Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / General / June 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Safety of anal intercourse.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jim Spriggs - 23 May 2005 21:16 GMT
How deeply may a woman be safely penetrated during anal intercourse?
Jason - 23 May 2005 23:05 GMT
> How deeply may a woman be safely penetrated during anal intercourse?

Anal intercouse is not safe for the woman. I worked with someone several
years ago that was once employed in a health clinic that treated AIDs
patients. Many of the patients had to wear diapers because the muscles in
their anus no longer worked the way they normally work in most people. One
of the doctors told him that this was because they had anal intercouse so
much that the muscles were damaged and no longer worked. I don't know the
results if a woman rarely had anal sex.

Signature

NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.

Twittering One - 24 May 2005 08:18 GMT
"Anal intercouse is not safe for the woman.
I worked with someone
Several years ago who was once employed
In a health clinic
That treated AIDs patients."
~ PF

"O,
Tell her Hey ~ !
Belleview, O, yes, we know her, too."
~ Folly

"Many of the patients had to wear diapers
Because the muscles
In their anus no longer worked
The way they normally work
In most people."
~ PF

"Loose lips
Sink ships."
~ Twittering

"Loose lips lick,
Too, but know ~ Plump ripened ones, O, so much better
To lick you, too ~ !"
~ Folly

"Folly,
Behave."
~ Twittering
Peter Jason - 09 Jun 2005 05:04 GMT
> "Anal intercouse is not safe for the woman.
> I worked with someone
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> Behave."
> ~ Twittering

You are copying the style of That Bitch Gertie Stein.
O Shame........
Where is thy blush.!..?


PF Riley - 24 May 2005 06:46 GMT
>How deeply may a woman be safely penetrated during anal intercourse?

Just try not to go past the splenic flexure.

PF
Twittering One - 24 May 2005 08:11 GMT
"Safety of anal intercourse ~

How deeply may a woman
Be safely penetrated during anal intercourse?"
~ Briggs

"I say,
Go no more
Than 6 ~ 7 centimneters. Hope
That helps. O, yes, Astro ~ Lube, to cope."
~ Twittering

"... or, If you see Kay,
Ask for KY, too."
~ Folly
Twittering One - 24 May 2005 08:22 GMT
"... O, please, if you see
Astrobabe, tell her our legal concerns
Need serious attention.
Merci."
~ Twittering
Peter Jason - 09 Jun 2005 05:06 GMT
> "Safety of anal intercourse ~
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Ask for KY, too."
> ~ Folly

Does anyone know the address of  Linda Lovelace;  she might know.
Twittering One - 09 Jun 2005 05:10 GMT
"Does anyone know the address
of  Linda Lovelace;  she might know."

I am not laughing.
And I am sick of jokes.
Twittering One - 09 Jun 2005 05:12 GMT
Your ugliness is repugnant.
David Wright - 09 Jun 2005 05:19 GMT
>> "Safety of anal intercourse ~
>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
>Does anyone know the address of  Linda Lovelace;  she might know.

Linda Lovelace died in 2002 (car crash).

 -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
      "Are you going to come quietly, or do I have to use earplugs?"
                                       -- The Goon Show
Happy Dog - 09 Jun 2005 07:01 GMT
"David Wright" <wright@l1000.prodigy.net>
>>Does anyone know the address of  Linda Lovelace;  she might know.
>
> Linda Lovelace died in 2002 (car crash).

Then it's one of two places.

moo
Jim Spriggs - 24 May 2005 21:17 GMT
> >How deeply may a woman be safely penetrated during anal intercourse?
>
> Just try not to go past the splenic flexure.

Excuse my ignorance, but what's that?
Jason - 25 May 2005 01:11 GMT
> > >How deeply may a woman be safely penetrated during anal intercourse?
> >
> > Just try not to go past the splenic flexure.
>
> Excuse my ignorance, but what's that?

