NO CLAMPING: BABY DIDN'T BREATHE FOR 9 MINUTES! WOW!
See below...
>> YAY BRADLEY METHOD!
>>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> Richard
> Micaela's dad
Richard,
Obviously, little Michaela's cyanic hands have since "pinked up" and 9
APGARs sounds pretty darn good.
Still, I would not have allowed clamping with any part of my baby still
cyanic.
I would have kept everything warm.
In 1957, Mavis Gunther, MD reported a case where cord and baby were kept
warm and cord pulsating went on for 20 minutes.
Dr. Morley exclaimed regarding Dr. Gunther's case:
"Figure 1 is a recording of a placental transfusion [3] obtained by placing
the newborn at the level of the placenta, wrapped in a warm blanket, on a
recording scales. It was obviously not a typical birth - the cord pulsated
for 19 minutes, the placental transfusion (cord closure) was completed after
20 minutes, and the child started crying about ten minutes after birth!"
And then...
"During the first nine minutes...[t]here is no record of it breathing during
this time..." [Gastaldo remarks - WOW!]
Finally...
"Weight variation, INFLUENCED BY UTERINE CONTRACTIONS, indicates that a
virtual tidal wave of placental blood flow was adequately oxygenating the
child in the absence of any obvious lung function." (emphasis
added)...Marked vertical 'activity' lines occur at the height of UTERINE
CONTRACTION/TRANSFUSION PEAKS..." (emphasis added)
Dr. Morley discussing Gunther M. The Transfer of
Blood Between the Baby and the Placenta. Lancet 1957;I:1277-1280.
http://www.cordclamping.com/cry.htm
As I wrote to "E"...
Your birth plan should clearly indicate what retired obstetrician George
Malcom Morley, MB ChB FACO indicates:
DO NOT CLAMP UNTIL THE CORD HAS STOPPED PULSATING AND MY BABY IS PINK AND
BREATHING AND NOT IN NEED OF RESUSCITATION.
My thanks to Canadian grandmother Donna Young for calling my attention to
the immediate cord clamping child abuse.
Todd
PS 1957 - the year Mavis Gunther, MD reported her remarkable case - was also
the year that Borell and Fernstrom demonstrated radiographically (albeit
indirectly) that semisitting and dorsal delivery close the birth canal - up
to 30% it turns out.
egpeach - 28 Mar 2005 23:07 GMT
Thank you for the advice!
The Bradley work book does show the semi-reclined position (I think you
are talking about the "squat" at 45 degrees - right?). It is one of
about 10 positions they show. I don't have the work book with me, but
I believe the "Classic" postion is a side lying one.
Thanks again,
"E"
Todd Gastaldo - 28 Mar 2005 23:57 GMT
> Thank you for the advice!
Quite welcome.
> The Bradley work book does show the semi-reclined position (I think you
> are talking about the "squat" at 45 degrees - right?). It is one of
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Thanks again,
> "E"
Dear "E" -
The semi-reclined position - woman on her sacrum closing her birth canal up
to 30% - *used* to be the Bradley "Classic."
I am most interested to know if Bradley Method has adopted side-lying as the
new Bradley "Classic."
Todd
Richard - 29 Mar 2005 19:23 GMT
> [ . . . ]
> Still, I would not have allowed clamping with any part of my baby still
> cyanic.
I examined her cord closely; it was completely still with no evidence of
blood flow.
> I would have kept everything warm.
We did, and, as you suggested, her hands did 'pink up' quickly.
Fwiw, Lily labored almost entirely on her knees (leaning against the head of
the birthing bed, which was raised), and delivered on her side, right into my
hands (I learned why the term "catch" is used to describe the action of
welcoming a newborn -- once her second shoulder was born, she popped out!).
Richard
29 months later, still thrilled to be Micaela's dad