Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / General / July 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Support Growing for ED CONRAD.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Ed Conrad - 18 Jun 2005 12:53 GMT
<
<
On Sept. 6, 1996, Ron Cittesiano wrote to talk.origins
and alt.catastrophism:

Beneath the Header:
<
>>>> "ED CONRAD WILL WIN IN THE LONG RUN." <<<<
<
> http://www.edconrad.com/canals/newtibia2.jpg
<
> http://www.edconrad.com/canals/sem.jpg
<
> http://www.edconrad.com/canals/index.html
<
<
Mr. Cittesiano wrote:
<
> The SEM image makes it clear to anyone not blinded
> by evolutionism that Mr. Conrad has found a bone,
> a human bone.

(Response from a vested-interest Scientific
Establishment fool):
<
>> Not without a similar image at same magnification
>> of an object that everyone agrees is a rock. What
>> if the SEM image of Conrad's sample looks more lke
>> a rock than it ooks like a bone? There's no control,
>> at least none that I could find, so the comparison
>> is totally worthless.
<
Mr. Cittesiano continued to write:
<
> If you (Mr. Conrad) persevere, you will be remembered
> in the history and science books as the man who ended
> the dark ages of evolutionism and ushered in a new era
> of scientific enlightenment.

(Back to vested-interest Pseuoscientific Establishment fool):
<
>> No he won't. He may be right, but with the sloppy
>> and unprofessional work that Ed Conrad does, he will
>> never earn a reputation as you describe. Maybe some
>> researcher, who knows enough to include controls
>> for comparison, will make the case one day. But all
>> Ed Conrad is doing is wasting his time. If ever it's
>> proven that humans lived in the carboniferous, Ed
>> Conrad's name will probably not be mentioned, or
>> it will appear only in a footnote that says "This
>> idea was claimed by Ed Conrad in the 1990s, but
>> shoddy methodology prevented its widespread
>> acceptance until proper work was done in 2015."
<
Mr. Cittesiano fires the knockout punch when he wrote::
<
> Great discoveries in science are often greeted
> by scorn at first, but don't let the shouts
> of the close-minded deter you from your quest
> for the truth.

Thanks for the kind words, Mr. Cittesiano.
<
Better late than never (this Thank You).
<
Now WHO says I don't have any backers?

<
=====================
<
Mr. Cittesiano, if you're still alive, here are
some of the other petrified bones, teeth and soft
organs -- some human -- found between anthracite
veins:
<
>   OLDEST HUMAN SKULL EVER FOUND
<
> http://www.edconrad.com/images/z11calv.jpg
>
> http://www.edconrad.com/images/krogwskull.jpg

Wilton Krogman, one of the world's foremost experts
on human anatomy,holds what he had identified as
a petrified human calvarium, a skull with the eye
sockets broken off, that was discovered between Penna's
anthracite veins. He is shown at his desk at the Cooper
Clinic in Lancaster, Pa., where moments later he
beckoned a colleague -- a medical doctor -- to examine
"the oldest human skull ever found."
<
A CATscan was performed on this specimen with
favorable results.
<
> http://www.edconrad.com/images/catcalv.jpg
<
Meanwhile, Haversian canals were identified in the cell
structure, the tell-tale sign of bone. And dried blood
was found on the specimen during testing at American
MedicalLaboratories in Chantilly, Va.
<
This is the official report from AML which had performed
Calculus Analysis by Crystallography. The final report,
dated April 21, 2000," was issued by Dr. Nathan Sherman,
director of laboratories.
<
>>> "The specimen consists of 1 irregularly
>>>  shaped, brown calculus weighing less
>>>  than 0.0010 grams and measuring 1X1X0.5
>>>  mm. No nidus is observed. The calculi
>>>  indicates a composition of dried blood
>>>  intermingled with a few small crystals
>>>  resembling calcium oxalate dihydrate."
>
> http://www.edconrad.com/images/z12calv.jpg
> http://www.edconrad.com/images/z13cav.jpg
>
> =========================================
>
>          AND THE BEAT GOES ON . . .
<
Here's a petrified human femur still embedded in slate.
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/z8femur.jpg
<
Here's a petrified human finger, with fingernail:
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/FINGER/MVC-008S.JPG
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/FINGER/MVC-011S.JPG
<
Here's a petrified human toe (with toe nail), found only
10-15 feet from the petrified finger.
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Au29/MVC-017S.JPG
<
Here are the petrified human finger and the petrified
human toe shown together.
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Au29/MVC-016S.JP
<

This is the boulder containing the complete human skull.
Testing has confirmed the presence of Haversian canals
and American Medical Laboratories discovered it contains
dried blood.
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/skullb.jpg
<
Here's a petrified human mandible (frontal).
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix5/MVC-002S.JPG
<
Here's a portion of a human mandible (side).
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-006S.JPG
<
Here's a giant petrified tooth.
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/1tooth.jpg
<
Here's a petrified dinosaur foot still embedded in slate.
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix3/z3dino.jpg
<
Here's a petrified fetus of some large animal.
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-013F.JPG
<
Here's another petrified fetus, still embedded in slate.
>  http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Day/MVC-005S.JPG
>
>Here are several views of a portion of a giant prehistoric
>scorpion identified as such by Krogman.
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-001S.JPG
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-010S.JPG
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-020S.JPG
>
>Here's a photo of the same portion of a petrified giant
>scorpion -- found 22 years ago -- alongside one found
>just weeks ago.
>>>>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/SCORPIONS/MVC-039S.JPG
>
>Here are two views of a piece of wood that appears to
> to have been andcarved for use as a tool or a weapon.
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-003S.JPG
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-005S.JPG

(And there are a whole lot more...)
<
>> Ed Conrad
>  http://www.edconrad.com
<
<  Man as Old as Coal
<
<
HOLD IT! There's more...
<
<
On March 6, 1997, Michael D. Painter (mpainter@maxinet.com)
wrote to talk.origins:
<
Mr. Ed claims that science has some great fear of admitting
his rocks are bones. He has a few other ideas that he claims
science tries to surpress but the rocks are the biggest.
<
After watching the Nova show on the fairly recent realization
that asteroids can hit the earth and do great damage, it
occured to me that it must be a personal vendetta against
him rather than a general hiding of the truth.
<
Either that or he is crazy.
<
In the scheme of things so many "absolute facts" have been
overturned this century that even if his rocks were bones,
it would be a small discovery.
<
Solid state physics, flight, relativity, contentional
drift, asteroid impact and many other finds have changed
our world view far in excess of some fanciful story
about man being older than what is known.
<
>Editorial Comment:
>(I think an avalanche has begun.)
<    
Stan de SD - 22 Jul 2005 03:14 GMT
You mean support for commitment to an asylum, right?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.