I've a cure for AIDS.

Abstain from sex until you marry and then remain faithful. ( need I
mention not to share freaking dirty needles with drug addicts?)

Oh I know, that smacks of "extremist religious hate".

hehehehe....and you're all Darwin Award winners.

The truth will all be played out in the long term....all the
blabbering is meaningless.

Who will the survivers be in 10,000 years....that's all that matters.

It apparently takes an intellect more powerful than yours to realize
that your description has nothing to do with the actual course of AIDS
in Africa.  Many of the victims are anything but starving; they were
much more urbanized, upper-class folks.  Also, starvation-based
diseases invariably kill off the aged and the young, which is the
exact opposite of what happened with AIDS.

I would say I'm sorry to rain on your parade, but I'm not.

And lies are stranger than both.

 -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "If you can't say something nice, then sit next to me."
                                -- Alice Roosevelt Longworth

<For sheep who elect academia as their authority providers - I'm not
the
<only 'crackpot' saying these things - nobel prize winning medical
<researches and many others are saying _exactly the same_.

So you went from your original posts stating you don't listen to
authority or academia to now quoting authority and academia.

Who gives out the nobel prize which is sponsored by the media,
established drug companies set up by commercial enterprize and picked
by academia around the world?

You are one confused puppy who keeps changing names but still has the
same story.
Who do you think sponsors the HIV does not cause AIDS stuff?
People who want to make money by selling that HIV does not cause AIDS
stuff through alternative treatments.

I didn't know that people were starving in the US a decade ago and that
was the TRUE cause of AIDS. Selective starvation of homosexual males in
their twenties. Nice theory. Everybody in the medical community did not
know what was going on at the time. Rare conditions that would normally
make it into the literature were appearing daily.  AIDS wards were
being established and people were dying. Now the wards are gone and
out-patients visits are common and the rare conditions are again
uncommon. Anybody with any experience in hospital work knows the
difference.
I don't need anybody to tell me what I can see with my own eyes.
People like you obviously needs somebody to listen to and you prefer to
listen to *crackpots*. That's your choice.

Ah, the old fallback of the loon:  anyone who disagrees with you is a
paid agent of the conspiracy.  Pathetic.

Guess you need to do more than a cursory examination.

Failed what peer review?  Which peers?  Which review?

Name a few.  Many of the supposed skeptics who originally signed onto
the "we need to re-evaluate all this" memo have since changed their
minds.

 -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "If you can't say something nice, then sit next to me."
                                -- Alice Roosevelt Longworth

I assume that you are volunteering yourself to be both injected with
live HIV and to receive unprotected anal sex from someone who is HIV+.

If you are not prepared to do these things then you are exposed as
someone who talks the talk but won't walk the walk. If you truly
believe what you are saying there can be no reason to refuse both of
these alleged by others (but denied by you) methods of transmission of
AIDS.

So, tell us when you are going to bare your arm and your arse in order
to prove that everyone with sense is wrong.