Medical Forum / General / General / November 2004
Can a cold last a month?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
MS - 18 Oct 2004 19:33 GMT I've had a cold for about a month now. I don't still have the fever, aching, etc., that I had at the beginning, but I still have respiratory symptoms--nose and throat a lot worse than usual, laryngitis, etc.
Is it possible to really still have the cold virus that long? Or could it be that the nose, throat, etc., having become inflamed during the cold, are taking a long time to heal, although with no more infection?
bobbie sellers - 18 Oct 2004 11:51 GMT MS wrote,
> I've had a cold for about a month now. I don't still have the fever, aching, > etc., that I had at the beginning, but I still have respiratory > symptoms--nose and throat a lot worse than usual, laryngitis, etc. A cold, aka virual rhinitis, should only last about 10 to 14 days.
> Is it possible to really still have the cold virus that long? Or could it be > that the nose, throat, etc., having become inflamed during the cold, are > taking a long time to heal, although with no more infection? You might have an allergy that you are able to ignore when you are well. You might have a bacterial infection or something else entirely.
You should seek the advice of a medical professional and in my opinion, as soon as possible.
later bliss -- C O C O A Powered ...
-- bobbie sellers - a retired nurse in San Francisco bliss at california dot com
MS - 19 Oct 2004 03:56 GMT > You might have an allergy that you are able to ignore when > you are well. You might have a bacterial infection or something [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > later > bliss -- C O C O A Powered ... I do have allergies and chronic rhinitis (all year). So it's not unusual for my nose to be inflamed, and to have more mucus (very thick) than most people.
However, it has been worse than normal the last few weeks. And I definitely did have some kind of infection a few weeks ago, with fever, dizziness, aching, etc., that I considered to be a "cold". I don't have those symptoms now, but the nose, throat, etc., are definitely worse than normal, I lose my voice (I'm a teacher), etc. So, that's why I think that the virus is probably gone, but the nose, throat, etc., never fully healed from it.
As far as a bacterial infection---I used to get sinus infections frequently, and was on antibiotics a good part of the year. Since my last sinus surgery, that has occurred far less often. Doesn't one usually have colored mucus with a bacterial infection? Mine has been clear. Also, if I had an active infection, wouldn't I still have symptoms like the dizziness, fever, etc.?
So, I'm really not sure how seeing a doctor about it could help. Sure, if the doc thought I had a bacterial infection they would prescribe antibiotics. But I doubt that would be diagnosed from these symptoms, and doctors are reluctant about antibiotics these days.
Other than that--there's not much a doctor could do about this. I already use different meds for rhinitis--cortisone nasal spray, Atrovent nasal spray, and Astelin. I also take Allegra and Singulair. I irrigate to wash out my nose. (Tons of thick junk coming out now, but clear in color.) I really cannot think of what a doctor might do about this, other than prescribe antibiotics if they suspected bacterial infection, which I rather doubt. (Or--do you think from these symptoms, that I might indeed have a bacterial infection?)
bobbie sellers - 19 Oct 2004 02:44 GMT MS you wrote,
And to make it simple I have given you my best advice and see no reason to modify it. But if you go further down I will share my personal experience.
> > You might have an allergy that you are able to ignore when > > you are well. You might have a bacterial infection or something > > else entirely. > > > > You should seek the advice of a medical professional and in > > my opinion, as soon as possible. snip of my old tags
> I do have allergies and chronic rhinitis (all year). So it's not unusual for > my nose to be inflamed, and to have more mucus (very thick) than most > people. You shouldn't have symptoms all year unless as I did for so many years you are ignoring dietary sensitivities. Shortly before I came up with the virual illness that ended in my case of chronic post-virual fatigue syndrome aka cfids. I was informed that I was allegic to cows milk and I gave it up though it took me 6 months. After the illnesses and in the midst of cfids I had a terrible time with wheat allegies and apparent yeast allegies. A kindly and well informed allegist-immunologist got me on a rotation diet. That helped my rhinitis terrifically and let me isolate the foods that caused the problems that were keeping me awake all night.
> However, it has been worse than normal the last few weeks. And I definitely > did have some kind of infection a few weeks ago, with fever, dizziness, [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > doubt. (Or--do you think from these symptoms, that I might indeed have a > bacterial infection?) I make no diagnosis especially since #1, I am only a nurse, and #2 I have never done a physical on you or even read your chart. I never came close to using the expensive chemicals you have at your disposal. My last UR problem seems to have been an exhaberation of allergies which I treated with staying warm, breathing warm air, and doubling the frequency at which I take my generic loratidine 10 mg. usually one in the AM. I keep forgetting the value of warm air but I was having a lot of coughing and sneezing and having to go to the market, put on a dust mask, It warmed up the air I was (re)breathing and my nasal congestion diminished and my cough went away in about 5 blocks.
This is only my personal experience. I think you might consider seeking advice from a knowlegable specialist in allergy, if you don't continue to improve or rather continue as ill as you have been.
later bliss -- C O C O A Powered ...