It's my guess that they person was just trying to be funny. I have taken
college courses related to biology and never heard such words.

It's my guess that they the typical woman will let you know if she is
feeling pain. In fact, you should tell her to let you know if she feels
any pain. If she tells you that she is feeling pain--that is how far she
can be safely penetrated.

Signature

NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.

Tom Salls - 25 May 2005 19:07 GMT
jason@nospam.com wrote:
> In article <42938BF2.481932B5@ANTISPAMbtinternet.com.invalid>, Jim Spriggs
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> It's my guess that they person was just trying to be funny. I have taken
> college courses related to biology and never heard such words.

Then you might want to retake that part of the course relating to the
colon.
Anonymous - 25 May 2005 20:20 GMT
For Splenic Flexure of Transverse Colon see http://tinyurl.com/9mvec

Signature

Anonymous
-----------------------------------------------------
Work harder. Millions on benefits are relying on you!
-----------------------------------------------------

Twittering One - 25 May 2005 20:31 GMT
Safety of anal intercourse ~ ?

Who's askin' us ~ ?
Who's fuckin' us ~ ?
______

Anonymous
-----------------------------------------------------
Work harder. Millions on benefits are relying on you!
-----------------------------------------------------

Twittering
-----------------------------------------------------
I'm Tired. Exhaustion Is a State We Live!
-----------------------------------------------------

~ * ~
Blog, or dog? Who knows.
But if you see my lost pup, please bring him home!
I got Leon a brand-new bone.
_________________
http://journals.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo
Jason - 26 May 2005 17:50 GMT
> For Splenic Flexure of Transverse Colon see http://tinyurl.com/9mvec

Thanks---there are probably lots of medical terms that I have not seen
before. I learned another such term last week--Hyperkalemia. It simply
means higher than normal levels of potassium in the bloodstream. It would
make more sense to me if the word was hyperpotassium. I thought the person
was joking because he should have defined the words or term when he made
the post or at least the following day when the original poster asked him
to define the term.

Signature

NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.

Robert A. Fink, M. D. - 26 May 2005 21:42 GMT
>It would
>make more sense to me if the word was hyperpotassium.

That would only be true if the scientific symbol for patassium wasn't
"K", from the Latin "Kalium".  The term "hyperkalemia" is one which is
used by scientific types, so it is not unexpected that they would use
a scientific term.

Best,

Bob

Robert A. Fink, M. D.
Neurological Surgery
2500 Milvia Street  Suite 222
Berkeley, CA  94704-2636  USA
510-849-2555

**********************************
NOTE:  The material above is not "medical
advice".  Medical advice can only be
given after an in-person contact between
doctor and patient.
**********************************
David Wright - 27 May 2005 03:51 GMT
>> For Splenic Flexure of Transverse Colon see http://tinyurl.com/9mvec
>
>Thanks---there are probably lots of medical terms that I have not seen
>before. I learned another such term last week--Hyperkalemia.

It's little gems like this that illustrate why nobody should ever take
medical advice from jason.  I mean, *I* knew the term and I'm not a
doctor and I never had any sort of medical education.  Jason claims
he has a medical background, but he didn't know the term.  Draw your
own conclusions.

 -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
      "I don't need someone to tell me that George W. Bush is a
       deceitful, corrupt, clever and destructive man--that's pretty
       clear on the face of it."  -- Garrison Keillor
Jason - 27 May 2005 06:29 GMT
> >> For Splenic Flexure of Transverse Colon see http://tinyurl.com/9mvec
> >
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>         deceitful, corrupt, clever and destructive man--that's pretty
>         clear on the face of it."  -- Garrison Keillor

David,
I have never claimed to be a doctor or have any degrees related to
medicine. However, I have a M.A. degree and have taken various courses
related to various medical problems. I have worked with doctors and nurses
as they treated sick people. David, are you a doctor?
Jason

Signature

NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.

