Quackbuster Barrett Broken in "Home Town" Court...
Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen
Thursday, October 13th, 2005
In simple language - the Lehigh County Court Judge, today, in the
Barrett v. Koren "defamation" case, ruled that Stephen Barrett wasted
the Lehigh County Court's time with his meritless claims.
Just before lunch on Thursday, October 13th, 2005 (today), Judge
Johnson of the Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas turned to the jury
assembled to decide a case brought by one Stephen Barrett, a local
resident, against famous Chiropractor, author, publisher, and health
advocate Tedd Koren DC - and told the jury that he was ruling in favor
of a Motion made by Defendant Koren.
The Judge's ruling in favor of Koren's Motion, officially called a
"Motion for Directed Verdict," approved Koren's request that "the Court
enter judgment in its favor before submitting the case to the jury
because there is no legally sufficient evidentiary foundation on which
a reasonable jury could find
for the other party." Under Federal Rules of Court this type of motion
is known as a "Motion for judgment as a matter of law."
To read the entire article, and access the interesting links, click on
the URL below:
http://www.bolenreport.net/
Barry - 14 Oct 2005 14:48 GMT
> because there is no legally sufficient evidentiary foundation on which
> a reasonable jury could find
> for the other party.
We care about health here more than law, and that's not exactly a
reputable news source you linked to. You didn't teach me anything.
johngohde@naturalhealthperspective.com - 14 Oct 2005 15:47 GMT
> > because there is no legally sufficient evidentiary foundation on which
> > a reasonable jury could find
> > for the other party.
>
> We care about health here more than law, and that's not exactly a
> reputable news source you linked to. You didn't teach me anything.
Your B/S speaks volumes. Crackposts are full of sh.t. Examine the
evidence impartially, and the Crackpots will lose every time. :)
The claims of crackpots have been proved in a court of law to be
totally baseless. So basely in fact that a jury did not even need to
rule on it.
All you scamming Crackpots belong in jail, where slime belongs.
Just my opinion, but damn Crackpots make it easy to be perfect in every
way.
Barry - 14 Oct 2005 16:16 GMT
What was the issue in that case? Defamation isn't necessarily related
to medicine.