-- bobbie sellers - a retired nurse in San Francisco bliss at california dot com
Carey Gregory - 19 Oct 2004 05:25 GMT >So, I'm really not sure how seeing a doctor about it could help. But you'll accept advice from anonymous strangers on the internet?
MS - 19 Oct 2004 05:39 GMT > >So, I'm really not sure how seeing a doctor about it could help. > > But you'll accept advice from anonymous strangers on the internet? Silly reply. There are always some strange people on newsgroups who will give strange answers like that to anything someone asks.
I didn't say I would accept anything. I know that many doctors read and write here, was curious to get opinions. That doesn't replace going to see a doctor, of course. Comparing the two, going for a doctor's appointment, or writing a post inquiring about something on an internet newsgroup, is like comparing apples and oranges. There is no comparison between the two--of course writing a question on an Internet newsgroup is not a substitute for going to the doctor, I didn't imply anything of the kind. I just asked a question here.
What I have just done silly was to reply to you. Such a response doesn't merit a reply. Bobbie wrote an intelligent, caring response to my original post, and I responded to her post. Someone who throws out a snide meaningless comment like yours, doesn't merit a reply.
10Squared - 19 Oct 2004 11:09 GMT > I didn't say I would accept anything. I know that many doctors read and > write here, was curious to get opinions. That doesn't replace going to see [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > post, and I responded to her post. Someone who throws out a snide > meaningless comment like yours, doesn't merit a reply. There is some nasty bug going around Atlanta right now that sounds like you described. I've got it, my wife has it, and sister-in-law has it. Sister-in-law did not respond to antibiotics. A friend of my wife has had it for >5 weeks. I'm getting progressively better, if slowly.
Carey Gregory - 19 Oct 2004 14:11 GMT >> >So, I'm really not sure how seeing a doctor about it could help. >> >> But you'll accept advice from anonymous strangers on the internet? > >Silly reply. There are always some strange people on newsgroups who will >give strange answers like that to anything someone asks. You come here with a question that could be answered in 30 seconds on google, then post a lengthy, complex medical history and specifically ask for a diagnosis no one can possibly give you....
But *my* question is silly?
>I didn't say I would accept anything. Nor did I. I asked a question, and it wasn't rhetorical. You might be surprised how many people come here with specific medical complaints *in lieu of* seeking medical care. I was wondering -- and still am -- if you are one of them.
>I know that many doctors read and write here, was curious to get opinions. Actually, on that you would be wrong. I can count on one hand the doctors who regularly post here. Add a dozen PAs, nurses, and assorted others who seem to have a clue (but haven't revealed their education), and you've pretty much summed up the sci.med "professional staff." The nuts, loons, and trolls easily outnumber all the above. (Do you know which are which?)
>That doesn't replace going to see a >doctor, of course. Comparing the two, going for a doctor's appointment, or [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >going to the doctor, I didn't imply anything of the kind. I just asked a >question here. You specifically said you doubted the value of seeing a doctor despite being ill. That's a refrain you'll hear a lot around here. Can you not imagine why it would raise an eyebrow?
>What I have just done silly was to reply to you. Such a response doesn't >merit a reply. Bobbie wrote an intelligent, caring response to my original >post, and I responded to her post. Someone who throws out a snide >meaningless comment like yours, doesn't merit a reply. My comment was not snide or meaningless.
MS - 19 Oct 2004 20:40 GMT > You specifically said you doubted the value of seeing a doctor despite being > ill. That's a refrain you'll hear a lot around here. Can you not imagine > why it would raise an eyebrow? But I didn't say that. I go to doctors a lot, in fact. I said that I wasn't at all sure that would be helpful in this case.
Can doctors do much to help a person with a common cold? Doctors are very busy, with overloaded schedules, and they probably don't like people coming in for any ailment, such as a cold.
So--from your statement "that's a refrain you'll hear a lot around here", it might be that you think a lot of people are making such a statement, so you interpret statements you read as saying that, and give your pat response to the pat statement you think you read, when the writer (certainly in my case) is not saying that at all.
Carey Gregory - 20 Oct 2004 07:07 GMT >Can doctors do much to help a person with a common cold? Doctors are very >busy, with overloaded schedules, and they probably don't like people coming >in for any ailment, such as a cold. I agree: Doctors can't do diddly for colds, and you shouldn't even go see one if that's all it is.
But colds don't usually last a month....
I think you're completely justified in asking why you still feel sick. Maybe just allergies, maybe more than a cold... who knows? It's just that someone who can look down your throat and exchange more info in 5 minutes than we can exchange here in 5 days seems like a much better bet.
>So--from your statement "that's a refrain you'll hear a lot around here", it >might be that you think a lot of people are making such a statement, so you >interpret statements you read as saying that, and give your pat response to >the pat statement you think you read, when the writer (certainly in my case) >is not saying that at all. My response was just a reality check. Please don't over-interpret it or be offended. You're obviously free to discuss it all you want, but if I were you, I'd have an appointment by now....
