Medical Forum / General / General / December 2004
Coca Cola Causing Diabetes.
|
|
Thread rating:  |
TheBarber - 28 Nov 2004 19:29 GMT I drink a lot of coca cola everyday, but I am starting to worry about the possibility of being diagnosed with diabetes. Can someone please tell me if coca cola can cause diabetes, and if so, how much per day would be bad for you?
Jim Chinnis - 28 Nov 2004 19:41 GMT tyler@chariho-dot-org.no-spam.invalid (TheBarber) wrote in part:
>I drink a lot of coca cola everyday, but I am starting to worry about >the possibility of being diagnosed with diabetes. Can someone please >tell me if coca cola can cause diabetes, and if so, how much per day >would be bad for you? Yes. Drinking Coca-Cola is probably a major contributor to the epidemic of diabetes. In my opinion, any at all is bad for you. Switch to whole foods and natural foods if you want to avoid diabetes. -- Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA jchinnis@alum.mit.edu
Jeff - 28 Nov 2004 20:12 GMT > tyler@chariho-dot-org.no-spam.invalid (TheBarber) wrote in part: > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > and > natural foods if you want to avoid diabetes. There is nothing particularly good (or bad) about whole foods and natural foods.
Also, make sure you get plenty of excercise and keep a healthy weight. Obesity is a major risk factor for and cause of diabetes.
The sugar in colas, juices, etc., is harmful. Switch to Diet Coke or Diet Pepsi.
Jeff
> -- > Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA jchinnis@alum.mit.edu Jim Chinnis - 28 Nov 2004 20:20 GMT "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in part:
>> tyler@chariho-dot-org.no-spam.invalid (TheBarber) wrote in part: >> [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] >The sugar in colas, juices, etc., is harmful. Switch to Diet Coke or Diet >Pepsi. The sugar in whole foods comes with fiber, which affects digestion so as to slow the rise in insulin. The sugar in colas is highly processed and the fiber has been removed, along with the useful nutrients.
A simple rule--usually right--is that whole foods will be less likely to cause diabetes than will processed foods. -- Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA jchinnis@alum.mit.edu
David Wright - 28 Nov 2004 21:19 GMT >tyler@chariho-dot-org.no-spam.invalid (TheBarber) wrote in part: > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >diabetes. In my opinion, any at all is bad for you. Switch to whole foods and >natural foods if you want to avoid diabetes. It's not health food, but probably the biggest thing is to avoid being overweight, no matter what it is that you're eating.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)
Jim Chinnis - 28 Nov 2004 21:33 GMT wright@clam.prodigy.net (David Wright) wrote in part:
>It's not health food, but probably the biggest thing is to avoid being >overweight, no matter what it is that you're eating. No question about that. -- Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA jchinnis@alum.mit.edu
tech27 - 28 Nov 2004 22:27 GMT > tyler@chariho-dot-org.no-spam.invalid (TheBarber) wrote in part:
> Yes. Drinking Coca-Cola is probably a major contributor to the epidemic of > diabetes. In my opinion, any at all is bad for you. Switch to whole foods > and > natural foods if you want to avoid diabetes. > -- > Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA jchinnis@alum.mit.edu You are a f.cking idiot Jim. Why are you posting BULLSHIT when the OP was looking for some serious answers. Medical science has not found ANYTHING THAT CAUSES DIABETES- you f.cking twit.
There are lots of contributing factors such as obesity, pregnancy, poor diet, lack of exercise, stress, ageing, and most obviously hereditary, but they are just factors. There is no proof that a skinny unstressed male athlete will not develop diabetes. In fact, if both his parents were diabetics chances are he will be too eventually.
Now go away with your stupidity!
Jim Chinnis - 01 Dec 2004 03:16 GMT "tech27" <tech27@mail.anonymizer.com> wrote in part:
>> tyler@chariho-dot-org.no-spam.invalid (TheBarber) wrote in part: > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > >Now go away with your stupidity! For someone who indicated that he was concerned about receiving a diagnosis of type II diabetes and asked about the advisability of continuing to consume 36 ounces of Coca-Cola each day, I would advise avoiding it.
