Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / General / November 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Can magnetic resonance be optically detected in room temperature?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jim - 04 Nov 2004 01:23 GMT
I have great interest on optically detected magnetic resonance. It is
based on electron spin resonance technique, while detecting the change
of photon instead of microwave.

From the literatures I collected so far, I found all the experiments
were done at pretty low temperature, normally less than 100K.

Can magnetic resonance be optically detected in room temperature? And
by the way, is there any relation between the sample temperature and
signal-to-noise ratio or sensitivity?

Thanks a million!
AES/newspost - 04 Nov 2004 03:15 GMT
> I have great interest on optically detected magnetic resonance. It is
> based on electron spin resonance technique, while detecting the change
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Thanks a million!

Would you be interested in the reverse process, i.e. detecting optical
absorption by its effect on a microwave (X band, 10 GHz) spin resonance
transition, at room temperature?
Jim - 04 Nov 2004 19:00 GMT
> > I have great interest on optically detected magnetic resonance. It is
> > based on electron spin resonance technique, while detecting the change
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> absorption by its effect on a microwave (X band, 10 GHz) spin resonance
> transition, at room temperature?
I 'd like to try both since my system would be able to detect EPR
signal and optical signal both.

The question is, according to many literatures, since photon takes
much more energy than microwave, monitoring EPR by detecting light
absorption/scattering should be much more sensitive than monitoring
light absorption by detecting EPR signal. If true, what is the merit
of the latter?

Thank you!
AES/newspost - 05 Nov 2004 01:07 GMT
> > > I have great interest on optically detected magnetic resonance. It is
> > > based on electron spin resonance technique, while detecting the change
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> light absorption by detecting EPR signal. If true, what is the merit
> of the latter?

My interest in it was purely as a demonstration experiment, for teaching
purposes.  Make an X-band microwave cavity filled with ruby; sweep the
input microwave frequency across the ruby resonance and display the
X-band resonance on a scope; fire a ruby laser (or possibly a chopped UV
source) into the ruby; watch the X-band magnetic resonance change and
then recover.
Jim - 06 Nov 2004 05:54 GMT
> My interest in it was purely as a demonstration experiment, for teaching
> purposes.  Make an X-band microwave cavity filled with ruby; sweep the
> input microwave frequency across the ruby resonance and display the
> X-band resonance on a scope; fire a ruby laser (or possibly a chopped UV
> source) into the ruby; watch the X-band magnetic resonance change and
> then recover.

Got it. Thank you very much!
David A. Van Baak - 08 Nov 2004 21:55 GMT
> I have great interest on optically detected magnetic resonance. It is
> based on electron spin resonance technique, while detecting the change
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Thanks a million!

I'm not sure it's the sort of experiment you had in mind, but standard
optical pumping experiments seem to meet your criterion--magnetic
resonance induced by rf or microwave magnetic fields, but detected by
change in transmission of a sample for light.  And the technique
certainly works at normal temperatures--say 50 Celsius for rubidium
vapor, using 795 nm resonance line for polarizing and probing the
sample.  Signal to noise ratio rises as the sample gets denser, then
drops as it gets too opaque.

D. Van Baak
Jim - 09 Nov 2004 19:26 GMT
> I'm not sure it's the sort of experiment you had in mind, but standard
> optical pumping experiments seem to meet your criterion--magnetic
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> sample.  Signal to noise ratio rises as the sample gets denser, then
> drops as it gets too opaque.
Can I use solid instead of vapor in room temperature?

I suppose the use of vapor is because that the linewidth is not
significantly broadened by the solid lattices. However, I did see some
researchers succeeded to optically detect EPR of Ruby at tens of K.
Can I apply the same system to room temperature?
Thank you!
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.