> Hello, I had a collapsed lung in March of this year. A surgeon later
> determined that it was a Hemothorax, because of the large amount of
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> "bubbling" or whatever previous to my lung collapsing. Of course then
> I did not know that it was a sign of anything bad.
> The answer would depend very much on why your lung collapsed in the first
> place.
>
> HMc
Hi, well they don't know why my lung collapsed. It was what they call
a "spontaneous pneumothorax". My last CT scan done a few months ago
did show some trapped air, but my doctor did not think it was enough to
cause the symptoms that I was complaining about. Another theory was
scar tissue, but wouldn't that show up in an x-ray or CT scan?
CTV
Howard McCollister - 25 Oct 2005 02:21 GMT
>> The answer would depend very much on why your lung collapsed in the first
>> place.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> cause the symptoms that I was complaining about. Another theory was
> scar tissue, but wouldn't that show up in an x-ray or CT scan?
"Spontaneous pneumothorax" is a well-understood and well-recognized problem.
Googling it will return you about 250,000 hits.
It is almost exclusively caused by numerous clusters of little blebs at the
apex of the lung. Every so often, one of these blebs will rupture and the
lung will collapse. The sensation you're feeling is not air leaking - the CT
scan you had would show if there was any residual or ongoing pneumothorax.
More likely it's narrow-based scar tissue at the apex of the lung.
It sounds like you've had two of these pneumothoraces. Your google search
will tell you that the liklihood of a third is extremely high, adn that you
are equally prone to this on the other lung. Current treatment is
thoracoscopic resection of the apex of the lungs where the blebs are, and
pleurodesis to cause the lung to scar across the upper lobe so it can't
happen again.
This is really fundamental stuff. Very hard to imagine that the surgeon you
saw didn't tell you these same things.
HMc