Ed Mathes - 20 Oct 2004 13:34 GMT This is funny....my primary patient complaint for the past few days has been cold symptoms, usually people looking for an antibiotic (which I don't give them).
Some of the rhinoviruses can be persistent. Cough can also persist for weeks after cold symptoms disappear.
I usually tell people that colds last a week. If they are really really ill (fever, etc), come in sooner. If they are no better after 7 days, come in. If there are just "mild sympoms"...wait a few more days.
Ed
> >Can doctors do much to help a person with a common cold? Doctors are very > >busy, with overloaded schedules, and they probably don't like people coming [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > offended. You're obviously free to discuss it all you want, but if I were > you, I'd have an appointment by now.... MS - 21 Oct 2004 04:10 GMT Thank you for the reply.
Yes, doctors often used to give antibiotics when patients came in for a cold, just to give the patient something, and just in case there was a bacterial infection also, or to prevent a secondary bacterial infection from taking place.
Now, with all the publicity about bacteria becoming resistant to antibiotics due to overuse, doctors are much more reluctant to prescribe them.
And unfortunately, nothing can be done about rhinoviruses. (Wasn't there a med being developed to combat them, but then it was dropped, not having proven to be effective.)
With the symptoms I have now, and especially since I am already taking several nasal meds, I really doubt a doctor would prescribe something else, if I went in for an appointment. Going in for an appointment would just be a waste of my and the doctor's time, that is why I responded as I did.
But I was curious to ask about lingering colds. Not only I, but I have noticed others as well, have had this.
You say "some of the rhinoviruses can be persistent". So, is it possible for them to last for weeks?
> This is funny....my primary patient complaint for the past few days has been > cold symptoms, usually people looking for an antibiotic (which I don't give [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] > > offended. You're obviously free to discuss it all you want, but if I were > > you, I'd have an appointment by now.... Ed Mathes - 21 Oct 2004 04:38 GMT > But I was curious to ask about lingering colds. Not only I, but I have > noticed others as well, have had this. > > You say "some of the rhinoviruses can be persistent". So, is it possible for > them to last for weeks? Clarify: Some symptoms may persist for 4-6 weeks.....cough, runny nose. If they have an underlying pulmonary disease (asthma/COPD), symptoms may be worse. The "full blow" presentation of the common cold last anywhere from 3-10 days.
I recently attended a presentation on sinusitis. The speaker (a prominent ENT) used a slide that demonstrated the duration of common viri and bacteria. The rhinovirus curve went out beyond a month....
But, again, I'll find the literature to back that up. And the product you were asking about, I believe, was ZICAM.
In the meantime, see http://www.stopgettingsick.com/Conditions/condition_template.cfm/1531/50/16
Ed
MS - 22 Oct 2004 03:07 GMT > > But I was curious to ask about lingering colds. Not only I, but I have > > noticed others as well, have had this. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > worse. The "full blow" presentation of the common cold last anywhere from > 3-10 days. So, if the virus lasts for 3-10 days, but symptoms can last for weeks, is it just that the respiratory linings can take a long time to heal (more so in some people than others, especially someone like me, with a screwed-up nose to begin with), long after the virus is gone?
> I recently attended a presentation on sinusitis. The speaker (a prominent > ENT) used a slide that demonstrated the duration of common viri and > bacteria. The rhinovirus curve went out beyond a month.... So, by that explanation, the cold virus can last over a month? Rhinoviruses are cold viruses, no? Can rhinoviruses cause sinusitis?
> And the product you were asking about, I believe, was ZICAM. Nope, not at all, I was not referring to Zicam. Zicam is an otc zinc nasal spray that claims to shorten the life of a cold. The company that makes it had some kind of study that indicated that it works, but I don't think that has been really scientifically validated. Have you found it to work? I've never heard it recommended by a doctor. I have tried it a few times, just in case it might help (in fact I just used up a bottle yesterday), but I cannot really say it has helped me at all to get over a cold. It is rather irritating to the nose as well.
The medicine I was referring to has never been available to buy. A prescription medicine, not an OTC product. It was being worked on by one of those biotech companies, supposed to really kill rhinoviruses. I recall reading about it a year or two ago, when it was being worked on. I believe the company's stock went up a lot, as the common cold is so prevalent, and if this med really worked to significantly shorten colds, it would be a highly prescribed med, under patent.
But I believe the FDA didn't find that it worked well enough, and did not allow the medicine to come to market. (As one might imagine, the company's stock prices then dropped dramatically.
I guess there are medications like that that are supposed to fight flu viruses, after catching the flu. (Easier to create for flu than colds, as there are many more viruses that can cause colds than can cause influenza. That's why they have vaccinations for flu, but have never come up with one for colds. One pill and one nasal spray. I think one is called Tamiflu, I forget the other name. But those are not really prescribed often, are they? Have they been found not to be very effective?
