Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / General / September 2003

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Drinking hard liquor Vs beer

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Kannan Nair - 25 Sep 2003 09:07 GMT
One beer bottle in india contains about 6% alcohol so drinking a full
bottle infuses about 60 ml of hard liquor to brain. If one person drinks
3 bottle of beer then gets 180 ml of alcohol. How it compares with a
person drinks directly 180 ml of alcohol diluted with water. Which will
cause more damage to liver? Is drinking beer better or worse?

--
Mxsmanic - 25 Sep 2003 12:18 GMT
> One beer bottle in india contains about 6% alcohol so drinking a full
> bottle infuses about 60 ml of hard liquor to brain. If one person drinks
> 3 bottle of beer then gets 180 ml of alcohol. How it compares with a
> person drinks directly 180 ml of alcohol diluted with water. Which will
> cause more damage to liver? Is drinking beer better or worse?

All that matters is the total amount of alcohol and the period of time
over which it is ingested.  So if these two drinks are consumed over the
same period, they'll have the same effect.

Signature

Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.

Robert E. Lewis - 25 Sep 2003 17:35 GMT
<snip of consuming the same volume of alcohol in beer vs 'hard liquor'>

> All that matters is the total amount of alcohol and the period of time
> over which it is ingested.  So if these two drinks are consumed over the
> same period, they'll have the same effect.

I've always heard this, and it makes sense; and it's what I was taught in
drug/alcohol awareness class in school as a teen.  But I long felt my
experience differed from this, and years ago when I found myself with a long
string of Friday nights with nothing better to do, I conducted a little
semi-scientific experiment:

On Friday evening at the same time each week I would have the same frozen
dinner, so I had the same thing on my stomach.  Then I would begin drinking
one selected type of alcoholic drink each week - beer one Friday, wine the
next, vodka the week after that, and so on.

I used a bartender's guide for mixed drinks and measured carefully, sizing
each drink so I got the same amount of alcohol per drink.  I had a friend
once who insisted he could safely drink one beer per half-hour without
getting drunk, and my aim was to become intoxicated, so I timed myself to
have one drink per twenty minutes, drinking it over the twenty minute
period, and then starting the next.

After each drink, I sat down at my computer and played a couple of simple
computer games.  One was a 'Concentration' type game, to measure my ability
to focus and remember things.  The other measured my response time in
thousandths of a second - it flashed a light and I hit a key, and it told me
how long it took me to respond.  I also wrote down generally how I was
feeling.

The overall results were similar for most drinks - my scores on the games
went up for about the first three drinks each evening, usually, I assume
because the alcohol was relaxing me, but perhaps the alcohol wasn't having
much effect and I was just getting into the rhythm of the games.  After six
drinks, my scores plummeted (and six drinks, in my experience, is the point
at which I begin to have a hangover the next morning, whatever I'm
drinking).

But the 'curve' of my response to different types of alcohol was different.
I've long since lost the actual data I recorded, but IIRC, with vodka (and
tonic), and rum (with caffeine-free Coca-Cola), my 'improvement' in the
reaction scores to the games increased the most, stayed steady through drink
four and had a moderate drop for drinks five and six; I was also less aware
of 'feeling drunk' even when I was, with vodka.  Beer had less effect
through the first three or four, but a more noticeable drop from five and
six; beer also made me sleepy.  Wine had a very gentle curve (as befits a
genteel beverage, I suppose!) - not much change for the first few drinks and
a more gradual decline after six glasses.

The last alcoholic beverage of my experiment was tequila.  I followed the
bartending guide for frozen margaritas, calculated a 'one-dose of alcohol'
serving size, mixed them up and found them to strong for my liking, so I
diluted them a bit and recalculated... than I had about a drink and a half
and curled up on the sofa and slept it off.

I wasn't up to drinking straight vodka, whiskey or rum, and I don't know
what effects other components of the drinks have - sugar in the vodka and
rum drinks might effect the body along with the alcohol; caffeine (I avoided
for the sake of my experiment in my Rum-&-Coke) might speed up metabolism of
the alcohol; I've heard it's the carbohydrates in beer that make one sleepy,
but that doesn't sound right to me.  I seldom drink hard liquor anymore, and
never more than one or two drinks in an evening, and wine I most often drink
with meals, influencing its effects. But I still notice a different effects
from different kinds of alcoholic beverages.
Mxsmanic - 25 Sep 2003 22:12 GMT
> But I still notice a different effects from different
> kinds of alcoholic beverages.

Other components of the beverages can have a small effect on the speed
at which the alcohol is absorbed.  Still, it's nothing that one should
depend on.  Usually it is prudent to assume the worst case when
attempting to predict drug concentrations and possible toxicity.

Signature

Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.

Jeff - 26 Sep 2003 04:24 GMT
> One beer bottle in india contains about 6% alcohol so drinking a full
> bottle infuses about 60 ml of hard liquor to brain. If one person drinks
> 3 bottle of beer then gets 180 ml of alcohol. How it compares with a
> person drinks directly 180 ml of alcohol diluted with water. Which will
> cause more damage to liver? Is drinking beer better or worse?

I think beer. It has more calories. So you will get fat faster.

Jeff

> --
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.