The high fructose corn syrup in that quantity, regularly consumed, probably contributes to weight gain and possibly to a variety of physiologic responses not yet well understood that may lead to insulin resistance and or diabetes m. There's a reasonable chance that moving down on the glycemic scale may improves ones odds of developing DM. -- Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA jchinnis@alum.mit.edu
TheBarber - 28 Nov 2004 20:30 GMT You are pricks for not answering.
Jim Chinnis - 28 Nov 2004 20:53 GMT tyler@chariho-dot-org.no-spam.invalid (TheBarber) wrote in part:
>You are pricks for not answering. > >*-----------------------* > Posted at: > www.GroupSrv.com >*-----------------------* And you need a newsreader. -- Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA jchinnis@alum.mit.edu
David Wright - 28 Nov 2004 21:21 GMT >You are pricks for not answering. Says some anonymous twat *one hour* after posting his original question, and I've already seen multiple responses. Hey, "The Barber", drop dead. Don't drink Coke, try injecting it directly into a vein.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)
PF Riley - 29 Nov 2004 03:30 GMT >You are pricks for not answering. Gosh, I see you waited a whole HOUR! I'm sorry we weren't sitting at our terminals on a Sunday afternoon waiting for your message.
We'll try harder next time.
a.shole.
PF
TheBarber - 28 Nov 2004 23:29 GMT Well then I have no worries if I am not overweight, and leaning towards underweight? I never eat candy, or sweets, just drink coke. Everything else suits a helathy diet. Although I drink a lot of coke. About 3 cans a day I would say.
tech27 - 29 Nov 2004 00:04 GMT > Well then I have no worries if I am not overweight, and leaning > towards underweight? I never eat candy, or sweets, just drink coke. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > www.GroupSrv.com > *-----------------------* Very generally speaking your lifestyle does not indicate any concerns regarding diet and weight. A good diet with 3 cokes a day is not bad, although some would argue that no Coke is better. But they say that about coffee, tea, etc.
My opinion is that nothing is bad for you in moderation. If you have no family history of diabetes I wouldn't be concerned. But all of that means nothing if you have bad luck. In my case, I was perfectly healthy but got very seriously food poisoned. I was virtually comatose for almost 2 days - don't recall a thing. When I recovered I almost immediately had all the classic symptoms of diabetes, polyphasia, polyuria (excessive thirst, hunger), and general lethargy. My pancreas had been damaged by the poisoning and had ceased to function.
Happy Dog - 29 Nov 2004 00:28 GMT "TheBarber" <tyler@chariho-dot-org.no-spam.invalid>
< bipolar like mood swing noted... >
> Well then I have no worries if I am not overweight, and leaning > towards underweight? I never eat candy, or sweets, just drink coke. > Everything else suits a helathy diet. Although I drink a lot of coke. > About 3 cans a day I would say. That's not a huge amount, considering that you don't eat many other sources of simple sugar carbs. But it's still significant and maybe unnecessary. There's a new Coke called "C2" out that is marketed toward Coke users who want to cut carbs but don't like the taste of Diet Coke. Reviews claim that it tastes virtually the same. Switching to it would cut your Coke sugar intake by half. 1.5 Cokes a day isn't a risk in any sane person's book (for a healthy person).
http://www.cokec2.com/pages/aboutC2.shtml
http://www.carbwire.com/2004/06/11/coke-c2-review
moo
PF Riley - 29 Nov 2004 03:36 GMT >"TheBarber" <tyler@chariho-dot-org.no-spam.invalid> > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] >intake by half. 1.5 Cokes a day isn't a risk in any sane person's book (for >a healthy person). This is irrelevant to the original question. Eating too much sugar does not cause diabetes. This is such an annoying yet common misconception, because people confuse cause and effect. People who have diabetes have high sugar levels in their bloodstream. This is CAUSED by the diabetes, not the other way around. You won't raise your blood glucose levels by eating lots of sugar and "become" diabetic.
