Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / General / November 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Vitamin D more important then calcium intake: JAMA

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
fresh~horses - 03 Nov 2005 20:25 GMT
Adequate Vitamin D Status Appears More Important Than High Calcium
Intake for Maintaining Calcium Metabolism

CHICAGO - Calcium intake levels of more than 800 mg/day may be
unnecessary for maintaining calcium metabolism if vitamin D status is
adequate, according to a study in the November 9 issue of JAMA.

The importance of adequate vitamin D status for optimum bone health has
received increased recognition in recent years, with higher recommended
intake levels being proposed by some investigators, according to
background information in the article. The ideal intake is not known,
and different criteria have been proposed for estimating population
requirements. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D  has been the generally
accepted indicator of vitamin D status, but no universal consensus has
been reached regarding which serum values constitute sufficiency. An
inverse relationship between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and serum
parathyroid hormone (PTH) is well established. Parathyroid hormone is a
major hormone maintaining normal serum concentrations of calcium and
phosphate and is itself regulated through levels of calcitriol and
serum calcium. An insufficiency of vitamin D or calcium is generally
associated with an increase in PTH.

Laufey Steingrimsdottir, Ph.D., of Landspitali-University Hospital,
Reykjavik, Iceland, and colleagues conducted a study to determine the
importance of high calcium intake and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D for
calcium homeostasis (metabolic equilibrium) in healthy adults, as
determined by serum intact PTH. The study included 2,310 healthy
Icelandic adults who were divided equally into 3 age groups (30-45
years, 50-65 years, or 70-85 years) and recruited from February 2001 to
January 2003. They were administered a semi-quantitative food frequency
questionnaire, which assessed vitamin D and calcium intake.
Participants were further divided into groups according to calcium
intake (less than 800 mg/d, 800-1200 mg/d, and greater than1200 mg/d)
and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level (less than 10 ng/mL, 10-18 ng/mL,
and greater than 18 ng/mL).  A total of 944 participants completed the
dietary questionnaire.

The researchers found that after adjusting for relevant factors, serum
intact PTH was lowest in the group with a serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D
level of more than 18 ng/mL but highest in the group with a serum
25-hydroxyvitamin D level of less than 10 ng/mL. At the low serum
25-hydroxyvitamin D level (less than 10 ng/mL), calcium intake of less
than 800 mg/d vs. more than 1200 mg/d was significantly associated with
higher serum PTH; and at a calcium intake of more than 1200 mg/d, there
was a significant difference between the lowest and highest vitamin D
groups.

"The significance of our study was demonstrated by the strong
negative association between sufficient serum levels of
25-hydroxyvitamin D and PTH, with calcium intake varying from less than
800 mg/d to more than 1200 mg/d. Our results suggest that vitamin D
sufficiency can ensure ideal serum PTH values even when the calcium
intake level is less than 800 mg/d, while high calcium intake (greater
than 1200 mg/d) is not sufficient to maintain ideal serum PTH, as long
as vitamin D status is insufficient," the authors write.

"Although a cross-sectional study such as our study is not sufficient
to demonstrate causality, the association between vitamin D status,
calcium intake, and the interaction between these 2 with serum PTH
levels is a strong indication of the relative importance of these
nutrients," the researchers write. "Although ideal intakes of these
2 nutrients need to be further defined in more elaborate studies, there
is already sufficient evidence from numerous studies for physicians and
general practitioners to emphasize to a much greater extent the
importance of vitamin D status and recommend vitamin D supplements for
the general public, when sun exposure and dietary sources are
insufficient."

"In conclusion, our study suggests that vitamin D sufficiency may be
more important than high calcium intake in maintaining desired values
of serum PTH. Vitamin D may have a calcium sparing effect and as long
as vitamin D status is ensured, calcium intake levels of more than 800
mg/d may be unnecessary for maintaining calcium metabolism. Vitamin D
supplements are necessary to ensure adequate vitamin D status for most
of the year in northern climates."

