The report suggested that supplements intended as drugs should demonstrate
they work and are safe and that labels reflect what is said to be in the
contents. Because more people are using them a doctor or any other health
provider can't now advise someone based on the lack of this information,
now the standard for these drugs. From the drug consumer point of view,
informed choices are impossible for the same reason. As it stands people
are the lab rats for these drugs, the fda isn't even allowed to require
that the drug companies producing them report side effects, damage or
death resulting from their use. They can only act if the level of damage
and/or deaths is brought to their attention by some third party source.
Health providers and consumers need at least the level of information
about these drugs that we have about aspirin.
>..."The pharmaceuticals companies see herbal remedies advancing while their
>problematic nostrums are being discredited."...
>
>Bill Sardi's excellent summation on the attack on supplements debunks all
>the myths being propagated by pharma Mafia and their cronies, the mainstream
>medicine and the media is must read. As usual, it is now embellished with
>appropriate links.
>
>See also:
>
>Comprehensive Nutrient Review
>
>An Open Challenge To The Ridiculous Dietary Allowance (RDA)
>
>Chris Gupta
>http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/2005/01/19/campaign_launched_against_diet
>ary_supplements.htm
>-----------------------
>
>For Immediate Release 1/18/2005
>
>CAMPAIGN LAUNCHED AGAINST DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS
>
>At a time when the Food and Drug Administration is under criticism for
>approving unsafe drugs, and when pharmaceutical companies are being called
>to task for not disclosing negative studies of their products, a concerted
>effort is being launched against dietary supplements. The obvious reason ---
>don't let the public discover dietary supplements as alternative to
>prescription drugs that can duplicate the biological action of most
>prescription medicines with far lower costs and side effects.
>
>Harvard Medical School in a joint effort with the FDA and the Institute of
>Medicine, has released a report that says: "Unlike drugs, which must be
>proven safe before they can be sold, the current law allows sale of
>supplements unless the Food and Drug Administration can prove them harmful."
>The assumption is that prescription drugs are safer than supplements because
>they have undergone an FDA approval process. But a review of data from the
>US Poison Control Centers indicates vitamin and mineral supplements are
>linked with few if any deaths over the past few years and deaths linked to
>use of herbal products, except for ephedra, are few. For comparison, just
>the use of non-steroidal pain relievers like aspirin and ibuprofen cause an
>estimated 16,000 deaths annually. Side effects from properly used
>prescription drugs, administered by nurses in hospitals, result in over
>100,000 deaths annually. The FDA approval process does not guarantee safety.
>
>Public Citizen, the Ralph Nader group, indicates 181 FDA-approved drugs
>should be recalled because they are not as safe as other drugs or are
>ineffective. An FDA drug reviewer, Dr. David Graham, had to publish his
>report on the hidden dangers of Vioxx outside of the country in the British
>Medical Journal. His job was later threatened for not following FDA protocol
>even though an estimated 139,000 Americans died prematurely from the use of
>Vioxx.
>
>Many drug side effects are the result of nutritional deficiencies caused by
>the medications themselves. But the FDA is stubbornly resistant to warn the
>public how to avoid drug side effects by taking companion supplements. For
>example, statin cholesterol-lowering drugs deplete the body of coenzyme Q10
>which can result in a mortal condition called rhabdomyolysis. Acetaminophen
>(Tylenol) is toxic to the liver and acetaminophen use is the leading cause
>for liver transplants. The antidote for acetaminophen poisoning is N-acetyl
>cysteine, a sulfur-based dietary supplement. The FDA has resisted appeals to
>combine these nutrients into the drugs or mandate that supplements be
>prescribed as companions.
>
>Another mistaken complaint is that dietary supplement manufacturers don't
>have to report adverse reactions as do drug companies. Yet the FDA is
>obviously working in league with the drug companies to hide negative reports
>that could trigger the recall of many drugs.
>
>Another false assumption in the report is that dietary supplements interfere
>with prescription medications. Hilary Tindle, MD, a research fellow at
>Harvard Medical School, and lead author of the report, says: "This is
>especially critical as more becomes known about the adverse effects
>associated with individual dietary supplements as well as their interactions
>with prescription drugs." But vitamins and minerals are essential for life
>and it is the drugs that interfere with the nutrients, not the other way
>around.
>
>There is a concerted effort to regulate dietary supplements, which is in
>reality a smoke screen to limit dosages of vitamins and minerals that can
>replace many prescription drugs. For example, high-dose vitamin B6 and
>vitamin C reduce blood pressure equally as well as prescription medications.
>High-dose folic acid is a safe anti-depressant. High-dose vitamin D is as
>effective as many blood pressure pills. High-dose vitamin C can prevent a
>form of unstable plaque that causes most sudden-death heart attacks.
>Pharmaceutical companies are attempting to patent altered vitamin D
>molecules to treat cancer when high-dose vitamin D is inexpensive and has
>the same biological action.
>
>Later in the year, CODEX, a trade organization linked with the World Health
>Organization, hopes to limit dosages of vitamins and minerals under the
>presumption high doses cause significant side effects. The Institute of
>Medicine report appears to be softening up the public for these limitations.
>
>The report discloses the real reason for restrictions against dietary
>supplements in their own words: "In the past five years the biggest change
>was an increase in use of herbal supplements." The pharmaceuticals companies
>see herbal remedies advancing while their problematic nostrums are being
>discredited.
>
>The dietary supplement industry is continually characterized as some giant
>behemoth that must be curbed. The industry was responsible for $18.7 billion
>in sales in 2002. For comparison, the sales of just one class of drugs,
>statins for cholesterol, nearly equal the entire annual sales of dietary
>supplements.
>
>Both the Harvard and Institutes of Medicine reports advised users of dietary
>supplements to disclose their supplement regimens to their doctors. But
>doctors are poorly educated in the use of vitamins, minerals and herbal
>products and would offer little help to consumers. ####
>
>Knowledge of Health, Inc.
>
>457 West Allen Avenue #117 San Dimas, Ca. 91773 USA
>
>Telephone: 909 596-9507 Facsimile: 909 596-9189 Email: bsardi@aol.com
calypso@voyger.com - 23 Jan 2005 19:42 GMT
I think this kind of "feel" good is what is being sold. In the selling
there is often a great point made about "increased energy" and other very
vague things. The only way we can know for sure if something works is to
test it wherethings like these mental things are not allowed to interfere.
The placebo effect is what the science people call it. That is why even
the person testing some new thing doesn't know which pill has the new
stuff and which has some typical thing like a sugar pill. Also if it is
not tested we don't know if someone would get better anyway. If I have a
cold and someone says take this pill and it will go away it will but not
because of the pill. But then I start to think it was the pill. This is
another reason we need things tested to see if they make a difference.
>The few homeopathic treatments I have taken have worked quite well with
>me so far and that is why i will spend some money on it the next time i
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>> "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
>> were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)