Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / General / October 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Aspartame Industry Seeks To Block New Mexico Hearings

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Quintal - 11 Oct 2005 00:53 GMT
alt.conspiracy,sci.med,fr.bio.medecine,fr.soc.complots

http://www.rbnlive.com/aspartame.html

Aspartame Industry Seeks To
Block New Mexico Hearings

By Jackie Jadrnak, Albuquerque Journal Staff Writer 10-6-05
Aspartame And Donald Rumsfeld (Video)

SANTA FE - Gov. Bill Richardson doesn't think the federal government
is doing enough to protect the public from possible dangers of
aspartame.

He said Wednesday that he supports a decision this week by the
Environmental Improvement Board to hold hearings next summer on the
safety of the sugar substitute, commonly known as Equal or NutraSweet.
It is an ingredient in about 6,000 products.

Asked if he is concerned aspartame may be harmful, Richardson
answered, "Yes, from what I've learned." Critics of the sweetener have
claimed it causes cancers and other health problems, despite the fact
that it has been approved as safe in countries around the world.

T. J. Trujillo, Santa Fe attorney for a low calorie products industry
group, said Wednesday he and his clients are still exploring whether
they have any grounds for an immediate appeal to block the hearing. In
the meantime, industry representatives will reach out to New Mexico
government officials and policy advisers, he said. "We want to figure
out their positions and work for a resolution."

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which is responsible for
determining the safety of food additives, approved aspartame in l981.
Richardson said he doesn't want New Mexico to overstep its bounds.

But "I'm not saying we can't do anything about it," he added. Hearings
next July might give some idea of what steps New Mexico should and
could take, he said.

FDA spokeswoman Kimberly Rawlings said officials there are aware of
the New Mexico board's action and are keeping an eye on what happens
next.

__end of article

Note From Betty Martini -

People interested in banning aspartame from your state you need to
check on statutes on poisonous substances and adulteration. I would
suspect they are the same in other states and countries. You have a
precedent set. Let's get aspartame off this planet. I think its of
interest that attorneys for Calorie Control Council, the aspartame
industry front group, said they are exploring whether they have
grounds for appeal to block the hearing. Since they push this toxin as
safe, they should embrace this hearing. What are they afraid of?
Perhaps the thousands and thousands of victims who are invited to New
Mexico to testify? Or maybe because now Italian researchers who
declared malignant brain tumors, lymphoma and leukemia after a three
year study have now added kidney cancer among other cancers. They call
aspartame a "multipotential carcinogen".

This goes along with what the FDA's own toxicologist, the late Dr.
Adrian Gross, told Congress. He said aspartame violated the Delaney
Amendment which forbid putting anything in food you know will cause
cancer because without a shadow of a doubt aspartame can cause brain
tumors and brain cancer. However, in original studies it also caused
mammary, ovarian, testicular, pancreatic and thyroid tumors, for
starters!

As we know, the Governor of California has outlawed pop in schools
there. We hope Governor Richardson will now do the same in New Mexico,
including any product with aspartame.

Join the Aspartame Information List on www.wnho.net, click on
aspartame for more information and also www.dorway.com Aspartame
Toxicity Center, www.holisticmed.com/aspartame Also
www.aspartamekills.com

Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum.
Founder, Mission Possible Intl
9270 River Club Parkway
Duluth, Georgia 30097
770 242-2599
Quintal - 11 Oct 2005 01:05 GMT
>Aspartame And Donald Rumsfeld (Video)

http://www.soundandfury.tv/media/Rumsfeld.wmv
dcholiman@ev1.net - 11 Oct 2005 04:01 GMT
Quintal my good fellow,

Where are the victims ?  Where are
the damages for aspartame toxicity ?
Seen any big multimillion dollar  awards
for aspartame  death, injury, maiming,
crippling, paralysis, mental distress
and carcinogenicity ?

Quintal, be 4 real.

David H
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Quintal - 11 Oct 2005 10:23 GMT
>Quintal my good fellow,
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>crippling, paralysis, mental distress
>and carcinogenicity ?

no idea, you look it up.