Carey Gregory - 27 May 2005 07:26 GMT
>I have worked with doctors and nurses
>as they treated sick people.

And you heard the word "hyperkalemia" just last week?

Bullshit.
PF Riley - 29 May 2005 06:14 GMT
>>I have worked with doctors and nurses
>>as they treated sick people.
>
>And you heard the word "hyperkalemia" just last week?
>
>Bullshit.

Hearing != Listening

PF
David Wright - 28 May 2005 04:44 GMT
>> >In article <4294cfe6@212.67.96.135>, "Anonymous" <anonymous@nospam.net>
>wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>related to various medical problems. I have worked with doctors and nurses
>as they treated sick people. David, are you a doctor?

Jason, this is just another example of your low level of cluefulness.
Take another look at what I wrote.  See the part where it says "I'm
not a doctor"?

 -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
      "I don't need someone to tell me that George W. Bush is a
       deceitful, corrupt, clever and destructive man--that's pretty
       clear on the face of it."  -- Garrison Keillor
Twittering One - 09 Jun 2005 17:18 GMT
I just hope the FBI takes complaints seriously.
Jim Spriggs - 27 May 2005 16:35 GMT
> >> For Splenic Flexure of Transverse Colon see http://tinyurl.com/9mvec
> >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> It's little gems like this that illustrate why nobody should ever take
> medical advice from jason.  

Don't worry.  I take advise from newsgroups (not just this one) only so
far as I can check it against other sources.  

Thanks to everyone who replied to my op.
Jason - 27 May 2005 22:59 GMT
> > >> For Splenic Flexure of Transverse Colon see http://tinyurl.com/9mvec
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Thanks to everyone who replied to my op.

Jim,
Thanks for the support. I am a lot like you. Just because someone gives me
medical advice in a newsgroup, I don't take it unless I can confirm it
from other sources. I hope that all people do the same as us.
Jason.

Signature

NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.

Peter Jason - 09 Jun 2005 05:09 GMT
>> > >In article <4294cfe6@212.67.96.135>, "Anonymous"
> <anonymous@nospam.net> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> from other sources. I hope that all people do the same as us.
> Jason.

Why dosn't someone ask an enema nurse?
Jason - 09 Jun 2005 16:47 GMT
> >> > >In article <4294cfe6@212.67.96.135>, "Anonymous"
> > <anonymous@nospam.net> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Why dosn't someone ask an enema nurse?

Great--I was in a grocery store and noticed the name label
on the cashier. It said, "Front Manager". I asked her
what the manager of the workers at the loading dock at
the REAR of the store was called. She laughed and said that
it was NOT "REAR MANAGER".

Signature

NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.

Carey Gregory - 27 May 2005 06:42 GMT
>Thanks---there are probably lots of medical terms that I have not seen
>before. I learned another such term last week--Hyperkalemia.

Page 2 is chock full of new words.

>I thought the person
>was joking because he should have defined the words or term when he made
>the post or at least the following day when the original poster asked him
>to define the term.

Anyone who uses the word wouldn't expect that you need them to define it for
you.  There are these things called books.  And search engines.  Marvelous
inventions.  You should try them sometime.
Jason - 27 May 2005 23:09 GMT
> >Thanks---there are probably lots of medical terms that I have not seen
> >before. I learned another such term last week--Hyperkalemia.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> you.  There are these things called books.  And search engines.  Marvelous
> inventions.  You should try them sometime.

I now realize that some people are really shocked when people don't know
what every medication is used for or the meaning of every medical term.
I'll consider buying a medical dictionary so that various people don't
have to get upset. I did notice that the best response was from a doctor
that did not criticize me but actually explained why the word is
hyperkalemia instead of hyperpotassium. He was a true professional unlike
some of the other people that posted their opinions.

Signature

NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.

