--- quoting in part LiveScience ---
First-ever Chimp Fossils Found
Bjorn Carey
LiveScience Staff Writer
LiveScience.com Wed Aug 31, 2:00 PM ET
The first ever chimpanzee fossils were recently discovered in an area
previously thought to be unsuitable for chimps. Fossils from human
ancestor were also found nearby.
(snip)
Hominid fossils were also discovered less than a kilometer from the
lake shore where the chimp fossils were buried. More importantly, they
were found in sediments of the same age as the chimp teeth-about half
a million years old.
(snip)
"These represent an earlier species of human, relatives to modern
humans, but not Homo sapiens," Jablonski said. "There's some
controversy over what this species is called. Most would call it an
advanced form of Homo erectus. They looked like people and were a
fairly sophisticated culture with various stone tools and lived in the
same environment as humans."
(snip)
These findings are detailed in the Sept. 1 issue of the journal Nature.
--- end quoting in part ---
You see there is a huge illogic for it is claimed by present day
scientists working in this science that chimpanzee history goes back to
about 5 million years ago where the chimp and human lines converged at
5 million years ago. Now here is a huge illogic because if Orrorin
threw stones and was bipedal and the direct human ancestor, yet Orrorin
is 6 million years old, well, any person who can think straight and
clear can see that there is a huge problem here. And this problem has
gone on for decades because no-one in these anthropology science has
taken a leadership role and said to the scientists, "let us get this
house in logical order". And Anthropology is too much of a clubhouse
science where bones are not allowed testing for Stonethrowing because
the owners of the bones do not allow testing.
But reports such as the above are beginning to get on the correct
logical path of investigation. Because every future reports of a
hominid fossil and chimpanzee fossil should talk about the stone tools
such as rocks used in throwing at the dig site.
Now, last night I posted about a Math Equation, e.g. a secant
trigonometry function for energy of leaf size to mature plant size and
that the A,C,T,G of the genome of rhubarb and knotweed should have that
secant function in amoungst those A,C,T,G once those letters are given
a numerical value.
So, I want to get a Mathematical Equation for Stonethrowing out of the
ACTG genome of humans compared to orangutan or monkey or chimpanzee.
There is a tool using bird of a finch if memory serves me and this
species is similar to the other finch species except that it uses
tools. So what I am proposing is that if the genome of this tool using
species is begot and the finch species that does not use tools, its
genome also begot and then compared. That the tooluser genome will have
a Mathematical function of its A,C,T,G letter code that is not existing
in the nontool user genome. Let us say it is a trig function and let us
say it is a cosine function that the tool using finch has a cosine of
letters A,C,T,G that the nontool user does not have. And because this
cosine function of ACTG is the tool coding, then the same sort of
science investigation should reveal a Mathematical Function of the ACTG
for humans which codes for Throwing of rocks and stones. That the
chimpanzee genome would have a rudimentary such function because chimps
are capable of throwing but that the orangutan, gorilla and other apes
and monkeys do not have that Mathematical Function of their ACTG.
But that is DNA coding. I must mention mitochrondrial DNA because
Stonethrowing may not be in the DNA coding but in the mitochrondrial
DNA. And this would be a surprize even to myself to think that the
difference between Humans and apes or monkeys is not in the DNA but the
mitochrondrial DNA.
And also, the DNA coding codes for specific signature bones such as the
Pickford groove for bipedalism so that there is a specific A,C,T,G that
yields the Pickford groove in the femur that creates bipedalism. What I
am saying with a Math Formula of the A,C,T,G coding is that bipedalism
is not consigned to just the femur groove but many other A,C,T,G spread
over the full genome. And that the behaviour of Throwing would have a
overall Math Equation embedded in the genome of its A,C,T,G letters
just as bipedalism has a overall Math formula for that behaviour.
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
rmacfarl - 10 Sep 2005 01:43 GMT
...
> You see there is a huge illogic for it is claimed by present day
> scientists working in this science that chimpanzee history goes back to
> about 5 million years ago where the chimp and human lines converged at
> 5 million years ago. Now here is a huge illogic because if Orrorin
> threw stones and was bipedal and the direct human ancestor, yet Orrorin
> is 6 million years old, well, any person who can think straight and
...
2) Refuses to get involved in discussion threads that do not discuss their
own hypothesis. (+ 20 points).
3) Commonly forces their hypothesis into discussion threads that are
discussing other topics. (+ 40 points).
4) Claims to be an expert or a "specialist" on the subject but will not give
their credentials when asked. (+ 40 points).
...
8) When asked, they subsequently cannot (or will not) provide a published
reference that backs up their statement in #6 or #7. (+ 40 points).*
http://home.thegrid.net/~lllove/net-loon_index.html
Still waiting Archi...
Ross Macfarlane