Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / General / November 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Can a cold last a month?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
MS - 18 Oct 2004 19:33 GMT
I've had a cold for about a month now. I don't still have the fever, aching,
etc., that I had at the beginning, but I still have respiratory
symptoms--nose and throat a lot worse than usual, laryngitis, etc.

Is it possible to really still have the cold virus that long? Or could it be
that the nose, throat, etc., having become inflamed during the cold, are
taking a long time to heal, although with no more infection?
bobbie sellers - 18 Oct 2004 11:51 GMT
MS wrote,

> I've had a cold for about a month now. I don't still have the fever, aching,
> etc., that I had at the beginning, but I still have respiratory
> symptoms--nose and throat a lot worse than usual, laryngitis, etc.

   A cold, aka virual rhinitis, should only last about 10 to 14 days.

> Is it possible to really still have the cold virus that long? Or could it be
> that the nose, throat, etc., having become inflamed during the cold, are
> taking a long time to heal, although with no more infection?

   You might have an allergy that you are able to ignore when
you are well.  You might have a bacterial infection or something
else entirely.

   You should seek the advice of a medical professional and in
my opinion, as soon as possible.

   later
   bliss -- C O C O A  Powered ...

--    
bobbie sellers - a retired nurse in San Francisco
         bliss at california dot com
MS - 19 Oct 2004 03:56 GMT
>     You might have an allergy that you are able to ignore when
> you are well.  You might have a bacterial infection or something
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>     later
>     bliss -- C O C O A  Powered ...

I do have allergies and chronic rhinitis (all year). So it's not unusual for
my nose to be inflamed, and to have more mucus (very thick) than most
people.

However, it has been worse than normal the last few weeks. And I definitely
did have some kind of infection a few weeks ago, with fever, dizziness,
aching, etc., that I considered to be a "cold". I don't have those symptoms
now, but the nose, throat, etc., are definitely worse than normal, I lose my
voice (I'm a teacher), etc. So, that's why I think that the virus is
probably gone, but the nose, throat, etc., never fully healed from it.

As far as a bacterial infection---I used to get sinus infections frequently,
and was on antibiotics a good part of the year. Since my last sinus surgery,
that has occurred far less often. Doesn't one usually have colored mucus
with a bacterial infection? Mine has been clear. Also, if I had an active
infection, wouldn't I still have symptoms like the dizziness, fever, etc.?

So, I'm really not sure how seeing a doctor about it could help. Sure, if
the doc thought I had a bacterial infection they would prescribe
antibiotics. But I doubt that would be diagnosed from these symptoms, and
doctors are reluctant about antibiotics these days.

Other than that--there's not much a doctor could do about this. I already
use different meds for rhinitis--cortisone nasal spray, Atrovent nasal
spray, and Astelin. I also take Allegra and Singulair. I irrigate to wash
out my nose. (Tons of thick junk coming out now, but clear in color.) I
really cannot think of what a doctor might do about this, other than
prescribe antibiotics if they suspected bacterial infection, which I rather
doubt. (Or--do you think from these symptoms, that I might indeed have a
bacterial infection?)
bobbie sellers - 19 Oct 2004 02:44 GMT
MS you wrote,

   And to make it simple I have given you my best advice
and see no reason to modify it. But if you go further down
I will share my personal experience.

> >     You might have an allergy that you are able to ignore when
> > you are well.  You might have a bacterial infection or something
> > else entirely.
> >
> >     You should seek the advice of a medical professional and in
> > my opinion, as soon as possible.

      snip of my old tags

> I do have allergies and chronic rhinitis (all year). So it's not unusual for
> my nose to be inflamed, and to have more mucus (very thick) than most
> people.

   You shouldn't have symptoms all year unless as I did for so many
years you are ignoring dietary sensitivities.  Shortly before I came
up with the virual illness that ended in my case of chronic post-virual
fatigue syndrome aka cfids. I was informed that I was allegic to cows
milk and I gave it up though it took me 6 months.  After the illnesses
and in the midst of cfids I had a terrible time with wheat allegies and
apparent yeast allegies.  A kindly and well informed
allegist-immunologist
got me on a rotation diet.  That helped my rhinitis terrifically and let
me isolate the foods that caused the problems that were keeping me awake
all night.

> However, it has been worse than normal the last few weeks. And I definitely
> did have some kind of infection a few weeks ago, with fever, dizziness,
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> doubt. (Or--do you think from these symptoms, that I might indeed have a
> bacterial infection?)

   I make no diagnosis especially since #1, I am only a nurse, and #2 I
have
never done a physical on you or even read your chart.  I never came
close to
using the expensive chemicals you have at your disposal.  My last UR
problem
seems to have been an exhaberation of allergies which I treated with
staying
warm, breathing warm air, and doubling the frequency at which I take my
generic loratidine 10 mg. usually one in the AM.  I keep forgetting the
value of warm air but I was having a lot of coughing and sneezing and
having
to go to the market, put on a dust mask,  It warmed up the air I was
(re)breathing
and my nasal congestion diminished and my cough went away in about 5
blocks.