>Quintal, be 4 real.

get up from your a.s and do some research and free thinking, will ya?
you're just rationalizing your trust in big business advertising with
this present argument of yours.

>David H
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
goozlefotz - 11 Oct 2005 04:36 GMT
> He said Wednesday that he supports a decision this week by the
> Environmental Improvement Board to hold hearings next summer on the
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> claimed it causes cancers and other health problems, despite the fact
> that it has been approved as safe in countries around the world.

I avoid aspartame as much as possible.  I prefer Splenda, but will use
saccharin in preference to aspartame.  What ever happened to stevia?
Much of the world uses this inexpensive plant as the artificial
sweetener of choice.
@club-internet.fr - 11 Oct 2005 09:00 GMT
Il faut arrêter de bouffer de la merde comme ça ! Si vous voulez manger
sucré, mettez du saccharose, c'est à dire le sucre naturel des fruits, ou du
miel. De toute façon, c'est une grossière erreur de penser que remplacer le
sucre par l'aspartame vous fera maigrir. La seule utilisation que je peux
concevoir est pour les diabétiques. Et encore...

C.L.

> > He said Wednesday that he supports a decision this week by the
> > Environmental Improvement Board to hold hearings next summer on the
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Much of the world uses this inexpensive plant as the artificial
> sweetener of choice.
Quintal - 11 Oct 2005 10:22 GMT
>> He said Wednesday that he supports a decision this week by the
>> Environmental Improvement Board to hold hearings next summer on the
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>I avoid aspartame as much as possible.  I prefer Splenda, but will use
>saccharin in preference to aspartame.  What ever happened to stevia?

stevia is hunted down and prohibited wherever the industry can pull
it. It got illegal in many countries. Just because it is natural,
safe, and is a sweetener. It also has the advantage of being a
medicinal herb, helping regulating the pancreating functions (perfect
for a sweet isnt it).

>Much of the world uses this inexpensive plant as the artificial
>sweetener of choice.

in france where i live you got to order it from foreign countries, and
illegally, whereas a few years ago it was free to sell.

anyway one can do without sugar and stevia.
there are natural sugars everywhere, honey, vegetal sirups, fruits,
whatever. There is also non-refined sugar that is useable for those
who just dont want the refined industrialized one.
Quintal - 11 Oct 2005 11:15 GMT
> the pancreating functions

I meant pancreatic
;-)
cdang - 11 Oct 2005 11:50 GMT
> I avoid aspartame as much as possible.  I prefer Splenda, but will use
> saccharin in preference to aspartame.  What ever happened to stevia?

What about drinking water instead of soda ? Drinking coffea or thea without
sugar (or drinking stronger coffea so you only drink 2 or 3 in the day) ?

What about eating fresh fruits instead of cakes and chips ?

If you don't eat or drink sweet stuff, you don't need to replace the sugar.

--
Christophe Dang Ngoc Chan (cdang@wanadoo.fr)
secouriste bénévole, moniteur
PAP - 11 Oct 2005 13:11 GMT
>> I avoid aspartame as much as possible.  I prefer Splenda, but will use
>> saccharin in preference to aspartame.  What ever happened to stevia?
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> If you don't eat or drink sweet stuff, you don't need to replace the
> sugar.

Hé Ho, là... vous vous égarez, les enfants !

ici, c'est un "newsgroup" francophone, hein...

Signature

PAP
my tailor is rich

dcholiman@ev1.net - 12 Oct 2005 20:00 GMT
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It is not necessary to get  glucose from grains, starches
and sweets because your vegetables contain 7% to 15%
sugar and starch which the body converts to glucose.
David H
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PAP - 12 Oct 2005 23:17 GMT
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> It is not necessary to get  glucose from grains, starches
> and sweets because your vegetables contain 7% to 15%
> sugar and starch which the body converts to glucose.
> David H
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

bon, incurable...

PLONK
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.