Medical Forum / General / General / August 2005
PROMOTING BIRTH CONTROL = LESS ABORTION
|
|
Thread rating:  |
essentialsexinfo3@rock.com - 30 Jul 2005 08:35 GMT Lack of birth control leads to three million unplanned pregnancies per year. One million of these pregnancies end in abortion. Two million of these pregnancies end in unplanned childbirth. By not promoting birth control, you're choosing unplanned pregnancies. Though some say that promoting birth control could encourage sex, that added risk from the increased incidence of sex, is extremely slight because it is increased safe sex, compared to the decrease in unsafe sex, turning unsafe sex into safe sex, and decreasing pregnancy.
The risk of accidental pregnancy when both condoms and birth control pills are used is approximately 1 in 1,000,000 couples per year. When just condoms are used, the risk is 1 in 50 per year and when just birth control is used, the risk is 1 in 200 per year.
Risk of accidental pregnancy Per Year (assuming 100 sex acts) Per Act No protection 8 in 10 (1 in 1.25) 1 in 125 Condoms 1 in 50 1 in 5,000 Birth Control 1 in 200 1 in 20,000 Condoms & Birth Control 1 in 1,000,000 1 in 100,000,000
Calculation is derived as 5,000*20,000=100,000,000
There are around 100 million women in the United States between the ages of 14-59 who can get pregnant. If every one of these women are on birth control and use condoms, there will only be 100 unplanned pregnancies per year.
Thus we should promote birth control. Specifically we should promote the use of two forms of birth control - such as the pill, and condoms - together, at the same time.
And thus we may conclude, that failing to promote and provide birth control is one of the most immoral things in the world, leading to 1 million abortions, and 2 million unplanned childbirths, over 500,000 of them to teenage mothers.
Given that there are approximately 4 million babies born per year, 2 million, or 50% of all newborns are thus unplanned. This must surely have a demonstrative effect upon the socio-econcomic status of our society.
Literature regarding different birth control methods: http://hcd2.bupa.co.uk/fact_sheets/html/hormonal_contraception.html http://hcd2.bupa.co.uk/fact_sheets/html/contraception.html
Try the fabulous Crown Skinless Skin Condom! - a 12 pack for $6.25 http://www.condomdepot.com/products/crown-skinless.htm
essentialsexinfo2@rock.com - 30 Jul 2005 09:00 GMT Risk of accidental pregnancy BEST case scenario assuming PERFECT use Per Year (assuming 100 sex acts) Per Act No protection 8 in 10 (1 in 1.25) 1 in 125 Condoms 1 in 50 1 in 5,000 Birth Control 1 in 333 1 in 33,300 Condoms & Birth Control 1 in 1,665,000 1 in 166,500,000*
Given 100,000,000 women of child bearing age (ages 14-59*), Unplanned pregnancies result: 100,000,000/1,665,000= 60
Risk of accidental pregnancy WORST case scenario assuming TYPICAL use Per Year (assuming 80 sex acts) Per Act No protection 8 in 10 (1 in 1.25) 1 in 125 Condoms 1 in 6.6 1 in 533 Birth Control 1 in 12.5 1 in 1,000 Condoms & Birth Control 1 in 6,666 1 in 533,333
533*1000=533,333 533,333/80=6,666 Unplanned pregnancies result: 100,000,000/6,666=15,000
Pregnancy rates of different contraceptives are from: Comparison Of Birth Control Effectiveness: Number of Pregnancies per 100 Women During First Year of Use http://www.plannedparenthood.org/pp2/portal/files/portal/medicalinfo/birthcontro l/pub-birth-control-02.xml & more info here: http://www.aafp.org/afp/20040215/853.html
Data does not say how many times couples are assumed to have sex, so based on information gathered elsewhere, I estimated 80-100 times to concoct best and worst case scenarios.
