 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / General / General / July 2005CORRUPT Theory of Evolution vs. Intelligent Design.
The Theory of the Evolution of Man is the greatest farce ever perpetrated on mankind. There is not -- and never was -- any creditable facts and physical evidence linking mankind to any other animal that ever lived. It is a Fairy Tale gone mad. And just WHO is responsible? Why, obviously. the foremost scientific establishments in various countries and the countless number of physical anthropologists -- of all races and nationalities -- who fear opening their mouth out of fear of jeopardizing their vested interests. It's as simple as that. The so-called scientific discipline of physical anthropology -- and its related fields -- is a total sham, and it has been that way for many decades. < The so-called "scientists" --those who have made a mockery of the sacred name Science -- detest any facts or physical evidence that would show them for the phonies that they are. See, I've had head-to-head dealings with some of the most "prestigous" institutions -- the Smithsonian, for one -- and universities -- Penn, Penn State University and the University of California-Berkeley, for example -- and they want no parts of new discoveries that tend to upset their applecart. Their's is a caludron of lies, deceit, deception, collusion and conspiracy. Dr. Evil is their name. Yet, in the eyes of the public, they are considered Omnipotent, which explains why they are arrogance personified. Their day will come, though, and hopefully very soon. And I'd say Truth is moving in the right direction. These slimeballs and sleazeballs have made a mockery of sacred Science, but sacred Science may have the last laugh. > ============================================== < > HUMAN REMAINS FOUND BETWEEN COAL VEINS > (Meaning the Theory of Man's Evolution a Farce) > > ============================================== < > http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Au29/MVC-016S.JPG > http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z11calv.jpg > http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/z8femur.jpg > http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/z5gall.jpg > http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/newtibia.jpg > http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/skullb.jpg > http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/z9lung.jpg > http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/brain/MVC-001S.JPG > http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix5/MVC-002S.JPG > http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-006S.JPG > http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/1tooth.jpg > http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix3/z3dino.jpg > http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-013F.JPG > http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-012F.JPG > http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Day/MVC-005S.JPG > http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-001S.JPG > http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-010S.JPG > http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-020S.JPG > http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/SCORPIONS/MVC-039S.JPG > http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-003S.JPG > http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-005S.JPG < ============================================ > > BERLIN EXHIBIT < > > THE WORLD'S SMALLEST WOMAN -- > OR IS SHE AN EXTRATERRESTRIAL? The following photos show a female adult skeleton that measures only 14 cm (5.5 inches) in height and was discovered in South America. > http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/LittleWoman/MVC-004S.JPG > http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/LittleWoman/MVC-001S.JPG > http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/LittleWoman/MVC-003S.JPG > http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/LittleWoman/MVC-002S.JPG The miniature skeleton is the highlight of the "Unsolved Mysteries" exhibit currently on display in Berlin, along with the petrified bones found between coal veins and 300 more fascinating artifacts and fossils that the Scientific Establishment doesn't want you to see. >========================================== > > UNSOLVED MYSTERIES > Die Welt des Unerklarlichen > > Zentrum Kreuzberg > vis a vis U - Bahnstation Kottbusser Tor > Skalitzerstrasse 135, D-10999 Berlin > > Info Hotline: 0049-30-616-59 58-0 > > ========================================= (cc) talk.origins (since talk.origins is refusing to accept my postings, in direct violation of its charter and by-laws.) > WORLD'S LARGEST NEWSPAPERS 1. Yomiuri Shimbun (Japan) 14,532,694 2. Asahi Shimbun (Japan) 12,601,375 3. Sichuan Ribao (China) 8,000,000 4. Mainichi Shimbun (Japan) 5,845,857 5. Bild (Germany) 5,674,400 6. Chunichi Shimbun (Japan) 4,323,144 7. Sun (England) 3,718,354 8. Renmin Ribao (China) 3,000,000 9. Sankei Shimbun (Japan) 2,890,835 10. Nihon Keizai Shimbun (Japan) 2,705,877 11. Gongren Ribao (China) 2,500,000 12. Daily