JAMA.2005; 294:2336-2341.

Editor's Note: This study was supported by a grant from the Science
Fund of St. Josephs Hospital, Landakot, and the University Hospital,
Reykjavik, Iceland.
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 04 Nov 2005 06:29 GMT
> Adequate Vitamin D Status Appears More Important Than High Calcium
> Intake for Maintaining Calcium Metabolism
>
>  CHICAGO - Calcium intake levels of more than 800 mg/day may be
> unnecessary for maintaining calcium metabolism if vitamin D status is
> adequate, according to a study in the November 9 issue of JAMA.

A conclusion in keeping with a large amount of epidemiology. It's nice
to finally lay it to rest.

Though the calcium pill may yet to have a role in the prevention of
certain problems such as colon cancer.

SBH
fresh~horses - 04 Nov 2005 06:53 GMT
> > Adequate Vitamin D Status Appears More Important Than High Calcium
> > Intake for Maintaining Calcium Metabolism
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> SBH

Related from www.nejm.org

Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

To the Editor: In discussing vitamin D deficiency, Rosen (Aug. 11
issue)1 refers to a serum level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D below 15 ng per
milliliter (37.4 nmol per liter). I believe that this level is too low.
Studies have shown increases in serum parathyroid hormone levels2 and
decreases in bone mineral density3 at approximately 20 ng per
milliliter (50 nmol per liter) and below. In addition, levels below 20
ng per milliliter have been associated with decreases in intestinal
calcium absorption and lower-extremity function. Therefore, vitamin D
deficiency should be considered if the serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level
is below 20 ng per milliliter, and perhaps even below 30 ng per
milliliter (75 nmol per liter).4

Andrew S. Chan, M.D.
Kaiser Panorama City Medical Center
Panorama City, CA 91402

#  Rosen CJ. Postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med
2005;353:595-603. [Full Text]
# Need AG, O'Loughlin PD, Morris HA, Horowitz M, Nordin BE. The effects
of age and other variables on serum parathyroid hormone in
postmenopausal women attending an osteoporosis center. J Clin
Endocrinol Metab 2004;89:1646-1649. [Abstract/Full Text]
# Hickey L, Gordon CM. Vitamin D deficiency: new perspectives on an old
disease. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes 2004;11:18-25.
# Heaney RP. Vitamin D: how much do we need, and how much is too much?
Osteoporos Int 2000;11:553-555. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Dr. Rosen replies: Dr. Chan raises an important point: At what level of
25-hydroxyvitamin D should the patient be considered to have vitamin D
deficiency? In my review article, I cited a report that up to two of
every three women with hip fracture had vitamin D levels of less than
15 ng per milliliter.1 More recently, Gaugris et al., in a
meta-analysis of 30 studies, found that up to 70 percent of all
postmenopausal women with a history of any fracture had levels below 15
ng per milliliter, and that among all postmenopausal women in the
meta-analysis, up to 86 percent had levels below 20 ng per milliliter.2
However, there was significant heterogeneity in the populations studied
with regard to the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency. I agree that to
consider a patient as having vitamin D deficiency, the cutoff should be
higher than 15 ng per milliliter, although whether it should be 20, 25,
or 30 ng per milliliter is still being debated.3

Clifford J. Rosen, M.D.
St. Joseph Hospital
Bangor, ME 04401
rofe@aol.com

  1.  LeBoff MS, Kohlmeier L, Hurwitz S, Franklin J, Wright J,
Glowacki J. Occult vitamin D deficiency in postmenopausal US women with
acute hip fracture. JAMA 1999;281:1501-1511.
  2. Gaugris S, Heaney RP, Boonen S, Kurth H, Bentkover JD, Sen SS.
Vitamin D inadequacy among post-menopausal women: a systematic review.
QJM 2005;98:667-676. [Abstract/Full Text]
  3. Hanley DA, Davison KS. Vitamin D insufficiency in North America.
J Nutr 2005;135:332-337. [Abstract/Full Text]
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.