Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / General / September 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

The obsolete people

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Hank - 11 Sep 2005 16:51 GMT
In this increasingly techno oriented society it is obvious that the
negro, average IQ 85, is obsolete. Would it not be better to pay young
negro females a big bonus to be neutered? Many could get a decent
start with say $25K, and in the long run such a program would save
America many problems.

Will
old hoodoo - 11 Sep 2005 18:04 GMT
> In this increasingly techno oriented society it is obvious that the
> negro, average IQ 85, is obsolete. Would it not be better to pay young
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Will

Won't solve the problem.  The black man is not obsolete sexually.

You are neutering the wrong sex. A lot of white girls have this thing
for black guys...and we don't need the competition...while we are
hacking on keyboards, getting fat and looking at porn, fantsizing the
perfect relationship---with a :"realdoll", the black guys are
humping/servicing our women and also getting the black girls pregnant.

The problem is a black guy values his virility at more than $25,000,
which is justifiable.  Considering your average black guy has had sex
with 200 women...by age 13, you are going to have to pony up a lot more
bucks. Now, I would gladly get castrated now for 5,000 bucks, but then I
am a white guy computer nerd. Think of the computer I could buy for
5,000 bucks...

:-)
harrj824@peoplepc.com - 11 Sep 2005 18:04 GMT
> In this increasingly techno oriented society it is obvious that the
> negro, average IQ 85, is obsolete. Would it not be better to pay young
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Will

harrj824 writes:  First, women (females) aren't neutered.  Second, it's
a moronic idea which means your IQ must be between 50 & 70.
harrj824
B1ackwater - 11 Sep 2005 22:26 GMT
>In this increasingly techno oriented society it is obvious that the
>negro, average IQ 85, is obsolete. Would it not be better to pay young
>negro females a big bonus to be neutered? Many could get a decent
>start with say $25K, and in the long run such a program would save
>America many problems.

  Hmmm ... you DO realize, don't you, that as the technology
  curve grows just a little steeper, 'average Americans' - IQ
  100 - will ALSO be obsolete ? Only Asians and Jews will have
  high enough IQs to cope ...  :-)

  So, I suggest checking with China to see how much they'd
  offer to have YOUR sons and daughters neutered ... wouldn't
  want them to be a drag on future society, now would you ?
Foxtrot - 12 Sep 2005 02:24 GMT
>In this increasingly techno oriented society it is obvious that the
>negro, average IQ 85, is obsolete. Would it not be better to pay young
>negro females a big bonus to be neutered? Many could get a decent
>start with say $25K, and in the long run such a program would save
>America many problems.

One of the guys who invented the transistor, William
Shockley, actually suggested that exact thing. Needless
to say, the idea was not well-received.
nosceteipsum - 12 Sep 2005 10:01 GMT
markwh04@yahoo.com - 12 Sep 2005 23:15 GMT
> In this increasingly techno oriented society it is obvious that the
> negro, average IQ 85, is obsolete.

Right idea, wrong fault line.  Even Mr. "America is divided between
Black and White" Hacker of the 1970's -- the pied piper of the whole
school of thought -- has changed his tune with the new book
"Mismatched".

US proficiency scores (from the Census Bureau)
Reading, 17 years old:
1979-80: Male 282, Female 289
1987-88: Male 286, Female 294
1998-99: Male 282, Female 295
Pulling away.

Writing, 11th grade:
1983-84: Male 281, Female 299
1987-88: Male 282, Female 299
1995-96: Male 275, Female 292
the gap about the same as reported between whites and blacks.

1998 college degrees, % awarded to females
Associates: (US 61.0%)
RI 50.0% NE 51.3% HI 55.2%...[44 states]...AR 67.4% LA 70.0% KY 71.0%
Bachelor's: (US 56.1%)
UT 50.1% MT 52.3% CO 52.7%...[44 states]...MS 58.9% LA 58.9% AL 60.2%
Master's: (US 57.1%)
UT 43.7% ID 50.8% IN 52.5%...[44 states]...SC 64.1% ME 64.5% VT 68.1%

PhD's, 2004: now over 50% to women
law and med school enrollment, 2004: now over 50% women

==================

Men? They're reduced to sperm donors
(Commentary on famed BBC newscaster's recent remarks)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=3594
45&in_page_id=1770&ito=1490


http://news.independent.co.uk/media/article306271.ece

==================

Virgin birth mammal rewrites rules of biology
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn4909
2004 April 21

"A mammal that is the daughter of two female parents has been created
for the first time"

[A more recent report came out 2 days ago on September 10, 2005,
announcing the first parthenogenetic creation of a HUMAN embryo]
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.