   This is only my personal experience.  I think you might consider
seeking
advice from a knowlegable specialist in allergy, if you don't continue
to
improve or rather continue as ill as you have been.

   later
   bliss -- C O C O A  Powered ...

--    
bobbie sellers - a retired nurse in San Francisco
         bliss at california dot com
Carey Gregory - 19 Oct 2004 05:25 GMT
>So, I'm really not sure how seeing a doctor about it could help.

But you'll accept advice from anonymous strangers on the internet?
MS - 19 Oct 2004 05:39 GMT
> >So, I'm really not sure how seeing a doctor about it could help.
>
> But you'll accept advice from anonymous strangers on the internet?

Silly reply. There are always some strange people on newsgroups who will
give strange answers like that to anything someone asks.

I didn't say I would accept anything. I know that many doctors read and
write here, was curious to get opinions. That doesn't replace going to see a
doctor, of course. Comparing the two, going for a doctor's appointment, or
writing a post inquiring about something on an internet newsgroup, is like
comparing apples and oranges. There is no comparison between the two--of
course writing a question on an Internet newsgroup is not a substitute for
going to the doctor, I didn't imply anything of the kind. I just asked a
question here.

What I have just done silly was to reply to you. Such a response doesn't
merit a reply. Bobbie wrote an intelligent, caring response to my original
post, and I responded to her post. Someone who throws out a snide
meaningless comment like yours, doesn't merit a reply.
10Squared - 19 Oct 2004 11:09 GMT
> I didn't say I would accept anything. I know that many doctors read and
> write here, was curious to get opinions. That doesn't replace going to see
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> post, and I responded to her post. Someone who throws out a snide
> meaningless comment like yours, doesn't merit a reply.

There is some nasty bug going around Atlanta right now that sounds like you
described. I've got it, my wife has it, and sister-in-law has it.
Sister-in-law did not respond to antibiotics. A friend of my wife has had
it for >5 weeks. I'm getting progressively better, if slowly.
Carey Gregory - 19 Oct 2004 14:11 GMT
>> >So, I'm really not sure how seeing a doctor about it could help.
>>
>> But you'll accept advice from anonymous strangers on the internet?
>
>Silly reply. There are always some strange people on newsgroups who will
>give strange answers like that to anything someone asks.

You come here with a question that could be answered in 30 seconds on
google, then post a lengthy, complex medical history and specifically ask
for a diagnosis no one can possibly give you....

But *my* question is silly?

>I didn't say I would accept anything.

Nor did I.  I asked a question, and it wasn't rhetorical.  You might be
surprised how many people come here with specific medical complaints *in
lieu of* seeking medical care.  I was wondering -- and still am -- if you
are one of them.

>I know that many doctors read and write here, was curious to get opinions.

Actually, on that you would be wrong.  I can count on one hand the doctors
who regularly post here.  Add a dozen PAs, nurses, and assorted others who
seem to have a clue (but haven't revealed their education), and you've
pretty much summed up the sci.med "professional staff."  The nuts, loons,
and trolls easily outnumber all the above.  (Do you know which are which?)

>That doesn't replace going to see a
>doctor, of course. Comparing the two, going for a doctor's appointment, or
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>going to the doctor, I didn't imply anything of the kind. I just asked a
>question here.

You specifically said you doubted the value of seeing a doctor despite being
ill.  That's a refrain you'll hear a lot around here.  Can you not imagine
why it would raise an eyebrow?

>What I have just done silly was to reply to you. Such a response doesn't
>merit a reply. Bobbie wrote an intelligent, caring response to my original
>post, and I responded to her post. Someone who throws out a snide
>meaningless comment like yours, doesn't merit a reply.

My comment was not snide or meaningless.
MS - 19 Oct 2004 20:40 GMT
> You specifically said you doubted the value of seeing a doctor despite being
> ill.  That's a refrain you'll hear a lot around here.  Can you not imagine
> why it would raise an eyebrow?

But I didn't say that. I go to doctors a lot, in fact. I said that I wasn't
at all sure that would be helpful in this case.

Can doctors do much to help a person with a common cold? Doctors are very
busy, with overloaded schedules, and they probably don't like people coming
in for any ailment, such as a cold.

So--from your statement "that's a refrain you'll hear a lot around here", it
might be that you think a lot of people are making such a statement, so you
interpret statements you read as saying that, and give your pat response to
the pat statement you think you read, when the writer (certainly in my case)
is not saying that at all.
Carey Gregory - 20 Oct 2004 07:07 GMT
>Can doctors do much to help a person with a common cold? Doctors are very
>busy, with overloaded schedules, and they probably don't like people coming
>in for any ailment, such as a cold.

I agree:  Doctors can't do diddly for colds, and you shouldn't even go see
one if that's all it is.

But colds don't usually last a month....

I think you're completely justified in asking why you still feel sick.
Maybe just allergies, maybe more than a cold... who knows?   It's just that
someone who can look down your throat and exchange more info in 5 minutes
than we can exchange here in 5 days seems like a much better bet.

>So--from your statement "that's a refrain you'll hear a lot around here", it
>might be that you think a lot of people are making such a statement, so you
>interpret statements you read as saying that, and give your pat response to
>the pat statement you think you read, when the writer (certainly in my case)
>is not saying that at all.

