Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / General / March 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

blood tests question (bilirubin and iron)

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
ryan - 27 Mar 2004 03:28 GMT
Hi.

I received results from some blood testing today.  There were a few
things which were out of range.  I have no history of elevated levels
of these three things, and I'm not on medications and have no history
of disease and do not drink alcohol, etc. This was just testing done
along with my annual physical.  I did fast for about fourteen hours
before the test.  I'm male, 24.

bilirubin  2.1 MG/DL   (reference range:  0.2 - 1.3)
iron       231 mcg/dl  (reference range:  35 - 185 )
phosphorus 2.4 mg/dl   (reference range:  2.5 - 4.5 )

I just wanted to ask opinions on this since my appointment with a
doctor isn't for another ten days, and I'm a little worried about it.

BTW, I'm wondering if my habit of eating lots of carrots and
tomatoes(lycopene) can cause a false high on the bilirubin.  I
searched and did not see anything that suggested that it could, but I
thought I'd ask.

Thanks.
Robert - 27 Mar 2004 06:57 GMT
> Hi.
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Thanks.

I would be obviously interested in other liver function tests such as ALT or
AST.  Follow-up testing is in order. If other liver function tests ,such as
indirect bilirubin and the two mentioned are normal, then it may be simply a
case of Gilbert's syndrome where a person has a minor problem dealing with
bilirubin especially in the prolonged fasting state.
The other thing one would look for in an elevated iron is genetic
hemochromatosis which may also cause liver damage.  Is there any family
history of hemochromatosis?
The two conditions above are genetically inherited so you might want to ask
family about that.
The next step is to verify the previous abnormals with repeat and more tests
to better define the nature of the abnormality.  The liver is a major organ
so just about anything can cause changes.
The list of possibilities are pretty endless but given the fact that you are
young and  do not have overt disease right now is a point in your favor.  Go
od luck
Robert
JohnV - 30 Mar 2004 01:42 GMT
"> I would be obviously interested in other liver function tests such
as ALT or
> AST.  Follow-up testing is in order. If other liver function tests ,such as
> indirect bilirubin and the two mentioned are normal, then it may be simply a
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> od luck
> Robert

Hey there.  I have hemochromatosis, can can possibly give some insight
there (take it for what it is... not medical advice).  Ferritin level
is what seems to be the best indicator.  The range max is somewhere in
the 400's.  The hemochromatosis was discovered last June, and at that
time, my ferritin was 5,100.  Since then, I've had pretty agressive
blood-letting.  I get a blood test every Wednesday, and give 1 to 1
1/2 pints every Thursday.  Since June, the ferritin has dropped to
just under 1,000.  As was said, too much iron can severely damage
organs.  The ALT, AST and Alkaline Phosphatase are the three liver
function tests done weekly, as they indicate an irritated liver.  They
can very drastically.  The most important thing to look at (I believe)
is whether it improves over time... indicating no final damage has
been done.  The liver can really fix itself up given the chance.

I had several indicators for years, and the doctors I saw in the past
didn't put the pieces together.  I thank God for the doctor I have
now, who discovered the hemochromatosis.  So here's the indicators
that can be attributed to my condition:

1) Arthritic pain in my ankles and shoulders for the past 9 years...
starting when I was just 30 years old.  By the way, this has improved
dramatically in the last 9 months.

2) Migranes - I believe they are caused by food alergies.  This could
have possibly been brought about by my liver not functioning
correctly.  I watch what I eat now, but have had very few migranes in
the past 4 or 5 months.  I used to get 2 or 3 a week.

3) I was tired a lot, even though I was going to the gym frequently.

These symptoms may not appear for quite sometime.  As the iron builds
up over the years, symptoms can start to pop up.

As far as what I can and can't eat, it's not as dramatic as you may
think.  Food with some iron is ok.  What I need to stay away from is
food that has huge amounts of iron, and things that cause the body to
retain iron.  Basically, I stay away from Vitamin C, iron skillets,
spinach, etc.  But I can eat meat, just as long as it's not excessive.
Ok.  I hope this helps a little.  Sorry for the book.

