> >1) how concerned should i be that the pain has increased, and that it
> >is still ongoing since july/04 (now nearly 8 months)? should i consider
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> management, it will do so within 2-3 months. It sounds as if yours
> has not responded to treatment.
agreed. my research indicates that those who have surgery and those who
dont have the same level of pain after 4 years. But i dont hink it is
wise to risk damage either from constantly taking nsaids or from the
nucleus pulposus inflammating the nerve.
have you seen the study where infliximab was used to treat sciatica?
(see nih pubmed) results very successful. abstract also mentioned that
the extrusion was absorbed by the body after a year! the doctor i
consulted with was against it because 1) use would be offlabel, hence
not ethical 2) risk of pneumonia
comments?
> I suspect that you are losing work time (and income). Also, over
> time, the nerve can degenerate under the influence of chronic
> compression.
>
> If the disc is *extruded* (rather than merely herniated), then the
> odds of this recovering without surgery are small.
drat!
> "Minimally invasive" disc surgery is not effective when there is an
> extruded fragment. You cannot get the free fragment. If you have
> surgery, you are most likely going to need "standard" surgery. Go see
> a good neurosurgeon.
i have seen a number of surgical web sites that claim that endoscopic
surgery can work for extruded disks.
> Best,
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> doctor and patient.
> **********************************
Robert A. Fink, M. D. - 16 Feb 2005 23:05 GMT
>have you seen the study where infliximab was used to treat sciatica?
>(see nih pubmed) results very successful. abstract also mentioned that
>the extrusion was absorbed by the body after a year! the doctor i
>consulted with was against it because 1) use would be offlabel, hence
>not ethical 2) risk of pneumonia
>comments?
Infliximab has use in ankylosing spondylitis and other forms of
rheumatoid arthritis, but I have not seen much about its use in
ordinary disc disease.
>>i have seen a number of surgical web sites that claim that endoscopic
surgery can work for extruded disks.<<
I disagree. It is like working "blind" and the failure rate is very
high, resulting in the need for re-operation (standard method).
Best,
Bob
Robert A. Fink, M. D.
Neurological Surgery
2500 Milvia Street Suite 222
Berkeley, CA 94704-2636 USA
510-849-2555
**********************************
NOTE: The material above is not "medical
advice". Medical advice can only be
given after an in-person contact between
doctor and patient.
**********************************
etc1760@yahoo.com - 24 Feb 2005 16:40 GMT
please see the following link which indicates that minimally invasive
discectomy does appear to be effective.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstra
ct&list_uids=13680028
please see the following link which shows that infliximab is effective
for sciatica:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstra
ct&list_uids=15454701
your comments??
> >have you seen the study where infliximab was used to treat sciatica?
> >(see nih pubmed) results very successful. abstract also mentioned that
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> doctor and patient.
> **********************************