Mail (England) 2,387,867 13. Daily Mirror (England) 2,339,001 14. Chosun Ilbo (South Korea) 2,225,000 15. Dong-A Ilbo (South Korea) 2,150,000 16. Hokkaido Shimbun (Japan) 1,962,666 17. Eleftherotypia (Greece) 1,858,316 18. Xin Min Wan Bao (China) 1,750,000 19. Wall Street Journal (U>S>) 1,740,450 20. Yangcheng Wanbao (China ) 1,730,000 21. Kerala Kaumudi (India) 1,720,000 22. Wen Hui Bao Daily (China 1,700,000 23. USA Today (United States) 1,653,428 24. Joong-Ang Ilbo (South Korea) 1,550,000 25. Economic Daily (China) 1,500,000 26. Rodong Sinmun (North Korea) 1,500,000 27. Kyung-Hyang Daily News (South Korea) 1,478,537 28. Sports Nippon (Japan) 1,452,699 29. Shizuoka Shimbun (Japan) 1,442,310 30. Sankei Sports (Japan) 1,367,734 31. West Deutche Allgemeine (Germany) 1,313,400 32. United Daily News (Taiwan) 1,300,000 33. China Times (Taiwan) 1,270,000 34. O Estado de Sao Paulo (Brazil) 1,230,160 35. Jang Daily (Pakistan) 1,200,000 36. Jang Lahore (Pakistan) 1,200,000 37. Akhbar El Yom/Al Akhbar (Egypt) 1,159,339 38. Hankook Ilbo (South Korea) 1,156,000 39. Hochi Shimbun (Japan) 1,119,031 40. Daily Express (England) 1,118,981 41. Los Angeles Times (United States) 1,067,540 42. New York Times (United States) 1,066,540 43. Tokyo Shimbun (Japan) 1,062,080 44. Daily Telegraph (England) 1,047,861 45. Nishinippon Shimbun (Japan) 1,041,104 46. Jiefang Ribao (China) 1,000,000 47. Nanfang Ribao (China) 1,000,000 48. Nongmin Ribao (China) 1,000,000 49. Zhongguo Qingnian Ribao (China) 1,000,000 50. Nikkan Sports (Japan) 984,058 51. Al Akhbar (Egypt) 980,000 52. Guangming Ribao (China) 950,000 53. Al Ahram (Egypt) 900,000 54. Al Goumhouriya (Egypt) 900,000 55. Seoul Shinmun (South Korea) 900,000 56. Xin Hua Ribao (China) 900,000 57. Verdens Gang (Norway) 870,267 58. Corriere della Sera (Italy) 868,266 59. Kyoto Shimbun (Japan) 839,499 60. Chugoku Shimbun (Japan) 831,165 61. Jang (Pakistan) 820,000 62. Times of India (India) 813,000 63. Kobe Shimbun (Japan) 810,353 64. Beijing Wanbao (China) 800,000 65. Hubei Ribao (China) 800,000 66. Jiefangjun Ribao (China) 800,000 67. Trybuna Slaska (Poland) 800,000 68. La Gazzetta dello Sport (Italy) 798,243 69. Ouest-France (France) 790,133 70. Holos Ukrainy (Ukraine) 768,000 71. The Times (England) 766,999 72. ABC (Spain) 765,668 73. Washington Post (United States) 759,122 74. La Repubblica (Italy) 754,930 75. De Telegraf (Netherlands) 751,400 76. Gazeta Wyborcza (Poland) 750,000 77. Zero Hora (Brazil) 727,188 78. Diario dos Campos (Brazil) 725,000 79. New York Daily News (United States) 723,143 80. Sabah (Turkey) 722,950 81. Jornal da Tarde (Brazil) 709,793 82. Beijing Ribao (China) 700,000 83. Chongqing Ribao (China) 700,000 84. Clarin (Argentina) 700,000 85. Thai Rath (Thailand) 700,000 86. Zhejiang Ribao (China) 700,000 87. Diario Insular (Portugal) 684,143 88. Granma Internacional (Cuba) 675,000 89. Chicago Tribune (United States) 673,508 90. Daily Record (Scotland) 671,267 91. China Daily News (Taiwan) 670,000 92. The Daily Star (England) 650,406 93. Guangxi Ribao (China) 650,000 94. Malayala Manorama (India) 630,068 95. La Nacion (Argentina) 630,000 96. Hurriyet (Turkey) 615,579 97. Herald Sun (Australia) 600,000 98. Hurriyet (Pakistan) 600,000 99. Liaoning Ribao (China) 600,000 100. Oriental Daily News (Hong Kong) 600,000 Ed wrote: > The so-called "scientists" --those who have made a mockery > of the sacred name Science -- detest any facts or physical evidence > that would show them for the phonies that they are." You give no examples. For anyone who wants to learn about evolution, see http://nationalacademies.org/evolution/ > The Theory of the Evolution of Man is the greatest farce ever > perpetrated on mankind. [quoted text clipped - 42 lines] >> HUMAN REMAINS FOUND BETWEEN COAL VEINS >> (Meaning the Theory of Man's Evolution a Farce) Dear Mr Conrad, The so-called scientists, as you say, have for the most part no mind of their own, but as an oxen team, keep ploughing methodically along the same furrow as their predecessors. They put in this the same application as their forebears of the Flat Earth, of the Ptolemaic system, of the Phlogiston, of the Creation in 7 days 3650 BC etc How can you blame these poor people and belittle them the way you do ? They are honest, hard working and abiding to the rules and regulations of their respective sciences ! Are they not ? How can you be so harsh on such Pen pushing Slaves, who follow to the letter what they have been told to think ? Do you have only the least idea what could befall such Intellectual Slaves if they were to vary even by a iota of their sacred writings ??? Moral, mental, intellectual Crucifixion followed immediately by banishment from the scientific Community !!! Yes ! There is a common delusion in many people minds, this is that scientists are supposed to be free thinkers and free minded people ! ... able indeed to take decisions and orientation according to their conscience ! It is your delusion too Mr Conrad. You have discovered something strikingly important, and you ask these people to make a stand ! Really, dear Mr Conrad, you are completely deluded about that alleged science, or should