John
Robert - 30 Mar 2004 08:04 GMT
> "> I would be obviously interested in other liver function tests such
> as ALT or
[quoted text clipped - 56 lines]
>
> John

That was my impression also John in that most symptoms take years to develop
and quite often it is only suspected in the fourth decade and not really in
the one's twenty's.  There are genetic testing available for it now that
every family member should have if a family history is positive.
JEDilworth - 27 Mar 2004 07:55 GMT
You may want to cool it on the carrots and lycopene until you talk to
your doc. Check out this URL:

http://nutritionfocus.com/nutrition_supplementation/vitamins/beta-carotene.html

"SIGNS OF TOXICITY
50,000 IU's (provitamin A) daily may be toxic, 18,500 IU's (provitamin
A) daily for 1-3 months toxic for infants, 25,000 IU's (provitamin A)
can produce liver damage, large doses lead to anemia and gout, anemia,
blurred vision, bone pain, diarrhea, fatigue, gout, hair loss,
headaches, irregular periods, liver enlargement, nausea, vomiting.
Prolonged excessive intake results in abnormalities in skin, eyes, and
mucous membranes, blurred vision, bone fragility, deep bone pain,
enlargement of liver and spleen, reduced thyroid activity, skin rashes,
thickening of long bones. If toxicity is detected, the symptoms will
disappear in a few days after the vitamin is withdrawn. (An
International Unit (IU) of Vitamin A is equivalent to 0.6 mcg of
beta-Carotene) "

Did your blood testing include liver enzymes? Vitamin A is a fat soluble
vitamin - not easily gotten rid of if excessive amounts are ingested.
Bilirubin goes up if there's liver problems. Bilirubin is broken down
into indirect and direct bilirubin. The two will add up to the total
bilirubin (which is the 2.1 you've indicated). Your lab will probably
only report out the total unless both are asked for. Direct bilirubin
elevation is indicative of a liver problem, but a much more sensitive
indicator is GGTP and/or SGPT (liver enzyme testing).

Are you taking big doses of Vit. A along with all the carrots and
lycopene? Be sure you don't go overboard with the Vit. A.

Be sure to tell your doc exactly how MANY carrots you're eating. He may
want to do a carotene level to make sure you're okay.

http://www.emedicine.com/derm/topic789.htm  This is also interesting.
Again, give your doc a REAL GOOD history and that will help him
immensely.

Judy Dilworth, M.T. (ASCP)
Microbiology (but used to do chemistry)

> bilirubin  2.1 MG/DL   (reference range:  0.2 - 1.3)
> iron       231 mcg/dl  (reference range:  35 - 185 )
> phosphorus 2.4 mg/dl   (reference range:  2.5 - 4.5 )

> BTW, I'm wondering if my habit of eating lots of carrots and
> tomatoes(lycopene) can cause a false high on the bilirubin.  I
> searched and did not see anything that suggested that it could, but I
> thought I'd ask.
Robert - 28 Mar 2004 01:24 GMT
> You may want to cool it on the carrots and lycopene until you talk to
> your doc. Check out this URL:

http://nutritionfocus.com/nutrition_supplementation/vitamins/beta-carotene.html

> "SIGNS OF TOXICITY
> 50,000 IU's (provitamin A) daily may be toxic, 18,500 IU's (provitamin
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> International Unit (IU) of Vitamin A is equivalent to 0.6 mcg of
> beta-Carotene) "

Those are all good points Judy.  I think a distinction should be made
between eating carrots and taking Vit A.  Most people who eat a lot of
veggies can end up with yellow skin but will have normal liver function
including bili and a beta carotene can help with that as you stated. The
other point concerning this is that a multi-chemistry panel probably
included one transaminase level that this person did not comment on but if a
phosphorus was included in the panel I am sure that one was. Trying to read
tea leaves here but, iron levels and PO4 is not typical for the standard
biochemical panel. Any iron would have to be specifically added on in the US
that is because of raising health care cost. Only clinically relevant
testing is allowed on a case by case basis. We can not even order a T7
anymore as they have to order a T3uptake and a T4 separately.
Follow up testing is appropriate and that is why multi-chemical profiles are
getting banned. The more tests included in a battery the higher the chances
that you will get an abnormality that is not clinically relevant but adds
costs by follow-up expenses. If twenty tests are run, through chance alone
one of those can be abnormal. Out of statistical reference range is a better
term than abnormal. Most of these pickups occur in the clinically
asymtomatic and thus the push for clinically relevant testing.
There is something wrong when an iron and phos is done on a 25 year old male
asymptomatic male. I am in my fifth decade and have never had an iron
ordered on me. There is no guidelines as yet on having doing so.
JEDilworth - 28 Mar 2004 18:27 GMT
Good point about the iron. I was kind of wondering about that. Iron
levels aren't usually ordered unless something in the CBC would indicate
that it would be needed, correct?

