Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / General / January 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Predicted measles outbreak Oct 31, 2003 [Still waiting for this one, Jan 2005]

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
john - 18 Jan 2005 15:26 GMT
http://www.whale.to/a/daily.html

"I have lectured all over the world... I have always had a special interest
in newspapers. All of them have one thing in common, there is always some
reference made to some epidemic in some part of the world. For instance, two
years ago, one paper referred to a polio epidemic in Holland. For the past
three years, our newspapers have commented on the diphtheria epidemic in
Russia. By these means, the population is constantly threatened with
epidemics, they have been made to fear them, and the reports always
conclude: "Go and get vaccinated".--Dr Buchwald MD
Vaccine-man - 18 Jan 2005 22:45 GMT
I don't see "measles" anywhere in your post. Despite this, there are
700,000 cases of measles globally each year.

> http://www.whale.to/a/daily.html
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> epidemics, they have been made to fear them, and the reports always
> conclude: "Go and get vaccinated".--Dr Buchwald MD
PF Riley - 19 Jan 2005 07:13 GMT
>I don't see "measles" anywhere in your post. Despite this, there are
>700,000 cases of measles globally each year.

Small correction: This is 700,000 measles DEATHS per year.

PF
john - 19 Jan 2005 20:42 GMT
> >I don't see "measles" anywhere in your post. Despite this, there are
> >700,000 cases of measles globally each year.
>
> Small correction: This is 700,000 measles DEATHS per year.

If you guys are going to pluck a number from thin air (aka. a lie) at least
get together
and agree on a figure

"Measles kills 1 million worldwide"---Liam Donaldson, Chief Medical Officer,
Sunday Times Jan 28, 2001
David Wright - 20 Jan 2005 04:46 GMT
>>I don't see "measles" anywhere in your post. Despite this, there are
>>700,000 cases of measles globally each year.
>
>Small correction: This is 700,000 measles DEATHS per year.

John will dodge this, of course.  He'll claim that measles is harmless
unless treated, as long as the victims are well-nourished.  (Which is
usually true, but not always.)

Of course, this completely dodges the question of "what shall we do
for those who we cannot guarantee good nourishment."  John never
answers this question except to claim that measles vaccine doesn't
work, a claim so ludicrously false that it's hard to imagine anyone
taking it seriously.

 -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
      "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
          were standing on my shoulders."  (Hal Abelson, MIT)
Vaccine-man - 20 Jan 2005 16:41 GMT
Yes, that's deaths. You're supposed to read what I *mean*, not what I
*write*!
john - 19 Jan 2005 10:24 GMT
> I don't see "measles" anywhere in your post. Despite this, there are
> 700,000 cases of measles globally each year.

It's not my fault if you can't get it.  No measles epidemic here, UK, over a
year after they predicted one.  What happens in the third world is
irrelevant to the UK and firsat world countries--as poverty is the main
cuase of measles deaths.

Oh, and I don't believe that figure of 700,000 deaths anyway, it is a lie to
sell vaccination in the first world, mostly.

"According to government, measles was a threat to national interest,
claiming more than 40,000 lives every year (a statistic which is laughable
since most people who get measles stay at home and treat it and the majority
of sick people go to private clinics that do not keep records this figure
was of course trumped up). This of course is a questionable statistic since
the majority of deaths in Uganda are not registered and few parents remember
any measles death. No point in registering a person once he has died. Forty
thousand people are far much less than those killed in Uganda annually due
to the civil war, dwarfs the figure for malaria, which kills a child every
five second and for which governments is happy to ignore.......The forcing
of them to take a vaccine against a disease they know to be harmless and
which they know how to cure in its harmful state was seen as government hell
bent on killing its own population for the benefit of commanding whiteworld.
All village people know that once you have recovered from measles you will
never catch it again, but here they were telling people to vaccinate even
those who have recovered from measles. "--Kihura Nkuba 2003
http://www.whale.to/a/kihura.htm
kyernurse - 20 Jan 2005 21:45 GMT
For the "Non-pharma shill compliments of the W.H.O. website...
"
Despite the availability of a safe, effective, inexpensive vaccine for over
40 years, measles remains the leading vaccine-preventable killer of
children.

In 1999, the benchmark year, some 869 000 people - mostly children - died of
measles. In 2002 1, measles killed an estimated 610 000 people, a decline of
30%.

