> WHAT part of my description of .. YOU .. being .. a fkg .. pussy ..
> do you disagree with .. ?
> So .. if .. I .. specifically .. place an article .. YOU get .. pissed
> ..
> Eh ..
No. If you place an article in a newsgroup, you should be prepared to
discuss it rationally, and you should have the decency to explain - if
asked - exactly what it means.
<<
Actually .. michael .. I don't think the above has .. ever .. been
attempted with .. me ..
It would be rather ..
> WHAT part of my description of .. YOU .. being .. a fkg .. pussy ..
> do you disagree with .. ?
Actually ... the 'word' .. pussy .. has many .. 'meanings' ..
It.. means .. "one who attacks without reason" .. or .. "uses
underhanded tactics , lies .. falsifies .. etc .. DURING .. 'debate' /
attack .."
Somewhat like .. kicking a man when he is down ..
Fkg .. pussy ..
I think others would be able to think of their OWN .. run-ins WITH ..
those who fit the description OF .. pussy ..
YOU .. fit .. coincidentally .. both .. 'meanings' ..
In the context of this thread .. I believe the 'meaning' of the word ..
has been effectively .. proven ..
And it .. seems .. admitted ..
>>The fact that it's nothing but an unsupported attempt on your part to
discredit me with slander is a good start.<<
Heh .. heh ..
You thought I called you a .. homo .. ?
Heh .. heh ..
No .. michael .. you are a .. pussy ..
Who loves ya.
Tom
Jesus Was A Vegetarian!
http://jesuswasavegetarian.7h.com
Man Is A Herbivore!
http://tinyurl.com/a3cc3
DEAD PEOPLE WALKING
http://tinyurl.com/zk9fk
Michael - 21 May 2006 19:43 GMT
>> So .. if .. I .. specifically .. place an article .. YOU get ..
>> pissed ..
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Actually .. michael .. I don't think the above has .. ever .. been
> attempted with .. me ..
You may not "think" so, but it's happened many, many times. You ought to
read back through the long history of our encounters.
> It would be rather ..
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> underhanded tactics , lies .. falsifies .. etc .. DURING .. 'debate' /
> attack .."
Would you please show your readers a dictionary citation of these
definitions? I've never seen or heard any such use of the term...
anywhere.
Besides, your unique definition above would describe *you* better than it
describes me, Tom.
While I do "attack" you now and then (not to evade or distract argument...
simply because it can be fun to watch you melt down,) I usually offer you my
opinions of the articles you post and ask you to explain yourself clearly -
which you haven't done once yet in the entire decade of our interactions,
choosing instead to attack without reason, use underhanded tactics, lie,
falsify, ridicule and threaten.
> You thought I called you a .. homo .. ?
Not this time out, no... although you've done so many times in the past.
Rob Duncan - 21 May 2006 21:21 GMT
Tom is mentally ill, and its just getting worse. Conversing with him is
fruitless, he is ill. Logic and reason play no part in his mental process.
Youre just antagonizing an ill person...
Rob
>>> So .. if .. I .. specifically .. place an article .. YOU get ..
>>> pissed ..
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>
> Not this time out, no... although you've done so many times in the past.
Sylv - 22 May 2006 00:37 GMT
Tommy Tinpot wrote;
<snip>
> Actually ... the 'word' .. pussy .. has many .. 'meanings' ..
> It.. means .. "one who attacks without reason" .. or .. "uses
> underhanded tactics , lies .. falsifies .. etc .. DURING .. 'debate' /
> attack .."
>
> Somewhat like .. kicking a man when he is down ..
Not only does have his own religion and his own science, now he has his
own language.
I have never heard of this meaning for "pussy."
In the dictionaries I've read, it means an affectionate term for a cat,
vulgar slang for female sex organs, or it is a derogatory word for a
coward, usually used on males.
What dictionary are you using, Tommy? The one in your head with all
the voices?
Sylvia