Be careful what you say about them.
If you call a spade a spade, and the cards don't suit Ilena, she will 'sh.t
page' you.
You can't tell her any of this.
You can't even PROVE it to her with past posts, etc.
She simply will not hear that she is wrong, and will not admit it no matter
how much proof to the contrary you show her.
A simple discussion on whether or not Ritalin helps kids with ADD/ADDHD, and
your opinion or experiences being contrary to what Ilena thinks, causes her
to label you.
Just as she has done with countless others.
I've read, with interest, the comments of the 'posse' over about a year and
a half now.
Many times their thoughts are the SAME as Ilena's, many times they are not.
For the times that they are not, Ilena persecutes them and uses those
opinions as 'proof'...ever neglecting to point out the many times that they
are...for that would never further her agenda.
I've noted this, and many other things....including how she has strung Mark
Probert up by his unmentionables and ties him to Steven Barrett.
When all along, Probert has maintained that he did not agree with Barrett
suing Ilena.
It's in the archives, anyone can look it up.
She ignores that, of course.
Note, she hypes all the 'blogs' but never shows links for them.
Likely cause?
She MAY have seen a blog, and ASSUMED that it was one of the people she
mentions here....but can't prove it...so rather than find out before she
opens her fat mouth(botox?), she utilizes Usenet to publicly harass.
I personally don't believe a word she says.
Reason?
Just weeks ago she advertised that I was involved, in 1994, in hiring a
private detective to find her where abouts.
It's absurd.
Over half the people she's tied to me are people I have never had any
contact with what so ever.
The other half I have had contact with only on usenet, or privately about
issues OTHER THAN those talked about in these groups.
Last year a woman named Myrl Jeffcoat posted a post about another breast
implant victim who was living in the hurricane area.
I wrote Mrs. Jeffcoat privately and asked if they had any more information
about the woman (whom I also did not know).
Mrs. Jeffcoat wrote me back and told me that she had been heard from and
that she was doing well.
That was my last contact with her...September of last year.
However, Ilena reports that I am WORKING for Mrs. Jeffcoat.
And she recently became so enraged with me, and others on the SBI board that
she threatened to make a call to Mrs Jeffcoat's broker...Mrs Jeffcoat was
employed as a real estate agent apparently (something else I did not know
until Ilena made her threat)
Basically, she said if we didn't shut up she would attempt to cause Mrs
Jeffcoat problems at her job.
Mrs Jeffcoat had not posted on usenet to the best of my knowledge in many
many months by this time.
At one point she became so upset with Probert that she actually contacted
his wife about his usenet posts.
Just weeks ago she posted the city that another woman lives in.
She recently implied that my mother was a figment of my imagination, not a
real person.  Yet, she's dedicated a web page to her in which she pretends
to 'talk' to my deceased mother about me.
I know that most of what she says about me is untrue, and because of that, I
realize that it's very likely that what she says about others is untrue as
well.
If it's not untrue, it's take out of context, or manipulated.
Ilena has slandered so many people that she does everything in her power to
make sure that no one knows where she is so that she can't be served with
summons.
And she's pretty smart to do so because there are literally dozens of people
that she has harassed who are just itching to see her in court.
But, what the heck, why am I telling you all this?
It seems obvious that you are capable of reading for yourself, and finding
out for yourself, as you have obviously done so already.
A grain of salt is all one needs to be a usenet poster and reader.

Borderline??

More likely ol' Pete comes under Hanlon's Razor:
"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by
stupidity."

He's kind of like fundamentalists: They KNOW the one true way, so
anyone who disagrees with them must be evil--Case closed.