> It seems to me I heard somewhere that Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote
> in article <1103753967.073996.236550@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>:
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> sci.med.cardiology, sci.med.pharmacy, and misc.health.arthritis; note
> that the OP ("MB") was asking about arthritis medications:
It seems to me I heard somewhere that Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote
in article <1103860516.b32a681e214875de5f4f70aba08172f5@teranews>:
>> It seems to me I heard somewhere that Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote
>> in article <1103753967.073996.236550@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>:
>> >> > Latest news is finding problems with naprosyn and aleve.
>> >> > What can one take for arthritic problems???
[...]
>> >> Is an alternative safer NSAID being worked on?
NSAID - Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammation Drug
>> >See:
>> >http://makeashorterlink.com/?Q26E3661A
>> Here is the referenced message, which was crossposted to
>> sci.med.cardiology, sci.med.pharmacy, and misc.health.arthritis; note
>> that the OP ("MB") was asking about arthritis medications:
>Actually, the OP asked about another anti-inflammatory to replace
>naprosyn (an NSAID) that is being taken for arthritis (most likely
>osteoarthritis which is the most common arthritis in the US).
First, the ratio of sufferers from the various varieties of arthritis is
hardly the way to diagnose (jump to conclusions about) the kind of
arthritis the OP has. No patient is a statistic.
Second, osteoarthritis (of which there are only a handful of varieties)
may be the most common type of arthritis (about 21 million sufferers),
but there are more sufferers from the 150+* varieties of rheumatoid
arthritises.
* Some sources give the figure as at least 170 varieties; some can be
life-threatening.
>> [Begin]
>> >JOE wrote:
>> >> December 21, 2004
>> >> Aleve Latest Drug to Draw Scrutiny
>> >> By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
>> >One new option is Limbrel.
>> >http://www.mcramerican.com/limbrel.htm
>> >Would suggest you ask your doctor about it.
>> >Hope the above information helps you.
>> [End]
>> To which I responded in misc.health.arthritis:
>> [Begin]
>> It seems to me I heard somewhere that Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote
>> in article <1103647182.556648.176890@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>:
>> >JOE wrote:
>> >> December 21, 2004
>> >> Aleve Latest Drug to Draw Scrutiny
>> >> By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
>> >One new option is Limbrel.
>> >http://www.mcramerican.com/limbrel.htm
>> [Begin]
>> LIMBRELTM
>> flavocoxid (U.S. patents pending) capsules by oral administration
>> An ethical medical food product to be used under physician supervision
>> for the clinical dietary management of osteoarthritis (OA), including
>> associated inflammation.
>> [End]
>> http://intetlab.com/product_description.php?product=limbrel
>> [Begin]
>> (4) Nurse practitioners with prescriptive authority are authorized to
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>> [End]
>> www.oregon.gov/OSBN/pdfs/npa/Div50.pdf
>> IOW, this is not an FDA approved medication. Dr. Chung is a
>> cardiologist and apparently does not have current information about
>> arthritis treatment.
>> The following has been somewhat expanded from what I wrote in
>> misc.health.arthritis.
>> Would suggest Dr. Chung shouldn't be making suggestions in areas of
>> medicine in which he has given no evidence of experience or training.
>Along with being board-certified in cardiology, I also hold
>board-certification in internal medicine which is an area of medicine
>that covers the diagnosis and treatment of arthritis.
Not at all. Board certified Rheumatologists are the experts in that
specialty. Many patients have Internal Medicine doctors as Primary Care
Providers, who regularly refer patients to rheumatologists when symptoms
suggest arthritis; my wife sees a Board certified Internal Medicine
doctor for her routine care, not including her arthritis.
>> There are over 150 variations of the rheumatoid arthritises, and NSAIDs
>> are not the recommended treatment for most of them.
>Rheumatoid arthritis is not being discussed here since the OP was taking
>naprosyn (an NSAID) for what was probably osteoarthritis.
A rheumatologist would not likely jump to that conclusion because the
NSAIDs are used for relief of pain and inflammation in many varieties of
arthritis, though they are not the preferable treatment for the
rheumatoid arthritises. I gave my main reasons earlier for not making
that assumption.
>> Nutritionals like
>> Limbrel are not typical first-line recommendations.
>It remains a prescription-only alternative to NSAIDs for osteoarthritis.
>> Prescription-strength NSAIDs do seem to have value for osteoarthritis,
>> the wear-and-tear type, but Limbrel appears to be an OTC nutritional.
>Limbrel is prescription-only and comprised of active ingredients that
>the FDA has characterized as GRAS.
I was wrong; it is a prescription medication--a food preparation. And
true, it is Generally Recognized as Safe, but no evidence of proven
effectiveness. Arthritis sufferers want reduction of inflammation, pain
relief, and, if possible, reduction of bone erosion. Can Limbrel
provide any of those benefits? Limbrel's home page does not mention
pain relief or anti-inflammatory effects, but deals only with patient
nutrition. http://www.limbrel.com/limbrel.php
www.niams.nih.gov/hi/topics/ arthritis/ArthRheumdisRP.pdf is an
excellent page for information about the diagnosis, effects, and
treatment of the full range of arthritic diseases (which include lupus,
gout, and fibromyalgia). The treatment information is quite current,
but obviously doesn't include the recent concerns about Celebrex and
others.

Signature
Don
donkirk@covad.net