I use the proper term Sci000nce ! Only True Geologists can understand the real value of your discoveries, and bring it in the right perspective of the proper genesis of Anthracite coal ! Indeed you datation for such is completely wrong for two reasons, fundamentally i.e regarding the origin of coal, and taking secondly as reference an Age Column which is the one of those very people you despise so much. This is a matter of coherence, indeed either you to practice the True Geology ( without having learnt it by the way ) and you Human remains are of course found in coal veins BUT those coal veins go back only to 12 000 years, OR you practice Orthodox sci000nce.... but you cannot have one foot in each camp. With kindest regards Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud Australia Mining Pioneer Exploration Geologist Discoverer and Legal Owner of Telfer, Nifty & Kintyre Mines The Great Sandy Desert of Australia Founder of the True Geology ~~ Ignorance Is The Cosmic Sin, The One Never Forgiven ! ~~ Someone needs to be more strict about keeping these posts on-topic and deleting off-topic posts. This group is about medical issues, and even if it were about evolution, there should be some substance to the posts. They don't have to be proven true, but they should show an attempt to contribute something that's either generally accepted or for which some half way decent argument is made or references are provided. > Someone needs to be more strict about keeping these posts on-topic and > deleting off-topic posts. This group is about medical issues, and even > if it were about evolution, there should be some substance to the > posts. They don't have to be proven true, but they should show an > attempt to contribute something that's either generally accepted or for > which some half way decent argument is made or references are provided. This is Usenet, not a single server with a person in charge... Unmoderated groups don't have a person to keep things on-topic or to delete posts. If these things annoy you (and I know they do, just like the rest of us), you'd best learn to use kill files and filters... That is the only solution, sorry. Jim Just like the common pub. Whatever can walk through the door. Up out of the caves and down out of the trees. They are part of the great experiment Homo sapiens. It impresses me just how much they can type with a straight jacket on. > Someone needs to be more strict about keeping these posts on-topic and > deleting off-topic posts. It's USENET. There is no (exactly zero, not approximately zero) content regulation. > This group is about medical issues, No it's not. You posted this message to all of the following groups : > sci.anthropology,sci.geo.geology,sci.astro,sci.med,sci.geo.earthquakes This is probably because the original message you were replying to was cross-posted to all of these groups to try to get a bigger audience and to create more disturbance. If you examine this message carefully you'll see that I've only sent it to sci.med, not to the other groups whose membership are probably more familiar with Ed Conrad's lunacy than the medics are. Your news-reading program should allow you to select which groups a message is sent to, a configuration tool you should become familiar with. ("G2" news reader? Not heard of that one.) By the way, should you choose to reply you'll need to manually add sci.geo.earthquakes back into the list because I don't read sci.med myself. (Also, I go out to sea tomorrow morning where I won't have any internet access. I'll be there for days to weeks.) > and even > if it were about evolution, there should be some substance to the > posts. They don't have to be proven true, but they should show an > attempt to contribute something that's either generally accepted or for > which some half way decent argument is made or references are provided. Ed Conrad (who I *think* is the original poster who's annoying you, judging from the style and content of the subject line) is a well-known internet kook. In medical terminology, he's delusional and paranoid, but apparently sub-clinical. I've not heard of anyone who's successfully had him confined to a mental institution, but he certainly needs professional assistance (probably in chemical form). But since he's not going to go away, the simplest thing to do is to kill-file him. Your news reader should have the facility to do that, but I've no idea how. My killfile has had Ed as a resident for years, which is why I don't see his posts. (I occasionally disable that rule, and Ed's messages pop back in to view. Which is amusing. Briefly. Then Ed goes back into the kill-file.) Welcome to USENET. It's a jungle in here.  