Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / General / June 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Legislation allowing use of public restroom

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
NNTP - 15 May 2005 05:22 GMT
The following is the online write-up of a TV news story about a person with
a medical condition who was not allowed to use a restroom when it was
necessary.
http://www.nbc5.com/health/4487759/detail.html

I sure wish there were federal regulations that made this a public health
issue
Howard McCollister - 15 May 2005 05:41 GMT
> The following is the online write-up of a TV news story about a person
> with
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> I sure wish there were federal regulations that made this a public health
> issue

It's not a public health issue -- it's a public convenience issue. It's a
case of an overzealous legislature making a law to force people act
compassionate. A ridiculous waste of taxpayer money.

HMc
Repeating Rifle - 15 May 2005 05:57 GMT
>> The following is the online write-up of a TV news story about a person
>> with
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> HMc

Nest time, the young lady should just poop on a pile of the store's pants.

Bill
Jim Chinnis - 15 May 2005 17:41 GMT
"Howard McCollister" <nospam@nospam.net> wrote in part:

>> The following is the online write-up of a TV news story about a person
>> with
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>HMc

I agree with your comment, but only as far as it goes. It's an
important public convenience and should be provided with tax money
and not coerced out of private businesses.
--
Jim Chinnis   Warrenton, Virginia, USA
Coilman - 15 May 2005 22:49 GMT
> "Howard McCollister" <nospam@nospam.net> wrote in part:
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> --
> Jim Chinnis   Warrenton, Virginia, USA

Depends where the public toilets are placed. Any store of a certain size
upwards in Australia has long been forced, by legislation, to provide public
toilets or allow access to staff toilets. My local store has an underground
carpark. Of a night a security guard shuts the gates to the carpark and
checks no-one is around. No-one is. Yet in the morning they find the toilets
vandalised, needles from drug users littering the toilet everywhere or in
quite a few cases, dead people from shooting up. The store threw up it's
figurative arms in disgust and closed the toilets and got into trouble for
it. So, periodically, they close them and put up a sign "for renovation"
which gets them out of trouble in order to make the drug addicts and idiots
find another target and then they open them again and it starts all over
again.

I wonder if that store had have had access to staff toilets but the toilets
were closed to anyone for renovation whether this story would have been an
issue at all?
NNTP - 15 May 2005 23:42 GMT
Kind of curious why some of you think it's only a 'convenience'?   Are you
really not aware of the serious health implication when a person who has an
urgent need is not able to?   We must eat, take in fluid, breath air and
void waste.  It's life.   Some people can go for 24 hours without a problem
but on the other end are people who must go much more often or people who
unexpectantly have an urgent need.  Every had food poisoning?

> "Howard McCollister" <nospam@nospam.net> wrote in part:
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> --
> Jim Chinnis   Warrenton, Virginia, USA

Depends where the public toilets are placed. Any store of a certain size
upwards in Australia has long been forced, by legislation, to provide public
toilets or allow access to staff toilets. My local store has an underground
carpark. Of a night a security guard shuts the gates to the carpark and
checks no-one is around. No-one is. Yet in the morning they find the toilets
vandalised, needles from drug users littering the toilet everywhere or in
quite a few cases, dead people from shooting up. The store threw up it's
figurative arms in disgust and closed the toilets and got into trouble for
it. So, periodically, they close them and put up a sign "for renovation"
which gets them out of trouble in order to make the drug addicts and idiots
find another target and then they open them again and it starts all over
again.

I wonder if that store had have had access to staff toilets but the toilets
were closed to anyone for renovation whether this story would have been an
issue at all?
Howard McCollister - 16 May 2005 00:03 GMT
> Kind of curious why some of you think it's only a 'convenience'?   Are you
> really not aware of the serious health implication when a person who has
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> but on the other end are people who must go much more often or people who
> unexpectantly have an urgent need.  Every had food poisoning?

No, I'm really not aware. What "serious health implications" would those be?