"This is great news. Countries are to be commended for their efforts to
fight measles-- efforts that are truly paying off," said UNICEF Executive
Director Carol Bellamy. Since 1999, almost 260 000 deaths per year have been
prevented, she noted. "But we have to keep up the work and the funding as
still far too many children's lives are lost to measles."

> I don't see "measles" anywhere in your post. Despite this, there are
> 700,000 cases of measles globally each year.

It's not my fault if you can't get it.  No measles epidemic here, UK, over a
year after they predicted one.  What happens in the third world is
irrelevant to the UK and firsat world countries--as poverty is the main
cuase of measles deaths.

Oh, and I don't believe that figure of 700,000 deaths anyway, it is a lie to
sell vaccination in the first world, mostly.

"According to government, measles was a threat to national interest,
claiming more than 40,000 lives every year (a statistic which is laughable
since most people who get measles stay at home and treat it and the majority
of sick people go to private clinics that do not keep records this figure
was of course trumped up). This of course is a questionable statistic since
the majority of deaths in Uganda are not registered and few parents remember
any measles death. No point in registering a person once he has died. Forty
thousand people are far much less than those killed in Uganda annually due
to the civil war, dwarfs the figure for malaria, which kills a child every
five second and for which governments is happy to ignore.......The forcing
of them to take a vaccine against a disease they know to be harmless and
which they know how to cure in its harmful state was seen as government hell
bent on killing its own population for the benefit of commanding whiteworld.
All village people know that once you have recovered from measles you will
never catch it again, but here they were telling people to vaccinate even
those who have recovered from measles. "--Kihura Nkuba 2003
http://www.whale.to/a/kihura.htm
john - 21 Jan 2005 07:04 GMT
> "This is great news. Countries are to be commended for their efforts to
> fight measles-- efforts that are truly paying off," said UNICEF Executive
> Director Carol Bellamy. Since 1999, almost 260 000 deaths per year have been
> prevented, she noted. "But we have to keep up the work and the funding as
> still far too many children's lives are lost to measles."

Nice if it was true http://www.whale.to/b/genocide_vax_q.html

 "It was similar with the measles vaccination. They went through Africa,
South America and elsewhere, and vaccinated sick and starving
children...They thought they were wiping out measles, but most of those
susceptible to measles died from some other disease that they developed as a
result of being vaccinated. The vaccination reduced their immune levels and
acted like an infection. Many got septicaemia, gastro-enteritis, etcetera,
or made their nutritional status worse and they died from malnutrition. So
there were very few susceptible infants left alive to get measles. It's one
way to get good statistics, kill all those that are susceptible, which is
what they literally did." --Dr Kalokerinos, M.D.
"But, at the highest levels of the medical cartel, vaccines are a top
priority because they cause a weakening of the immune system. I know that
may be hard to accept, but it's true. The medical cartel, at the highest
level, is not out to help people, it is out to harm them, to weaken them.
To kill them. At one point in my career, I had a long conversation with a
man who occupied a high government position in an African nation. He told me
that he was well aware of this. He told me that WHO is a front for these
depopulation interests."--Jon Rappoport interview
kyernurse - 21 Jan 2005 12:31 GMT
He told me that WHO is a front for these
depopulation interests."--Jon Rappoport interview

So the WHO is trying to kill millions of innocent people?  Try a credible
source for your argument. By the way, Oliver Stone was wrong about the
Kennedy assassination, don't put any teeth you lose under your pillow, the
Easter Bunny isn't real, and there are no trolls living under the bridge.
They seem to have taken up residence in an otherwise respectable newsgroup.
john - 21 Jan 2005 15:13 GMT
>  He told me that WHO is a front for these
> depopulation interests."--Jon Rappoport interview
>
> So the WHO is trying to kill millions of innocent people?  Try a credible
> source for your argument. By the way, Oliver Stone was wrong about the

It's not my fault if you are uninformed, try someone on the ground
http://www.whale.to/a/nkuba_h.html or an MD who has spent a life among third
world people http://www.whale.to/vaccines/kalokerinos.html or an MD who has
researched the subject http://www.whale.to/vaccines/lanctot2.html  plus many
others like Cantwell MD http://www.whale.to/v/biowarfare.html

or research the depopulation agenda http://www.whale.to/b/population.html

or the real facts on smallpox vaccination over 200 years
http://www.whale.to/a/lymph2.html

etc etc

You just appear ignorant to the informed however much you sound off
kyernurse - 21 Jan 2005 18:55 GMT
Reference something other that "whale.crap" and maybe I'll give serious
consideration.
Mark Probert - 21 Jan 2005 21:49 GMT
> Reference something other that "whale.crap" and maybe I'll give serious
> consideration.

