Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / General / February 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

DAFNz: IQ-75 Genetic Pit Bullz of Society

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
makemyday@worldnet.att.net - 16 Feb 2004 12:23 GMT
DAFN Aggrezzion and violence are *GENETIC*:

http://rockymountainnews.com/drmn/local/article/0,1299,DRMN_15_2588993,00.html
************************ exZZZZZZZZZZerpt **************************
About the breed: American pit bull terrier
[...]
• Appearance: Medium-sized, solidly built with a short coat and
well-defined musculature. The pit bull terrier comes in all colors
and color patterns. [DAFNz- Nappy hair and one color: BLACK]

• ...Because most pit bulls exhibit some level of aggression,
they require careful socialization and obedience training.
[DAFNz- One third of them require welfare and/or incarceration]

• Are pit bulls dangerous? ...a dog's temperament is determined
by genes...but POOR BREEDING...leads to AGGRESSIVE dogs.
[Non-eugenic breeding leadz to aggrezzive DAFNz]

Source: United Kennel Club Inc., www.realpitbull.com/myths.html 
*********************************************************************

DAFNz - genetically created aggrezzive and violent...
Mr. 4X - 16 Feb 2004 21:57 GMT
> DAFN Aggrezzion and violence are *GENETIC*:

<FLUSH!>

Is this also true for your bad spelling and racism-like obsession?
Mary - 16 Feb 2004 23:39 GMT
>> DAFN Aggrezzion and violence are *GENETIC*:

Not being able to type an S where is belongs is also a GENETIC defect.
Racisism stems from a rotten brain -- and that is also GENETIC.

Too bad makemyday doesn't have the genes of a normal, intelligent
white male.
Rob Duncan - 17 Feb 2004 00:48 GMT
> >> DAFN Aggrezzion and violence are *GENETIC*:
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Too bad makemyday doesn't have the genes of a normal, intelligent
> white male.

LOL, well said.

Rob
Mr. 4X - 17 Feb 2004 21:49 GMT
>>> DAFN Aggrezzion and violence are *GENETIC*:
>
> Not being able to type an S where is belongs is also a GENETIC defect.
> Racisism stems from a rotten brain -- and that is also GENETIC.

I meant that as a joke but I'm not sure that it's not true :)

> Too bad makemyday doesn't have the genes of a normal, intelligent
> white male.
W.Syme - 17 Feb 2004 00:09 GMT
>DAFN Aggrezzion and violence are *GENETIC*:
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
>DAFNz - genetically created aggrezzive and violent...

What this has to do with Mensa, I'll never know.
Rob Duncan - 17 Feb 2004 01:04 GMT
> >DAFN Aggrezzion and violence are *GENETIC*:
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> What this has to do with Mensa, I'll never know.

In the meantime the AKC determined that pitbulls are the best dog for a
family with small children.  Hysteria anyone?

Rob
bnichols - 18 Feb 2004 04:28 GMT
> >DAFN Aggrezzion and violence are *GENETIC*:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> What this has to do with Mensa, I'll never know.

<lol>  That's OK -- neither does he. }:)

Bill
Belanger - 17 Feb 2004 04:29 GMT
> ? Are pit bulls dangerous? ...a dog's temperament is determined
> by genes...but POOR BREEDING...leads to AGGRESSIVE dogs.
> [Non-eugenic breeding leadz to aggrezzive DAFNz]

Are you trying to embarrass yourself?  Pit bulls were bred
("eugenically") specifically for bull baiting.  It is no mistake that
they should be strong and aggressive.

These "DAFNz" of yours, if they are what I believe them to be, have
generally not been bred with eugenics in mind.  But then, odds are
that you haven't either.  Why should that make you aggressive?
Upyer Alley - 17 Feb 2004 06:37 GMT
>> ? Are pit bulls dangerous? ...a dog's temperament is determined
>> by genes...but POOR BREEDING...leads to AGGRESSIVE dogs.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> generally not been bred with eugenics in mind.  But then, odds are
> that you haven't either.  Why should that make you aggressive?

You truly are an idiot, aren't you?

Blacks breed themselves.  People breed themselves.  It just so happens
that selective breeding is the norm as people tend to mate with those of
similar class and/or background.  (Not to mention more attrative people
breed with more attrative mates, and less attractive people breed with
you.)

Thus, you've got a bunch of violent, dumb negroes breeding with lazy,
dumb, welfare bitch negroes which results in a progeny of dumb, lazy,
violent negroes.

Get it?  Is that so difficult to understand?  Ghetto sh.t breeds with
ghetto sh.t and blue bloods breed with blue bloods.

Intelligence is highly genetic.  Behaviors also have a genetic basis as
well, albeit a weaker one.

Who's yer daddy, boy?!

King of SCAA
Alberto Moreira - 17 Feb 2004 13:28 GMT
Said  Upyer Alley <asss> :


>You truly are an idiot, aren't you?

Namecalling.

>Blacks breed themselves.  People breed themselves.  It just so happens
>that selective breeding is the norm as people tend to mate with those of
>similar class and/or background.  (Not to mention more attrative people
>breed with more attrative mates, and less attractive people breed with
>you.)

Gratuitous assertion without any inference to justify it.

>Thus, you've got a bunch of violent, dumb negroes breeding with lazy,
>dumb, welfare bitch negroes which results in a progeny of dumb, lazy,
>violent negroes.

Non sequitur.

>Get it?

Yes: namecalling, opinion and defective reasoning.