HMc
Ed - 16 May 2005 05:08 GMT
>> Kind of curious why some of you think it's only a 'convenience'?   Are you
>> really not aware of the serious health implication when a person who has
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>HMc

Well, some folks (me included) will go into urinary retention if the
bladder gets too full, and that can (and has) happened when a toilet
is unavailable.

But that is the individual's risk and IMHO he has to look after
himself to minimize the consequences. I don't think you can compel
others to always anticipate any health issues anyone might have.

I think most of the time if you ask nicely, you will get cooperation
from others if they can help.

But what if you are stuck in stop-and-go Interstate traffic and it is
10 minutes to the next interchange, but you have to go NOW? What if
you are in the dentist's chair having a root canal and the urge hits?
What if you are in a plane and the seatbelt sign is on because of
turbulence?

Pilots of small craft need to pee, and it can sometimes be a major
issue. Likewise with soldiers driving tanks.

Washrooms in public parks are commonly locked in the off-season.
Washrooms in schools often have locks on them and are locked up on
weekends, etc..

Consider your options beforehand and accept the risks.

(I carry an emergency pee bottle in the car with me...)

Ed
NNTP - 16 May 2005 13:47 GMT
In the U.S. a long time back almost all towns had at least one 'comfort
station'.  For what ever reason, probably crime and up keep, it was decided
it would be better if business's that catered to the public provided
restrooms and, as I said earlier, they made it a requirement of their
building codes.

As just about everywhere in the US, allowing a customer to use the restroom
is most likely a condition of doing business in Illinois.  That's why I get
angry about what caused this note, the story on the TV Show.
http://www.nbc5.com/health/4487759/detail.html

It's the same thing as a construction permit for new housing development
that requires sidewalks.   After the buildings are up, it's expected that
the sidewalks will not be closed

On 15 May 2005 18:03:02 -0500, "Howard McCollister"
<nospam@nospam.net> wrote:

>> Kind of curious why some of you think it's only a 'convenience'?   Are
>> you
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>HMc

Well, some folks (me included) will go into urinary retention if the
bladder gets too full, and that can (and has) happened when a toilet
is unavailable.

But that is the individual's risk and IMHO he has to look after
himself to minimize the consequences. I don't think you can compel
others to always anticipate any health issues anyone might have.

I think most of the time if you ask nicely, you will get cooperation
from others if they can help.

But what if you are stuck in stop-and-go Interstate traffic and it is
10 minutes to the next interchange, but you have to go NOW? What if
you are in the dentist's chair having a root canal and the urge hits?
What if you are in a plane and the seatbelt sign is on because of
turbulence?

Pilots of small craft need to pee, and it can sometimes be a major
issue. Likewise with soldiers driving tanks.

Washrooms in public parks are commonly locked in the off-season.
Washrooms in schools often have locks on them and are locked up on
weekends, etc..

Consider your options beforehand and accept the risks.

(I carry an emergency pee bottle in the car with me...)

Ed
PF Riley - 17 May 2005 06:08 GMT
>(I carry an emergency pee bottle in the car with me...)

I discovered, during a long solo car ride, that my bladder holds more
fluid than a Snapple bottle. They say men can't stop peeing once
they've started, but I can attest that, yes, we can, but it HURTS LIKE
HELL!

PF
Derek F - 18 May 2005 21:59 GMT
>>(I carry an emergency pee bottle in the car with me...)
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> PF
This is the latest in incar sanitation!
Derek.
http://www.indipod.com/#
NNTP - 20 May 2005 01:36 GMT
Interesting video but I can't imagine anyone would want to go to all that
trouble

This is the latest in incar sanitation!
Derek.
http://www.indipod.com/#
Coilman - 22 May 2005 23:22 GMT
> Kind of curious why some of you think it's only a 'convenience'?   Are you

Thanks for saying that but I didnt so I dont know how to answer you.
Jim Chinnis - 23 May 2005 04:25 GMT
"NNTP" <t5@soalex.us> wrote in part:

>Kind of curious why some of you think it's only a 'convenience'?

