Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / General / December 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

solubility in water of harmful components in smoke

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
dohduhdah@yahoo.com - 06 Dec 2005 01:40 GMT
Hello.

Is there any chemist or medical specialist out there who is willing to
comment on the following issue, regarding a debate about the
effectiveness of bongs (water pipes) to filter out potentially harmful
ingredients from smoke.

On this webpage you can find a comparison between the composition of
tobacco and marijuana smoke, listing the ingredients in both:
http://www.erowid.org/plants/cannabis/cannabis_info3.shtml

I don't smoke regularly myself, nor do I condone of smoking anything
(whether it's marijuana or tobacco). I am interested in this issue
however because I think that when you are engaged in some potentially
harmful activity, it's still best to minimize potential health-risks as
much as possible.

What are the primary nasty (in terms of health risk) ingredients in
smoke and to what extend are they likely to be filtered out by water
used for filtration in a smoking device?

There are studies that suggest that a bong is counterproductive because
it  affects the tar-THC ratio adversely:

http://www.maps.org/news-letters/v06n3/06359mj1.html

Is this the only possible consideration or are there other potentially
harmful ingredients, besides tar, found in smoke that might be filtered
by passing smoke through water?

Perhaps someone could point out the most likely place to find the
solubility in water of the primary ingredients in smoke?
Some medical advice on which ingredients in smoke are most likely to be
detrimental to the respiratory system would also be appreciated.

thanks very much for any comments or suggestions, kind regards, Niek
Bob - 06 Dec 2005 03:30 GMT
>Hello.
>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
>thanks very much for any comments or suggestions, kind regards, Niek

Given the complexity of the smokes and the uncertainties about what is
good/bad in them, I think the problem would be much better addressed
experimentally than theoretically. Chemical analysis of the filtered
smoke would be easy enough; even better would be bioassay.

Have you tried PubMed to see whether such work has been done? (If it
weren't for the political considerations, it would be a fairly obvious
kind of thing to do.)

bob
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.