Carey Gregory - 28 May 2005 08:11 GMT
>I now realize that some people are really shocked when people don't know
>what every medication is used for or the meaning of every medical term.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>hyperkalemia instead of hyperpotassium. He was a true professional unlike
>some of the other people that posted their opinions.

Fine, then why don't you provide us with a list of words you don't know but
are willing to discuss as if you do.  We'll do your homework for you and
show you where to find the definitions.  This should save all of us a lot of
time.
Tom Salls - 28 May 2005 12:49 GMT
jason@nospam.com wrote:
> I now realize that some people are really shocked when people don't know
> what every medication is used for or the meaning of every medical term.
> I'll consider buying a medical dictionary so that various people don't
> have to get upset

I think it's more that people are shocked that someone who doesn't
understand basic medical terms (or doesn't have enough sense to look
them up) is giving out medical advice to people who may assume that he
knows what he's talking about.
Jason - 28 May 2005 18:52 GMT
> jason@nospam.com wrote:
> > I now realize that some people are really shocked when people don't know
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> them up) is giving out medical advice to people who may assume that he
> knows what he's talking about.

It's great to be part of a newsgroup where everyone is a doctor or knows
the meaning of all medical terms and knows what every medication is used
for. It's a great place to get advice. I have noticed that no one responds
to some of the people that request advice. Now I know the reason--people
are afraid that people like you will tell them they should not try help
people unless they are doctors.

Signature

NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.

David Wright - 28 May 2005 19:50 GMT
>> jason@nospam.com wrote:
>> > I now realize that some people are really shocked when people don't know
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>are afraid that people like you will tell them they should not try help
>people unless they are doctors.

As usual, Jason, you have missed the point entirely.  But I'll spell
it out for you:

 Don't give medical advice when you don't know what the hell you
 are talking about.

In your case, Jason, that's 100% of the time.  You give reams of bad
advice, and you're too ignorant to KNOW that it's bad advice.  Stop
doing it.

 -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
      "I don't need someone to tell me that George W. Bush is a
       deceitful, corrupt, clever and destructive man--that's pretty
       clear on the face of it."  -- Garrison Keillor
Jason - 29 May 2005 17:31 GMT
> >> jason@nospam.com wrote:
> >> > I now realize that some people are really shocked when people don't know
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>         deceitful, corrupt, clever and destructive man--that's pretty
>         clear on the face of it."  -- Garrison Keillor

David,
Are you a doctor or nurse? If not--if we use your line of logic--none of
us that are not doctors or nurses should ever give medical advice to
people in any newsgroup. While working with doctors and nurses, I have
seen them refer to the PDR many times. I also look at the PDR many times
to figure out the information written on charts.
Jason

Signature

NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.

Tom Salls - 29 May 2005 18:46 GMT
jason@nospam.com wrote:
> Are you a doctor or nurse? If not--if we use your line of logic--none of
> us that are not doctors or nurses should ever give medical advice to
> people in any newsgroup.

You say that as if it's a bad thing.
Jason - 30 May 2005 15:23 GMT
> jason@nospam.com wrote:
> > Are you a doctor or nurse? If not--if we use your line of logic--none of
> > us that are not doctors or nurses should ever give medical advice to
> > people in any newsgroup.
>
> You say that as if it's a bad thing.

No--it's not a bad thing. However, as you may know, most doctors and
nurses are really busy with their jobs and they don't have the time needed
to spend several hours each day helping people on newsgroups. I have a
great amount of respect for the doctors and nurses in this newsgroup that
do take time out of their busy lives to help people in newsgroups like
this one. That means people that are NOT doctors or nurses do what we can
to help people in various newsgroups. I respect those people. I don't have
any respect at all for subcribers that instead of helping people with
their knowledge visit newsgroups in order criticize those of us that do
try to help people. Instead of being a critic--they should just post their
own advice. The posters are intelligent enough to figure out the best
solution. They don't need or want to start battles with subscribers.

Jason

Signature

NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.