It's just a matter of precision with the language. It's not a
health issue because one can choose to "go" wherever one is.
Health issue solved.

That doesn't mean that there aren't huge reasons to provide the
convenience.
--
Jim Chinnis   Warrenton, Virginia, USA
NNTP - 25 May 2005 11:45 GMT
Interesting story on the subject
http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/news/buggingyou/wabc_buggingyou_052405publicrestroom
s.html


BTW Jim - I think not being able to 'go' when you have to, especially when
it happens often, does cause medical problems.   bladder infections, kidney
disease and ironically frequently having to hold it can actually make a
bladder problem worse.

"NNTP" <t5@soalex.us> wrote in part:

>Kind of curious why some of you think it's only a 'convenience'?

It's just a matter of precision with the language. It's not a
health issue because one can choose to "go" wherever one is.
Health issue solved.

That doesn't mean that there aren't huge reasons to provide the
convenience.
--
Jim Chinnis   Warrenton, Virginia, USA
Twittering One - 15 May 2005 08:21 GMT
"I sure wish there were federal regulations
hat made this a public health
issue"
~ NNTP

Are there none?
Or were they merely not enforced?

If you tell a mental health professional you need help filing
a HIPAA complaint form (and you have ADD, as well as other
disabilites at the time), and you report verbally
to the professional,

Who takes the next steps?
Twittering One - 15 May 2005 10:24 GMT
Who takes the next steps?

Rosa Parks.
So did I.

So must you.

Represent for others,
Help them do
What they are unable to do.

~ * A Morning Wood Public Privet
Ledge * ~ !

**
And now ~
_________________________________________
A Morning Wood Moral
Reminder
~ * `
!You MUST Go
Out
Into the world and DO
The RIGHT Thing! *
__________________________________________
~ Now accepting reservations
For the Spring Season ~

! ~ * ~ !
Work & Volunteer & Efforts
For
People's, Fauna's and Flora's
NEEDS...
__________________________________________
~ * ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Teach
HELP
Feed
Equal ACCESS
Healthcare for ALL

~ * ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Stop
Look
Listen

~ * ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
SEE another's needs
SOLVE another's needs

~ * ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Advocate
RIGHT wrongs

~ * ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
REPRESENT the needs
& interests
Of those who cannot represent
Themselves

~ * ~
__________________________________________
~ * ~ Join,
Celebrate ~ The Native Tongue Movement ~ * ~
_________________________________________
A Morning Wood ~
Public Service Annunciation
_________________________________________
* Dogging Arts * Fogging Minds * It's a Star *
_________________________________________

~ * ~
TwitteringOne - 15 May 2005 17:47 GMT
"I sure wish there were federal regulations
hat made this a public health
issue"
~ NNTP

Are there none?
Or were they merely not enforced?

If you tell a mental health professional you need help filing
a complaint for an abusive therapeutic relationship (and you have ADD,
as well as other disabilites at the time), and you report verbally
to the professional,

Who takes the next steps?
NNTP - 15 May 2005 21:44 GMT
The State building codes require that there be toilets for employees and
customers but there's no way to enforce them for customers.  OHSA laws make
sure that the employee's are allowed to use them

"I sure wish there were federal regulations
hat made this a public health
issue"
~ NNTP

Are there none?
Or were they merely not enforced?

If you tell a mental health professional you need help filing
a complaint for an abusive therapeutic relationship (and you have ADD,
as well as other disabilites at the time), and you report verbally
to the professional,

Who takes the next steps?
All Things Mopar - 15 May 2005 12:42 GMT
NNTP commented courteously...

> http://www.nbc5.com/health/4487759/detail.html

This is total bullshit (the store manager, not Ally)! I
have IBS (Irritable Bowel Syndrome) which can have similar
symptoms as Crohn's, namely the sudden urge to take a
crap, although IBS is seldom painful.