My response was just a reality check.  Please don't over-interpret it or be
offended.  You're obviously free to discuss it all you want, but if I were
you, I'd have an appointment by now....
Ed Mathes - 20 Oct 2004 13:34 GMT
This is funny....my primary patient complaint for the past few days has been
cold symptoms, usually people looking for an antibiotic (which I don't give
them).

Some of the rhinoviruses can be persistent.  Cough can also persist for
weeks after cold symptoms disappear.

I usually tell people that colds last a week.  If they are really really ill
(fever, etc), come in sooner.  If they are no better after 7 days, come in.
If there are just "mild sympoms"...wait a few more days.

Ed

> >Can doctors do much to help a person with a common cold? Doctors are very
> >busy, with overloaded schedules, and they probably don't like people coming
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> offended.  You're obviously free to discuss it all you want, but if I were
> you, I'd have an appointment by now....
MS - 21 Oct 2004 04:10 GMT
Thank you for the reply.

Yes, doctors often used to give antibiotics when patients came in for a
cold, just to give the patient something, and just in case there was a
bacterial infection also, or to prevent a secondary bacterial infection from
taking place.

Now, with all the publicity about bacteria becoming resistant to antibiotics
due to overuse, doctors are much more reluctant to prescribe them.

And unfortunately, nothing can be done about rhinoviruses. (Wasn't there a
med being developed to combat them, but then it was dropped, not having
proven to be effective.)

With the symptoms I have now, and especially since I am already taking
several nasal meds, I really doubt a doctor would prescribe something else,
if I went in for an appointment. Going in for an appointment would just be a
waste of my and the doctor's time, that is why I responded as I did.

But I was curious to ask about lingering colds. Not only I, but I have
noticed others as well, have had this.

You say "some of the rhinoviruses can be persistent". So, is it possible for
them to last for weeks?

> This is funny....my primary patient complaint for the past few days has been
> cold symptoms, usually people looking for an antibiotic (which I don't give
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
> > offended.  You're obviously free to discuss it all you want, but if I were
> > you, I'd have an appointment by now....
Ed Mathes - 21 Oct 2004 04:38 GMT
> But I was curious to ask about lingering colds. Not only I, but I have
> noticed others as well, have had this.
>
> You say "some of the rhinoviruses can be persistent". So, is it possible for
> them to last for weeks?

Clarify:  Some symptoms may persist for 4-6 weeks.....cough, runny nose.  If
they have an underlying pulmonary disease (asthma/COPD), symptoms may be
worse.  The "full blow" presentation of the common cold last anywhere from
3-10 days.

I recently attended a presentation on sinusitis.  The speaker (a prominent
ENT) used a slide that demonstrated the duration of common viri and
bacteria.  The rhinovirus curve went out beyond a month....

But, again, I'll find the literature to back that up.
And the product you were asking about, I believe, was ZICAM.

In the meantime, see
http://www.stopgettingsick.com/Conditions/condition_template.cfm/1531/50/16

Ed
MS - 22 Oct 2004 03:07 GMT
> > But I was curious to ask about lingering colds. Not only I, but I have
> > noticed others as well, have had this.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> worse.  The "full blow" presentation of the common cold last anywhere from
> 3-10 days.

So, if the virus lasts for 3-10 days, but symptoms can last for weeks, is it
just that the respiratory linings can take a long time to heal (more so in
some people than others, especially someone like me, with a screwed-up nose
to begin with), long after the virus is gone?

> I recently attended a presentation on sinusitis.  The speaker (a prominent
> ENT) used a slide that demonstrated the duration of common viri and
> bacteria.  The rhinovirus curve went out beyond a month....

So, by that explanation, the cold virus can last over a month? Rhinoviruses
are cold viruses, no? Can rhinoviruses cause sinusitis?

> And the product you were asking about, I believe, was ZICAM.

Nope, not at all, I was not referring to Zicam. Zicam is an otc zinc nasal
spray that claims to shorten the life of a cold. The company that makes it
had some kind of study that indicated that it works, but I don't think that
has been really scientifically validated. Have you found it to work? I've
never heard it recommended by a doctor. I have tried it a few times, just in
case it might help (in fact I just used up a bottle yesterday), but I cannot
really say it has helped me at all to get over a cold. It is rather
irritating to the nose as well.

The medicine I was referring to has never been available to buy. A
prescription medicine, not an OTC product. It was being worked on by one of
those biotech companies, supposed to really kill rhinoviruses. I recall
reading about it a year or two ago, when it was being worked on. I believe
the company's stock went up a lot, as the common cold is so prevalent, and
if this med really worked to significantly shorten colds, it would be a
highly prescribed med, under patent.

But I believe the FDA didn't find that it worked well enough, and did not
allow the medicine to come to market. (As one might imagine, the company's
stock prices then dropped dramatically.

I guess there are medications like that that are supposed to fight flu
viruses, after catching the flu. (Easier to create for flu than colds, as
there are many more viruses that can cause colds than can cause influenza.
That's why they have vaccinations for flu, but have never come up with one
for colds. One pill and one nasal spray. I think one is called Tamiflu, I
forget the other name. But those are not really prescribed often, are they?
Have they been found not to be very effective?
MS - 25 Oct 2004 03:08 GMT
> But, again, I'll find the literature to back that up.
> And the product you were asking about, I believe, was ZICAM.

