Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / General / June 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

spread of polio to yemen and indonesia

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
zee - 06 Jun 2005 17:06 GMT
Yemen

As of May 24, 2005, the World Health Organization has confirmed 88
cases of polio in Yemen. Cases have been recorded in several areas,
including Hodeidah, Sana'a, Taiz, Hajjah, and Hadramaut. The viral
strain has been identified as wild poliovirus type-1 and has been
genetically linked to poliovirus circulating in Sudan, which originated
in Nigeria. Yemen had been polio-free since 1996, when surveillance
first began.

Indonesia

On May 2, 2005, Indonesia reported its first wild poliovirus case since
1995. The World Health Organization (WHO) confirmed a single case of
wild poliovirus type 1, from an acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) case, in
Giri Jaya village, Sukabumi District, West Java, Indonesia. As of May
24, 2005, 13 additional cases have been confirmed, bringing
Indonesia's total to 14 cases. The virus, genetically linked to
poliovirus originating in Nigeria, travelled to Indonesia through
Sudan.

Global Polio Situation

In 2005, between January 01 and May 24, 233 cases of poliovirus have
been confirmed in the following countries: Yemen (88), Nigeria (77),
Sudan (25), Indonesia (14), India (14), Pakistan (7), Ethiopia (5),
Afghanistan (1), Niger (1), and Cameroon (1).

Worldwide, polio remains endemic (constantly present) in six countries:
Nigeria, India, Pakistan, Niger, Afghanistan, and Egypt.

2004 Facts and Figures

As of May 24, 2005, a total of 1,265 cases of polio were reported in 18
countries for 2004. This figure represents a 61% increase over the 784
cases reported for 2003. The increase is attributed to a decrease in
immunization activity in sub-Saharan Africa.

In November 2004, the World Health Organization reported that, in 2004,
sub-Saharan Africa experienced epidemic poliomyelitis when, from August
2003 to July 2004, the state of Kano, Nigeria, halted immunization
against the disease, and some neighbouring countries had low routine
immunization coverage. As a result, several African countries (Benin,
Chad, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, the Central African Republic, Côte
d'Ivoire, Ghana, Guinea, Mali, Togo, Sudan and Botswana in southern
Africa) that had been polio free, reported imported cases of polio -
all linked to wild polio-virus circulating in Northern Nigeria. Polio
has since become re-established (that is, continued circulation for
more than 6 months) in four of these countries - Sudan, Cote d'Ivoire,
Chad and Burkina Faso.

http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/tmp-pmv/2005/polio050527_e.html
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 07 Jun 2005 03:40 GMT
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/3313419.stm

In November 2004, the World Health Organization reported that, in 2004,

sub-Saharan Africa experienced epidemic poliomyelitis when, from August

2003 to July 2004, the state of Kano, Nigeria, halted immunization
against the disease, and some neighbouring countries had low routine
immunization coverage. As a result, several African countries (Benin,
Chad, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, the Central African Republic, Côte
d'Ivoire, Ghana, Guinea, Mali, Togo, Sudan and Botswana in southern
Africa) that had been polio free, reported imported cases of polio -
all linked to wild polio-virus circulating in Northern Nigeria. Polio
has since become re-established (that is, continued circulation for
more than 6 months) in four of these countries - Sudan, Cote d'Ivoire,
Chad and Burkina Faso.

COMMENT:

As I said, religious nuttery. Islamic leaders in Nigeria told their
followers that the US, intent on depopulating the developing world, had
put anti-fertility drugs in the vaccine. The Nigerian government had
tested it, but the state of Kano in Nigeria refused it. Thus starting a
new polio epidemic which has since spread to much of the rest of
Africa, just when wild polio was nearly under control.

http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/tmp­-pmv/2005/polio050527_e.html

I myself think we have a cause to treat such rogue nations as Nigeria
at the national level as we treated Iraq with far less reason, justice,
and provocation.

Here is Nigeria (or a portion of it), engaged in actual germ warfare
with the rest of the world as a result of Islamic propaganda, and we
totally ignored it for a country which we said we thought MIGHT do such
a thing. Apparently, if your country ships oil to the US, your people
can get away with any international act of terror they like.
Afghanistan and Iraq's problem was merely that they weren't pumping to
the US. Nigeria, like Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, was.

Of course, Nigerians themselves suffer when they use their own bodies
to breed polio for the rest of us. Suicide bombers suffer also.
Self-destruction in the furtherance of jihad is an old Muslim
tradition. There is an argument that countries which willfully do this,
whether self-destructively or not, should simply be quaranteened.
Nobody and no goods come out, til they come to their senses. The
Israelis had to threaten to do it to the Palesitinians. It really does
work, if you're willing to back it up.

Of course, that would be seen as an act of war if we did it to Nigeria.
But it's international war, one way or the other. You either get
conventional warfare, or you get terrorist warfare, or you get
biowarfare. Pick which one you want to fight.

(Anything but Iraq!  You can't escape war, but you can certainly escape
fighting the WRONG war. My, but invading Iraq was stupid.)  

SBH
outrider - 07 Jun 2005 05:17 GMT
It's madness of course. Madness, and nuttiness.

But it's not religious nuttiness so much as sexist nuttiness. This is
about the ownership of women's bodies by men. How it's expressed here
is unique to the culture no doubt. But it's still sexism, not Islam.

Zee

> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/3313419.stm
>
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
>
> SBH
Carey Gregory - 07 Jun 2005 07:54 GMT
> But it's still sexism, not Islam.

What's the difference?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.