SignatureAidan Karley, FGS Aberdeen, Scotland, Location: 57°10'11" N, 02°08'43" W (sub-tropical Aberdeen), 0.021233 G2 news reader is apparently what Google Groups calls its web-based news reader. I didn't want my mailbox filled up, so I'm viewing and responding from http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.med/browse_frm/thread/63d8ffc58e81d447/1 ab5afb576778710#1ab5afb576778710 . I'm still able to select which groups to reply to, so I'll have to do that when my reply is meant just for one group. Google provides a Report This Post link, so I figured the web based version I'm using is moderated. > > Someone needs to be more strict about keeping these posts on-topic and > > deleting off-topic posts. [quoted text clipped - 45 lines] > Aberdeen, Scotland, > Location: 57°10'11" N, 02°08'43" W (sub-tropical Aberdeen), 0.021233 >Someone needs to be more strict about keeping these posts on-topic and >deleting off-topic posts. This group is about medical issues, Not for me it's not. But it's posted to all these groups: sci.anthropology, sci.geo.geology, sci.astro, sci.med, sci.geo.earthquakes >and even >if it were about evolution, there should be some substance to the >posts. They don't have to be proven true, but they should show an >attempt to contribute something that's either generally accepted or for >which some half way decent argument is made or references are provided. Thanks for the advice. ************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen@cox.net) ************* * Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow * * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps * > Someone needs to be more strict about keeping these posts on-topic and > deleting off-topic posts. This group is about medical issues, and even > if it were about evolution, there should be some substance to the > posts. They don't have to be proven true, but they should show an > attempt to contribute something that's either generally accepted or for > which some half way decent argument is made or references are provided. Barry - you posted to 5 newsgroups. While you do not seem to be a kook or troll; "Someone needs to be more strict about keeping these poste on-topic". Jim Lillie in sci.geo.geology > Barry - you posted to 5 newsgroups. > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Jim Lillie in sci.geo.geology I posted the following to sci.med just before you replied. I guess I should have posted that one to all five groups. Barry wrote: > G2 news reader is apparently what Google Groups calls its web-based > news reader. I didn't want my mailbox filled up, so I'm viewing and [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Report This Post link, so I figured the web based version I'm using is > moderated. Hey, geology guys - do something about those volcanic super-eruptions. "They could result in the devastation of world agriculture, severe disruption of food supplies, and mass starvation. These effects could be sufficiently severe to threaten the fabric of civilisation." I found a picture of Mr. Conrad if anybody is interested. :)~ http://www.apple2.org.za/gswv/me/Pepperhead.jpg [SNIP] Evolution, IS intelligent design - in fact it is so difficult to design a working evolutionary system that such systems are still largely all talk and precious little working code amongst "organic" programmers - these programmers are intent upon creating programs that evolve rather than having to be written line by line. That makes the grossly inefficient alternative to evolutionary design processes pretty stupid really. SignatureTimothy Casey GPEMC! >> 11950 is the number@fieldcraft.biz 2email Terms & conditions apply. See www.fieldcraft.biz/GPEMC Discover valid interoperable web menus, IE security, TSR Control, & the most advanced speed reading application @ www.fieldcraft.biz [snip tripe] I'm sorry, but every time I've ever seen anyone attempt to tout the Intelligent Design Theory, they've always without exception had a religious agenda. You absolutely _cannot_ make any sort of claims objectively if you have a prior agenda, this true throughout science. So please, tell us, if you believe in Intelligent Design, who are you saying created us? Aliens maybe? Because honestly that sounds a lot less kooky than an omnipotent being such as is outlined in the Bible. The only reason anyone it seems anyone pushes "Intelligent Design" is because it makes them feel more comfortable as a Christian. Well guess what, the truth hurts. Notions like the World being created in six-to-seven days fall apart under scrutiny. You think the Church is some infallible, perfect, organization and that the bible- or at least the bible after its been put through a wacky new age decoder ring- is 100% accurate in every detail? The Church of Rome is an organization that took 400 years to apologize for persecuting Galileo for daring to suggest that the Earth is not at the center of the Universe, and is an organization that never once condemned slavery while it was still a widespread practice. And do you really believe that Jonah stayed in a whale's belly for three days in a few feet of intestinal tract without air? The fact is numerous, numerous indigenous and major religions throughout the World have creation stories. The one associated with Christianity only became so popular because Christianity itself became so popular. The more I read about evolution, the _more_ convinced I have become, for over a decade now, that it is indeed not just an amazingly sound theory, but a fundamental truth of reality in general. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.