Not at all. The medication I was referring to was called  "Pleconaril". This
antiviral agent, that was supposed to help fight viruses causing common
cold, was being researched for years, supposed to come out in 2003, but the
FDA nixed it as ineffective.

Following is an article about it. written before it was unapproved:

http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/451846?src=search

or

http://tinyurl.com/5aubq
MS - 25 Oct 2004 05:55 GMT
Further info on this med. It appears that it did show some efficacy in
trials:

http://www.aafp.org/afp/20040201/tips/34.html

or

http://tinyurl.com/4mlt6.

If you do a Google search on "Pleconaril", you can find a lot of info on it.

The FDA apparently disapproved it because of some side effects, and they
figured common colds aren't so serious anyhow. See this article:

http://www.inpharma.com/news/news-ng.asp?id=48049-nasal-route-could

or

http://tinyurl.com/5hr8p.

Apparently the company that developed it, Viropharma, is still trying to get
approval. Their former partner, Aventis, pulled out after the FDA
disapproval, and now they are working with Schering-Plough on an intranasal
formulation. (Figuring less systemic side effects that way.) They plan to
present it to the FDA again in the intranasal formulation.

I hope they get it approved soon, and that it really works!

> Not at all. The medication I was referring to was called  "Pleconaril". This
> antiviral agent, that was supposed to help fight viruses causing common
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> http://tinyurl.com/5aubq
MS - 21 Oct 2004 04:04 GMT
The thing is:

It seemed before (not in this post) that you were reacting with a kneejerk
reaction against a group of people, that you assumed I was part of, without
really paying (until now) attention to what I had written.

For instance, you wrote about "accepting advice from total strangers on the
Internet". Not only did I not accept any advice (in this post you yourself
are giving me advice), I didn't ask for advice. Read what I wrote---it was
simply a question, as in the title, whether a cold virus could really last a
month.

Also, if you looked at the response I wrote to Bobbie, in which I mentioned
several prescription medicines I take regularly for nasal problems, you
would know that I am a person who goes to doctors, you don't get those over
the counter. So, obviously, I am not one of "those people" whom you think
are always "asking for medical advice from total strangers on the Internet,
while never going to doctors". Yet it was that very post that you responded
to with your comment.

So, I was just pointing out to you that, it makes sense to really look at
what someone has written, rather than be quick to pigeonhole someone in a
group, and react to that.

Perhaps you got that message, because your message below has a completely
different tone, finally responding to what I wrote. Thank you.

Yes, if someone has a respiratory condition for a month, in many cases it
would be advisable to see a doctor. If the doctor thinks it is a bacterial
infection, they can prescribe antibiotics. They can do nothing for viruses,
however, except to say "stay home, drink plenty of fluids", etc., which I
don't need to spend hours waiting in a doctor's office for.

As I have a lot of experience with bacterial sinus infections, as described
in that response to Bobbie, I don't think that's the case here. I probably
do know more about that than the average layman, though of course not as
much as a doctor. As I said, I have sometimes been on antibiotics for most
of the year, much less so since my last sinus surgery.

As I also said, I don't have fever any more. I feel fairly normal except for
nasal and throat symptoms worse than usual. (As mentioned, I always have a
bad nose, that's why I'm taking so many meds for it.)

Therefore, I asked if symptoms of a cold can last for weeks after the actual
cold virus is gone, that perhaps the inflammation caused by the virus can
take weeks to heal after the virus is gone? That was my question.

Actually, there seems to be a lot of people with lingering colds lately.

> >Can doctors do much to help a person with a common cold? Doctors are very
> >busy, with overloaded schedules, and they probably don't like people coming
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> offended.  You're obviously free to discuss it all you want, but if I were
> you, I'd have an appointment by now....
severesocialanxiety - 26 Oct 2004 03:06 GMT
> > >So, I'm really not sure how seeing a doctor about it could help.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> post, and I responded to her post. Someone who throws out a snide
> meaningless comment like yours, doesn't merit a reply.

Why would I go to the doctor if i have talked to a doc on the net? i
hate visiting the doc. The internet is an excellent substitute.
MS - 26 Oct 2004 03:47 GMT
"severesocialanxiety" <samappliance@yahoo.com> wrote in message

> Why would I go to the doctor if i have talked to a doc on the net? i
> hate visiting the doc. The internet is an excellent substitute.

Well, "severe social anxiety" (your name says it all), it looks like your
the person that Carey Gregory was talking to, but unfortunately he mistook
me for you.

I don't agree with you at all. Your statement above is ridiculous. But no
further comment--I sense anyhow you are a troll looking for attention-I
won't reply to you again.
Martha H Adams - 08 Nov 2004 03:04 GMT
When something passes from a person into text into the internet, back
into text on my screen and into my mind, I'm generally open to a few
ideas what lies behind what I read.  So it's back for me to the
original question.

