> Hi everyone,
>
[quoted text clipped - 108 lines]
>
> Pete
Ambulatory pH testing is pretty straightforward, and it appears that you are
overthinking the test and results.
If you are getting acid in your esophagus more than about 4% of the time, or
if your DeMeester score is more than about 15, especially on PPI's, then you
have acid reflux. Acid reflux is defined as esophageal pH less than 4.
Normal esophageal pH is about 6, anything higher than that usually indicates
alkaline reflux. Nightime reflux may be related to PPIs wearing off, but are
far more likely to be related to the recumbant position.
Normally, it would be considered pointless to do a pH test while a patient
is on PPIs, and I rarely, rarely would do that. The idea is to determine if
there is reflux, and under what conditions, and how much of the time. If
there is, that reflux can be addressed by the usual manner and the point is
to control the symptoms. PPI do not stop reflux, they only change the nature
of the refluxate. The problem is not the acid, it's the acid in the
esophagus permitted by a dysfunctional LES. When we discuss PPIs or any
other anti-secretory medication, we're talking about symptomatic treatment
only.
So, it's apparent that you have GERD - there appears to be no question about
that. The only other question that needs to be addressed is whether or not
your medications are controlling your symptoms to your satisfaction. If you
have no endoscopic evidence of Barrett's esophagus, stricture, or erosive
esophagitis, and the medication is keeping you comfortable, then you need do
nothing further except for periodic surveillance (by EGD), every two years
or so. If medication isn't controlling your symptoms to your satisfaction,
then you will need to consider some sort of anti-reflux procedure. Enteryx
and Stretta are effective about 70% of the time. Nissen fundoplication is
successful about 93% of the time (initially), but has as much as a 20-25%
failure rate over the succeeding 10 years.
I am currently out of the country in the remote central highlands of Haiti.
My internet access has been spotty due to problems with our satellite link.
I'll be glad to help you, but it will be a week or so before I have
unfettered access to the internet.
HMc
Pete - 18 Mar 2005 20:37 GMT
Howard...thank you for your response. Could you please address my main
concern as to why my esophagus had a higher ph than my stomach after 3:30 AM
(I explained it in detail in my message). This does not make sense unless
my possible explanation is valid. Thank you...Pete
> > Hi everyone,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 147 lines]
>
> HMc
Howard McCollister - 18 Mar 2005 21:49 GMT
> Howard...thank you for your response. Could you please address my main
> concern as to why my esophagus had a higher ph than my stomach after 3:30
> AM
> (I explained it in detail in my message). This does not make sense unless
> my possible explanation is valid. Thank you...Pete
There could be many reasons, but IMHO they don't make any difference
relative to your problem with GERD. It could be as simple as acid in the
esophagus and acid + bile in the stomach. From my review of what you've
posted here, I fail to understand why your doctor would care about gastric
pH. My simplistic surgeon's-view of your situation leaves me interested only
in acid in your esophagus - how often and under what circumstances.
HMc
Pete - 20 Mar 2005 02:39 GMT
Howard...the last post I sent you had a typo in it (it should have said the
ph in my esophagus was lower than my stomach after 3:30 AM - as explained in
detail in my first post). I deleted the post and resent it right away, but
you must have grabbed it before I had a chance. I think you got the just
anyway. My gastro doesn't care about any of this, and there are no more
gastro's left in my area. Like I said he didn't even know the doctor in
Baltimore sent him the ph test, and I doubt if he knew how to read it, and
he could not answer my questions. I am the one concerned. It doesn't make
sense for the ph of the esophagus to be lower than the stomach - that's my
point. Can you tell me if you are a gastroenterologist or a general surgeon
or what is your specialty, and is it possible to communicate with you one to
one. We do appreciate the valuable time you spend volunteering your inputs
to the newsgroup. Thanks again. You can write me directly by just taking
the "no spam" out of my address...Pete
> > Howard...thank you for your response. Could you please address my main
> > concern as to why my esophagus had a higher ph than my stomach after 3:30
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> HMc
Howard McCollister - 25 Mar 2005 01:59 GMT
> Howard...the last post I sent you had a typo in it (it should have said
> the
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> to the newsgroup. Thanks again. You can write me directly by just taking
> the "no spam" out of my address...Pete
I re-read your original post. It is normal for the pH in the esophagus to be
higher than in the stomach, at least part of the time. The LES is supposed
to prevent reflux - normal esophageal pH would be around 6-6.5. You have a
malfunctioning LES, so you occasionally get acid up into your esophagus,
which causes you symptoms. Fundic gland polyps are a trophic consequence of
PPI's causing hypergastrinemia. "Cutting them out" is pointless - the only
reason to biopsy a few is to make sure that they're not adenomatous.
I suspect the reason your gastroenterologist "doesn't care about any of
this" is that is likely makes no difference. As I mentioned there can be
many reasons why your esophageal pH might be lower or higher than your
gastric pH, but they're all pretty much irrelevant to your diagosis and its
subsequent treatment.
HMc
Pete - 18 Mar 2005 21:49 GMT
Howard...Thank you for your response. I am quite familiar with the
digestive tract, and reflux, and what the purpose of PPI's is, and how they
work. Could you please address my concern as to why my esophagus had a
lower ph (i.e. was more acidic) than my stomach after 3:30 AM (I explained
it in detail in my message). This does not make sense unless my possible
explanation is valid. Thank you for your time in reading and responding to
my messages...Pete
> > Hi everyone,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 147 lines]
>
> HMc
John Que - 19 Mar 2005 07:43 GMT
> So, it's apparent that you have GERD - there appears to be no question about
> that. The only other question that needs to be addressed is whether or not
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> successful about 93% of the time (initially), but has as much as a 20-25%
> failure rate over the succeeding 10 years.
The Nissen Fundo failure rate is more like 70% after 5 years from
the sources I've seen on the web, if I recall correctly.
Failure meaning that the subjects were
back taking acid suppressing meds.
Don't get me wrong, I am no fan of the PPI meds over the long term.
The Stretta success is 50% a couple years down the road.
As bad as the surgery numbers are, they IMO are
still valid choices.