Tom Salls - 30 May 2005 15:43 GMT
jason@nospam.com wrote:
> No--it's not a bad thing. However, as you may know, most doctors and
> nurses are really busy with their jobs and they don't have the time needed
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> own advice. The posters are intelligent enough to figure out the best
> solution. They don't need or want to start battles with subscribers.

That's a fair point Jason - you're right, I was being rude and I
apologise.

I think you'd ruffle a lot fewer feathers if you put a "I am not a
doctor" disclaimer in each post.  I'm a med student, and I wouldn't
dream of speaking with the authority that you have for some recent
posts: I know enough about my knowledge to know how limited it is, and
how difficult it is to apply what I do have over the Internet without
being able to see the person.

In most cases, I think that poor advice, no matter how well-intentioned,
is worse than no advice at all.
Jason - 30 May 2005 17:36 GMT
> jason@nospam.com wrote:
> > No--it's not a bad thing. However, as you may know, most doctors and
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> In most cases, I think that poor advice, no matter how well-intentioned,
> is worse than no advice at all.

Tom,
Thanks for an intelligent response. I hope that you succeed in becoming a
doctor. You may be right about letting people know that I am not a doctor.
I believe that other subscribers should follow this same policy and you
should let those people know of this policy if they fail to do it--not
just me.
I'll try to remember--esp. if it involves a person that has serious
medical problems. One of the problems that I have noticed in this and
other medical newsgroups is that some of the people that post problems
never get any advice from anyoone. One such person posted their problem in
several different medical newsgroups and none of the subscribers provided
any help. I decided to tell the person my opinion and refer them to their
own doctor. The following day--there must have been at least 4 subscribers
that criticized the advice that I gave to the person. I later wondered why
those same people did not give the person any advice during the prior
three days. It was my impression that they don't care about trying to help
people--instead they really get some sort of thrill out of criticizing
people. If they have medical knowledge--they should use the medical
knowledge to help people instead of making use of their medical knowledge
to criticize people. Those kind of subscribers need to find another hobby
or use their medical knowledge to help people. It's my guess that many of
those subscribers are afraid to post responses that help people since they
know that other subscribers like the ones mentioned above will criticize
them. George Will once stated: "It's easier to be a critic than it is to
write a book". I say--"It's easier to criticize me than it is to provide
medical advice that helps people".
Jason

Signature

NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.

Robert A. Fink, M. D. - 30 May 2005 20:40 GMT
> I later wondered why
>those same people did not give the person any advice during the prior
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>knowledge to help people instead of making use of their medical knowledge
>to criticize people.

Nobody, not even doctors, should give advice in an Internet Newsgroup.
True medical advice is only of value if it follows a direct,
face-to-face discussion between doctor and patient and a hands-on
medical examination.

"Off the cuff" medical advice is generally worthless and can easily
lead to grief.

Best,

Bob

Robert A. Fink, M. D.
Neurological Surgery
2500 Milvia Street  Suite 222
Berkeley, CA  94704-2636  USA
510-849-2555

**********************************
NOTE:  The material above is not "medical
advice".  Medical advice can only be
given after an in-person contact between
doctor and patient.
**********************************
Jason - 30 May 2005 23:43 GMT
> > I later wondered why
> >those same people did not give the person any advice during the prior
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> Berkeley, CA  94704-2636  USA
> 510-849-2555

Dr. Fink,
Thanks for your post. Believe it or not, I agree with you. I always try to
remember to refer people to their doctors. In some cases--if it's a very
minor problem such as poison oak, I might leave out the advice. I only
wish that we had more doctors like yourself that are willing to help
people or at least refer them to their own doctors in their newsgroup
posts. I was recently shocked when a subscriber actually told a person
that believed that they may have had a stroke that it was a muscle spasm.
How do you feel when someone gives that sort of advice to a person? Would
you ever do anything like that?
Thanks again,
Jason

Signature

NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.