Re hating to visit doctors.  There are doctors, and doctors.  Some of
them give people bad experiences (or worse); some respond differently
depending upon if your problem is politically correct -- gays, for
instance, may be seen as politically incorrect.  But doctors generally
are likely to know more information, have more hands-on experience,
and to be more able to give you support, than you can ever learn to do
by yourself for yourself.  You do have a choice between faith-based
(i.e., ignorance-based) vs reality-based (i.e., knowledge-based)
treatment: I feel reality based is the only way to go.  So maybe you
had best be seeking a doctor you don't hate to talk to.

Now about that cold lasting a month.  Concerning you, I *don't* know
practically everything.  But I wonder if you might have started with a
plain old virus common cold, which opened the way to some bacterial
process, which could be the long-lasting part of your illness.  In
which case it wouldn't be a cold any more, and might be vulnerable to
antibiotics -- if it's not some antibiotic resistant bacteria.

So however you look at it, maybe your best course is -- find a doctor
you can talk to.  Alternate / backup choice: a postdoctoral / premed
student.  

Cheers -- Martha Adams
Carey Gregory - 08 Nov 2004 07:08 GMT
>So however you look at it, maybe your best course is -- find a doctor
>you can talk to.  Alternate / backup choice: a postdoctoral / premed
>student.  

Huh?  A pre-med student is nothing but an undergrad who hopes to go to med
school someday.  They have zero medical training and zero medical
experience, but sometimes they imagine otherwise.  Almost anyone with any
sort of actual experience or education would be better.
Steve Harris  sbharris@ROMAN9.netcom.com - 09 Nov 2004 02:37 GMT
> >So however you look at it, maybe your best course is -- find a doctor
> >you can talk to.  Alternate / backup choice: a postdoctoral / premed
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> experience, but sometimes they imagine otherwise.  Almost anyone with any
> sort of actual experience or education would be better.

COMMENT:

Yes. The same goes even for a medical student. Very little of the core
of what you need to know to be an effective physician is taught in
medical school. Just as little of what you need to practice law is
taught in law school. Or for that matter, what you need to know to be
a good officer in officer's training school.  In all cases, the
effective learning is on the job, afterwards.  The first two years of
med school is mostly irrelevent books. The next two years are learning
to kiss a.s. (In this, it differs from officer's training, which is
learning to kiss a.s the whole way through.)

You could in theory design a medical school cirriculum which was
maximally efficient.  But then it would look so much like a
physician's assistant program, what would you then call it?

SBH
Griffin - 21 Oct 2004 13:57 GMT
> I've had a cold for about a month now. I don't still have the fever, aching,
> etc., that I had at the beginning, but I still have respiratory
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> that the nose, throat, etc., having become inflamed during the cold, are
> taking a long time to heal, although with no more infection?

Three possibilites come to mind. The first is simply a prolonged viral
upper respiratory infection, particularly common in smokers. The second
is reinfectoin (back-to-back colds). The third is allergic rhinitis.
You don't have symptoms of a bacterial sinusitis.
MS - 22 Oct 2004 03:13 GMT
> Three possibilites come to mind. The first is simply a prolonged viral
> upper respiratory infection, particularly common in smokers. The second
> is reinfectoin (back-to-back colds). The third is allergic rhinitis.
> You don't have symptoms of a bacterial sinusitis.

That's what I thought (about bacterial sinusitis), why I didn't think a
doctor could help much with it, as they might if it did look like a
bacterial infection (by prescribing antibiotics).

I'm not a smoker, but I do have chronic rhinitis. These symptoms feel a
little different than the usual rhinitis I have all year though. But with my
pipes screwed up by the chronic rhinitis (although I don't smoke), that
might make me more susceptible to the prolonged viral respiratory infection.
How long can those last?

I also work with a lot of young children (elementary school music teacher,
working at 5 different schools, seeing hundreds of kids each week), so I
guess the re-infection possibility could be the case as well. (I keep losing
my voice while teaching as well, not good! I've stayed home a few days, but
I cannot just stay home until I'm all well--that could take months at this
rate!)
Ed Mathes - 22 Oct 2004 05:18 GMT
I'm still looking for that data...

As I stated, the severe symptoms of cold...malaise, feve, stuffy nose, etc,
last usually less than 10 days.  However, a post viral cough can last for
several weeks:
http://www.clevelandclinicmeded.com/diseasemanagement/pulmonary/cough/cough.htm:

Acute Cough:
Acute cough has been defined as one with a duration of less than 3 weeks at
presentation.1 In general, acute cough usually results from respiratory
infections, of which the common cold is the most frequent. Some authors have
proposed a category of subacute cough, with a duration of 3 to 8 weeks.
Postinfectious cough due to irritation of cough receptors accounts for the
bulk of these cases. However, there are no case series assessing the
relative frequency of causes in either the acute or subacute categories.

The most common causes of acute cough are listed in Table 1. In the presence
of a compatible history and examination, further diagnostic testing is not
usually necessary. The mainstay of treatment includes nonspecific
antitussive therapy. Under-recognized causes for acute or subacute cough
include pertussis and mycoplasma infection. Rarely, life-threatening illness
may present primarily with acute cough. Examples include pulmonary embolus,
cardiogenic pulmonary edema, and pneumonia.