MS - 25 Oct 2004 03:08 GMT > But, again, I'll find the literature to back that up. > And the product you were asking about, I believe, was ZICAM. Not at all. The medication I was referring to was called "Pleconaril". This antiviral agent, that was supposed to help fight viruses causing common cold, was being researched for years, supposed to come out in 2003, but the FDA nixed it as ineffective.
Following is an article about it. written before it was unapproved:
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/451846?src=search
or
http://tinyurl.com/5aubq
MS - 25 Oct 2004 05:55 GMT Further info on this med. It appears that it did show some efficacy in trials:
http://www.aafp.org/afp/20040201/tips/34.html
or
http://tinyurl.com/4mlt6.
If you do a Google search on "Pleconaril", you can find a lot of info on it.
The FDA apparently disapproved it because of some side effects, and they figured common colds aren't so serious anyhow. See this article:
http://www.inpharma.com/news/news-ng.asp?id=48049-nasal-route-could
or
http://tinyurl.com/5hr8p.
Apparently the company that developed it, Viropharma, is still trying to get approval. Their former partner, Aventis, pulled out after the FDA disapproval, and now they are working with Schering-Plough on an intranasal formulation. (Figuring less systemic side effects that way.) They plan to present it to the FDA again in the intranasal formulation.
I hope they get it approved soon, and that it really works!
> Not at all. The medication I was referring to was called "Pleconaril". This > antiviral agent, that was supposed to help fight viruses causing common [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > http://tinyurl.com/5aubq MS - 21 Oct 2004 04:04 GMT The thing is:
It seemed before (not in this post) that you were reacting with a kneejerk reaction against a group of people, that you assumed I was part of, without really paying (until now) attention to what I had written.
For instance, you wrote about "accepting advice from total strangers on the Internet". Not only did I not accept any advice (in this post you yourself are giving me advice), I didn't ask for advice. Read what I wrote---it was simply a question, as in the title, whether a cold virus could really last a month.
Also, if you looked at the response I wrote to Bobbie, in which I mentioned several prescription medicines I take regularly for nasal problems, you would know that I am a person who goes to doctors, you don't get those over the counter. So, obviously, I am not one of "those people" whom you think are always "asking for medical advice from total strangers on the Internet, while never going to doctors". Yet it was that very post that you responded to with your comment.
So, I was just pointing out to you that, it makes sense to really look at what someone has written, rather than be quick to pigeonhole someone in a group, and react to that.
Perhaps you got that message, because your message below has a completely different tone, finally responding to what I wrote. Thank you.
Yes, if someone has a respiratory condition for a month, in many cases it would be advisable to see a doctor. If the doctor thinks it is a bacterial infection, they can prescribe antibiotics. They can do nothing for viruses, however, except to say "stay home, drink plenty of fluids", etc., which I don't need to spend hours waiting in a doctor's office for.
As I have a lot of experience with bacterial sinus infections, as described in that response to Bobbie, I don't think that's the case here. I probably do know more about that than the average layman, though of course not as much as a doctor. As I said, I have sometimes been on antibiotics for most of the year, much less so since my last sinus surgery.
As I also said, I don't have fever any more. I feel fairly normal except for nasal and throat symptoms worse than usual. (As mentioned, I always have a bad nose, that's why I'm taking so many meds for it.)
Therefore, I asked if symptoms of a cold can last for weeks after the actual cold virus is gone, that perhaps the inflammation caused by the virus can take weeks to heal after the virus is gone? That was my question.
Actually, there seems to be a lot of people with lingering colds lately.
> >Can doctors do much to help a person with a common cold? Doctors are very > >busy, with overloaded schedules, and they probably don't like people coming [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > offended. You're obviously free to discuss it all you want, but if I were > you, I'd have an appointment by now.... severesocialanxiety - 26 Oct 2004 03:06 GMT > > >So, I'm really not sure how seeing a doctor about it could help. > > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > post, and I responded to her post. Someone who throws out a snide > meaningless comment like yours, doesn't merit a reply. Why would I go to the doctor if i have talked to a doc on the net? i hate visiting the doc. The internet is an excellent substitute.
MS - 26 Oct 2004 03:47 GMT "severesocialanxiety" <samappliance@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> Why would I go to the doctor if i have talked to a doc on the net? i > hate visiting the doc. The internet is an excellent substitute. Well, "severe social anxiety" (your name says it all), it looks like your the person that Carey Gregory was talking to, but unfortunately he mistook me for you.
I don't agree with you at all. Your statement above is ridiculous. But no further comment--I sense anyhow you are a troll looking for attention-I won't reply to you again.
Martha H Adams - 08 Nov 2004 03:04 GMT When something passes from a person into text into the internet, back into text on my screen and into my mind, I'm generally open to a few ideas what lies behind what I read. So it's back for me to the original question.