David Wright - 30 May 2005 20:19 GMT
>> jason@nospam.com wrote:
>> > Are you a doctor or nurse? If not--if we use your line of logic--none of
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>own advice. The posters are intelligent enough to figure out the best
>solution. They don't need or want to start battles with subscribers.

Once again, as usual, wrong.

At least in the sense that what you post is, all too often, not good
advice, but you don't know that.

The most egregious example I can think of right now is your amazingly
bad suggestion to one poster that they should go to a health food
store and as a clerk for advice.  Not only is that a really dumb idea,
but you don't even *realize* it's a dumb idea.

I realize that you're trying to be helpful, which is commendable, but
you are simply not equipped for the job.  If the people who ask
questions here were really knowledgable (which most are not), they
wouldn't need to ask the questions in the first place.  And since you
post with an air of authority, someone might well be fooled into
thinking you know what you are talking about.

The only disclaimer on your postings that would really solve the
problem would be something like "I amd not a doctor, or any sort of
trained medical professional, and I have no idea what I'm talking
about, even when it sounds like I do."

By the way, it's not necessary for someone to be a trained medical
professional to give sound information here.  We used to have a fellow
by the name of Steve Dyer, who wasn't a doctor, but I think he slept
with a PDR and medical journals under his pillow.  He knew a lot about
pharmacology and I'm sorry he's not here any more, as I liked his
style.

 -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
      "I don't need someone to tell me that George W. Bush is a
       deceitful, corrupt, clever and destructive man--that's pretty
       clear on the face of it."  -- Garrison Keillor
Jason - 30 May 2005 23:26 GMT
> >> jason@nospam.com wrote:
> >> > Are you a doctor or nurse? If not--if we use your line of logic--none of
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
>         deceitful, corrupt, clever and destructive man--that's pretty
>         clear on the face of it."  -- Garrison Keillor

If you are not a doctor, I hope that you will also tell people in your posts:
"I am not a doctor, or any sort of trained medical professional, and I
have no idea what I'm talking about, even when it sounds like I do." If
everyone that is not a doctor posted such a statement after their
advice--none of the patients would ever be confused. In addition, unless
we have lots of wonderful doctors and nurses that subscribe to this
newsgroup--not very many people will ever get any advice from anyone.

Signature

NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.

Carey Gregory - 31 May 2005 06:05 GMT
>If you are not a doctor, I hope that you will also tell people in your posts:
>"I am not a doctor, or any sort of trained medical professional, and I
>have no idea what I'm talking about, even when it sounds like I do."

You just refuse to "get it," don't you?

David doesn't need a disclaimer like that as you do.  Unlike you, his track
record is solid and he clearly has knowledge and good judgment on when and
what to answer, and when and what not to answer.   On the occasions David
gives medical advice at all -- which is rare, just as it is for most of us
-- he does so only when it's obvious enough to be answered here on a
newsgroup, and only when he's sure of his facts.  That's probably the
primary reason you see questions go unanswered -- their question can't be
answered "safely."

As Dr. Fink pointed out, providing medical advice via the internet is
inherently flawed to begin with.  Most of us recognize that so we do so only
rarely, and only when we feel it's "safe."   Yes, some of us do answer on
occasion because we feel it's important and we're sure the answer we're
giving is correct.  Sometimes we can put someone's mind at ease, or
sometimes do the opposite and urge them to seek help immediately, or maybe
offer some insight they haven't considered, but I think you'll find it's
rare that such advice is given without qualification and a warning to seek
professional medical advice.

>In addition, unless
>we have lots of wonderful doctors and nurses that subscribe to this
>newsgroup--not very many people will ever get any advice from anyone.

To quote a previous poster....  You say that like it's a bad thing.

This is not alt.support.med.  This is sci.med.  Please try to comprehend the
difference.  It was never intended for medical advice and still isn't, but
if you insist on doing so, you damn well better get your facts straight or
you should be prepared to have a new orifice drilled in your backside every
time you screw up.  We may not be good at answering every question, but
we're very good at spotting bad answers.  