     Table 1:
     Acute Cough
     Etiology Recommended Treatment Comments
     Viral rhinosinusitis Antitussives, decongestants, first-generation
antihistamines, ibuprofen Difficult to distinguish from acute sinusitis.
Neuraminidase antagonists may be helpful if started earlier.
     Acute bronchitis Antitussives Antibiotics not routinely indicated
     Acute sinusitis Antibiotics, decongestants, first-generation
antihistamines Treatment duration 2-3 weeks
     Allergic/
     irritant rhinitis  Irritant avoidance; nonsedating antihistamines
Nasal corticosteroids useful for maintenance therapy
     Acute exacerbation
     of COPD Beta-agonist/anticholinergic MDIs with spacer, antibiotics,
systemic corticosteroids
     Pertussis Macrolides (if started within 8 days of symptom onset);
TMP-SMX (if macrolide allergy) Diagnosis is difficult (serologic or
nasopharyngeal culture)
     Mycoplasma Macrolides; alternatively, tetracyclines
     COPD=chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; MDIs=metered dose
inhalers;
     TMP-SMX=trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------
Tamiflu and a couple medication are available for the flu.  They have been
shown to shorten the duration and lessen the severity of the flu.  Tamiflu
has some efficacy in prophylaxis in high-risk populations with potential for
exposure to the flu.

Ed

A "primer" on common respiratory viruses:
http://web.uct.ac.za/depts/mmi/jmoodie/vires2.html#RHINOVIRUSES

Clinical Picture
PARA-INFLUENZA Types 1, 2, 3 and 4
All can cause minor infections in children and adults.
Types 1, 2 and 3 may be associated with more severe lower respiratory tract
disease in children. For instance, in an American series of cases, 30% of
acute laryngo-tracheo-bronchitis (LTB) cases yielded para-influenza viruses.
Type 1 is especially associated with LTB, sometimes also type 2.
Paraflu's have also been isolated from patients with pneumonia.

The virus grows locally in the respiratory tract lining of the URT and it
may then spread down into the lungs.
IgA type antibodies are induced. These are present in the respiratory
secretions and seem to be more important than the IgG antibodies in the
serum with regard to protection.
However, IgA antibodies do not cross the placenta and babies thus have no
maternal protection against this type of infection. Primary infections with
para-influenza viruses usually occur in the first year or years of life.
Re-infection usually causes only minor infection of the URT - one of the
causes of a common cold in children and adults.

Diagnosis
In cell cultures, the para-influenza viruses produce a recognisable
cytopathic effect, and haemadsorption is also used to detect their presence.

Each virus type has specific antigens by which they can be "typed", and
there are also a few minor subtypes.

Treatment
No specific treatment is available. Killed virus vaccines have been tried
but are of limited value in an infection which is so widespread and usually
of trivial significance.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Respiratory Syncytial virus - (RSV)
This is an unusual but very important member the Paramyxovirus group:
while it resembles the other members morphologically, no haemagglutinin or
neuraminidase or haemolytic properties have been detected, and there is no
antigenic similarity to other members. In cell cultures it readily induces
many large syncytia with cytoplasmic inclusions - hence its name.

Clinical
RSV was first isolated from chimpanzees with colds, and it was soon found to
cause colds in man as well. (Chimps were probably infected by their human
handlers.) However, it was also found to be associated with severe pulmonary
infections in infants - especially Bronchiolitis. RSV is the prime cause of
Bronchiolitis.

In Britain, RSV is the single major pathogen in respiratory infections of
childhood. The figures from Newcastle by Gardner are startling:

 under 1 year of age:
 78% of Bronchiolitis
 38% of LTB
 36% of Pneumonia
 35% of Bronchitis
 12% of minor respiratory illness,
were all caused by RSV.

RSV causes a fairly localised infection of the respiratory tract, and
infants have no maternal passive protection.
Re-infections do occur but seem only to produce fairly minor URT illness.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Vaccine
Because of its apparent importance, an attempt was made at vaccinating
infants. However, when the RS epidemic arrived, the vaccinated children
suffered more severe reactions than unvaccinated children. Somehow the
killed virus vaccine had unfortunately sensitised these children and
exposure to the live virus then induced a type of allergic reaction. This
drew attention to the possibility that RS viruses may in fact cause much of
its lung damage by immune mechanisms. Because of the importance of RSV in
childhood infections, intensive efforts to make a vaccine have continued,
especially along the lines of sub-unit vaccines (parts of virions) avoiding
those antigens which seem responsible for hypersensitisation. However, no
vaccine is as yet in general use.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

RHINOVIRUSES
(Common Cold virus)

Over 100 serotypes of this Picorna virus family are responsible for about
50% of common colds.

Clinical
An inhalational infection of the URT. Incubation period is short: 1 to 3
days followed by headache, sore throat, fullness in the nose. Then there is
a profuse watery discharge from the nose which gradually thickens and
becomes mucopurulent and decreases in volume. The infection resolves in
about a week. Following a rhinovirus cold, there is a short period of
immunity to all colds but prolonged immunity to the specific serotype
causing the recent infection.

Treatment
No specific treatment but numerous symptomatic treatments are available.