PF
Happy Dog - 29 Nov 2004 06:03 GMT "PF Riley" <pfriley@watt-not.com>
>>"TheBarber" <tyler@chariho-dot-org.no-spam.invalid> >>> Well then I have no worries if I am not overweight, and leaning [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > CAUSED by the diabetes, not the other way around. You won't raise your > blood glucose levels by eating lots of sugar and "become" diabetic. I know. My point is that there are health benefits to reducing unnecessary sugar intake and I suggested one.
m
tech27 - 30 Nov 2004 02:26 GMT > I know. My point is that there are health benefits to reducing > unnecessary sugar intake and I suggested one. > > m It has never been proven that "overworking" the pancreas will cause it to fail, which does not mean that one shouldn't moderate sugar intake, as one should moderate most things. Somewhat akin to overworking the heart will wear it out (ok -the heart is a muscle and the analogy is a stretch). The beauty of a healthy person with a functioning pancreas is that the body reacts so fast that even consuming a bag of sugar, or half a chocolate cake will not cause even slight spike in levels. Of course, all people are different, but the regulatory function of the pancreas is such that high sugar intake is immediately compensated for before any increase in levels.
Ed Mathes - 30 Nov 2004 03:00 GMT I would suggest you look up "Beta-Cell Burnout" and Sulfonyleureas
> > I know. My point is that there are health benefits to reducing > > unnecessary sugar intake and I suggested one. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > different, but the regulatory function of the pancreas is such that high > sugar intake is immediately compensated for before any increase in levels. Happy Dog - 30 Nov 2004 09:22 GMT "tech27" <tech27@mail.anonymizer.com> wrote in message
>> I know. My point is that there are health benefits to reducing >> unnecessary sugar intake and I suggested one. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > fail, which does not mean that one shouldn't moderate sugar intake, as one > should moderate most things. God's will that excesses be eschewed. Save suger.
moo
David Rind - 29 Nov 2004 23:28 GMT > This is irrelevant to the original question. Eating too much sugar > does not cause diabetes. This is such an annoying yet common [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > PF I think this answer is overly definitive. There's a fair amount of reason to worry that high glycemic index foods (and sugar is such a food) can increase the risk of type II diabetes.
 Signature David Rind drind@caregroup.harvard.edu
PF Riley - 30 Nov 2004 04:46 GMT >> This is irrelevant to the original question. Eating too much sugar >> does not cause diabetes. This is such an annoying yet common [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >reason to worry that high glycemic index foods (and sugar is such a >food) can increase the risk of type II diabetes. But given that simple sugars are a relatively recent addition to the human diet and believed by some, Atkins notwithstanding, to be a main cause of obesity and even hypercholesterolemia in Western society, and given that obesity is the major risk factor for type 2 diabetes, could it simply be that high sugar intake is a contributing factor to obesity, and the obesity causes the insulin resistance and ultimately diabetes?
PF
David Rind - 01 Dec 2004 02:12 GMT >>>This is irrelevant to the original question. Eating too much sugar >>>does not cause diabetes. This is such an annoying yet common [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > PF Yes, that is possible. But there is evidence from animals to suggest that high glycemic index foods actually promote diabetes independent of effects on weight. It's not that I think the issue is proven, but rather that I think your statement that eating sugar won't lead to diabetes is also not proven and may well turn out to be incorrect.
 Signature David Rind drind@caregroup.harvard.edu
Daniel Prince - 01 Dec 2004 05:51 GMT >I think this answer is overly definitive. There's a fair amount of >reason to worry that high glycemic index foods (and sugar is such a >food) can increase the risk of type II diabetes. Is this increase in risk independent of the increase in risk caused by the weight gain that high glycemic index foods cause?
 Signature I am TERRIBLY cruel to my cat. I tease him with a vine tendril until he either jumps up in the air to bat at it or zooms around in a circle until he gets too dizzy to stand up. What is cruel about it is that I don't do it nearly as much as he wants me to.
David Rind - 01 Dec 2004 12:21 GMT >>I think this answer is overly definitive. There's a fair amount of >>reason to worry that high glycemic index foods (and sugar is such a >>food) can increase the risk of type II diabetes. > > Is this increase in risk independent of the increase in risk caused > by the weight gain that high glycemic index foods cause? There is concern that it is an independent risk (based mainly on animal models). Again, I am not saying that such a risk has been definitively proven.