Re hating to visit doctors. There are doctors, and doctors. Some of them give people bad experiences (or worse); some respond differently depending upon if your problem is politically correct -- gays, for instance, may be seen as politically incorrect. But doctors generally are likely to know more information, have more hands-on experience, and to be more able to give you support, than you can ever learn to do by yourself for yourself. You do have a choice between faith-based (i.e., ignorance-based) vs reality-based (i.e., knowledge-based) treatment: I feel reality based is the only way to go. So maybe you had best be seeking a doctor you don't hate to talk to.
Now about that cold lasting a month. Concerning you, I *don't* know practically everything. But I wonder if you might have started with a plain old virus common cold, which opened the way to some bacterial process, which could be the long-lasting part of your illness. In which case it wouldn't be a cold any more, and might be vulnerable to antibiotics -- if it's not some antibiotic resistant bacteria.
So however you look at it, maybe your best course is -- find a doctor you can talk to. Alternate / backup choice: a postdoctoral / premed student.
Cheers -- Martha Adams
Carey Gregory - 08 Nov 2004 07:08 GMT >So however you look at it, maybe your best course is -- find a doctor >you can talk to. Alternate / backup choice: a postdoctoral / premed >student. Huh? A pre-med student is nothing but an undergrad who hopes to go to med school someday. They have zero medical training and zero medical experience, but sometimes they imagine otherwise. Almost anyone with any sort of actual experience or education would be better.
Steve Harris sbharris@ROMAN9.netcom.com - 09 Nov 2004 02:37 GMT > >So however you look at it, maybe your best course is -- find a doctor > >you can talk to. Alternate / backup choice: a postdoctoral / premed [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > experience, but sometimes they imagine otherwise. Almost anyone with any > sort of actual experience or education would be better. COMMENT:
Yes. The same goes even for a medical student. Very little of the core of what you need to know to be an effective physician is taught in medical school. Just as little of what you need to practice law is taught in law school. Or for that matter, what you need to know to be a good officer in officer's training school. In all cases, the effective learning is on the job, afterwards. The first two years of med school is mostly irrelevent books. The next two years are learning to kiss a.s. (In this, it differs from officer's training, which is learning to kiss a.s the whole way through.)
You could in theory design a medical school cirriculum which was maximally efficient. But then it would look so much like a physician's assistant program, what would you then call it?
SBH
Griffin - 21 Oct 2004 13:57 GMT > I've had a cold for about a month now. I don't still have the fever, aching, > etc., that I had at the beginning, but I still have respiratory [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > that the nose, throat, etc., having become inflamed during the cold, are > taking a long time to heal, although with no more infection? Three possibilites come to mind. The first is simply a prolonged viral upper respiratory infection, particularly common in smokers. The second is reinfectoin (back-to-back colds). The third is allergic rhinitis. You don't have symptoms of a bacterial sinusitis.
MS - 22 Oct 2004 03:13 GMT > Three possibilites come to mind. The first is simply a prolonged viral > upper respiratory infection, particularly common in smokers. The second > is reinfectoin (back-to-back colds). The third is allergic rhinitis. > You don't have symptoms of a bacterial sinusitis. That's what I thought (about bacterial sinusitis), why I didn't think a doctor could help much with it, as they might if it did look like a bacterial infection (by prescribing antibiotics).
I'm not a smoker, but I do have chronic rhinitis. These symptoms feel a little different than the usual rhinitis I have all year though. But with my pipes screwed up by the chronic rhinitis (although I don't smoke), that might make me more susceptible to the prolonged viral respiratory infection. How long can those last?
I also work with a lot of young children (elementary school music teacher, working at 5 different schools, seeing hundreds of kids each week), so I guess the re-infection possibility could be the case as well. (I keep losing my voice while teaching as well, not good! I've stayed home a few days, but I cannot just stay home until I'm all well--that could take months at this rate!)
Ed Mathes - 22 Oct 2004 05:18 GMT I'm still looking for that data...
As I stated, the severe symptoms of cold...malaise, feve, stuffy nose, etc, last usually less than 10 days. However, a post viral cough can last for several weeks: http://www.clevelandclinicmeded.com/diseasemanagement/pulmonary/cough/cough.htm:
Acute Cough: Acute cough has been defined as one with a duration of less than 3 weeks at presentation.1 In general, acute cough usually results from respiratory infections, of which the common cold is the most frequent. Some authors have proposed a category of subacute cough, with a duration of 3 to 8 weeks. Postinfectious cough due to irritation of cough receptors accounts for the bulk of these cases. However, there are no case series assessing the relative frequency of causes in either the acute or subacute categories.
The most common causes of acute cough are listed in Table 1. In the presence of a compatible history and examination, further diagnostic testing is not usually necessary. The mainstay of treatment includes nonspecific antitussive therapy. Under-recognized causes for acute or subacute cough include pertussis and mycoplasma infection. Rarely, life-threatening illness may present primarily with acute cough. Examples include pulmonary embolus, cardiogenic pulmonary edema, and pneumonia.
