 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / General / General / December 2004A new, CORRECT evolutionary theory
The Darwinian theory of evolution and the genetic theory of evolution are inadequate to describe what really happens in evolution. Let me put it this way. If you want to know how to repair a car, it helps to know how it the car is put together. Likewise, if you want to help people to get well, it is extremely important to know HOW human beings and all of life evolved. It is essential to have a proper understanding of the correct evolutionary process to know how stop the noxious activities of viruses and bacteria. If you grasp this, you will forever be far ahead of any and all funded scientists in the US and most of Europe today. To explain how evolution actually works it would be best to look at the evolutionary progression of viruses, bacteria, and fungi. Every bacteria is comprised of a virus as its primary part, and the secondary parts of fatty acids and nucleo-proteins. The fatty acids neutralize the noxious powers of the virus which enables the bacteria to survive as a life form. Every fungus, yeast, mold is comprised of a bacteria as its primary part, and the secondary parts of phospholipids and other constituents. The phospholipids neutralize the noxious effects of the bacteria which allows the fungi etc, to survive as a life form. A virus never, and I mean NEVER, mutates to become anything other than a new virus. A bacteria never, and I mean NEVER, mutates to become anything other than a new bacteria. As a corallary, certain fatty acids always, and I mean ALWAYS, act as neutralizers of viruses. And certain phospholipids always, and I mean ALWAYS, act as neutralizers of bacteria. This has been true since the existence of viruses and bacteria and molds, which would be billions of years. Biological life evolved from viruses to bacteria to molds, fungi, and yeasts and beyond to more complex life forms through this method. Genetic mutation did not cause the leap from viruses to bacteria to fungi, etc. There are untold varieties of viruses, bacteria, and fungi because they do mutate while remaining as viruses or bacteria or fungi. Some viruses, bacteria and fungi are their own endpoints because the particular mutation they have achieved are not compatible with becoming a higher life form. This helps to explain why there are so many holes in the trail of evolutionary progression. We are constantly at a loss to find the 'ancestors' of various life forms. That's because we are searching for gradual changes, say for instance from dinosaurs to birds. But evolution didn't happen that way. For instance, when a virus becomes a bacteria there is no gradual trail to observe. In a way, the difference would be sort of like the difference between a sperm and a fertilized egg -- a big difference! Similarly, when a bacteria took on the secondary parts of phospholipids to become a fungi or a mold or a yeast, it was a huge change. As a result, there was no evolutionary trail to follow. A critical -- essential -- criteria for a jump to a higher life form is that the higher life form MUST have a natural defense against the noxious aspect of the lower life form. All life forms must eat, so the higher life form must be able to shut off that aspect in the lower life form but provide a new way of sustaining life. As an addendum to this, the nucleus of human cells appear to correspond to the bacterial level. Cells appear to correspond to the fungal level, which is interesting because fungi, yeast, and molds are single cell life forms. Mitochondria are also interesting to look at from this evolutionary approach, since they appear to be interlopers of a sort. How they might fit in, I don't know. So here's what it means to you. Fatty acids shut off viral noxiousness. Phospholipids shut of bacterial noxiousness. This means if you come down with a viral infection, or you want to prevent one -- be sure to have an adequate intake of fatty acids in your diet. To neutralize bacterial infections, use phospholipids. I don't know which lipids shut off fungi, yeasts and molds. Fortunately I've found various herbs that do it, such as Pau D'Arco, although I don't know what the neutralizing component is. <awthrawthr@yahoo.com> wrote in message > The Darwinian theory of evolution and the genetic theory of evolution > are inadequate to describe what really happens in evolution. DOA < snip 100 lines of Nobel Prize losing crap > moo Jeez, dog, I see a Pulitzer in your future. Yeah, that'll happen. PS. What I wrote wasn't intended for you, but for intelligent readers who might have something to say. My apologies for tying up your mind with things you don't understand. -------------------------------------------------------------- Visit http://www.itsnotjustforsex.com <awthrawthr@yahoo.com> wrote in message > Jeez, dog, I see a Pulitzer in your future. I'll get one of those before you get a Nobel, spammer. > PS. What I wrote wasn't intended for you, but for intelligent readers > who might have something to say. My apologies for tying up your mind > with things you don't understand. I've seen nothing but a thorough trashing of your new theory of evolution by anyone here. And, I note that you haven't responded to the criticisms with much else than more drivel. But, I doubt you care as long as your eBook spam gets noticed. moo The theory isn't mine. Hierarchic Organization is already taught in some German Universities. It is also a respected theory in some European scientific circles, according to Professor Gerhard Schrauzer, who may be the world's foremost authority on selenium. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Visit http://www.itsnotjustforsex.com <awthrawthr@yahoo.com> wrote in message > The theory isn't mine. Hierarchic Organization is already taught in > some German Universities. References please. And maybe a link to some definitions of the "theory". m I suggest you go back and read what I said in my first message. It explains how the theory works. It's not about definitions. It's not about references. It is either correct or it isn't. Since the theory has been used to reverse AIDS whereas reversing AIDS is not doable with the Darwinian theory nor with the genetic theory, Hierarchic Organization has a leg up in my book. