I'm thinking of going to one. Please advise.
>I'm thinking of going to one. Please advise.
Are they any good for what?
If you want reasonable answers, a lot more detail is needed. Age, why you
want to see one, medical history, etc, etc, etc.
outrider - 14 May 2005 04:50 GMT
> >I'm thinking of going to one. Please advise.
>
> Are they any good for what?
>
> If you want reasonable answers, a lot more detail is needed. Age, why you
> want to see one, medical history, etc, etc, etc.
I completely disagree with you Carey.
No. They aren't any good. If you want to be treated for disease; see a
physician. If you want to be treated for muskulo-skeletal problems see
a physiotherapist.
Both professions are educated and trained in medical schools. Both will
refer you to specialists, also educated adn trained in medical schools,
if you need it.
zee
> I'm thinking of going to one. Please advise.
I have a counterexample to Zee's "No. They aren't any good."
My office partner had suffered chronic back pain for
about a decade, had always been turned away by MD's
with "there's nothing wrong with you".
When I smirked as he told of going to a chiropractor
out of desperation, he told me "You might be interested
in what he told me: You're very sick but there's nothing
I can do for you. Get yourself to a MD and if he tells
you there's nothing wrong then try again to find a
competent one."
Two MDs later, an orthopedic surgeon checked him into
the main local hospital looking for spinal problems.
Admissions blood work set off the alarms, soon they found
the prostate cancer which had already been in his bones
too long. He didn't last a year despite chemo and
starting a "medicinal" macrobiotic diet.
Annual checkups including DREs didn't help (I don't know
if he had PSAs, he died over ten years ago). The hospital
staff commented that they didn't kow how a DRE could
have missed it: "big as a grapefruit, hard as a rock."
The chiropractor recognised that there was a problem.
This was real relief. Perhaps the next MD would have
been as useful.
Ed
outrider - 15 May 2005 23:05 GMT
just_ed53s...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > I'm thinking of going to one. Please advise.
>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> Ed
How exceedinly rare. However he didn't need to see a chiropractor to be
told to seek MEDICAL help (which a chiropractor is not).
I, and the Honda salesman down the street, could have told him the same
thing.
Zee
just_ed53spam@yahoo.com - 16 May 2005 10:29 GMT
<snip my story about a chiro who wasn't trash>
> How exceedinly rare. However he didn't need to see a chiropractor to be
> told to seek MEDICAL help (which a chiropractor is not).
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Zee
You're right that the chiro provided no treatment to improve the
man's condition. Sometimes the information is the service.
The rest of us (friends and car dealer employees of all specialties)
couldn't really tell if there was anything serious that competent
MDs (or psychs) could help. That chiro was confident and convinced
him that there was a problem, was much better than all of the half
dozen MDs my friend had seen until then.
That chiro had a bustling practice, apparently NOT related to
slightly breaking people so they would return (my previous
opinion of their art). I forgot to mention in the earlier post
that it was known that our insurance paid for some number
of chiro visits. My friend would have been an easy mark.
Ed