David,

I don't care if you or anyone else is homosexual. Do I like it? No. Do I
want to hear about your perversions? No.

If you read the bible you will see MANY entries about the sanctity between a
man and a woman. In the beginning of time God created the man and then the
woman. He told them, he commanded them, "be fruitful and multiply." He never
once in the entire bible said "Have sex, have fun and who cares if you do it
with men or women."

I don't press my beliefs on others. I don't attack you personally and I
never will. I don't call you names and I don't threaten you. I happen to
think what you do is evil and wrong, and it makes me sick.

Am I afraid of homosexuals? No, quite contrary, my girlfriend has a gay male
friend that we hang around with all the time at school. He's a great guy,
but do I think his attraction towards men is right? No, I don't.

You ask "Why would God make gay people if he thought it was evil?  Why would
he give people sex if he wanted us to repress it like you?"

I'll tell you right now that God does not "make" gay people. They give into
all of their desires, they let sex, and not God, be the centre of their
life. All they do is seek pleasure regardless of where they get it from.
Being that way is a direct violation of the commandment that says "I, the
Lord, am your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, that place of
slavery. You shall not have other gods besides me." [Exodus 20:2] Instead of
worshiping God, you are too preoccupied with sex, you are a slave to your
own body. You could care less about God, I don't even need to ask you about
your religious beliefs to know that.

Sex is for the sanctity of marriage, and only marriage. God himself
commanded man and woman to: "Be fertile and multiply; fill the earth and
subdue it. Have dominion over the fish of the sea, the birds of the air, and
all the living things that move on the earth." [Genesis 1:28] Even Jesus
himself (who is God) said that sex is only for marriage, and anything
outside of marriage is a sin, a crime of adultery: "You have heard that it
was said, 'You shall not commit adultery.' But I say to you, everyone who
looks at a woman with lust has already committed adultery with her in his
heart. If your right eye causes you to sin, tear it out and throw it away.
It is better for you to lose one of your members than to have your body
thrown into Gehenna. And if your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off
and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one of your members than to
have your whole body go into Gehenna." Jesus speaks many times about sex and
the sanctity of marriage, these are just a few.

You asked me these questions, these are my answers. Like them, don't like
them, I don't care. I accept these as truth. These are why I do what I do.

David, Kenny is in denial. He is bursting to break out of the closet.

Then as Lou sang we will see ...

"Holly came from miami f.l.a.
Hitch-hiked her way across the u.s.a. ..."

This one is going to be  a real cutie pie.

Sheldon,

I'm sorry you don't like how I post my messages. I hate hunting through a
bunch of replies to find one relevant sentence, I just go back to the
previous post and find it.

I am Catholic, I respect other's religions, including the Jewish faith.
However, there is something morally wrong with circumcision. I am not doing
this to attack the Jewish faith, I am doing this to prevent harm from being
done to individuals.

I would like to ask you something in all seriousness. Please, don't attack
me for this or call me names for not knowing the answer, but, if you had a
baby boy tomorrow, and the law prevented infant circumcision, but after the
age of 18 a male can decide to circumcise himself, would that be allowed? I
also have another question, there are many groups out there that are made up
completely of Jewish people that oppose circumcision. They still perform the
bris, but it is an alternate one that removes no skin at all. Would this be
a possibility? I'm also curious, why must you remove all of the skin? As far
as I know God wasn't too specific, all he said is to circumcise the flesh of
the foreskin, and you know, to be honest, a circumcision doesn't have to
mean you have to cut anything off, circumcise just means to "cut around,"
and as I'm sure you have, I have cut my finger before with a knife on
accident, and that doesn't mean my finger was cut off. Not that these would
be acceptable to me either, but I would be far more comfortable with
something like that than I would a complete alteration of someone's body. Or
is it just Jews cut the entire foreskin off because of tradition? If it's
just tradition couldn't the tradition be broken and just allow the things I
mentioned before be performed?