Table 1: Acute Cough Etiology Recommended Treatment Comments Viral rhinosinusitis Antitussives, decongestants, first-generation antihistamines, ibuprofen Difficult to distinguish from acute sinusitis. Neuraminidase antagonists may be helpful if started earlier. Acute bronchitis Antitussives Antibiotics not routinely indicated Acute sinusitis Antibiotics, decongestants, first-generation antihistamines Treatment duration 2-3 weeks Allergic/ irritant rhinitis Irritant avoidance; nonsedating antihistamines Nasal corticosteroids useful for maintenance therapy Acute exacerbation of COPD Beta-agonist/anticholinergic MDIs with spacer, antibiotics, systemic corticosteroids Pertussis Macrolides (if started within 8 days of symptom onset); TMP-SMX (if macrolide allergy) Diagnosis is difficult (serologic or nasopharyngeal culture) Mycoplasma Macrolides; alternatively, tetracyclines COPD=chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; MDIs=metered dose inhalers; TMP-SMX=trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- Tamiflu and a couple medication are available for the flu. They have been shown to shorten the duration and lessen the severity of the flu. Tamiflu has some efficacy in prophylaxis in high-risk populations with potential for exposure to the flu.
Ed
A "primer" on common respiratory viruses: http://web.uct.ac.za/depts/mmi/jmoodie/vires2.html#RHINOVIRUSES
Clinical Picture PARA-INFLUENZA Types 1, 2, 3 and 4 All can cause minor infections in children and adults. Types 1, 2 and 3 may be associated with more severe lower respiratory tract disease in children. For instance, in an American series of cases, 30% of acute laryngo-tracheo-bronchitis (LTB) cases yielded para-influenza viruses. Type 1 is especially associated with LTB, sometimes also type 2. Paraflu's have also been isolated from patients with pneumonia.
The virus grows locally in the respiratory tract lining of the URT and it may then spread down into the lungs. IgA type antibodies are induced. These are present in the respiratory secretions and seem to be more important than the IgG antibodies in the serum with regard to protection. However, IgA antibodies do not cross the placenta and babies thus have no maternal protection against this type of infection. Primary infections with para-influenza viruses usually occur in the first year or years of life. Re-infection usually causes only minor infection of the URT - one of the causes of a common cold in children and adults.
Diagnosis In cell cultures, the para-influenza viruses produce a recognisable cytopathic effect, and haemadsorption is also used to detect their presence.
Each virus type has specific antigens by which they can be "typed", and there are also a few minor subtypes.
Treatment No specific treatment is available. Killed virus vaccines have been tried but are of limited value in an infection which is so widespread and usually of trivial significance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----
Respiratory Syncytial virus - (RSV) This is an unusual but very important member the Paramyxovirus group: while it resembles the other members morphologically, no haemagglutinin or neuraminidase or haemolytic properties have been detected, and there is no antigenic similarity to other members. In cell cultures it readily induces many large syncytia with cytoplasmic inclusions - hence its name.
Clinical RSV was first isolated from chimpanzees with colds, and it was soon found to cause colds in man as well. (Chimps were probably infected by their human handlers.) However, it was also found to be associated with severe pulmonary infections in infants - especially Bronchiolitis. RSV is the prime cause of Bronchiolitis.
In Britain, RSV is the single major pathogen in respiratory infections of childhood. The figures from Newcastle by Gardner are startling:
under 1 year of age: 78% of Bronchiolitis 38% of LTB 36% of Pneumonia 35% of Bronchitis 12% of minor respiratory illness, were all caused by RSV.
RSV causes a fairly localised infection of the respiratory tract, and infants have no maternal passive protection. Re-infections do occur but seem only to produce fairly minor URT illness.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Vaccine Because of its apparent importance, an attempt was made at vaccinating infants. However, when the RS epidemic arrived, the vaccinated children suffered more severe reactions than unvaccinated children. Somehow the killed virus vaccine had unfortunately sensitised these children and exposure to the live virus then induced a type of allergic reaction. This drew attention to the possibility that RS viruses may in fact cause much of its lung damage by immune mechanisms. Because of the importance of RSV in childhood infections, intensive efforts to make a vaccine have continued, especially along the lines of sub-unit vaccines (parts of virions) avoiding those antigens which seem responsible for hypersensitisation. However, no vaccine is as yet in general use.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----
RHINOVIRUSES (Common Cold virus)
Over 100 serotypes of this Picorna virus family are responsible for about 50% of common colds.
Clinical An inhalational infection of the URT. Incubation period is short: 1 to 3 days followed by headache, sore throat, fullness in the nose. Then there is a profuse watery discharge from the nose which gradually thickens and becomes mucopurulent and decreases in volume. The infection resolves in about a week. Following a rhinovirus cold, there is a short period of immunity to all colds but prolonged immunity to the specific serotype causing the recent infection.
Treatment No specific treatment but numerous symptomatic treatments are available.