 Signature David Rind drind@caregroup.harvard.edu
tech27 - 30 Nov 2004 02:17 GMT > This is irrelevant to the original question. Eating too much sugar > does not cause diabetes. This is such an annoying yet common [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > PF Absolutely correct. People have many misconceptions, like when a diabetic in the throws of a hypoglycemic event eats a donut or drinks a regular ginerale people think he is committing suicide. Public misconceptions are one thing, but when people post their misconceptions as factual replies it makes my blood boil (and blood sugar drop).
David Wright - 29 Nov 2004 03:50 GMT >Well then I have no worries if I am not overweight, and leaning >towards underweight? I never eat candy, or sweets, just drink coke. >Everything else suits a helathy diet. Although I drink a lot of coke. >About 3 cans a day I would say. Substituting diet Coke for one of those wouldn't hurt.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)
PF Riley - 30 Nov 2004 05:01 GMT >>Well then I have no worries if I am not overweight, and leaning >>towards underweight? I never eat candy, or sweets, just drink coke. >>Everything else suits a helathy diet. Although I drink a lot of coke. >>About 3 cans a day I would say. > >Substituting diet Coke for one of those wouldn't hurt. Ah, but some would say artificial sweeteners still induce insulin release, causing increased hunger.
David Wright - 30 Nov 2004 05:15 GMT >>>Well then I have no worries if I am not overweight, and leaning >>>towards underweight? I never eat candy, or sweets, just drink coke. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >Ah, but some would say artificial sweeteners still induce insulin >release, causing increased hunger. Oh, sure, but I'm trying to avoid obesity, and I'm going to assume that the Barber's iron will keeps him from succumbing to the supposedly induced hunger.
Besides, you're forgetting that, according to the Alternative Krowd, aspartame is probably the most toxic substance known next to plutonium.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)
PF Riley - 01 Dec 2004 06:41 GMT >>Ah, but some would say artificial sweeteners still induce insulin >>release, causing increased hunger. > >Oh, sure, but I'm trying to avoid obesity, and I'm going to assume >that the Barber's iron will keeps him from succumbing to the >supposedly induced hunger. Lady: Do you have a diet special?
Waiter: Yes we do, Ma'am.
Lady: Great. I'll have two of them.
>Besides, you're forgetting that, according to the Alternative Krowd, >aspartame is probably the most toxic substance known next to >plutonium. Don't you mean... mercury?
PF
David Wright - 03 Dec 2004 03:21 GMT >>>Ah, but some would say artificial sweeteners still induce insulin >>>release, causing increased hunger. [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > >Don't you mean... mercury? Oh, right. That's the second-most toxic substance. Aspartame is third.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)
Happy Dog - 30 Nov 2004 09:29 GMT "PF Riley" <pfriley@watt-not.com> wrote in message news:
>>>Well then I have no worries if I am not overweight, and leaning >>>towards underweight? I never eat candy, or sweets, just drink coke. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Ah, but some would say artificial sweeteners still induce insulin > release, causing increased hunger. Idiot. Some evidence of this?
m
David Wright - 01 Dec 2004 01:12 GMT >"PF Riley" <pfriley@watt-not.com> wrote in message news: >> [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > >Idiot. Some evidence of this? You know, HD, it would be OK with me if you refrained from calling PF an idiot.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)
Happy Dog - 01 Dec 2004 03:45 GMT "David Wright" <wright@clam.prodigy.net> wrote in
>>"PF Riley" <pfriley@watt-not.com> wrote in message news: >>> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > You know, HD, it would be OK with me if you refrained from calling PF > an idiot. Oops! My sincere apologies. It was about 4AM and I had this plus a couple other messages open. I meant this as a reply to Not Dr C. Obviously screwed up. In fact, I agree with PF's statement. Thanks for pointing this out. I'd email an apology but it's an anti-spam address.
le moo
PF Riley - 01 Dec 2004 06:54 GMT >Oops! My sincere apologies. It was about 4AM and I had this plus a couple >other messages open. I meant this as a reply to Not Dr C. Obviously >screwed up. In fact, I agree with PF's statement. Thanks for pointing this >out. I'd email an apology but it's an anti-spam address. No need to apologize -- I am an idiot. In fact, it didn't occur to me at all that your calling me such could have been in error. Here's why:
Firstly, I posted something that was pure conjecture without backing it up with evidence. (Although, in my defense, to avoid technically being "wrong", I do and did often preface such statements with "some would say..." or "some believe..." etc.)
