Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / General / November 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

"Ward off a pandemic"

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
yared22311@yahoo.com - 19 Nov 2005 13:35 GMT
Ward off a pandemic
By Paula Dobriansky
Published November 16, 2005

If avian flu, caused by the virulent influenza strain known as H5N1,
sparks a pandemic among humans, no country will be safe. Indeed, if the
virus mutates to pass easily between humans and is allowed to spread
rapidly, the ensuing pandemic could cripple economies, bring
international trade and travel to a standstill, and devastate entire
societies. To respond to this threat, the Bush administration has
launched an unprecedented international effort.
   Why is avian flu so worrying? First, it is uncommonly deadly in
animals. In birds, the virus is highly contagious and has led to the
deaths of more than 150 million of them in Cambodia, China, Indonesia,
Japan, Kazakhstan, Laos, Malaysia, Mongolia, Russia, Thailand, Vietnam
and, most recently, Romania, Turkey and Greece. Infected migratory
birds threaten flocks and, therefore, people in Europe, the Middle East
and Africa. Second, since H5N1 has infected humans only since 1997,
people have not developed immunity. In known cases of human infection,
more than half die. Victims, mostly in Southeast Asia, now number more
than 60. Third, there is potential evidence of limited human-to-human
transmission. If the virus mutates to facilitate easier human-to-human
transmission, the end result could be a pandemic.
   The 1918 Spanish Flu pandemic killed more than 40 million people,
and scientists consider another flu pandemic of that scale a worrying
possibility. What we do not know is whether a pandemic will come next
week, next year or next decade.
   Since no country can successfully combat avian flu alone, all
countries must join in the fight. The costs of inaction vastly exceed
the cost of enhanced preparedness, surveillance, response and
containment. The 2003 SARS outbreak cost more than 700 lives and some
$80 billion worldwide.
   To avoid the much higher toll of a flu pandemic, all countries must
elevate the need to address avian flu on their national policy agendas
and commit appropriate resources. They must educate their publics,
especially in rural communities, and improve surveillance and reporting
procedures. Flu viruses first spread slowly and locally, then
exponentially and widely, so a flu pandemic can be stopped only if
outbreaks are detected early, reported to the World Health Organization
and international community, and treated quickly through containment
and the administration of antiviral drugs.
   An enhanced capacity for rapid response and coordination should be
put in place now. With the lives of millions at stake, doing anything
else is both dangerous and immoral.
   Recognizing the need for an effective global response, the
president announced the International Partnership on Avian and Pandemic
Influenza at the September meeting of the U.N. General Assembly. The
president is personally engaged and has raised this issue directly
with, among others, the presidents of China, Indonesia and Russia, as
well as the prime minister of Thailand.
   This week, during the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation Leaders'
Meeting in Pusan, Korea, he will also highlight the urgent need to take
action. He has met with representatives of the major pharmaceutical
companies, whom he encouraged to develop and produce vaccines and
anti-flu medicines faster. Our country is working closely with the
private sector and more than 90 partner countries and organizations,
such as the United Nations, World Health Organization, Food and
Agriculture Organization, World Animal Health Organization (OIE), the
World Bank, Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation forum and Association of
Southeast Asian Nations.
   Within the United States, agencies across the federal government
are working jointly to implement a $7.1 billion national strategy for
combating pandemic influenza. Recently, Secretary of Health and Human
Services Secretary Mike Leavitt and I met with key partners in
Southeast Asia to engage senior government leaders in the anti-flu
effort. The United States has sent two additional multi-agency missions
led by USAID to work with health and agriculture experts abroad and
offer assistance.
   The State Department hosted a major international meeting to
develop and implement a comprehensive global strategy to combat avian
flu. We have already committed $38 million to prevent the spread of
avian influenza in Southeast Asia and the President has just requested
an additional $251 million to detect and contain outbreaks around the
world. These monies fund such vital measures as preparedness plans,
expanded surveillance and testing activities, training of first
responders and purchase of protective gear.
   Avian flu has not yet mutated in a way that threatens to become a
pandemic. If we are lucky and proactive, it never will. But even if
H5N1 does not spark a pandemic, another strain could. To prepare, we
must work globally and we must work together. When nature strikes, we
must be ready.