Complications
A cold may temporarily upset the mucosal cilia and predisposes to secondary
invaders especially bacterial infections, eg. sinusitis (pneumococcus,
haemophilus, etc) and bronchitis and possibly pneumonia. These may require
antibiotic treatment.

Epidemiology
An infected person is infectious in the first two days of coryza. Colds are
readily acquired from breathing room air from a room crowded with coldy
people. Wet cold weather per s? does not cause colds, but may predispose to
infection from other persons. Colds are ubiquitous around the world except
in very isolated communities.

Prevention
The enormous diversity of cold-causing viruses essentially rules out a
vaccine. Vitamin C and bacterial vaccines are unproven.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

ADENOVIRUSES
Virus
Ds DNA, Non-enveloped 70nm capsid shell with protruding penton-fibres.
See electron micrograph
Most adenoviruses grow easily in cell culture, and give rise to large
intranuclear inclusions.

1. Group Common Antigen
Shared by all adenoviruses, eg.a single complement fixation test can detect
a rise in antibody to any adeno infection also, a single immunofluorescent
reagent can be made which will react with all adenoviruses.

2. Type Specific Antigen
Can identify a specific type by neutralisation of infectivity or
haemagglutination. 47 Serotypes are grouped into about 6 larger groups
(labelled A ....... to F).

Clinical
Adenoviruses cause infections of man (many animals have their own
adenoviruses) and are spread by droplet, fomites and ingestion. They infect
the mucous membranes of the eye, respiratory and gastro intestinal tract,
occasionally urinary tract. Local lymph nodes often involved (enlarged and
tender). Infections are usually self-limiting.
Syndromes

1. Asymptomatic Infection
Adenoviruses may be present in healthy persons, eg. in stools of children,
and may also cause persistent silent infection of the tonsils.

2. Acute pharyngitis with fever
Adenoviruses are a common cause of an acute sore throat.

3. Pharyngoconjunctivical fever
Adenoviruses may cause an acute conjunctivitis together with a shore throat
and fever.

4. Acute follicular conjunctivitis
This is a non-purulent contagious inflammation with pearly, translucent
lymphoid hyperplasia.

5. Epidemic kerato-conjunctivitis (shipyard eye)
Mild trauma to the eye may facilitate a damaging adeno infection of cornea
(spread by multi- shared towels).

6. Pneumonia (and pneumonitis in children)
In some cases there may be a severe destructive pneumonia (and death) caused
by an adenovirus infection following measles or other predisposing factors,
eg. artificial airway.

7. Acute respiratory disease (ARD)
Is an epidemic form of acute pneumonic disease characteristically appearing
in military camps. Has been prevented by enteric capsulation of a live
vaccine strain which bypasses the respiratory tract and sets up a silent
infection in the gut, giving protection against acute respiratory infection.

8. Diarrhoea
In young children many adenoviruses may cause a generalised infection -
upper and lower respiratory tract infection with fever and diarrhoea. Quite
separately, some adenos (40/41) have been specifically associated with
causing acute gastroenteritis in children, which may lead to dehydration and
death.

9. Mesenteric Adenitis
Children may present with abdominal pain due to enlarged tender adenovirus
infected mesenteric lymph nodes. Occasionally an enlarged node may
invaginate the bowel wall and be gripped by peristaltic waves, leading to
intussusception of the bowel.

10. Immunocompromised host
In transplant patients, AIDS or other immunocompromised patients,
adenoviruses may cause a variety of infections - renal, disseminated, or a
haemorrhagic cystitis.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

PARAMYXOVIRUSES
General Properties of the Paramyxoviruses
The whole important group of Paramyxoviruses is fairly homogeneous.

Morphology
Generally fairly similar to influenza: roughly spherical sometimes
filamentous, easily distorted. A bit larger than influenza virus -
100-300nm. Composed of inner helical nucleocapsid containing protein/RNA,
contained within a membranous envelope studded with "spikes" of:
Haemagglutinin (Haemadsorption) and Neuraminidase (Haemolysis)

Antigens
Antigenically distinct from influenza virus. Within the paramyxovirus group
there is considerable overlapping, eg:
Parainfluenza 1, 2, 3 and mumps. Exposure of an adult to any one of these
viruses often induces a rise in serum antibodies to the others. Thus,
interpretation of serum antibody levels in this group of viral infections
may be difficult.

As in influenza vrus, there are two major antigens:
1. The haemagglutinin, present in the envelope of the intact virion (this is
sometimes called the "V" antigen);
2. On breaking open the virion, or rupturing of infected cells before virion
assembly, a "soluble" virus antigen is released, which is thought to be the
protein component of the nucleocapsid. This is sometimes called the "S"
antigen.

Infection induces antibodies to these two major antigens, amongst others.
The antigens are fairly stable. In contrast to influenza virus, there is no
antigenic drift or epidemics of infection

Primary infections
usually occur in (early) childhood, with some resultant degree of protection
against developing clinical disease later on in life. However, re-infections
do occur in adulthood, but disease is subclinical or very minor.