Currently there are an average 1 million abortions per year http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0764203.html http://www.nrlc.org/abortion/facts/abortionstats.html
48% of all U.S. pregnancies (and 78% of teen pregnancies) are an unplanned http://womensissues.about.com/cs/lifestyle/a/blunplannedpreg.htm
And 4 million new babies are born per year http://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/fertility/fert94/htab02.txt
The below statistics give you an idea of how much safer contraception makes us, and when compared to the numbers above, specifically how much safer two forms of contraception make us. Of course, not all women are having sex, so all estimates of unplanned pregnancy above and below are exaggerated.
unplanned pregnancies result with no contraception: 100,000,000/1.25 = 80,000,000 unplanned pregnancies result with condoms alone (perfect use): 100,000,000/50 = 2,000,000,000 (typical use) 100,000,000/6.667 = 15,000,000 unplanned pregnancies result with birth control alone (perfect use): 100,000,000/333= 300,300 (typical use) = 100,000,000/12.5 = 8,000,000
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.abortion/browse_thread/thread/4294a36767 d26f88/103d6b66f152db01?q=PROMOTING+BIRTH+CONTROL+%3D+LESS+ABORTION&rnum=1&hl=en #103d6b66f152db01
Rates of adolescent birth, abortion and pregnancy per year (per 1,000 women aged 15-19) and abortion ratio (per 100 pregnancies) by developed country, for the most recent year available
Country Birth rate Abortion rate Pregnancy rate Abortion ratio U.S. 54.4 29.2 83.6 34.9 Real #'s 544,000 292,000 836,000 291,764 10 million teen females http://www.baby-parenting.com/pregnancy/teen_pregnancy_statistics.html
*Calculation is derived as 5,000*33,300=166,500,000 *see census data http://www.census.gov/cgi-bin/ipc/idbpyrs.pl?cty=US&out=s&ymax=250a
Mark - 30 Jul 2005 09:19 GMT Would you please stop cross-posting this sh.t to rec.nude???
> Risk of accidental pregnancy BEST case scenario assuming PERFECT use > Per Year (assuming 100 sex acts) Per Act [quoted text clipped - 69 lines] > *see census data > http://www.census.gov/cgi-bin/ipc/idbpyrs.pl?cty=US&out=s&ymax=250a Sylvia Else - 30 Jul 2005 11:08 GMT > Specifically we should promote > the use of two forms of birth control - such as the pill, and condoms - > together, at the same time. People who are using two forms of birth control are presumably very wary of getting pregnant, and are likely to be taking more care with both forms of control than would typical people using just one form.
This is a form of self selection bias.
Sylvia.
Matt Beckwith - 31 Jul 2005 00:47 GMT > By not promoting > birth control, you're choosing unplanned pregnancies. This argument would only make sense to people with low IQ's, it seems to me.
If you believe that abortion is murder, then the above statements becomes, "By not promoting murder, you're choosing unplanned pregnancies."
Those who are against abortion believe it to be murder, so this argument will convince no one.
Sylvia Else - 31 Jul 2005 10:49 GMT >>By not promoting >>birth control, you're choosing unplanned pregnancies. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Those who are against abortion believe it to be murder, so this argument > will convince no one. Run that past me again. Start with
"By not promoting birth control, you're choosing unplanned pregnancies."
Now, it's the unplanned pregancies that lead to abortions, not the birth control. So substituting "abortion" for "unplanned pregnancies" we get:
"By not promoting birth control, you're choosing abortions."
Now substitute "murder" for "abortions", and we get:
"By not promoting birth control, you're choosing murder."
This is rather different from your claimed result of
"By not promoting murder, you're choosing unplanned pregnancies."
What was that about a low IQ?
Sylvia.
Jezebel - 01 Aug 2005 20:35 GMT Everyone missed the point of this post.
It's not to do with morality or ethics at all. It's actually a fairly clever SPAM tactic to get unsuspecting readers to look at the post and possibly increase sales of a product.
Hence the link to a condom website and crosspost to the nude newsgroup.
The more readers respond to the inflammatory comments, the more the link to their product gets viewed.
Cheers to the spammer for creativity.
(Not).
|
|
|