   Paula Dobriansky is undersecretary of state for democracy and
global affairs.
(PeteCresswell) - 20 Nov 2005 02:51 GMT
Per Paula Dobriansky:
>  Within the United States, ... a $7.1 billion national strategy for
>combating pandemic influenza.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>expanded surveillance and testing activities, training of first
>responders and purchase of protective gear.

>  When nature strikes, we must be ready.

Sounds like a lot of money at first.

But when put in the context of:

- 300 million people in the USA alone,

- what we spend very month in Iraq, and

- what all the money spent on homeland security did not get us in our response
to Katrina (the mayor of a major city didn't even have a satellite phone or any
other means of communicating until his deputy mayor broke into a Radio Shack and
found a live internet connection/router)

my knee jerk reaction is "Fat Chance".  

Look at the number of antiviral doses they're talking about and then run the
numbers: doses required per person, number of people in the USA.... they haven't
even got most of the first responders covered.  

Congress, corporate bigwigs, maybe high-level state people like governors,  and
certainly anybody who flys with Air Force One, yes - with some left over,
even.... but no realistic percent of even the healthcare providers, much the
civilian population.

Think of what I saw last year here in Chester County PA (about 23 miles west of
Philadelphia): there was a local epidemic of a "flu-like" illness that so
overloaded the hospitals that a friend's wife couldn't get in for something
else.   I think that most of us can forget about having acute care while we have
whatever form of the disease comes - we're basically going to be on our own,
much as the people in 1918 were.

Consider that the experts I've heard seem to be talking about vaccine
availability sometime around what?   2012.... Hopefully I'm way off base on that
one...

IMHO if/when this thing gets loose with virulency/infection levels above a
certain number there's going to be pandemonium.

The least-awful realistic scenario I can envision is a reassortment event that
unleashes something with greatly-reduced lethality that will infect a huge
number of people without killing too many - giving us, as a population, some
residual immunity to whatever comes next.  Sort of a naturally-occurring live
vaccine.
Signature

PeteCresswell

(PeteCresswell) - 21 Nov 2005 13:40 GMT
Per (PeteCresswell):
>Consider that the experts I've heard seem to be talking about vaccine
>availability sometime around what?   2012.... Hopefully I'm way off base on that
>one...

Thankfully it seems that I was off base on that one *way* off...

On PBS last nite, I heard the guy who developed one of the H5N1 vaccines say
that his vaccine would be available in significant amounts in developed
countries sometime in 2006.  

I didn't hear him say anything about availability in the rest of the world.
Signature

PeteCresswell

johngohde@naturalhealthperspective.com - 20 Nov 2005 11:15 GMT
> Ward off a pandemic
> By Paula Dobriansky
> Published November 16, 2005

Excuse me, but before you can ward off a pandemic you have to first
have a pandemic. :)

And, before you have a pandemic you need a few epidemics. :)

And, before you have just one epidemic you need more than one person
dying in a backward country like China. :)

Just thought that you might want to get real for a change. :)
Carey Gregory - 21 Nov 2005 05:26 GMT
>Excuse me, but before you can ward off a pandemic you have to first
>have a pandemic. :)

Heh....  

You might want to consult a native English speaker and find out what "ward
off" means.  

Or get smart enough to use the phrase correctly.

One of the two.
johngohde@naturalhealthperspective.com - 22 Nov 2005 00:06 GMT
> >Excuse me, but before you can ward off a pandemic you have to first
> >have a pandemic. :)
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Or get smart enough to use the phrase correctly.

Hey look at me!!!  I am warding off killer bees from attacking America.
I am warding off an invasion from Mars.  I am warding off white sharks
from Virginia Beach!

Ha, ... Hah, Ha!

You Science Geeks are pathetic.  And, I don't mind saying so.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.