Secondly, when I did look for evidence in support of my statement, I found only evidence to the contrary:
http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/full/76/4/721
"It was suggested from short-term studies that artificial, nonenergetic sweeteners can increase appetite through cephalic stimulation (eg, the taste, smell, and sight of food) and that aspartame in particular may have a paradoxical stimulating effect on appetite. We were not able to confirm such an effect in this long-term study, and our findings were therefore in agreement with several previous short-term studies."
See also Figure 1.
PF
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 29 Nov 2004 01:55 GMT > I drink a lot of coca cola everyday, but I am starting to worry about > the possibility of being diagnosed with diabetes. There may be cause for concern if there is type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in members of your family.
> Can someone please > tell me if coca cola can cause diabetes, and if so, how much per day > would be bad for you? In someone who is not genetically predisposed, Coca Cola will not bring out diabetes.
In someone who is genetically predisposed, over-consumption of anything (including soft-drinks) can lead to diabetes.
Servant to the humblest person in the universe,
Andrew
-- Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD Board-Certified Cardiologist http://www.heartmdphd.com/
** Who is the humblest person in the universe? http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048
What is all this about? http://makeashorterlink.com/?R20632B48
Is this spam? http://makeashorterlink.com/?N69721867
Mack? - 29 Nov 2004 15:20 GMT >> I drink a lot of coca cola everyday, but I am starting to worry about >> the possibility of being diagnosed with diabetes. [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > >Andrew liar. coca cola does not cause diabetes. chung is quack and fraud.
Mâck©® Type 1 since 1975 http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org http://www.diabetic-talk.org http://www.insulin-pumpers.org
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." ...Theodore Roosevelt
(o o) --ooO-(_)-Ooo--------------------
Ludwig - 30 Nov 2004 04:00 GMT > ... > >> Can someone please [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > M?ck?? > Type 1 since 1975 Coke does not exactly causes diabetes, but it can certainly contribute.
"Insulin resistance appears to be caused at least in part by inheritance and in part by high levels of fat -- in the form of triglycerides ... High levels of triglycerides in the blood ... are not so much the result of dietary fat as they are of carbohydrate consumption and existing body fat." (Dr. Bernstein's Diabetes Solution).
In other words, eating too much sugar and carbohydrates, or just eating too much, contributes to the development of type 2 diabetes. But there is nothing special about Coke. Pepsi does the same thing. (and pancakes, honey, bread, etc.)
IMHO, a small amount of coke is not harmful to a healthy person without diabetes or diabetes predisposition, who is not overweight. (Like a can or two per day). But why not at least switch to the sugar free version? Almost everyone (except those with PKU disease) would probably be better off.
Shirley Ann Tatum - 28 Dec 2004 15:37 GMT Dr. What about protein eating coca cola?
MU - 28 Dec 2004 17:19 GMT > What about protein eating coca cola? Don't inject it intra muscularly and you will be fine.
Steve Harris sbharris@ROMAN9.netcom.com - 29 Nov 2004 02:48 GMT > I drink a lot of coca cola everyday, but I am starting to worry about > the possibility of being diagnosed with diabetes. Can someone please > tell me if coca cola can cause diabetes, and if so, how much per day > would be bad for you? COMMENT:
Happy to. Coca Cola does cause diabetes. An amount of 3 cans per day is okay, but at 4 cans per day, your pancreas will turn into old leather within 5 years. Then you will die without insulin.
So, keep Coke consumption at exactly 3 of the 10 oz cans of Coke or less, per day. That's 30 fluid ounces, or 0.887 L. Or else 3.14 cans of diet Pepsi, or 2.6 cans of Dr. Pepper, which are all exactly equivalent.
Sometimes people ask whether or not, if they skip Coke for a day, they can drink more than 3 cans the NEXT day. The answer is that your geometric mean consumption of coke cannot exceed 22 cans per week. So take your number of cans each day, square that number, add up all the squared numbers in a week, and take the square root of that. If it's more than 22, you'd better save up for your test-meter.
