> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> really be an infected sweat gland, or is my husband trying to cover up for
> something more serious? Please help.
There is a huge difference between a painful lump in the testicle and a
painful lump in the skin of the scrotum, so you need to be more clear about
your terminology. The testicle doesn't HAVE sweat glands, for example. The
question is between an orchitis or epidymitis (testicle) vs. an infected
sebaceous cyst (scrotal skin). The former *might* be some sort of STD, the
latter would never be.
HMc
loobyloo - 10 Mar 2006 20:04 GMT
Hi,
Sorry I should have been clearer, the lump was of the scrotum, NOT the
testicle itself, I was told that it was an infected sweat gland that had
become blocked and then had become infected. It was a long hard mass in the
scrotum that had to be drained, does this sound right?
>> Hi,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>HMc
Howard McCollister - 10 Mar 2006 22:23 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>>
>>HMc
An infection of the skin of the scrotum from a blocked sweat gland
(sebaceous cyst) would be very unlikely to be related to any kind of STD.
HMc
loobyloo - 11 Mar 2006 13:44 GMT
Thank you very much for your help.
>> Hi,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>HMc