Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / General / February 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

tPA Window of time

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Donald Wilgus - 10 Feb 2005 22:29 GMT
   tPA is use as a clot dissolver in the advent of a stroke.  However there
is a window of time (3 hours) that it can be used effectively, as I
understand.  Why is there this time constraint?

   Thanks.

Don W
Jim Chinnis - 10 Feb 2005 22:50 GMT
"Donald Wilgus" <dwilgus@prodigy.net> wrote in part:

>    tPA is use as a clot dissolver in the advent of a stroke.  However there
>is a window of time (3 hours) that it can be used effectively, as I
>understand.  Why is there this time constraint?

Because the clot cuts off much of the blood supply to neurons and other cells
in the affected region of the brain and after a while they die.

Although this pretty effective treatment (and other similar ones) has been
around for quite some time, few hospitals seem to offer it.
--
Jim Chinnis  Warrenton, Virginia, USA  jchinnis@alum.mit.edu
Donald Wilgus - 11 Feb 2005 03:00 GMT
JIm,

 After 3 hours, they do not want to use tPA.  And even under imaging, if
they can't see the clot, they don't want to use it.  (To my understanding).
Why?  It would seem that if they had established that it was not a
hemorrhaging type of stroke, they would just go ahead and use it for the
insurance.  I understand the side effects of tPA are not nice.  Does that
prevail?

Thanks.

DonW

> "Donald Wilgus" <dwilgus@prodigy.net> wrote in part:
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> --
> Jim Chinnis  Warrenton, Virginia, USA  jchinnis@alum.mit.edu
Donald Wilgus - 11 Feb 2005 03:12 GMT
...or maybe after 3 hours they figure all the damage that can be done is
done, so why bother taking the risk with tPA.

> "Donald Wilgus" <dwilgus@prodigy.net> wrote in part:
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> --
> Jim Chinnis  Warrenton, Virginia, USA  jchinnis@alum.mit.edu
Jim Chinnis - 11 Feb 2005 04:42 GMT
Bingo.

"Donald Wilgus" <dwilgus@prodigy.net> wrote in part:

>...or maybe after 3 hours they figure all the damage that can be done is
>done, so why bother taking the risk with tPA.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>> --
>> Jim Chinnis  Warrenton, Virginia, USA  jchinnis@alum.mit.edu

--
Jim Chinnis  Warrenton, Virginia, USA  jchinnis@alum.mit.edu
Patrick - 11 Feb 2005 18:16 GMT
>     tPA is use as a clot dissolver in the advent of a stroke.  However there
> is a window of time (3 hours) that it can be used effectively, as I
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Don W

The brain cells have already had too much ischemia and are dead by
3 hours, Tpa would do no good.  They also can not give it until they have
rulled out the 10% chance that it is a hemmoragic stroke (aneurysm) as
opposed to a thromibic.

--
Patrick H. Mason M.S. OHST, EMT-I
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.