Spread
The human paramyxoviruses are essentially diseases of man only, and are
spread by droplets from the nose and mouth to fairly close contacts. Many of
them are fairly highly infectious and go around the community in epidemics -
often seasonal, eg. Winter coughs and colds. Fomites might also assist
spread.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Laboratory Diagnosis
1. Viral Detection
Isolation of a paramyxovirus from a patient is strong evidence for a cause
of a respiratory infection. All the Paramyxoviruses are to be found in the
respiratory tract secretions - and this is the best material to send to the
laboratory. The paramyxoviruses are unstable and do not survive well outside
cells.

a) Direct Examination
Viral antigens or viral infected cells in the secretions may be directly and
rapidly detected by immunofluorescence or ELISA tests.

b) Culture
Primary Monkey kidney cells will support replication of all the
Paramyxoviruses and many of the other respiratory viruses.

An intriguing property of most Paramyxo's is their ability to induce cell
fusion. Neighbouring cells join up to form large multinucleate syncytia or
giant cells. Viral fusion to cell for penetration follows proteolytic
cleavage of fusion protein on virion surface.
One of the first discovered members of the Paramyxo group - probably a mouse
virus - called Sendai , is used as a cell fusing agent in experimental work
on cells. The Sendai virus is first inactivated by UV (which damages the
nucleic acid) so that the virus will not grow and interfere with the
experiment. The inactivated virus still induces cell fusion - even across
species, eg. heterokaryons of murine and human cells.

Multinucleated giant cells can sometimes be seen in lung sections from
children dying with Paramyxovirus infection in the lung. Not all Paramyxos
do this readily, and haemadsorption is usually used to detect Paramyxovirus
infection in culture cells.

Once isolated, a haemadsorbing virus can be further typed using standard
specific antisera in various laboratory procedures:

 a.. haemadsorption inhibition;
 b.. neutralisation; and
 c.. fluorescent antibody.
2. Serological Diagnosis
Antibody determinations in acute and convalescent blood specimens by
complement fixation, Elisa or haemagglutination inhibition may sometimes be
helpful in arriving at a specific diagnosis.
Respiratory syncytial virus and measles virus infections are fairly
clearcut.
Mumps and Para influenza viruses seem to share a group common antigen, and
serological interpretation may be difficult.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

----- Original Message -----
From: " MS" <ms@nospam.com>
Newsgroups: sci.med
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 10:07 PM
Subject: Re: Can a cold last a month?

> > > But I was curious to ask about lingering colds. Not only I, but I have
> > > noticed others as well, have had this.
> > >
> > > You say "some of the rhinoviruses can be persistent". So, is it
possible
> > for
> > > them to last for weeks?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> > they have an underlying pulmonary disease (asthma/COPD), symptoms may be
> > worse.  The "full blow" presentation of the common cold last anywhere
from
> > 3-10 days.
>
> So, if the virus lasts for 3-10 days, but symptoms can last for weeks, is
it
> just that the respiratory linings can take a long time to heal (more so in
> some people than others, especially someone like me, with a screwed-up
nose
> to begin with), long after the virus is gone?
>
> > I recently attended a presentation on sinusitis.  The speaker (a
prominent
> > ENT) used a slide that demonstrated the duration of common viri and
> > bacteria.  The rhinovirus curve went out beyond a month....
>
> So, by that explanation, the cold virus can last over a month?
Rhinoviruses
> are cold viruses, no? Can rhinoviruses cause sinusitis?
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> spray that claims to shorten the life of a cold. The company that makes it
> had some kind of study that indicated that it works, but I don't think
that
> has been really scientifically validated. Have you found it to work? I've
> never heard it recommended by a doctor. I have tried it a few times, just
in
> case it might help (in fact I just used up a bottle yesterday), but I
cannot
> really say it has helped me at all to get over a cold. It is rather
> irritating to the nose as well.
>
> The medicine I was referring to has never been available to buy. A
> prescription medicine, not an OTC product. It was being worked on by one
of
> those biotech companies, supposed to really kill rhinoviruses. I recall
> reading about it a year or two ago, when it was being worked on. I believe
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> for colds. One pill and one nasal spray. I think one is called Tamiflu, I
> forget the other name. But those are not really prescribed often, are
they?
> Have they been found not to be very effective?

> > Three possibilites come to mind. The first is simply a prolonged viral
> > upper respiratory infection, particularly common in smokers. The second
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> I cannot just stay home until I'm all well--that could take months at this
> rate!)
MS - 23 Oct 2004 05:35 GMT
Thanks for all the info, Ed!

Well, what do you (and other docs here) think? Will medical science ever
have a cure for the common cold? A vaccine for it? If so, when do you
predict that will come to pass? Is it being worked on? (It apparently was
with that med I mentioned, but that apparently turned out to be a dud.)

> I'm still looking for that data...
>
> As I stated, the severe symptoms of cold...malaise, feve, stuffy nose, etc,
> last usually less than 10 days.  However, a post viral cough can last for
> several weeks:

http://www.clevelandclinicmeded.com/diseasemanagement/pulmonary/cough/cough.htm:

> Acute Cough:
> Acute cough has been defined as one with a duration of less than 3 weeks at
[quoted text clipped - 437 lines]
> > I cannot just stay home until I'm all well--that could take months at this
> > rate!)
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.