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Visit http://www.itsnotjustforsex.com <awthrawthr@yahoo.com> wrote in message >I suggest you go back and read what I said in my first message. It > explains how the theory works. It's not about definitions. It's not > about references. It is either correct or it isn't. It isn't rvrn defined like any scientific theory. > Since the theory has been used to reverse AIDS whereas reversing AIDS > is not doable with the Darwinian theory nor with the genetic theory, > Hierarchic Organization has a leg up in my book. Bullshit. Liar. Spamming idiot. Come back with a cogent theory and some evidence. Real evidence. moo >I suggest you go back and read what I said in my first message. It >explains how the theory works. It's not about definitions. It's not >about references. It is either correct or it isn't. Exactly. And if it makes nonsensical claims about "bacteria are viruses with add-on components," thus requiring viruses to have existed first, it's bogus and can be discarded. >Since the theory has been used to reverse AIDS whereas reversing AIDS >is not doable with the Darwinian theory nor with the genetic theory, >Hierarchic Organization has a leg up in my book. Yeah, right. I'll believe *that* one when I see some hard evidence. -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT) When it comes to an evolutionary theory such as Hierarchic Organization you won't see hard evidence, only a series of bits of evidence that all point in the same direction. By this I mean you would have a hard time recreating viruses transforming themselves into bacteria because it might be that they occurred during heavy volcanic activity with concomitant electrical storms. However, the theory can be used as a way of looking at cell development, cell defenses, etc. Then they can be tested. For instance, rabbits were pretreated with either fatty acid or sterol injections under their skin. (Sterols are compliments or antagonists to fatty acids.) The next day, viruses were introduced to the sites where the previous injections were made. In the sites that were injected with sterols, the viruses flourished. In contrast, the viruses were unable to take hold in the sites pretreated with the fatty acids. So it appears that the fatty acids provided an effective defense against viruses. In another study, mice were given anthrax, tuberuculosis, and a third bacterial infection (I forget which one.) Almost every one died. Another group of the same strain of mice were given phospholipids and then infected with the bacteria. Between 100% and 90% lived. So by applying the theory in animals, the results were consistent with what one would expect from the H.O. theory. That is how the H.O. theory could be used -- to provide direction in experimenting on what is likely to work in the treatment of disease. The H.O. theory merely gives scientists and others a new way of looking at how life is organized. If the theory is correct, it will then provide fruitful results when tested and applied. <awthrawthr@yahoo.com> wrote in message > When it comes to an evolutionary theory such as Hierarchic Organization > you won't see hard evidence, only a series of bits of evidence that all > point in the same direction. Yes. DOA. There are lots of crank "theories" to choose from. > By this I mean you would have a hard time recreating viruses > transforming themselves into bacteria because it might be that they > occurred during heavy volcanic activity with concomitant electrical > storms. No theory. No evidence. < snip anecdotal claims > Do you have ANY real studies that show a real novel effect? m >When it comes to an evolutionary theory such as Hierarchic Organization >you won't see hard evidence, only a series of bits of evidence that all [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >occurred during heavy volcanic activity with concomitant electrical >storms. Inasmuch as viruses are inactive until they have a cell to use, you'd have a hard time getting them to do anything at all. >In another study, mice were given anthrax, tuberuculosis, and a third >bacterial infection (I forget which one.) Almost every one died. >Another group of the same strain of mice were given phospholipids and >then infected with the bacteria. Between 100% and 90% lived. That's a long way from showing anything at all about evolution. -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT) Inactive viruses can come back to life as it were with the addition of new nucleic acids. When it comes to their transformation to a bacteria, the addition of fatty acids and nucleoproteins do the job. So the virus needn't be doing anything, to make the transformation. Nevertheless, with the addition, they are trasformed either form a dormant stage of virus or an active one. The use of phospholipids was arrived at because the author had observed that one of the differences between a bacterium and a single celled fungi, mold or yeast was the presence of phospholipids in the fungi, molds and yeasts. So the experiments support the conclusion that fungi, etc are the next step up the evolutionary ladder, in that phospholipids are a differentiating characteristic between bacteria and fungi, and that the phospholipids provide an effective defense against bacteria. Do those experiments prove by themselves that Hierarchic Organization is correct? Of course not. But they do provide powerful corroborative evidence. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Visit http://www.itsnotjustforsex.com I suggest you go back and read what I said in my first message. It explains how the theory works. It's not about definitions. It's not about references. It is either correct or it isn't. Since the theory has been used to reverse AIDS whereas reversing AIDS is not doable with the Darwinian theory nor with the genetic theory, Hierarchic Organization has a leg up in my book. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Visit http://www.itsnotjustforsex.com |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.