"It's an epidemic brought on by the social epidemics."
Monica I.

"Have you been diagnosed?  Are your quirks tolerated because you have
status in any realm and you are undiagnosed or you have been diagnosed
but have run away from the doctor in denial due to the social epidemic
of what they choose to ignore"  "Keep them homeless they say or swindle
them out of their life achievments of monetary value"
Yadda Yadda Yadda

optional rant to ignore.

Or do I care?

The third category is by far the most interesting from a psychological,
social, political and psychiatric point of view, notwhitstanding the
inherent interest as per neurobiology, chemical and systems points of
view of the working brain (the individual, indeed). By assuming an
individual or concerted attack on an individual to the point of
convince him/her of displaying weird behaviours, any and all of the
classical psychiatric disorders can be explained by the application of
a few principles of suggestion and basic psycological manipulation
(this was already exposed in "There are Four GENEMELS", on of the posts
the disgusting drug addicts that have been hunting me from Mexico might
have already published as being theirs... this is disgusting, isn't
it?).

The main point to take into consideration, besides the simple fact of
direct mind communication, (or indirect, as the medium of transmission
doesn't matter but just the effect of being non-mechanical
communication), is that the aberrant behaviour expressed in many of the
classical psychiatric illnesses is that *THEY HAVE LITTLE JUSTIFICATION
UNDER A SYSTEMIC APPROACH TO BRAIN AND INTELLIGENCE ARCHITECTURE*. The
hypothesis that a complex and so delicately balanced yet plastic system
fails always along the same basic lines and gives way to the same
behaviours is simply naive, particularly since those behaviours don't
have an underlying sustainance on an evolutive and loss of survival
advantages basis! Usually the "failure" allows the individual to live
in a society *without laws*, though it is the moment it is confronted
with the social structure that the illness is exposed. The exception
would be suicide, which terminates the life of the individual and can
therefore be diffiult to consider even an illness (much less a murder)
but a catastrophic event for which there are no real explanations,
besides the fact that survivors are usually individuals *under self
control*, whose only failure is to want to terminate their lives! A
depressed individual or a totally failed brain (with the exception of
some extraordinary automatism!) don't have the control to commit
suicide except by pure omission, and it must be taken into account that
depression is basically a chemical illness, being within the normal
functionality of the individual to experiment sadness and happiness
(both emotions playing to basic role of guiding Reason). Yet mass
suicide is avery commonly observed *consensual and consented*
phenomenon, since the famous Massada suicide (political), to the last
"asteroid coming" sects' suicides! It is this last phenomenon which
serves as further evidence that suicide, taken as a possible exception
and motivating example, is not a real illness or the result of a
dysfunction but instead is *motivated behaviour*, being irrelevant the
channel through which motivation convinced the individual as the
*ACTUAL METHOD OF CONVICTION* is more important as an object of study,
more hypothetical (assumed) that observed. It is convenient at this
point to say that in order to convince a minimally rational individual
to commit suicide some kind of credible reward must be offered, whether
it is a better afterlife (believers) or diminished pain (fear of the
future, torment), oterwise a biological being won't find a reason to
commit suicide (this point of view can be commented more extensively
further)...