The proper term is whale.bilge and John is the owner of that website, which
is the largest suppository of mis- and dis-information on all of usenet.
john - 22 Jan 2005 00:00 GMT
> Reference something other that "whale.crap" and maybe I'll give serious
> consideration.

Oh yeah, you aint going to risk bursting that reality bubble

I'd love to believe, like I did once,  there was only a lone gunman, Bush &
Blair are the good guys, Saddam was going to nuke the UK, vaccines are safe
and effective, drugs are the only effective med, the cause of alzheimer's is
a mystery, cancer, heart disease, arthritis, are incurable etc, but I woke
up.  I like the coffee too much I guess, and I wanted to grow up, if only to
make it better for my kids.
kyernurse - 22 Jan 2005 12:40 GMT
The only thing that is preventing your reality bubble from bursting is the
multiple layers of aluminum foil you keep wrapped around your head.
Everything is a conspiracy and you seem to be the self annointed keeper of
the secrets.  Fat chance.
john - 22 Jan 2005 17:47 GMT
> The only thing that is preventing your reality bubble from bursting is the
> multiple layers of aluminum foil you keep wrapped around your head.
> Everything is a conspiracy and you seem to be the self annointed keeper of
> the secrets.  Fat chance.

Yawn.

"Whenever I hear the words "conspiracy theory" it usually means someone is
getting too close to the truth."----- former CIA employee, Michael Hasty
00doc - 22 Jan 2005 14:19 GMT
> Reference something other that "whale.crap" and maybe I'll
> give
> serious consideration.

He references stuff all the time. They are uniformly books
and Internet articles written by well known whackos.
Occaisionaly he misrepresents a conventional study. Usually
if you Google the author you can find nice rebuttals and
expose's on other sites. The fun part is, if you have time,
going through and reading his references. They often don't
suppport his POV and frequently conflict with each other.
One will claim that pestisides cause a disease, the other
will say it is imunizations, and then a third will say the
whole thing never existed. he has ben known to be arguing
against vaccines and to give a link to an article whose
title sounds critical but once read turns out to support the
opposing side. He probably doesn't read, and certainly
doesn't understand, much of the what he quotes.

It is amazing how John can simultaneously firmly believe
that something that never existed is caused by
immunizations. It has been termed "double think."

Signature

00doc

David Wright - 22 Jan 2005 05:28 GMT
> He told me that WHO is a front for these
>depopulation interests."--Jon Rappoport interview
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>Easter Bunny isn't real, and there are no trolls living under the bridge.
>They seem to have taken up residence in an otherwise respectable newsgroup.

It's OK to keep trying, but bear in mind that John-boy is a hard-core
lunatic and will find a way to disregard anything that conflicts with
his whacko worldview.

 -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
      "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
          were standing on my shoulders."  (Hal Abelson, MIT)
HCN - 19 Jan 2005 06:39 GMT
...

Measles is being spread in an area hit by the tsunami:
http://www.nypost.com/news/worldnews/38292.htm

So, John Scudamore, what are you doing to help the victems of the tsunami?

Oh, yeah... not a problem:
http://www.dailynews.co.za/index.php?fSectionId=500&fArticleId=2373505

And let us not forget the problem with mumps:
http://icbirmingham.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/0100localnews/tm_objectid=15060073&
method=full&siteid=50002&headline=mumps-epidemic-sweeping-midlands-name_page.htm
l

Jeff - 19 Jan 2005 12:51 GMT
Some stupid paper has a report that says that there should be an epidemic on
Halloween, 2003. Why should we care?

Do you beleive everything you read?

Jeff
David Wright - 20 Jan 2005 04:44 GMT
>http://www.whale.to/a/daily.html
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>epidemics, they have been made to fear them, and the reports always
>conclude: "Go and get vaccinated".--Dr Buchwald MD

And good advice it is, too.  But the last polio outbreak in the
Netherlands was quite some time ago, so as usual, John is recycling
his ancient swill without telling us.

 -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
      "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
          were standing on my shoulders."  (Hal Abelson, MIT)
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.