Complications A cold may temporarily upset the mucosal cilia and predisposes to secondary invaders especially bacterial infections, eg. sinusitis (pneumococcus, haemophilus, etc) and bronchitis and possibly pneumonia. These may require antibiotic treatment.
Epidemiology An infected person is infectious in the first two days of coryza. Colds are readily acquired from breathing room air from a room crowded with coldy people. Wet cold weather per s? does not cause colds, but may predispose to infection from other persons. Colds are ubiquitous around the world except in very isolated communities.
Prevention The enormous diversity of cold-causing viruses essentially rules out a vaccine. Vitamin C and bacterial vaccines are unproven.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----
ADENOVIRUSES Virus Ds DNA, Non-enveloped 70nm capsid shell with protruding penton-fibres. See electron micrograph Most adenoviruses grow easily in cell culture, and give rise to large intranuclear inclusions.
1. Group Common Antigen Shared by all adenoviruses, eg.a single complement fixation test can detect a rise in antibody to any adeno infection also, a single immunofluorescent reagent can be made which will react with all adenoviruses.
2. Type Specific Antigen Can identify a specific type by neutralisation of infectivity or haemagglutination. 47 Serotypes are grouped into about 6 larger groups (labelled A ....... to F).
Clinical Adenoviruses cause infections of man (many animals have their own adenoviruses) and are spread by droplet, fomites and ingestion. They infect the mucous membranes of the eye, respiratory and gastro intestinal tract, occasionally urinary tract. Local lymph nodes often involved (enlarged and tender). Infections are usually self-limiting. Syndromes
1. Asymptomatic Infection Adenoviruses may be present in healthy persons, eg. in stools of children, and may also cause persistent silent infection of the tonsils.
2. Acute pharyngitis with fever Adenoviruses are a common cause of an acute sore throat.
3. Pharyngoconjunctivical fever Adenoviruses may cause an acute conjunctivitis together with a shore throat and fever.
4. Acute follicular conjunctivitis This is a non-purulent contagious inflammation with pearly, translucent lymphoid hyperplasia.
5. Epidemic kerato-conjunctivitis (shipyard eye) Mild trauma to the eye may facilitate a damaging adeno infection of cornea (spread by multi- shared towels).
6. Pneumonia (and pneumonitis in children) In some cases there may be a severe destructive pneumonia (and death) caused by an adenovirus infection following measles or other predisposing factors, eg. artificial airway.
7. Acute respiratory disease (ARD) Is an epidemic form of acute pneumonic disease characteristically appearing in military camps. Has been prevented by enteric capsulation of a live vaccine strain which bypasses the respiratory tract and sets up a silent infection in the gut, giving protection against acute respiratory infection.
8. Diarrhoea In young children many adenoviruses may cause a generalised infection - upper and lower respiratory tract infection with fever and diarrhoea. Quite separately, some adenos (40/41) have been specifically associated with causing acute gastroenteritis in children, which may lead to dehydration and death.
9. Mesenteric Adenitis Children may present with abdominal pain due to enlarged tender adenovirus infected mesenteric lymph nodes. Occasionally an enlarged node may invaginate the bowel wall and be gripped by peristaltic waves, leading to intussusception of the bowel.
10. Immunocompromised host In transplant patients, AIDS or other immunocompromised patients, adenoviruses may cause a variety of infections - renal, disseminated, or a haemorrhagic cystitis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----
PARAMYXOVIRUSES General Properties of the Paramyxoviruses The whole important group of Paramyxoviruses is fairly homogeneous.
Morphology Generally fairly similar to influenza: roughly spherical sometimes filamentous, easily distorted. A bit larger than influenza virus - 100-300nm. Composed of inner helical nucleocapsid containing protein/RNA, contained within a membranous envelope studded with "spikes" of: Haemagglutinin (Haemadsorption) and Neuraminidase (Haemolysis)
Antigens Antigenically distinct from influenza virus. Within the paramyxovirus group there is considerable overlapping, eg: Parainfluenza 1, 2, 3 and mumps. Exposure of an adult to any one of these viruses often induces a rise in serum antibodies to the others. Thus, interpretation of serum antibody levels in this group of viral infections may be difficult.
As in influenza vrus, there are two major antigens: 1. The haemagglutinin, present in the envelope of the intact virion (this is sometimes called the "V" antigen); 2. On breaking open the virion, or rupturing of infected cells before virion assembly, a "soluble" virus antigen is released, which is thought to be the protein component of the nucleocapsid. This is sometimes called the "S" antigen.
Infection induces antibodies to these two major antigens, amongst others. The antigens are fairly stable. In contrast to influenza virus, there is no antigenic drift or epidemics of infection
Primary infections usually occur in (early) childhood, with some resultant degree of protection against developing clinical disease later on in life. However, re-infections do occur in adulthood, but disease is subclinical or very minor.