And, if you consider that it's sci.med rather than alt.support.med, that's
exactly as it should be.
Jason - 31 May 2005 16:31 GMT
> >If you are not a doctor, I hope that you will also tell people in your posts:
> >"I am not a doctor, or any sort of trained medical professional, and I
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> And, if you consider that it's sci.med rather than alt.support.med, that's
> exactly as it should be.

I might join the critics instead of trying to help people. Since so many
people enjoy that hobby--it must be lots of fun. If I don't enjoy the
hobby--I'll try to find another hobby. I'll just tell the kind people that
take time out of their busy days to help people such things as:: "You are
stupid--you don't know anything about medical issues--you should not have
tried to help this person since you are not a doctor."
It must be a wonderful hobby since several people in this newsgroup
including yourself seem to enjoy your hobby so much.

Signature

NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.

Carey Gregory - 31 May 2005 18:30 GMT
>you should not have
>tried to help this person since you are not a doctor."

No one cares if you're a doctor, Jason.  What we care about is whether you
have a clue what you're talking about.

Wrong advice is worse than no advice.  Keep that in mind the next time you
want to "help."
David Wright - 03 Jun 2005 03:52 GMT
>I might join the critics instead of trying to help people.

Given the quality of help you're offering, that could be an
improvement.  However, your low level of knowledge strongly
suggests that you wouldn't be any more effective as a critic
than you are as an advocate.

>Since so many
>people enjoy that hobby--it must be lots of fun. If I don't enjoy the
>hobby--I'll try to find another hobby. I'll just tell the kind people that
>take time out of their busy days to help people such things as:: "You are
>stupid--you don't know anything about medical issues--you should not have
>tried to help this person since you are not a doctor."

Ah, Jason, your consistent level of cluelessness is an oasis of
stability in an ever-changing world.  Nobody has said that you have to
be a doctor to give good information.  What you do need is knowledge.
This is, alas, a commodity in which you are woefully lacking.

>It must be a wonderful hobby since several people in this newsgroup
>including yourself seem to enjoy your hobby so much.

You'll never know.

 -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
      "I don't need someone to tell me that George W. Bush is a
       deceitful, corrupt, clever and destructive man--that's pretty
       clear on the face of it."  -- Garrison Keillor
Jason - 03 Jun 2005 06:39 GMT
> >I might join the critics instead of trying to help people.
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> You'll never know.

David,
In the future, I will try to be more careful related to my posts and try
to remember to tell people that I am not a doctor and am not a medical
expert. A medical doctor told me that I implied that I was a doctor or
medical expert in some of my posts. I did not mean to do that. I always
tried to remember to refer people to their own doctors when they had
serious problems. Thanks for letting me know about some of my errors.
Jason

Signature

NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.

David Wright - 04 Jun 2005 04:03 GMT
>> >I might join the critics instead of trying to help people.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>tried to remember to refer people to their own doctors when they had
>serious problems. Thanks for letting me know about some of my errors.

You're welcome.  I must have missed your being rebuked for having
implied you were a doctor.  I don't think I ever saw you do that,
though you did sound much too certain in some of the advice you gave.

 -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
      "I don't need someone to tell me that George W. Bush is a
       deceitful, corrupt, clever and destructive man--that's pretty
       clear on the face of it."  -- Garrison Keillor
Jason - 04 Jun 2005 05:02 GMT
> >> >I might join the critics instead of trying to help people.
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>
>  
David,
I did not actually tell people that I was a doctor. The person that I was
referring to explained to me that I (like you also wrote) "did sound much
too certain in some of the advice that I gave". In other words, I did not
say that I was a doctor--just "implied" that I was a doctor or medical
expert. If I actually tell people in future posts that I am not a
doctor--that should solve the problem--I just hope that I don't forget.
Jason

Signature

NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.

