Animal Experiments Are More Stressful Than Previously Recognized
Forwarded message from fidyl@yahoo.com
[ Subject: Animal Experiments Are More Stressful Than Previously Recognized
[ From: fidyl@yahoo.com
[ Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004
Animal Experiments Are More Stressful Than Previously Recognized
New Study Shows Animals Experience Severe Stress Response at
Slightest Contact with Researchers
Contact - Jeanne Stuart McVey, 202-686-2210, ext. 316; jeannem@p...
December 16, 2004
WASHINGTON - Mice, rabbits, rats, beagles, geese, and other animals
all show measurable physiological stress responses to routine
laboratory procedures that have been up until now viewed as
relatively benign. The findings come in a new report published in
Contemporary Topics in Laboratory Animal Science, based on an
extensive review of the scientific literature by ethologist Jonathan
Balcombe, Ph.D., of Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine
(PCRM). For example, a mouse who is picked up and briefly held
experiences several physiological reactions. As stress-response
hormones flood the bloodstream, the mouse exhibits a racing pulse and
a spike in blood pressure. These symptoms can persist for up to an
hour after each event. Immune response is also affected. In rats and
mice, the growth of tumors is strongly influenced by how much the
animals are handled.
Dr. Balcombe's paper appears in the journal's current issue, Autumn
2004, available mid-December.
Until now, humane concerns focused mainly on the experiments
themselves. The new findings suggest that routine procedures, such as
blood draws and use of stomach tubes, are terrifying for animals. "In
essence, there is no such thing as a humane animal experiment," says
Dr. Balcombe. "Fear or panic ensues when the animal is touched or
stuck with a needle."
The paper, a review of 80 previously published studies, is titled,
"Laboratory Routines Cause Animal Stress," and focuses on three
routine procedures: handling, blood collection, and force-feeding.
Independent of the invasive experiments themselves, these daily
routines can cause an animal to experience elevated bloodstream
concentrations of corticosterone, prolactin, glucose, and
epinephrine, all indicators of stress. Impaired immune response has
also been recorded in animals after anxiety-producing contact with
lab personnel.
"Research on tumor development, immune function, endocrine and
cardiovascular disorders, neoplasms, developmental defects, and
psychological phenomena are particularly vulnerable to data being
contaminated by animals' stress effects," notes Dr. Balcombe.
Dr. Balcombe's study follows closely a recent paper in the British
Medical Journal, titled "Where Is the Evidence that Animal Research
Benefits Humans?" The authors found that in many cases trials on
humans were conducted concurrently with the animal studies and in
other instances, clinical trials went ahead despite evidence of harm
from the animal studies.
Founded in 1985, the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine is
a nonprofit health organization that promotes preventive medicine,
especially good nutrition. PCRM also conducts clinical research
studies, opposes unethical human experimentation, and promotes
alternatives to animal research.
End of forwarded message from fidyl@yahoo.com
Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti
Hindu Holocaust Museum
http://www.mantra.com/holocaust
Hindu life, principles, spirituality and philosophy
http://www.hindu.org
http://www.hindunet.org
The truth about Islam and Muslims
http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate
The terrorist mission of Jesus stated in the Christian bible:
"Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not so send
peace, but a sword.
"For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the
daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in
law.
"And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.
- Matthew 10:34-36.
o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational
purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not
have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
fair use of copyrighted works.
o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current
e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are
not necessarily those of the poster.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.
Last Timer - 18 Dec 2004 13:56 GMT
The anatomists wreaked havoc by dividing brain into left and right
hemispheres, while they went about experimenting with animals as though
their own brains are wholesome.
zolota - 19 Dec 2004 09:11 GMT
> The anatomists wreaked havoc by dividing brain into left and right
> hemispheres, while they went about experimenting with animals as though
> their own brains are wholesome.
PLease translate that into English, thanks.
Z