Spread The human paramyxoviruses are essentially diseases of man only, and are spread by droplets from the nose and mouth to fairly close contacts. Many of them are fairly highly infectious and go around the community in epidemics - often seasonal, eg. Winter coughs and colds. Fomites might also assist spread.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Laboratory Diagnosis 1. Viral Detection Isolation of a paramyxovirus from a patient is strong evidence for a cause of a respiratory infection. All the Paramyxoviruses are to be found in the respiratory tract secretions - and this is the best material to send to the laboratory. The paramyxoviruses are unstable and do not survive well outside cells.
a) Direct Examination Viral antigens or viral infected cells in the secretions may be directly and rapidly detected by immunofluorescence or ELISA tests.
b) Culture Primary Monkey kidney cells will support replication of all the Paramyxoviruses and many of the other respiratory viruses.
An intriguing property of most Paramyxo's is their ability to induce cell fusion. Neighbouring cells join up to form large multinucleate syncytia or giant cells. Viral fusion to cell for penetration follows proteolytic cleavage of fusion protein on virion surface. One of the first discovered members of the Paramyxo group - probably a mouse virus - called Sendai , is used as a cell fusing agent in experimental work on cells. The Sendai virus is first inactivated by UV (which damages the nucleic acid) so that the virus will not grow and interfere with the experiment. The inactivated virus still induces cell fusion - even across species, eg. heterokaryons of murine and human cells.
Multinucleated giant cells can sometimes be seen in lung sections from children dying with Paramyxovirus infection in the lung. Not all Paramyxos do this readily, and haemadsorption is usually used to detect Paramyxovirus infection in culture cells.
Once isolated, a haemadsorbing virus can be further typed using standard specific antisera in various laboratory procedures:
a.. haemadsorption inhibition; b.. neutralisation; and c.. fluorescent antibody. 2. Serological Diagnosis Antibody determinations in acute and convalescent blood specimens by complement fixation, Elisa or haemagglutination inhibition may sometimes be helpful in arriving at a specific diagnosis. Respiratory syncytial virus and measles virus infections are fairly clearcut. Mumps and Para influenza viruses seem to share a group common antigen, and serological interpretation may be difficult.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----
----- Original Message ----- From: " MS" <ms@nospam.com> Newsgroups: sci.med Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 10:07 PM Subject: Re: Can a cold last a month?
> > > But I was curious to ask about lingering colds. Not only I, but I have > > > noticed others as well, have had this. > > > > > > You say "some of the rhinoviruses can be persistent". So, is it possible
> > for > > > them to last for weeks? [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > they have an underlying pulmonary disease (asthma/COPD), symptoms may be > > worse. The "full blow" presentation of the common cold last anywhere from
> > 3-10 days. > > So, if the virus lasts for 3-10 days, but symptoms can last for weeks, is it
> just that the respiratory linings can take a long time to heal (more so in > some people than others, especially someone like me, with a screwed-up nose
> to begin with), long after the virus is gone? > > > I recently attended a presentation on sinusitis. The speaker (a prominent
> > ENT) used a slide that demonstrated the duration of common viri and > > bacteria. The rhinovirus curve went out beyond a month.... > > So, by that explanation, the cold virus can last over a month? Rhinoviruses
> are cold viruses, no? Can rhinoviruses cause sinusitis? > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > spray that claims to shorten the life of a cold. The company that makes it > had some kind of study that indicated that it works, but I don't think that
> has been really scientifically validated. Have you found it to work? I've > never heard it recommended by a doctor. I have tried it a few times, just in
> case it might help (in fact I just used up a bottle yesterday), but I cannot
> really say it has helped me at all to get over a cold. It is rather > irritating to the nose as well. > > The medicine I was referring to has never been available to buy. A > prescription medicine, not an OTC product. It was being worked on by one of
> those biotech companies, supposed to really kill rhinoviruses. I recall > reading about it a year or two ago, when it was being worked on. I believe [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > for colds. One pill and one nasal spray. I think one is called Tamiflu, I > forget the other name. But those are not really prescribed often, are they?
> Have they been found not to be very effective?
> > Three possibilites come to mind. The first is simply a prolonged viral > > upper respiratory infection, particularly common in smokers. The second [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > I cannot just stay home until I'm all well--that could take months at this > rate!) MS - 23 Oct 2004 05:35 GMT Thanks for all the info, Ed!
Well, what do you (and other docs here) think? Will medical science ever have a cure for the common cold? A vaccine for it? If so, when do you predict that will come to pass? Is it being worked on? (It apparently was with that med I mentioned, but that apparently turned out to be a dud.)
> I'm still looking for that data... > > As I stated, the severe symptoms of cold...malaise, feve, stuffy nose, etc, > last usually less than 10 days. However, a post viral cough can last for > several weeks: http://www.clevelandclinicmeded.com/diseasemanagement/pulmonary/cough/cough.htm:
> Acute Cough: > Acute cough has been defined as one with a duration of less than 3 weeks at [quoted text clipped - 437 lines] > > I cannot just stay home until I'm all well--that could take months at this > > rate!)
|
|
|