>Is that so difficult to understand?

No, dude, it's crystal clear: you don't have a leg to stand on.

>Ghetto sh.t breeds with ghetto sh.t and blue bloods breed with blue bloods.

More namecalling. More gratuitous assertion.

>Intelligence is highly genetic.

And more,

>Behaviors also have a genetic basis as  well, albeit a weaker one.

and more. As usual, no leg to stand on.

Tsk, tsk, what a pitiful show. Try again ?

Alberto.
Petzo - 18 Feb 2004 05:22 GMT
> Said  Upyer Alley <asss> :
>
>  
>>You truly are an idiot, aren't you?
>
> Namecalling.

Hey, I don't like to resort to it.  But I call them as I see them.

>>Blacks breed themselves.  People breed themselves.  It just so happens
>>that selective breeding is the norm as people tend to mate with those
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Gratuitous assertion without any inference to justify it.

Common sense.  Personal observation.  Try to refute it.  You won't.  You
can't.

>>Thus, you've got a bunch of violent, dumb negroes breeding with lazy,
>>dumb, welfare bitch negroes which results in a progeny of dumb, lazy,
>>violent negroes.
>
> Non sequitur.

Absolutely not.  People tend to breed with people like them.  Most people
still breed within racial and socio-economic lines.

Are you debating this???  If so, then debate it.

>>Get it?
>
> Yes: namecalling, opinion and defective reasoning.

And you:  denial, ignorance, and failure to refute.

Sure, it's easy to sit back and criticize everybody else's stuff without
saying anything yourself.  

I posed a question to you.  You refuse to answer.  There is a reason you
refuse to answer--you know I'm right.  And it bothers you, Alberto.

Can't you put your biases aside and be objective for just one minute?

>>Is that so difficult to understand?
>
> No, dude, it's crystal clear: you don't have a leg to stand on.

Wrong.  YOU don't have a leg to stand on.

Does the evidence support what we see in the real world???  Yes or no.  
Just answer it.

>>Ghetto sh.t breeds with ghetto sh.t and blue bloods breed with blue
>>bloods.
>
> More namecalling. More gratuitous assertion.

Wrong.  Anyone with common sense knows that people stick to those with
similar backgrounds.

In some societies, it is forbidden to breed outside your class.  In
America, something like 95% of marriages are between those of the same
race.  I can provide the stat from the government if you insist.



>>Intelligence is highly genetic.
>
> And more,

Wrong.  You saw the post I made regarding correlations of intelligence.  
You saw the interpretation of an expert on statistics.

Yet you deny, ignore, and dismiss.

>>Behaviors also have a genetic basis as  well, albeit a weaker one.
>
> and more. As usual, no leg to stand on.
>
> Tsk, tsk, what a pitiful show. Try again ?

No, the pitiful show is on your part.

Blanket denials are not a way to prove your point.  By the way, what the
hell is your point???  I don't think anyone knows.

Why don't you try presenting data to refute what we post?

By the way, I read part of your Flynn piece yesterday.  Pure bullshit.  
When I get the time, I'm actually going to disect the piece and work
through his mathematical models.

http://www.apa.org/journals/rev/rev1082346.html

Flynn contradicts himself.

Who's yer daddy, boy?!

King of SCAA
makemyday@worldnet.att.net - 17 Feb 2004 08:29 GMT
> > ? Are pit bulls dangerous? ...a dog's temperament is determined
> > by genes...but POOR BREEDING...leads to AGGRESSIVE dogs.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> ("eugenically") specifically for bull baiting.  It is no mistake that
> they should be strong and aggressive.

That'z exactly the point.  Tendency to *AGGRESSION*, disproportionately
found in DAFNz, is a *GENETIC* trait....
Alberto Moreira - 17 Feb 2004 13:28 GMT
Said  makemyday@worldnet.att.net :

>That'z exactly the point.  Tendency to *AGGRESSION*, disproportionately
>found in DAFNz, is a *GENETIC* trait....

Whites have a much higher tendency to aggression than any other race
in the planet.

Alberto.
LOP - 18 Feb 2004 05:06 GMT
junkmail@moreira.mv.com (Alberto Moreira) wrote in news:403716fd.3615999
@news.mv.net:

> Said  makemyday@worldnet.att.net :
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Alberto.

No they don't.  But they do have the intelligence to do more damage.  
Negroes shoot into a crowd an run away.  Hitler created an infrastructure
and industries to support his murderous rampage.  WWII was an impressive
undertaking.  Of course, Hitler was pure evil.  But he accomplished a lot
with what he had.  (By the way, how many negroes are developing tanks,
jets, and working on nuclear weapons.  How many this very day?)  

http://www.rlynn.co.uk

"Racial and ethnic differences in psychopathic personality.
Personality and Individual Differences, 2002, 32, 273-316.
Shows that psychopathic personality considered as a dimension of
personality is highest among blacks and Native Americans, next highest in
Hispanics, lower in whites and lowest in Orientals."

Blacks be da most violent.

Which, of course, is what we see in the real world.  (Notice how violence
is inversely correlated with intelligence.)

http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/race.htm

"Blacks were over 7 times more likely than whites to commit homicide in
2000"

Who's yer daddy, boy?!

King of SCAA
Alberto Moreira - 17 Feb 2004 04:46 GMT
Said  makemyday@worldnet.att.net :

>DAFN Aggrezzion and violence are *GENETIC*:

Is squawking genetic too ?

Alberto.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.