> It seems prudent not to measure oxytocin. Why would want to turn someone
> away on the basis of a lab test that is not 100% accurate.
>
> Jeff
>> It seems prudent not to measure oxytocin. Why would want to turn someone
>> away on the basis of a lab test that is not 100% accurate.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Not 100% accurate at what? Measing the level of oxytocin or predicting
> outcomes?
Both, actually. Especially because this has never been tested in humans to
determine female bonding based on oxytocin levels.
> If you mean the latter, then of course no single factor is determinative.
> However there's no reason it shouldn't factor into the decision to wed. We
> intuitively evaluate all sorts of factors about our prospective spouse,
> why not clinicaly determine the levels of a hormone that plays a
> signifigant role in forming life long relationships?
Because you already are in a long-term relationships. So you really need to
evaluate the usefulness of using the levels of the hormones to predict
whether or not a relationship that is already long-term will break up
later.
I think you are barking up the wrong tree.
Jeff