>> looked into this. The test of choice to rule out CSF rhinorrhea is to
determine the presence of beta2 transferrin in the drainage. It is
always
present in CSF, never present in other secretions. Your local lab would
need
at least 0.5 cc of nasal fluid as well as a couple of CCs of blood. It
would
be cheaper than a CT scan or MRI, and probably more specific. <<
COMMENT:
Agree! There are all kinds of ways you can have a small crack enough
to leak CSF, and never even be able to see it on CT. So they'll end up
doing chemistries on the fluid even if the CT is negative. Duh. Which
means why not do the chemistry first to save the money of a CT (if it
IS negative)? Answer: because nobody advising about the CT decision is
PAYING FOR THE THING. If it was the *doctor's* money he had to pay out
of pocket, he'd have done the same 5 min medline search Dr. McCollister
just did, methinks. But it's not.
Advice to patient: if you really are going to pay out of pocket for the
radiology, demand the definitive chemistry first. That being said, I
can't think of any way you're going to have glucose that high if it's
not CSF. But who knows? These test strips aren't perfect, and aren't
made to measure glucoses at levels this low.
SBH
fake_fake_666@yahoo.com - 18 Jun 2005 02:25 GMT
Ya, looking at the images from the CT Scan, there's no way a tiny leak
would show up. Not only that, but statistically (according to info
found on the net) most mild cases of fractures and CSF leaks heal on
their own with time.
The glucometer is pretty accurate, I believe it goes down to around
20mg/dl and anything below that is 0. That's why I did repetitive
testing over the course of a week. In the last instance I performed 3
readings one right after the other, and got 45, 50, 50.
Chemistry looks like the way to go. Why then do I read of these tests
where they insert dye into the CSF through the spine, and you keep
cotton stuffed up your nose for a long time?
Anyways, part of my reason for doing the CT Scan was to see that I had
a brain. It turns out, while the images show a brain, I have none since
I went through with the test rather than being smart about it.
The physician didn't even know that nasal secretions don't have glucose
or what the normal CSF levels are.
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 18 Jun 2005 03:52 GMT
>>Anyways, part of my reason for doing the CT Scan was to see that I had
a brain. It turns out, while the images show a brain, I have none since
I went through with the test rather than being smart about it.
The physician didn't even know that nasal secretions don't have glucose
or what the normal CSF levels are. <<
COMMENT:
LOL. Don't feel bad about it. Why, anybody can have a brain. That's a
very mediocre commodity. Every pusillanimous creature that crawls on
the Earth or slinks through slimy seas has a brain. Back where I come
from, we have universities, seats of great learning, where men go to
become great thinkers. And when they come out, they think deep thoughts
and with no more brains than you have. But they have one thing you
haven't got: a diploma.
-- The Man Behind the Curtain
Thanks but too late, I already went. It wasn't an enjoyable experience
and I have buyers remorse. I imagine when the report comes in the doc
will want another appointment just to tell me they found nothing.
P.S. - Physician was interested in hearing what your advice was. I said
it was to go to the ER and get a CT Scan. Maybe that is why mine was
scheduled. ;)