I've had similar situations in stores and restaurants as
Ally did. Sometimes I have only minutes "warning", and
sometimes only seconds, so I tell the manager he/she has 2
choices: let me use the employee john or I'm pulling my
pants down and sh.tting on your floor! Or, if the mensroom
is busy or out-of-order (which is a public health
violation), I give the manager a 3rd choice: I use the
women's john.

This in-your-face attitude has worked every time. I
suppose the twit could call the fuzz for a "disturbing the
peace" charge, but when ya gots ta go, ya gots ta go!

I've had similar experiences on airliners when the
seatbelt sign is "lit". I just push right past the flight
attendents and use the porta potty. I don't do anything to
endanger myself or other passengers, but pilots will turn
on that God Damn light for 30 minutes at takeoff and
landing. For example, a flight from Detroit Metro to
Chicago O'Hare is just a tweak over an hour, so half the
flight the nose is up and the seatbelt sign is lit, and
the other half, the pilot aims the nose down. There's only
about 10 minutes of level flight, just long enough for the
flight attendents to offer refreshments (but today, that's
almost a thing of the past anyway)

Signature

ATM, aka Jerry

Jeff - 15 May 2005 16:46 GMT
> The following is the online write-up of a TV news story about a person
> with
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> I sure wish there were federal regulations that made this a public health
> issue

I agree that this is a convience issue. No store *has* to have public
restrooms.

If you feel differently, do go to stores without public restrooms. Vote with
your wallet.
Jeff
TwitteringOne - 15 May 2005 17:05 GMT
wrong
Jeff - 16 May 2005 12:55 GMT
> wrong

Why is it wrong? I did mean to say that if you disagree, don't go to stores
without public restrooms.

Stores are there to sell products. They aren't there to provide public
restrooms. However, if you think public restrooms in stores are that
important, go only to stores with public restrooms. If enough people do
this, only stores with public restrooms will survive.

Jeff
PF Riley - 17 May 2005 06:11 GMT
>Stores are there to sell products. They aren't there to provide public
>restrooms. However, if you think public restrooms in stores are that
>important, go only to stores with public restrooms. If enough people do
>this, only stores with public restrooms will survive.

Why, Jeff, I didn't know you were a Libertarian! Now I don't miss JG
so much anymore!

PF
Jeff - 17 May 2005 13:59 GMT
>>Stores are there to sell products. They aren't there to provide public
>>restrooms. However, if you think public restrooms in stores are that
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Why, Jeff, I didn't know you were a Libertarian! Now I don't miss JG
> so much anymore!

Damn! I had forgot about her. And that wasn't a bad thing.

My political views are not those of any party. They coincide with some
political parties, but that is only because the politcal party has the
proper view on that issue ;-)

My political views tend to align most closely with the democratic parrty,
though.

Jeff

> PF
medusa569@netscape.com - 16 Jun 2005 00:38 GMT
I absolutely agree..the fasct is weith more and more chronic illnesses
developing among the population which affect either bowle or urinary
function I am amazed at how America
does not consider its citizens to have the necessity of pubklic bathrooms
everywhere among with federal regulation for bathroom access.
It won't happen though if people don't raise their voices.

medusa

> The following is the online write-up of a TV news story about a person with
> a medical condition who was not allowed to use a restroom when it was
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> I sure wish there were federal regulations that made this a public health
> issue
Howard McCollister - 16 Jun 2005 01:22 GMT
>I absolutely agree..the fasct is weith more and more chronic illnesses
> developing among the population which affect either bowle or urinary
> function I am amazed at how America
> does not consider its citizens to have the necessity of pubklic bathrooms
> everywhere among with federal regulation for bathroom access.
> It won't happen though if people don't raise their voices.

You're clueless....of course there are public bathrooms - just like
everywhere else in the civilised world. The issue raised by the OP is
whether or not people should be allowed to use *private* bathrooms.

HMc
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.