Carey Gregory - 05 Jun 2005 00:16 GMT
>If I actually tell people in future posts that I am not a
>doctor--that should solve the problem--

No, it won't solve the problem.  The problem isn't whether you're a doctor
or not, the problem is your answers are extremely naive and just plain
wrong.  Read more, discuss more, ask questions more, and offer advice less.
Jason - 05 Jun 2005 02:24 GMT
> >If I actually tell people in future posts that I am not a
> >doctor--that should solve the problem--
>
> No, it won't solve the problem.  The problem isn't whether you're a doctor
> or not, the problem is your answers are extremely naive and just plain
> wrong.  Read more, discuss more, ask questions more, and offer advice less.

Carey,
I am trying to do that.
I learned some excellent information by reading a book that was written by
Don Colbert, M.D. The title of the book is "Toxic Relief".
I hope that you will do the same thing that you advised me to do--none of
us ever stop learning until after we die.
Jason

Signature

NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.

David Wright - 03 Jun 2005 03:48 GMT
>> >> jason@nospam.com wrote:
>> >> > Are you a doctor or nurse? If not--if we use your line of logic--none of
[quoted text clipped - 49 lines]
>professional, and I have no idea what I'm talking about, even when it
>sounds like I do."

Nope.  Because I won't post on subjects I know nothing about.  If I
post something, I may be wrong, but I at least tell you where I got my
info, and in any case, I'm not typically giving medical advice.

You, on the other hand, *do* give medical advice, usually bad advice,
and you don't even bother to check on simple things (like your
bollixed post about Rogaine -- you didn't even get the *name* right,
for pity's sake, you didn't know what it cost, etc etc etc).

>If everyone that is not a doctor posted such a statement after their
>advice--none of the patients would ever be confused. In addition,
>unless we have lots of wonderful doctors and nurses that subscribe to
>this newsgroup--not very many people will ever get any advice from
>anyone.

Which is as it should be -- diagnosis over the net is usually
impossible, except perhaps in a negative sense ("No, headache is not
usually a symptom of athlete's foot.")

 -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
      "I don't need someone to tell me that George W. Bush is a
       deceitful, corrupt, clever and destructive man--that's pretty
       clear on the face of it."  -- Garrison Keillor
David Wright - 30 May 2005 03:16 GMT
>> >> jason@nospam.com wrote:
>> >> > I now realize that some people are really shocked when people don't know
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>> advice, and you're too ignorant to KNOW that it's bad advice.  Stop
>> doing it.

>Are you a doctor or nurse?

As I told you twice in other threads, Jason, I'm not.  Apparently, you
are too stupid to have understood that.

>If not--if we use your line of logic--none of
>us that are not doctors or nurses should ever give medical advice to
>people in any newsgroup.

As usual, you are wrong.  The point is only that YOU should not --
because you are too ignorant to do it.  I'm not the only person to
tell you this, by the way.  I don't generally give medical advice
on these newsgroups anyway.  

>While working with doctors and nurses, I have
>seen them refer to the PDR many times. I also look at the PDR many times
>to figure out the information written on charts.

How marvelous.  If only you had even the slightest clue as to what you
were reading, you might be of some value  But you aren't.

 -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
      "I don't need someone to tell me that George W. Bush is a
       deceitful, corrupt, clever and destructive man--that's pretty
       clear on the face of it."  -- Garrison Keillor
Jim Chinnis - 28 May 2005 19:19 GMT
Tom Salls <noaddress@nope.com> wrote in part:

>jason@nospam.com wrote:
>> I now realize that some people are really shocked when people don't know
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>them up) is giving out medical advice to people who may assume that he
>knows what he's talking about.

Actually, anyone with any science background at all (i.e.,
periodic table) would recognize a term like hyperkalemia
--
Jim Chinnis   Warrenton, Virginia, USA
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.