Helpfully,
SBH
tech27 - 30 Nov 2004 02:13 GMT "Steve Harris sbharris@ROMAN9.netcom.com" <sbharris@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message news:79cf0a8.0411281848.5ad102eb@posting.google.com...
> Happy to. Coca Cola does cause diabetes. An amount of 3 cans per day > is okay, but at 4 cans per day, your pancreas will turn into old > leather within 5 years. Then you will die without insulin. Bullshit. Absolute crap. Show us any studies that prove 3 cans per day will do that. Why the f.ck do idiots like you make up stupid sh.t like this. f.ck off if you don't know. Idiot!
What about other factors? Does it matter if you weigh 97 lbs or 300 lbs? Is 4 the max for any person? How about a lab rat? Moron.
> So, keep Coke consumption at exactly 3 of the 10 oz cans of Coke or > less, per day. That's 30 fluid ounces, or 0.887 L. Or else 3.14 cans [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > squared numbers in a week, and take the square root of that. If it's > more than 22, you'd better save up for your test-meter. Such a bullshit analysis! It's amazing you would even attempt to quantify your bullshit ideas.
> Helpfully, > > SBH Helpfully? How about "IGNORANTLY"?
David Wright - 30 Nov 2004 03:59 GMT >"Steve Harris sbharris@ROMAN9.netcom.com" <sbharris@ix.netcom.com> wrote in >message news:79cf0a8.0411281848.5ad102eb@posting.google.com... [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >What about other factors? Does it matter if you weigh 97 lbs or 300 lbs? Is >4 the max for any person? How about a lab rat? Moron. You see, tech27, this is why you need to work on the ol' anger management issues. You have just been trolled. Now take the hook out of your mouth and contemplate the fact that if you actually had a sense of humor, you would not have had to remove the hook.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)
>> So, keep Coke consumption at exactly 3 of the 10 oz cans of Coke or >> less, per day. That's 30 fluid ounces, or 0.887 L. Or else 3.14 cans [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > >Helpfully? How about "IGNORANTLY"? Happy Dog - 30 Nov 2004 09:14 GMT "tech27" <tech27@mail.anonymizer.com> wrote in
> "Steve Harris sbharris@ROMAN9.netcom.com" <sbharris@ix.netcom.com> wrote >>> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Bullshit. Absolute crap. You're new here, no?
moo
TheBarber - 29 Nov 2004 03:29 GMT As for diabetes being in the family, my grandfather on my father's side got diabetes after my father was born.....So technically, I would have no inheritence of diabetes, since my grandfather got it after his son (my dad) was already born and far afterwards got diabetes.
So yeah, I guess I am fine. :)
PF Riley - 29 Nov 2004 03:38 GMT >As for diabetes being in the family, my grandfather on my father's >side got diabetes after my father was born.....So technically, I [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >So yeah, I guess I am fine. :) I will assume you're just "playing" stupid.
PF
Ed Mathes - 29 Nov 2004 04:05 GMT This makes absolutely no sense whatsoever...........
> As for diabetes being in the family, my grandfather on my father's > side got diabetes after my father was born.....So technically, I [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > www.GroupSrv.com > *-----------------------* tech27 - 30 Nov 2004 02:19 GMT Hereditary predilection for diabetes is either there or it isn't. It doesn't matter who gets it when. It's not like AIDS - where it won't be passed to offspring if the parent was not infected before or during pregnancy.
Are you really that dim?
> This makes absolutely no sense whatsoever........... > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] >> www.GroupSrv.com >> *-----------------------* Ed Mathes - 30 Nov 2004 03:01 GMT Hmmm...I hope that was address to "the barber" and not me......
> Hereditary predilection for diabetes is either there or it isn't. It doesn't > matter who gets it when. It's not like AIDS - where it won't be passed to [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > >> www.GroupSrv.com > >> *-----------------------* gman99 - 29 Nov 2004 15:26 GMT > I drink a lot of coca cola everyday, but I am starting to worry about > the possibility of being diagnosed with diabetes. Can someone please > tell me if coca cola can cause diabetes, and if so, how much per day > would be bad for you? Depends, are you a fatty ?? Do the extra calories in Coke keep the fat on ?? Switch to diet coke if you're too worried...you'll save money at the dentist too.
|
|
|