2006 00:36 GMT
LOL, thank you, she is majoring in sociology and intends to "counsel"
young people so I have no doubt about her intentions although I hope
she can find a way to support herself in her "noble" causes.
cookie - 05 Jun 2006 21:56 GMT
> LOL, thank you, she is majoring in sociology and intends to "counsel"
> young people so I have no doubt about her intentions although I hope
> she can find a way to support herself in her "noble" causes.

Well Robert it appears you are correct in your assumption that this
test was methodology dependent.  Tests from independent lab revealed no
Anti-HBc positive result, the only positive result (can't remember what
the test is called) was the one from the vaccination.  So the doctor is
perplexed now.
Robert CLS, MT(ASCP) - 06 Jun 2006 07:28 GMT
> > LOL, thank you, she is majoring in sociology and intends to "counsel"
> > young people so I have no doubt about her intentions although I hope
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> the test is called) was the one from the vaccination.  So the doctor is
> perplexed now.

I don't know what country you are in but in the US regulatory standards
require the donor be screened for HBsAG and anti-HBc. They don't test
for anti-HBsAB which shows after vaccination.
They also test for HIV I and II antibodies and by NAT (Pcr).
Anti-HCV and NAT HCV
anti-HTLV I and II
NAT West Nile Virus
RPR syphilis

If the anti-HBc is still positive with repeat then this would be a
false positive with that reagent manufacturer and sorry to say your
daughter would still be ineligible for donation even for a family
member as a directed special unit.
They never tell us why the unit would be unavailable because of privacy
issues so sometimes that causes a lot of problems and confusion.
Hepatitis B surface antigen is always included as a part of a prenatal
panel.
Sorry about the good and the bad news.
cookie - 06 Jun 2006 10:57 GMT
We are in New York.  The Red Cross is denying her donation, however,
she remembers also donating through New York Blood Services and they
have NOT denied her.  Obviously she will not even attempt to donate
through the Red Cross but she is going to give New York Blood Services
another shot and see what happens.

> > Well Robert it appears you are correct in your assumption that this
> > test was methodology dependent.  Tests from independent lab revealed no
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> panel.
> Sorry about the good and the bad news.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.