Is there any cheap and effective way to measure a change in hormones that
would "clinically" indicate PMS?
Thanks. David
David Jensen - 13 May 2005 19:56 GMT
I should add that I was referring to whether some kind of test existed (like
a EPT pregnancy test, for example on the simple side or a lab test on the
more involved side) to test for the liklihood of PMS.
David
> Is there any cheap and effective way to measure a change in hormones that
> would "clinically" indicate PMS?
>
> Thanks. David
outrider - 14 May 2005 05:06 GMT
> I should add that I was referring to whether some kind of test existed (like
> a EPT pregnancy test, for example on the simple side or a lab test on the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> >
> > Thanks. David
Actually I was having you on there. No test. You just have to wing this
one. But if she is in her late 30s and beyond and having PMS (and her
period) more often than once a month she could be perimenopausal. If
she is having PMS all month, she's menopausal. You win some and you
lose some.
Zee
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 14 May 2005 00:06 GMT
>>Is there any cheap and effective way to measure a change in hormones that
would "clinically" indicate PMS?<<
Talk to the USDA, as this is also known as Mad Cow Disease, and there
is a blood test for it.
SBH
Kurt Ullman - 14 May 2005 13:49 GMT
>>>Is there any cheap and effective way to measure a change in hormones
>that
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>SBH
IINNCCCOOOOMMMMIIINNNGGGG!!!!!!!!!!
--
Army Liason to the Office of Naval Contemplation
outrider - 14 May 2005 04:59 GMT
> Is there any cheap and effective way to measure a change in hormones that
> would "clinically" indicate PMS?
>
> Thanks. David
Yes. There is a hormone test. If her FSH hormone level is on the floor,
she's
FREE AT LAST! FREE AT LAST!
THANK GAWD ALMIGHTEEEE FREE AT LAAAAAAAAST!
Zee