Its a simple $10 test when automated , one copy can be kept by govts and another by the UN.
Its no more intrusive than dental records. Billions are going to be spent by relatives trying to
identify their loved ones . With dna tests it can be done in minutes and much agony saved. it will
also identify Jihadis in America and Britain and is more secure than an ID card as there is only a
billion to one chance of two dnas matching.
Hindian - 04 Jan 2005 20:34 GMT
> Its a simple $10 test when automated , one copy can be kept by govts and another by the UN.
>Its no more intrusive than dental records. Billions are going to be spent by relatives trying to
>identify their loved ones . With dna tests it can be done in minutes and much agony saved. it will
>also identify Jihadis in America and Britain and is more secure than an ID card as there is only a
>billion to one chance of two dnas matching.
privacy laws would prevent that and rightfully so.
how would you like your genes analysed and patented by some lab
without your knowledge?
stewy - 05 Jan 2005 03:14 GMT
anyone4tennis@hotmail.com wrote:
> Its a simple $10 test when automated , one copy can be kept by govts and
> another by the UN.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> card as there is only a
> billion to one chance of two dnas matching.
And I've heard Haliburton is trying to corner the market in dna testing.
It's a 100 billion dollar market.
Carey Gregory - 05 Jan 2005 06:55 GMT
> Its a simple $10 test when automated , one copy can be kept by govts and another by the UN.
>Its no more intrusive than dental records. Billions are going to be spent by relatives trying to
>identify their loved ones . With dna tests it can be done in minutes and much agony saved. it will
>also identify Jihadis in America and Britain and is more secure than an ID card as there is only a
>billion to one chance of two dnas matching.
You know, Habshi, every once in a while you say something so funny it makes
it worth reading your next post.
§§ Blue Ice §§ - 06 Jan 2005 02:21 GMT
> Its a simple $10 test when automated , one copy can be kept by govts and another by the UN.
> Its no more intrusive than dental records. Billions are going to be spent by relatives trying to
> identify their loved ones . With dna tests it can be done in minutes and much agony saved. it will
> also identify Jihadis in America and Britain and is more secure than an ID card as there is only a
> billion to one chance of two dnas matching.
since when it started costing 10$ and taking few minutes??
*wondering* i must still be living in an ice age or maybe stone age.