Also, I was wondering about the bilirubin testing in absence of enzyme
testing. Usually at least ONE liver enzyme is thrown in (as I recall in
the olden days of panel testing, it was usually an SGPT, but maybe not
nowadays. Actually, that may have only been thrown in if a liver battery
was ordered).

Thanks for clearing up the Vit. A vs. carrots thing. CE is always a good
thing for we techs who have migrated into different areas over the
years.

Judy Dilworth, M.T. (ASCP)
Microbiology (but remembers some chemistry :-))

> Those are all good points Judy.  I think a distinction should be made
> between eating carrots and taking Vit A. .....  Trying to read
> tea leaves here but, iron levels and PO4 is not typical for the standard
> biochemical panel. Any iron would have to be specifically added on in the US
> that is because of raising health care cost..... There is something
wrong when an iron and phos is done on a 25 year old male asymptomatic
male. I am in my fifth decade and have never had an iron ordered on me.
There is no guidelines as yet on having doing so.
Robert - 28 Mar 2004 20:07 GMT
> Good point about the iron. I was kind of wondering about that. Iron
> levels aren't usually ordered unless something in the CBC would indicate
> that it would be needed, correct?

There was a lab offering an outragous panel in order to make money. The feds
went after them and put the national lab chain owner in jail for of all
things iron.

> Also, I was wondering about the bilirubin testing in absence of enzyme
> testing. Usually at least ONE liver enzyme is thrown in (as I recall in
> the olden days of panel testing, it was usually an SGPT, but maybe not
> nowadays. Actually, that may have only been thrown in if a liver battery
> was ordered).

The expanded chemistry panel survived and you are right, it may includes the
SGPT.  It does not include thyroid, iron, and cholesterol.  The bili with
SGPT has always been there and I am pretty sure that if the bili was done it
was also done.

> Thanks for clearing up the Vit. A vs. carrots thing. CE is always a good
> thing for we techs who have migrated into different areas over the
> years.
>
> Judy Dilworth, M.T. (ASCP)
> Microbiology (but remembers some chemistry :-))

I appreciate your point of view, it is always uses a fresh look at some
things I miss like the vit A connection.
PF Riley - 29 Mar 2004 05:42 GMT
>> Good point about the iron. I was kind of wondering about that. Iron
>> levels aren't usually ordered unless something in the CBC would indicate
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>went after them and put the national lab chain owner in jail for of all
>things iron.

Although, Robert, in your initial excellent response, you did
acknowledge the possibility of hemochromatosis. While routine
screening is still controversial and not currently recommended by
general consensus, perhaps this one doctor does feel screening is
valuable and routinely orders iron panels in his relatively young
patients.

PF
Robert - 30 Mar 2004 08:27 GMT
> >> Good point about the iron. I was kind of wondering about that. Iron
> >> levels aren't usually ordered unless something in the CBC would indicate
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> PF

Maybe, but with present genetic testing it is not a good idea to rely simply
on iron studies in early cases where alterations in iron handling is a
common nonspecific finding. Keep in mind simple hemolysis can increase the
iron level. If a family member has the condition then a normal iron is not
assurance of anything in another young related patient.  My impression,
which might to wrong because we don't know enough about the situation, is
that the iron was being used as a part of a general screen. The insurance
carrier will eat the cost if it was the one asking for it or it can deny the
claim based on symptom complex code billing. The doctor can order any test
he wants to but must answer to the all mighty dollar. I think iron studies
should be done at least once in all males but at what age is the question
and do genetic studies in those with high risk at an early age as possible.
anon - 27 Mar 2004 15:06 GMT
None of these appear worrisome. Reference ranges are based on
statistical averages; there will always be outliers at both ends of the
scale. If your other liver enzymes and blood count are normal, I would
not be concerned about the slightly elevated bilirubin level. There are
some benign disease states, such as Gilbert's syndrome, which manifest
as chronically elevated bilirubin levels without any other symptoms.
This is usually familial. As for the slightly elevated iron, if your
ferritin level is normal, I wouldn't be concerned about that either. If
your ferritin was also elevated, one might consider a diagnosis of
hereditary hemochromatosis.

> I received results from some blood testing today.  There were a few
> things which were out of range.  I have no history of elevated levels
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> iron       231 mcg/dl  (reference range:  35 - 185 )
> phosphorus 2.4 mg/dl   (reference range:  2.5 - 4.5 )
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.